Evaluating the evidence for and against the use of IOLs in infants and young children

References

• Amaya LG, Speedwell L, Taylor D. Contact lenses for infant aphakia. Br J Ophthalmol. 1990;74:150–154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann D, Weissman BA, Isenberg SJ, et al. The effectiveness of daily wear contact lenses for the correction of infantile aphakia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:927–930.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambert SR, Lynn M, Drews-Botsch C, et al. Intraocular lens implantation during infancy: perceptions of parents and the American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus members. J Aapos. 2003;7(6):400–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SR, Buckley EG, Drews-Botsch C, et al. The Infant Aphakia Treatment Study: design and clinical measures at enrollment. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(1):21–27.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lambert SR, Buckley EG, Drews-Botsch C, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing contact lens with intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2010;128(7):810–818.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plager DA, Lynn MJ, Buckley EG, et al. Complications, adverse events, and additional intraocular surgery 1 year after cataract surgery in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:2330–2334.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Hartmann EE, et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing contact lens to intraocular lens correction of monocular aphakia during infancy: HOTV Optotype acuity at 4.5 years and clinical findings at age 5 years. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(6):676–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann EE, Lynn MJ, Lambert SR. Baseline characteristics of the infant aphakia treatment study population: predicting recognition acuity at 4.5 years of age. IOVS. 2015;56(1):388–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, Hartmann EE. In reply: comments on infant aphakia treatment study 4.5-year results. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014;132(12):1491–1492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plager DA, Lynn MJ, Buckley EG, et al. Complications in the first 5 years following cataract surgery in infants with and without intraocular implantation in IATS. Am J Ophthalmol. 2014;158:892–898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck AD, Freedman SF, Lynn MJ, et al. Glaucoma-related adverse events in the infant aphakia treatment study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(3):300–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freedman SF, Lynn MJ, Beck AD, et al. Glaucoma-related adverse events in the first five years after unilateral cataract removal in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015;133(8):907–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solebo AL, Russell-Eggitt I, Cumberland PM, et al. Risks and outcomes associated with primary intraocular lens implantation in children under 2 years of age: the IoLunder2 cohor study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2015;99:1471–1476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann EE, Stout AU, Lynn MJ, et al. Stereopsis results at 4.5 years of age in the IATS Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;159:64–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrigan AK, DuBois LG, Becker ER, et al. Cost of intraocular lens vs contact lens treatment after unilateral congenital cataract surgery: retrospective analysis at age 1 year. Ophthalmology. 2013;120(1):14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger SJ, DuBois L, Becker ER, et al. Cost of intraocular lens versus contact lens treatment after unilateral congenital cataract surgery in the infant aphakia treatment study at age 5 years. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:288–292.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell B, Ward MA, Lynn M, et al. The infant aphakia treatment study contact lens experience: one-year outcomes. Eye and Contact Lens. 2012;38:234–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson ME, Hafez GA, Trivedi RH. Secondary in-the-bag intraocular lens implantation in children who have been aphakic since early infancy. J Aapos. 2011;15:162–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruger TL, Monson BS, Baker JD. The role and efficacy of secondary IOL in the treatment of monocular infantile cataracts. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2014;51(6):370–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, DubOis LG, et al. Axial elongation following cataract surgery during the first year of life in the infant aphakia treatment study. IOVS. 2012;53:7539–7545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trivedi RH, Lambert SR, Lynn MJ, et al. The role of preoperative biometry in selecting initial contact lens power in the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. J Aapos. 2014;18(3):251–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderVeen DK, Nizam A, Lynn MJ, et al. Predictability of intraocular lens calculation and early refractive status: the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Arch Ophthalmol. 2012;130(3):293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VanderVeen DK, Trivedi RH, Nizam A, et al. Predictability of intraocular lens power calculation formulae in infantile eyes with unilateral congenital cataract: results from the Infant Aphakia Treatment Study. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156(6):1252–1260.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin AA, Buckley EG. Update on pediatric cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2010;21:55–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costenbader FD, Albert DG. Conservatism in the management of congenital cataract. Arch Ophthalmol. 1957;58:426–430.
   Google Scholar
• Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Receptive fields of cells in striate cortex of very young, visually inexperienced kittens. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:994–1002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubel DH, Wiesel TN. Effects of monocular deprivation in kittens. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Exp Pathol Pharmakol. 1964;248:492–497.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Effects of visual deprivation on morphology and physiology of cells in the cat’s lateral geniculate body. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:978–993.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel TN, Hubel DH. Single-cell responses in striate cortex of kittens deprived of vision in one eye. J Neurophysiol. 1963;26:1003–1017.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch DD, Kohnen T. A retrospective comparison of techniques to prevent secondary cataract formation following posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation in infants and children. Trans Am Ophthallmol Soc. 1997;95:351–360.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vasavada AR, Trivedi RH. Role of optic capture in congenital cataract and intraocular lens surgery in children. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;26(6):824–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Looveren J, Ni Dhubhghaill S, Godts D, et al. Pediatric bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens implantation: long-term follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41(8):1685–1692.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dick HB, Schultz T. Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in infants. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:665–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford J, Werner L, Mamalis N. Adjustable intraocular lens power technology. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(7):1205–1223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portaliou DM, Kymionis GD, Pallikaris IG. Multi-component adjustable intraocular lenses: a new concept in pediatric cataract surgery. J Refract Surg. 2014;30(1):62–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacLean KD, Werner L, Kramer GD, et al. Evaluation of stability and capsular bag opacification of a new foldable adjustable intraocular lens. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol. 2015;43(7):648–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahn CE, Schopfer DC. Cataract surgery with implantation of a mechanically and reversibly adjustable intraocular lens; Acri-Tec AR-1 posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol. 2007;125:935–939.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn CE, Strotmann H. Investigation of the safety of an intraocular lens with reversibly adjustable optical power: the Acri-Tec AR-1 PC/IOL. Ophthalmologica. 2005;219:362–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews MW, Eggleston HC, Pekarek SD, et al. Magnetically adjustable intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29:2211–2216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonov AN, Vdovin G, Loktey M. Liquid-crystal intraocular adaptive lens with wireless control. Opt Express. 2007;15:7468–7478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chayet A, Sandstedt C, Chang S, et al. Correction of myopia after cataract surgery with a light-adjustable lens. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1432–1435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chavet A, Sandstedt CA, Chang SH, et al. Correction of residual hyperopia after cataract surgery using the light adjustable intraocular lens technology. Am J Ophthalmol. 2009;147:392–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner L, Yeh O, Haymore J, et al. Corneal endothelial safety with the irradiation system for light-adjustable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33:873–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner L, Chang H, Haymore J, et al. Retinal safety of the irradiation delivered to light-adjustable intraocular lenses evaluated in a rabbit model. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1392–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinzelmann S, Hengerer FH, Maier P, et al. Is there an endothelial cell toxicity of light-adjustable lens UVA irradiation on the human corneal endothelium? Eur J Ophthalmol. 2012;22(suppl 7):S57–S61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar