The value of robotic systems in stroke rehabilitation

References

• Rosamond W, Flegal K, Furie K, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2007 update: a report from the American heart association statistics committee and stroke statistics subcommittee. Circulation 2007;15(5):69-17
   Google Scholar
• WHO. World health statistics. WHO Press; Geneva, Switzerland: 2008
   Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003;34(9):2181-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolucci S, Bragoni M, Coiro P, et al. Quantification of the probability of reaching mobility independence at discharge from a rehabilitation hospital in nonwalking early ischemic stroke patients: a multivariate study. Cerebrovasc Dis 2008;26(1):16-22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Writing Group Members; American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121(7):46-215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Carraro E. Upper limb movements and cerebral plasticity in post-stroke rehabilitation. Aging Clin Exp Res 2008;20(1):103-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolpert DM, Diedrichsen J, Flanagan JR. Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Rev Neurosci 2011;12(12):739-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber D, Gutnisky DA, Peron S, et al. Multiple dynamic representations in the motor cortex during sensorimotor learning. Nature 2012;484(7395):473-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nudo RJ. Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery. Stroke 2007;38(2):845-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oulad Ben Taib N, Manto M, Laute MA, Brotchi J. The cerebellum modulates rodent cortical motor output after ripetitive somatosensory stimulation. Neurosurgery 2005;56(4):811-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelles G. Cortical reorganization – effects of intensive therapy. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004;22(3-5):239-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P, Mauritz KH. Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. J Neurol Sci 1995;130(1):59-68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayona NA, Bitensky J, Salter K, Teasell R. The role of task-specific training in rehabilitation therapies. Top Stroke Rehabil 2005;12(3):58-65
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26(8):923-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol 2004;3(9):528-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: does it matter what the robot does? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43(5):619-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner TH, Lo AC, Peduzzi P, et al. An economic analysis of robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. Stroke 2011;42(9):2630-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vliet PM, Wulf G. Extrinsic feedback for motor learning after stroke: what is the evidence? Disabil Rehabil 2006;28(13-14):831-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prange GB, Jannink MJ, Groothuis-Oudshoorn CG, et al. Systematic review of the effect of robot-aided therapy on recovery of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43(2):171-84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez RJ, Liu J, Rao S, et al. Automating arm movement training following severe stroke: functional exercises with quantitative feedback in a gravity-reduced environment. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2006;14(3):378-89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisneski KJ, Johnson MJ. Quantifying kinematics of purposeful movements to real, imagined, or absent functional objects: implications for modelling trajectories for robot-assisted ADL tasks. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmans JA, Gladman JR, Walker M, et al. Mixed reality environments in stroke rehabilitation: development as rehabilitation tools. 5th International Conference of Disability, Virtual Reality & Assoc Tech (ICDVRAT); Oxford, UK; 2004
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans AA, Seelen HA, Willmann RD, et al. Arm and hand skills: training preferences after stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31(16):1344-52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levack WM, Taylor K, Siegert RJ, et al. Is goal planning in rehabilitation effective? A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2006;20(9):739-55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI. Robot-mediated movement therapy: a tool for training and evaluation. Eur Symp Tech Aids Rehabil TAR 2007;2007
   Google Scholar
• French B, Thomas L, Leathley M, et al. Does repetitive task training improve functional activity after stroke? A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2010;42(1):14.9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wevers L, van de Port I, Vermue M, et al. Effects of task-oriented circuit class training on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2009;40(7):2450-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Port IG, Wood-Dauphinee S, Lindeman E, Kwakkel G. Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(11):935-51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt H, Werner C, Bernhardt R, et al. Gait rehabilitation machines based on programmable footplates. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riener R, Lünenburger L, Jezernik S, et al. Patient-cooperative strategies for robot-aided treadmill training: first experimental results. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13(3):380-94
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Mehrholz J, Werner C. Robot-assisted upper and lower limb rehabilitation after stroke: walking and arm/hand function. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2008;105(18):330-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J, Mehrholz J, Werner C, KuglerPohl M. Electromechanical-assisted training for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD006185
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobkin BH, Duncan PW. Should body weight-supported treadmill training and robotic-assistive steppers for locomotor training trot back to the starting gate? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26(4):308-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Carraro E, Ferraro C, et al. Upper limb rehabilitation robotics after stroke: a perspective from the University of Padua, Italy. J Rehabil Med 2009;41(12):981-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;6:CD006876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT. Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 1998;6(1):75-87
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, Rymer WZ, Burgar C. Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002;8(4):40-53
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dipietro L, Ferraro M, Palazzolo JJ, et al. Customized interactive robotic treatment for stroke: EMG-triggered therapy. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2005;13(3):325-34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein J, Krebs HI, Frontera WR, et al. Comparison of two techniques of robot-aided upper limb exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2004;83(9):720-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al. A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000;54(10):1938-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Burgar CG, Van der Loos M, et al. MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: a follow-up study. J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43(5):631-42
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Schulte-Tigges G, Konrad M, et al. Robot-assisted arm trainer for the passive and active practice of bilateral forearm and wrist movements in hemiparetic subjects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(6):915-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M, et al. Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stroke: a single-blinded randomized trial in two centers. Stroke 2005;36(9):1960-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coote S, Murphy B, Harwin W, Stokes E. The effect of the GENTLE/s robot-mediated therapy system on arm function after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008;22(5):395-405
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loureiro R, Amirabdollahian F, Topping M, et al. Upper limb robot mediated stroke therapy –GENTLE/s approach. Auton Robots 2003;15(1):35-51
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirabdollahian F, Loureiro R, Gradwell E, et al. Multivariate analysis of the Fugl-Meyer outcome measures assessing the effectiveness of GENTLE/S robotmediated stroke therapy. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidali M, Duschau-Wicke A, Broggi S, et al. A robotic system to train activities of daily living in a virtual environment. Med Biol Eng Comput 2011;49(10):1213-23
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahn LE, Lum PS, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: does it matter what the robot does? J Rehabil Res Dev 2006;43(5):619-30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazekas G, Horvath M, Toth A. A novel robot training system designed to supplement upper limb physiotherapy of patients with spastic hemiparesis. Int J Rehabil Res 2006;29(3):251-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G, Armani M. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88(2):142-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Armani M, Rosati G. Upper-limb robot-assisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48(4):355-66
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein J, Narendran K, McBean J, et al. Electromyography-controlled exoskeletal upper-limb-powered orthosis for exercise training after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2007;86(4):255-61
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, Feng X, Johnson LM, Winters JM. Potential of a suite of robot/computer-assisted motivating systems for personalized, home-based, stroke rehabilitation. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2007;4:6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ, Ramachandran B, Paranjape RP, Kosasih JB. Feasibility study of TheraDrive: a low-cost game-based environment for the delivery of upper arm stroke therapy. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006;1:695-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buschfort R, Brocke J, Heß A, et al. Arm studio to intensify upper limb rehabilitation after stroke: concept, acceptance, utilization and preliminary clinical results. J Rehabili Med 2010;42(4):310-14
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Delden AL, Peper CL, Kwakkel G, Beek PJ. A systematic review of bilateral upper limb training devices for poststroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:972069
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R, Dietz V. Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000;37(6):693-700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy A, Forrester LW, Macko RF. Short-term ankle motor performance with ankle robotics training in chronic hemiparetic stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48(4):417-29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banala S, Agrawal S, Scholz J. Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients. In 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); Noordwijk, The Netherlands; 2007. p. 401-7
   Google Scholar
• Koopman B, van Asseldonk EH, van der Kooij H. Selective control of gait subtasks in robotic gait training: foot clearance support in stroke survivors with a powered exoskeleton. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2013;10:3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Waldner A, Tomelleri C. Research Innovative gait robot for the repetitive practice of floor walking and stair climbing up and down in stroke patients. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2010;7:30
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bouri M, Stauffer Y, Schmitt C, et al. The WalkTrainer. a robotic system for walking rehabilitation. In Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE international conference on robotics and biomimetics, Kunming, China;2006
   Google Scholar
• Peshkin M, Brown D, Santos-Munné J, et al. KineAssist: a robotic overground gait and balance training device. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); Chicago, USA; 2005. p. 241-6
   Google Scholar
• Kawamoto H, Sankai Y. Power assist system HAL-3 for gait disorder person. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Computers Helping People with Special Needs (ICCHP); Linz, Austria; 2002
   Google Scholar
• Reinkensmeyer D, Wynne J, Harkema S. A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation. In 24th Annual Conference and the Annual Fall Meeting of the Biomedical Engineering Society (EMBS/BMES); Houston, U.S; 2002. p. 2353-4
   Google Scholar
• Aoyagi D, Ichinose W, Harkema S, et al. An assistive robotic device that can synchronize to the pelvic motion during human gait training. In 9th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR); Chicago, U.S; 2005. p. 565-8
   Google Scholar
• Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med 2010;362(19):1772-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Wu CY, Liao WW, et al. Effects of treatment intensity in upper limb robot-assisted therapy for chronic stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25(6):503-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgar CG, Lum PS, Scremin AM, et al. Robot-assisted upper-limb therapy in acute rehabilitation setting following stroke: department of veterans affairs multisite clinical trial. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48(4):445-58
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Pohl M. Electromechanical-assisted gait training after stroke: a systematic review comparing end-effector and exoskeleton devices. J Rehabil Med 2012;44(3):193-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hornby TG, Campbell DD, Kahn JH, et al. Enhanced gait-related improvements after therapist- versus robotic-assisted locomotor training in subjects with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled study. Stroke 2008;39(6):1786-92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidler J, Nichols D, Pelliccio M, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009;23(1):5-13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oujamaa L, Relave I, Froger J, et al. Rehabilitation of arm function after stroke. Literature review. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2009;52(3):269-93
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cauraugh JH, Lodha N, Naik SK, Summers JJ. Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis. Hum Mov Sci 2010;29(5):853-70
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tijs E, Matayas TA. Bilateral training does not facilitate performance of copying tasks in post-stroke hemiplegia. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006;20(4):473-83
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, et al. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther 2006;86(6):817-24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao WW, Wu CY, Hsieh YW, et al. Effects of robot-assisted upper limb rehabilitation on daily function and real-world arm activity in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2012;26(2):111-20
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang CL, Lin KC, Chen HC, et al. Pilot comparative study of unilateral and bilateral robot-assisted training on upper-extremity performance in patients with stroke. Am J Occup Ther 2012;66(2):198-206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iosa M, Morone G, Bragoni M, et al. Driving electromechanically assisted Gait Trainer for people with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2011;48(2):135-46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Regnaux JP, Saremi K, Marehbian J, et al. An accelerometry-based comparison of 2 robotic assistive devices for treadmill training of gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22(4):348-54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morone G, Bragoni M, Iosa M, et al. Who may benefit from robotic-assisted gait training? A randomized clinical trial in patients with subacute stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25(7):636-44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morone G, Iosa M, Bragoni M, et al. Who may have durable benefit from robotic gait training?: a 2-year follow-up randomized controlled trial in patients with subacute stroke. Stroke 2012;43(4):1140-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Sullivan KJ, Behrman AL, et al. LEAPS investigative team. Body-weight-supported treadmill rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2011;364(21):2026-36
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragoni M, Broccoli M, Iosa M, et al. Influence of psychologic features on rehabilitation outcomes in patients with subacute stroke trained with robotic-aided walking therapy. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2013;92(10 Suppl 1):e16-25
   Google Scholar
• Belda-Lois JM, Mena-del Horno S, Bermejo-Bosch I, et al. Rehabilitation of gait after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2011;8:66
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke 2008;39(3):910-17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner J, Solis-Escalante T, Grieshofer P, et al. Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects. Neuroimage 2012;63(3):1203-11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse S, Werner C, Schonhardt EM, et al. Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2007;25(1):9-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards DJ, Krebs HI, Rykman A, et al. Raised corticomotor excitability of M1 forearm area following anodal tDCS is sustained during robotic wrist therapy in chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2009;27(3):199-207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ochi M, Saeki S, Oda T, et al. Effects of anodal and cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with robotic therapy on severely affected arms in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Med 2013;45(2):137-40
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson MJ. Recent trends in robot-assisted therapy environments to improve real-life functional performance after stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006;18:3-29
   Google Scholar
• Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26(8):923-31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen R, Soerensen K, Simonsen D, Jensen W. Effect of early and late rehabilitation onset in a chronic rat model of ischemic stroke-assessment of motor cortex signaling and gait functionality over time. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2013;21(6):1006-15
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay-Lyons M, McDonald A, Matheson J, et al. Dual effects of body-weight supported treadmill training on cardiovascular fitness and walking ability early after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013;27(7):644-53
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husemann B, Müller F, Krewer C, et al. Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patients after stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. Stroke 2007;38(2):54.349
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aisen ML, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al. The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol 1997;54(4):6.443
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iosa M, Morone G, Fusco A, et al. Seven capital devices for the future of stroke rehabilitation. Stroke Res Treat 2012;2012:187965
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takahashi CD, Der-Yeghiaian L, Le V, et al. Robot-based hand motor therapy after stroke. Brain 2008;131(2):425-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Celia A, Armani M, et al. Robot-aided intensive training in post-stroke recovery. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18(3):261-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masiero S, Celia A, Armani M, Rosati G. A novel robot device in rehabilitation of post-stroke hemiplegic upper limbs. Aging Clin Exp Res 2006;18:531-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar