Technological advances in nanoscale biomaterials: the future of synthetic vascular graft design

References

• Webster TJ, Ergun C, Doremus RH, Siegel RVV, Bizios R. Enhanced functions of osteoblasts on nanophase ceramics. Biontaterials 21 (17), 1803–1810 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Price RL, Gutwein LG, Kaledin L, Tepper F, Webster TJ. Osteoblast function on nanophase alumina materials: influence of chemistry, phase and topography. J Bionted. Mater. Res. 67A(4), 1284–1293 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Giannaras D, Riehle MO etal. Rapid fibroblast adhesion to 27-nm high polymer demixed nanotopography. Biontaterials 25 (1), 77–83 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Webster TJ, Ejiofor JU. Increased osteoblast adhesion on nanophase metals: Ti, Ti6A14V and CoCrMo. Biontaterials (19), 4731–4739 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Savaiano JK, Webster TJ. Altered responses of chondrocytes to nanophase PLGAinanophase Mania composites. Biontaterials 25 (7–8), 1205–1213 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bos GVV, Poot AA, Beugeling T, Van Aken WG, Feijen J. Small diameter vascular graft prostheses: current status. Arch. Physiol. Bloch= 106(2), 100–115 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Xue L, Greisler HP. Biomaterials in the development and future of vascular grafts. Vasc. Surg. 37(2), 472–480 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Friedman SG, Lazzaro RS, Spier LN, Moccio C, Tortolani AJ. A prospective randomized comparison of Dacron and polytetrafluroethylene aortic bifurcation grafts. Surgery117,7-10 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Green RM, Abbott WM, Matsumoto T et al. Prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass grafting: fiber-year results of a randomized trial. J Vasc. Slug. 31, 417–425 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Goodman SL, Sims PA, Albrecht RM. Three-dimensional extracellular matrix textured biomaterials. Biornaterials 17(21), 2087-2095 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cell function on poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) with nanostructured surface features. Biornaterials 25(1), 53–61 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mo XM, Xu CY, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Electrospun P(LLA-CL) nanofiber: a biomimetic extracellular matrix for smooth muscle cell and endothelial cell proliferation. Biornaterials 25(10), 1883–1890 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Childs S, Riehle MO etal. Fibroblast reaction to island topography: changes in cytoskeleton and morphology with time. Biontaterials 24(6), 927–935 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Pepin A. Nanofabrication: conventional and nonconventional methods. Electrophoresis 22 (2), 187–207 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Semiconductor industry association. The national technology roadmap for semiconductor industry association (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Caning J. Potentials and challenges for lithography beyond 193 nm optics. J Vac. Sc]. Technol. B15,2109-2111 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Kupka RK, Rousseaux F et al. 50-nm x-ray lithography using synchrotron radiation. J Vac. Sc]. Technol. B12, 3959–3964 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Fibroblast response to a controlled nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography. J Biorned. Mater. Res. 69A(2), 314–322 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Berry CC, Riehle MO et al. Attempted endocytosis of nanoenvironment produced by colloidal lithography by human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell. Res. 295(2), 387–394 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Sutherland DS, Agheli H, Curtis AS. Changes in fibroblast morphology in response to nanocolumns produced by colloidal lithography. Biontaterials 25 (23), 5415–5422 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Vance RJ, Miller DC, Thapa A, Haberstroh KM, Webster TJ. Decreased fibroblast cell density on chemically degraded poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid), polyurethane, and polycaprolactone. Biornaterials 25 (11), 2095–2103 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dalby MJ, Riehle MO, Johnstone H, Affrossman S, Curtis ASG. in vitro reaction of endothelial cells to polymer demixed nanotopography. Biornaterials 23(14), 2945–2954 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gao J, Niklason L, Langer R. Surface hydrolysis of poly (glycolic acid) meshes increases the seeding density of vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biorned. Mater. Res. 3,417–424 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Thapa A, Miller DC, Webster TJ, Haberstroh KM. Nanostructured polymers enhance bladder smooth muscle cell function. Biontaterials 24(17), 2915–2926 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Deitzel JM, Kleinmeyer J, Harris D, Beck Tan NC. The effect of processing variables on the morphology of electrospun nanofibers and textiles. Polymer 42(1), 261–272 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Shin YM, Hohman MM, Brenner MP, Rutledge GC. Experimental characterization of electrospinning: the electrically forced jet and instabilities. Polymer 42(25), 9955–9967 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Berkland C, Pack DW, Kim KK. Controlling surface nanostructure using flow-limited field-injection electrostatic spraying (FFESS) of poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide). Biontaterials 25 (25), 5649–5658 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Zong X, Kim K, Fang D, Ran S, Hsiao BS, Chu B. Structure and process relationship of electrospun bioabsorbable nanofiber membranes. Polymer 43 (16), 4403–4412 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Theron A, Zussman E, Yarin AL. Electrostatic field-assisted alignment of electrospun nanofibers. Nanotechnology12, 384–390 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Buer A, Ugbolue SC, Warner SB. Electrospinning and properties of some nanofibers. Tex. Res. J.71 (4), 323–328 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Suthar A, Chase G. Nanofibers in filter media. Chem. Eng. 726,26–28 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Xu CY, Inai R, Kotaki M, Ramakrishna S. Aligned biodegradable nanofibrous structure: a potential scaffold for blood vessel engineering. Biornaterials 25(5), 877–886 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ma PX, Zhang R. Synthetic nanoscale fibrous extracellular matrix. J Biorned. Mater. Res. 46(1), 60–72 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nanofibrous lactic acid) scaffolds with interconnected spherical macropores. Biornaterials 25(11), 2065–2073 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Woo KM, Chen VJ, Ma PX. Nanofibrous scaffolding architecture selectively enhances protein adsorption contributing to cell attachment. j Biorned. Mater. Res. 67A(2), 531–537 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nikolovski J, Mooney DJ. Smooth muscle cell adhesion to tissue engineering scaffolds. Biontaterials 21 (20), 2025–2032 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Leong KF, Cheah CM, Chua CK. Solid freeform fabrication of three-dimensional scaffolds for engineering replacement tissues and organs. Biornaterials 24(13), 2363–2378 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hutmacher DW, Schantz T, Zein I etal. Mechanical properties and cell cultural response of polycaprolactone scaffolds designed and fabricated via fused deposition modeling. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 55(2), 203–216 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Zeltinger J, Sherwood JK, Graham DA, Mueller R, Griffith LG. Effect of pore size and void fraction on cellular adhesion, proliferation and matrix deposition. Tissue Eng. 7(5), 557–572 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Landers R, Hubner U, Schmelzeisen R, Millhaupt R. Rapid prototyping of scaffolds derived from thermoreversible hydrogels and tailored for applications in tissue engineering. Biornaterials 23(23), 4437–4447 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Fromstein JD, Woodhouse KA. Elastomeric biodegradable polyurethane blends for soft tissue applications. J. Biornater. Sci. Polyrn. Ed. 13(4), 391–406 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lee SH, Kim BS, Kim SH etal. Elastic biodegradable poly(glycolide-co-caprolactone) scaffold for tissue engineering. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 66A(1), 29–37 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Schakenraad, JM. Adsorption behavior of proteins at solid-liquid interfaces In: Biomaterials Science. Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons JE (Eds). Academic Press, CA, USA, 136–150 (1996).
   Google Scholar