References
- Berlin L, Hall FM. More mammography muddle: emotions, politics, science, costs and polarization. Radiology 2010;255:311-16
- Berg WA, Zhang Z, Cormack JB, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. J Ame Med Ass 2012;307:1394-404
- Hubbard RA, Kerlikowske K, Flowers CI. Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2011;155:481-92
- Brodersen J, Siersma VD. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:106-15
- Yaffe MJ, Mainprize JG. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening. Radiology 2011;258:98-105
- Buist DS, Anderson ML, Haneuse SJ, et al. Influence of annual interpretive volume on screening mammography performance in the United States. Radiology 2011;259:72-84
- Gross CP, Long JB, Ross JS, et al. The cost of breast cancer screening in Medicare population. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:220-6
- Brawley OW. Risk-based mammography screening: an effort to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:662-3
- Gail MH, Mai PL. Comparing breast cancer risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:665-8
- Nishikawa RM, Gur D. CADe for early detection of breast cancer – current status and why we need to continue to explore new approaches. Acad Radiol 2014;21:1320-1
- Amir E, Freedman OC, Seruga B, Evans DG. Assessing women at high risk of breast cancer: a review of risk assessment models. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102:680-91
- Harvey J, Bovbjerg VE. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: Relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 2004;230:29-41
- Kopans DB. Basic physics and doubts about relationship between mammographically determined tissue density and breast cancer risk. Radiology 2008;246:348-53
- Nielsen M, Karemore G, Loog M, et al. A novel and automatic mammographic texture resemblance marker is an independent risk factor for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2011;35:381-7
- Haberle L, Wagner F, Fasching PA, et al. Characterizing mammographic images by using generic texture features. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14:R59
- Sun W, Qian W, Zhang J, et al. Using multi-scale texture and density features for near-term breast cancer risk analysis. Med Phys 2015;42:2853-62
- Tan M, Pu J, Cheng S, et al. Assessment of a four-view mammographic image feature based fusion model to predict near-term breast cancer risk. Ann Biomed Eng 2015. [Epub ahead of print]
- Fenton JJ, Abraham L, Taplin SH, et al. Effectiveness of computer-aided detection in community mammography practice. J Natl Cancer Inst 2011;103:1152-61
- Hupse R, Samulski M, Lobbes MB, et al. Computer-aided detection of masses at mammography: Interactive decision support versus prompts. Radiology 2013;266:123-9
- Tan M, Qian W, Pu J, et al. A new approach to develop computer-aided detection schemes of digital mammograms. Phys Med Biol 2015;60:4413-27
- Wang X, Li L, Xu W, et al. Improving performance of computer-aided detection of subtle breast masses using an adaptive cueing method. Phys Med Biol 2012;57:561-75
- Aerts H, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, et al. Decoding tumor phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun 2014;5:4006
- Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging 2012;30:1234-48
- Gundreddy RR, Tan M, Qui Y, et al. Assessment of performance and reproducibility of applying a content-based image retrieval scheme for classification of breast lesions. Med Phys 2015;42:4241-9
- Collins FS, Varmus H. A new initiative on precision medicine. N Engl J Med 2015;372:793-5