Robotic prostate surgery

References

• Craig JJ. Introduction to Robotics: Mechanics and Control (3rd Edition). Pearson Education Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer-integrated surgery. IEEE Trans. Rob. Autom.19(5), 765–781 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Taylor RH, Funda J, Grossman DD. Remote Center-of-Motion Robot for Surgery. International Business Machines Corporation, NY, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Allaf M, Patriciu A, Mazilu D, Kavoussi L, Stoianovici D. Overview and fundamentals of urologic robot-integrated systems. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 671–682 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies B. A review of robotics in surgery. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]214(1), 129–140 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies BL, Hibberd RD, Coptcoat MJ, Wickham JE. A surgeon robot prostatectomy – a laboratory evaluation. J. Med. Eng. Technol.13(6), 273–277 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris SJ, Arambula-Cosio F, Mei Q et al. The Probot – an active robot for prostate resection. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. [H]211(4), 317–325 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nathan MS, Mei Q, Seenivasagam K, Davies B, Wickham JE, Miller RA. Comparison of prostatic volume and dimensions by transrectal and transurethral ultrasonography. Br. J. Urol.78(1), 84–89 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho G, Ng WS, Teo MY, Kwoh CK, Cheng WS. Computer-assisted transurethral laser resection of the prostate (CALRP): theoretical and experimental motion plan. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.48(10), 1125–1133 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chinzei K, Hata N, Jolesz FA, Kikinis R. MR compatible surgical assist robot: system integration and preliminary feasibility study. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Third International Conference. Pittsburgh, PA, USA (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Rovetta A, Sala R. Execution of robot-assisted biopsies within the clinical context. J. Image Guid. Surg.1(5), 280–287 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rovetta A, Sala R, Wen Z et al. Sensorization of a surgeon robot for prostate biopsy operation. Presented at: First International Symposium on Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. PA, USA, 22–24 September (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Kim HL, Schulam P. The PAKY, HERMES, AESOP, ZEUS, and da Vinci robotic systems. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 659–669 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW. Comparison of robotic versus human laparoscopic camera control. J. Urol.154(6), 2134–2136 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partin AW, Adams JB, Moore RG, Kavoussi LR. Complete robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgery: a preliminary report. J. Am. Coll. Surg.181(6), 552–557 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassweiler J, Seemann O, Hatzinger M, Schulze M, Frede T. Technical evolution of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy after 450 cases. J. Endourol.17(3), 143–154 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varkarakis IM, Rais-Bahrami S, Kavoussi LR, Stoianovici D. Robotic surgery and telesurgery in urology. Urology65(5), 840–846 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiono S, Gilbert JM, Soin B, Finlay PA, Gordan A. Controlled trial of the introduction of a robotic camera assistant (EndoAssist) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg. Endosc.16(9), 1267–1270 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nebot PB, Jain Y, Haylett K, Stone R, McCloy R. Comparison of task performance of the camera-holder robots EndoAssist and Aesop. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc. Percutan. Tech.13(5), 334–338 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Germay O et al. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J. Surg.25(11), 1467–1477 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satava RM. Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch. Surg.134(11), 1197–1202 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowersox JC, Cornum RL. Remote operative urology using a surgical telemanipulator system: preliminary observations. Urology52(1), 17–22 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schurr MO, Buess G, Neisuis B, Voges U. Robotics and telemanipulation technologies for endoscopic surgery. A review of the ARTEMIS project. Advanced Robotic Telemanipulator for Minimally Invasive Surgery. Surg. Endosc.14(4), 375–381 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MM, Gill IS, Kauok JH, Matin SF, Sung GT, Bravo EL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Urology60(6), 1104–1107 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gettman MT, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R. Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty performed using the da Vinci robotic system. Urology60(3), 509–513 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan S, Vanuno D, Sileri P, Cicalese L, Benedetti E. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for kidney transplantation. Transplantation73(9), 1474–1479 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen LH, Jorgensen TM. Computer assisted pyeloplasty in children: the retroperitoneal approach. J. Urol.171(6 Pt 2), 2629–2631 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology50(6), 854–857 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J. Urol.163(6), 1643–1649 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A et al. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology55(5), 630–634 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.170(5), 1738–1741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.87(4), 408–410 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A et al. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol.168(3), 945–949 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasticier G, Rietbergen JB, Guillonneau B, Fromont G, Menon M, Vallancien G. Robotically assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: feasibility study in men. Eur. Urol.40(1), 70–74 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 701–717 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaul S, Saveri A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M. Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int.97(3), 467–472 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: conventional and robotic. Urology66(5 Suppl.), 101–104 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, El-Hakim A, Leung RA. Robotic prostatectomy: a pooled analysis of published literature. Expert Rev. Anticancer Ther.6(1), 11–20 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozet F, Harmon J, Cathelineau X, Barret E, Vallancien G. Robot-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol. (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, Brautigam R, Kramer W, Binder J. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur. Urol.44(2), 175–181 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrell SD, Smith JA Jr. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology66(Suppl. 5), 105–107 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cathelineau X, Rozet F, Vallancien G. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the European experience. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 693–699 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Skarecky WD. Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: has the initial promise been fulfilled? Laparoscopy Today5(1), 6–10 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Gerovich O, Marayong P, Okamura AM. The effect of visual and haptic feedback on computer-assisted needle insertion. Comput. Aided Surg.9(6), 243–249 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitagawa M, Dokko D, Okamura AM, Yuh DD. Effect of sensory substitution on suture-manipulation forces for robotic surgical systems. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.129(1), 151–158 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawluk DT, Howe RD. Dynamic contact of the human fingerpad against a flat surface. J. Biomech. Eng.121(6), 605–611 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pawluk DT, Howe RD. Dynamic lumped element response of the human fingerpad. J. Biomech. Eng.121(2), 178–183 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wellman PS, Dalton EP, Krag D, Kern KA, Howe RD. Tactile imaging of breast masses: first clinical report. Arch. Surg.136(2), 204–208 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimberger D, Kavoussi L, Stoianovici D et al. [Telerobotic surgery between Baltimore and Munich]. Urologe A.41(5), 489–492 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M et al. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery. Nature413(6854), 379–380 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janetschek G, Bartsch G, Kavoussi LR. Transcontinental interactive laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Europe. J. Urol.160(4), 1413 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BR, Bishoff JT, Janetschek G et al. A novel method of surgical instruction: international telementoring. World J. Urol.16(6), 367–370 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee BR, Png DJ, Liew L et al. Laparoscopic telesurgery between the United States and Singapore. Ann. Acad. Med. Singapore29(5), 665–668 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cleary K, Nguyen C. State of the art in surgical robotics: clinical applications and technology challenges. Comput. Aided Surg.6(6), 312–328 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu KK, Hricak H. Imaging prostate cancer. Radiol. Clin. North Am.38(1), 59–85 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atalar E, Menard C. MR-guided interventions for prostate cancer. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N Am.13(3), 491–504 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beyersdorff D, Winkel A, Hamm B et al. MR imaging-guided prostate biopsy with a closed MR unit at 1.5 T: initial results. Radiology234(2), 576–581 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amico AV, Cormack R, Tempany CM et al. Real-time magnetic resonance image-guided interstitial brachytherapy in the treatment of select patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.42(3), 507–515 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan I, Oldenburg NE, Meskell P, Blake M, Church P, Holupka EJ. Real time MRI-ultrasound image guided stereotactic prostate biopsy. Magn. Reson. Imaging20(3), 295–299 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susil RC, Krieger A, Derbyshire JA et al. System for MR image-guided prostate interventions: canine study. Radiology228(3), 886–894 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoianovici D. Multi-imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics. Int. J. Med. Robot. Comput. Assis. Surg.1(2), 86–100 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinzei K, Miller K. Towards MRI guided surgical manipulator. Med. Sci. Monit.7(1), 153–163 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hempel E, Fischer H, Gumb L et al. An MRI-compatible surgical robot for precise radiological interventions. Comput. Aided Surg.8(4), 180–191 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tsekos NV, Ozcan A, Christoforou E. A prototype manipulator for magnetic resonance-guided interventions inside standard cylindrical magnetic resonance imaging scanners. J. Biomech. Eng.127(6), 972–980 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stoianovici D, Patriciu A, Mazilu D et al. A new type of motor: pneumatic step motor. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics (2006) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Muntener M. MRI compatible robotic system for fully automated brachytherapy seed placement. Urology (2006) (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Potters L, Morgenstern C, Calugaru E et al. 12-year outcomes following permanent prostate brachytherapy in patients with clinically localized prostate cancer. J. Urol.173(5), 1562–1566 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gellekom MP, Moerland MA, Van Vulpen M, Wijrdeman HK, Batterman JJ. Quality of life of patients after permanent prostate brachytherapy in relation to dosimetry. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.63(3), 772–780 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurhanewicz J, Swanson MG, Nelson SJ, Vigneron DB. Combined magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopic imaging approach to molecular imaging of prostate cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging16(4), 451–463 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menard C, Susil RC, Choyke P et al. An interventional magnetic resonance imaging technique for the molecular characterization of intraprostatic dynamic contrast enhancement. Mol. Imaging4(1), 63–66 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rajesh A, Coakley FV. MR imaging and MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N Am.12(3), 557–579 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pandya A, Auner G. Robotics technology: a journey into the future. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 793–800 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar