Physiological monitoring and control in hemodialysis: state of the art and outlook

References

• Daugirdas JT, Ing TS, Blake PG. Handbook of Dialysis, Third edition. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Polaschegg H-D, Levin NW. Hemodialysis machines and monitors, chap. 14. In: Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, 5th Edition. Hörl WH, Koch K-M, Lindsay RM, Ronco C, Winchester JF (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 325–449 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Polaschegg H-D. The extracorporeal circuit. Semin. Dial.8, 299–304 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe RA, Ashby VB, Milford EL et al. Comparison of mortality in all patients on dialysis, patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation, and recipients of a first cadaveric transplant. N. Engl. J. Med.341, 1725–1730 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierratos A, McFarlane P, Chan CT. Quotidian dialysis – update 2005. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens.14, 119–124 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M. Wiederherstellung von Nierenfunktionen, chap. 4. In: Kooperative und autonome Systeme der Medizintechnik: Funktionswiederherstellung und Organersatz. Werner J (Ed.). Oldenbourg Verlag München Wien, 277–347 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Schneditz D. Technologic aspects of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis, chap. 3. In: Clinical Dialysis, 4th Edition. Nissenson AR, Fine RN (Eds). The McGraw Hill Companies, Inc., 47–85 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lindsay RM, Schneditz D. Online monitoring and feedback-control, chap. 20. In: Replacement of Renal Function by Dialysis, 5th Edition. Hörl WH, Koch K-M, Lindsay RM, Ronco C, Winchester JF (Eds). Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht/Boston/London, 555–584 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Akoh JA, Hakim NS. Dialysis Access: Current Practice. Imperial College Press, London, UK (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Depner TA, Rizwan S, Cheer AY, Wagner JM, Eder LA. High venous urea concentrations in the opposite arm. ASAIO Trans.37, M141–M143 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Steuer RR, Bell DA, Barrett LL. Optical measurement of hematocrit and other biological constituents in renal therapy. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther.6, 217–224 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krivitski NM. Theory and validation of access flow measurement by dilution technique during hemodialysis. Kidney Int.48, 244–250 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivitski NM, MacGibbon D, Gleed RD, Dobson A. Accuracy of dilution techniques for access flow measurement during hemodialysis. Am. J. Kidney Dis.31, 502–508 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M, Polaschegg H-D. Automated measurement of recirculation. EDTNA-ERCA J.XIX, 8–15 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Wang E, Schneditz D, Kaufman AM, Levin NW. Sensitivity and specificity of the thermodilution technique in detection of access recirculation. Nephron85, 134–141 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopot F, Nejedly B, Sulkova S, Blaha J. Comparison of different techniques of hemodialysis vascular access flow evaluation. Int. J. Artif. Organs26, 1056–1063 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneditz D, Wang E, Levin NW. Validation of haemodialysis recirculation and access blood flow measured by thermodilution. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.14, 376–383 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• III. NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: Update 2000. NY, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Tonelli M, Jindal K, Hirsch D, Taylor S, Kane C, Henbrey S. Screening for subclinical stenosis in native vessel arteriovenous fistulae. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.12, 1729–1733 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulson WD, Ram SJ, Birk CG, Zapczinski M, Martin SR, Work J. Accuracy of decrease in blood flow in predicting hemodialysis graft thrombosis. Am. J. Kidney Dis.37, 451–452 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• May RE, Himmelfarb J, Yenicesu M et al. Predictive measures of vascular access thrombosis: a prospective study. Kidney Int.52, 1656–1662 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelberts I, Tordoir JH, Boon ES, Schreij G. High-output cardiac failure due to excessive shunting in a hemodialysis access fistula: an easily overlooked diagnosis. Am. J. Nephrol.15, 323–326 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer RR, Miller DR, Zhang S, Bell DA, Leypoldt JK. Noninvasive transcutaneous determination of access blood flow rate. Kidney Int.60, 284–291 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercadal L, Hamani A, Béné B, Petitclerc T. Determination of access blood flow from ionic dialysance: theory and validation. Kidney Int.56, 1560–1565 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay RM, Burbank J, Brugger J et al. A device and a method for rapid and accurate measurement of access recirculation during hemodialysis. Kidney Int.49, 1152–1160 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinekofort W, Kraemer M, Rode C, Wizemann V. Extracorporeal pressure monitoring and the detection of vascular access stenosis. Int. J. Artif. Organs25, 45–50 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besarab A, Al-Saghir F, Alnabhan N, Lubkowski T, Frinak S. Simplified measurement of intra-access pressure. ASAIO J.42, M682–M687 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Polaschegg H-D, Techert F, Wizemann V. Dynamic pressure measurement for detection of blood access stenosis. EDTNA-ERCA J.24(4), 39–44 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ciandrini A, Lodi CA, Galato R, Miscia MC, Cavalcanti S. On-line evaluation of vascular access flow in hemodialysis patients. (abstract) Int. J. Artif. Organs28, 897 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Besarab A. Access monitoring is worthwile and valuable. Blood Purif.24, 77–89 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depner TA. Hemodialysis adequacy: basic essentials and practical points for the nephrologist in training. Hemodial. Int.9, 241–254 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greene T, Depner TA, Daugirdas JT et al. Association of achieved dialysis dose with mortality in the hemodialysis study: an example of “dose-targeting bias”. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.16, 3371–3380 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanholder R, De Smet R, Glorieux G et al. Review on uremic toxins: classification, concentration, and interindividual variability. Kidney Int.63(5), 1934–1943 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanholder R, Glorieux G, Lameire N. New insights in uremic toxicity. Contrib. Nephrol.149, 315–324 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NKF-DOQI. Clinical practice guidelines for hemodialysis adequacy: update 2000. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.37, S7–S64 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• European best practice guidelines expert group on hemodialysis, European Renal Association. Section II. Hemodialysis adequacy. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.17, 16–31 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depner TA. Prescribing Hemodialysis: A Guide To Urea Modeling. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Depner TA. Quantifying hemodialysis. Am. J. Nephrol.16, 17–28 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argiles A, Ficheux A, Thomas M et al. Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement. Kidney Int.52, 530–537 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzavara P, Calconi G, Canini E, Paolini F. A new biosensor for continuous monitoring of the spent dialysate urea level in standard hemodialysis. Int. J. Artif. Organs21, 147–150 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depner TA, Keshaviah P, Ebben JP et al. Multicenter clinical validation of an on-line monitor of dialysis adequacy. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.7, 464–471 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosticardo GM, Avalle U, Giacchino F, Molino A, Alloatti S. Accuracy of an on-line urea monitor compared with urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification. ASAIO J.40, M426–M430 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Colasanti G, Arrigo G, Santoro A et al. Biochemical aspects and clinical perspectives of continuous urea monitoring in plasman ultrafiltrate. Int. J. Artif. Organs18, 544–547 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polaschegg H-D. Automatic, noninvasive intradialytic clearance measurement. Int. J. Artif. Organs16, 185–191 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petitclerc T, Goux N, Reynier AL, Bene B. A model for non-invasive estimation of in vivo dialyzer performances and patient’s conductivity during hemodialysis. Int. J. Artif. Organs16, 585–591 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotch F. On-line clearance: advanced methodology to monitor adequacy of dialysis at no cost. Contrib. Nephrol.137, 268–271 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotch FA, Panlilio F, Buyaki R, Wang E, Folden T, Levin NW. Mechanisms determining the ratio of conductivity clearance to urea clearance. Kidney Int. Suppl.89, S3–S24 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Locatelli F, Buoncristiani U, Canaud B, Köhler H, Petitclerc T, Zucchelli P. Hemodialysis with on-line monitoring equipment: tools or toys? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.20, 22–33 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlin F, Fridolin I, Lindberg LG, Magnusson M. Estimation of delivered dialysis dose by on-line monitoring of the ultraviolet absorbance in the spent dialysate. Am. J. Kidney Dis.41, 1026–1036 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoer Jensen P, Bak J, Ladefoged S, Andersson-Engels S, Friis-Hansen L. Online monitoring of urea concentration in dialysate with dual-beam Fourier-transform near-infrared spectroscopy. J. Biomed. Opt.9, 553–557 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olesberg JT, Arnold MA, Flanigan MJ. Online measurement of urea concentration in spent dialysate during hemodialysis. Clin. Chem.50, 175–181 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M, Rode C, Wizemann V. Detection limit of methods to assess fluid status changes in dialysis patients. Kidney Int.69, 1609–1620 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbane S, Natke E, Maesaka JK. Role of volume overload in dialysis-refractory hypertension. Am. J. Kidney Dis.28, 257–261 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Harnett JD, Kent GM, Murray DC, Barre PE. Impact of hypertension on cardiomyopathy, morbidity and mortality in end-stage renal disease. Kidney Int.49, 1379–1385 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parfrey PS. Pathogenesis of cardiac disease in dialysis patients. Semin. Dial.12, 62–68 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charra B. Dry weight in dialysis: the history of a concept. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.13, 1882–1885 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger JQ, Mehta RL. Assessment of dry weight in hemodialysis: an overview. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.10, 392–403 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouw PM, Kooman JP, Cheriex EC, Olthof CG, de Vries PM, Leunissen KML. Assessment of postdialysis dry weight: a comparison of techniques. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.4, 98–104 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wizemann V, Schilling M. Dilemma of assessing volume state – the use and the limitations of a clinical score. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.10, 2114–2117 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ando Y, Yanagiba S, Asano Y. The inferior vena cava diameter as a marker of dry weight in chronic hemodialyzed patients. Artif. Organs12, 1237–1242 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Kusaba T, Yamaguchi K, Oda H. Echography of the inferior vena cava for estimating fluid removal from patients undergoing hemodialysis. Jpn J. Nephrol.38, 119–123 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Oe B, de Fijter CW, Geers TB, Vos PF, Donker ABJ, de Vries PM. Diameter of inferior caval vein and impedance analysis for assessment of hydration status in peritoneal dialysis. Artif. Organs24, 575–583 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Kuhlmann U, Sarkar S et al. Adjustment of dry weight in hemodialysis patients using intradialytic continuous multifrequency bioimpedance of the calf. Int. J. Artif. Organs27, 104–109 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F, Sarkar S, Kaiwatcharachai C, Greenwood R, Ronco C, Levin NW. Methods and reproducibility of measurement of resistivity in the calf using regional bioimpedance analysis. Blood Purif.21, 131–136 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward L, Cornish BH, Paton NI, Thomas BJ. Multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: a cross-validation study of the inductor circuit and cole models. Physiol. Meas.20, 333–347 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gudivaka R, Schoeller DA, Kushner RF, Bolt JG. Single- and multifrequency models for bioelectrical impedance analysis of body water compartments. J. Appl. Physiol.87, 1087–1096 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Loan MD, Withers PO, Matthie JR, Mayclin PL. Use of bioimpedance spectroscopy to determine extracellular fluid, intracellular fluid, total body water, and fat-free mass. In: Human Body Composition. Ellis KJ, Eastman JD (Eds), Plenum Press, NY, USA, 67–70 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Patel RV, Matthie JR, Withers PO, Peterson EL, Zarowitz BJ. Estimation of total body and extracellular water using single- and multiple-frequency bioimpedance. Ann. Pharmacother.28, 565–569 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Marken Lichtenbeld WD, Westerterp KR, Wouters L, Luijendijk SC. Validation of bioelectrical-impedance measurements as a method to estimate body-water compartments. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.60, 159–166 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamney P, Kraemer M, Rode C, Kleinekofort W, Wizemann V. A new technique for establishing dry weight in hemodialysis patients via whole body bioimpedance. Kidney Int.61, 2250–2258 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katzarski K, Charra B, Laurent G et al. Multifrequency bioimpedance in assessment of dry weight in haemodialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.11, 20–23 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Fisch BJ, Spiegel DM. Assessment of excess fluid distribution in chronic hemodialysis patients using bioimpedance spectroscopy. Kidney Int.49, 1105–1109 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M. A new model for determination of fluid status and body composition from bioimpedance measurements. Physiol. Meas.27, 901–919 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chertow GM. Assessing the nutritional status of patients with end-stage renal disease. Semin. Dial.10, 108–114 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa-Silva MCG, Barros AJD, Post CLA, Waitzberg DL, Heymsfield SB. Can bioelectrical impedance analysis identify malnutrition in preoperative nutrition assessment? Nutrition19(5), 422–426 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcen R, Teruel JL, de la Cal MA, Gamez C. The impact of malnutrtion in morbidity and mortality in stable haemodialysis patients. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.12, 2324–2331 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugirdas JT. Preventing and managing hypotension. Semin. Dial.7, 276–283 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Converse RL, Jacobsen TN, Jost CH et al. Paradoxical withdrawal of reflex vasoconstriction as a cause of hemodialysis-induced hypotension. J. Clin. Invest.90, 1657–1665 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt R, Roeher O, Hickstein H, Korth S. Prevention of haemodialysis-induced hypotension by biofeedback control of ultrafiltration and infusion. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.16, 595–603 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneditz D, Levin NW. Non-invasive blood volume monitoring during hemodialysis: technical and physiological aspects. Semin. Dial.10, 166–169 (1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries JP, Donker AJM, de Vries PM. Prevention of hypovolemia-induced hypotension during hemodialysis by means of an optical reflection method. Int. J. Artif. Organs17, 209–214 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schallenberg U, Stiller S, Mann H. A new method of continuous haemoglobinometric measurement of blood volume during haemodialysis. Life Support Syst.5, 293–305 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hinghofer-Szalkay H, Greenleaf JE. Continuous monitoring of blood volume changes in humans. J. Appl. Physiol.63(3), 1003–1007 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneditz D, Pogglitsch H, Horina J, Binswanger U. A blood protein monitor for the continuous measurement of blood volume changes during hemodialysis. Kidney Int.38, 342–346 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johner C, Chamney P, Schneditz D, Kraemer M. Evaluation of an ultrasonic blood volume monitor. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.13, 2098–2103 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries PM, Kouw PM, Meijer JH, Oe LP, Schneider H, Donker ABJ. Changes in blood parameters during hemodialysis as determined by conductivity measurements. ASAIO Trans.29, 623–626 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood R, Aldridge C, Cattell WR. Serial blood water estimations and in-line blood viscometry: the continuous measurement of blood volume during dialysis. Clin. Sci.66, 583 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann U, Buren FV, Aziz O, Lange H. On-line monitoring of intravascular volume during haemodialysis by continuous refractometry. Int. J. Artif. Organs22, 205–209 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steuer RR, Leypoldt JK, Cheung AK, Senekjian HO, Conis JM. Reducing symptoms during hemodialysis by continuously monitoring the hematocrit. Am. J. Kidney Dis.27, 525–532 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paolini F, Mancini E, Bosetto A, Santoro A. Hemoscan: a dialysis machine-integrated blood volume monitor. Int. J. Artif. Organs18, 487–494 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barth C, Boer W, Garzoni D et al. Characteristics of hypotension-prone hemodialysis patients: is there a critical relative blood volume? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.18, 1353–1360 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M. New strategies for reducing intradialytic symptoms. Semin. Dial.12, 389–395 (1999).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuemann E, Wojke R, Gauly A et al. Less intradialytic morbid events by automatic blood volume controlled ultrafiltration (abstract). Int. J. Artif. Organs26, 652 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Basile C, Giordano R, Vernaglione L et al. Efficacy and safety of haemodialysis treatment with the hemocontrol biofeedback system: a prospective medium-term study. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.16, 328–334 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santoro A, Mancini E, Basile C et al. Blood volume controlled hemodialysis in hypotension-prone patients: a randomized, multicenter controlled trial. Kidney Int.62, 1034–1045 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gotch FA, Keen ML, Yarian SR. An analysis of thermal regulation in hemodialysis with one and three compartment models. ASAIO Trans.35, 622–624 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneditz D. Temperature and thermal balance in hemodialysis. Semin. Dial.14, 357–364 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraemer M, Steil H, Polaschegg HD. Optimization of a sensor head for blood temperature measurement during hemodialysis. Proc. of the IEEE14(4), 1610–1611 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Kraemer M, Polaschegg H-D. Control of blood temperature and thermal energy balance during hemodialysis. Proc. of the IEEE14(4) (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Maggiore Q, Pizzarelli F, Santoro A et al. The effects of control of thermal balance on vascular stability in hemodialysis patients: results of the European randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Kidney Dis.40, 280–290 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman AM, Morris AT, Lavarias VA et al. Effects of controlled blood cooling on hemodynamic stability and urea kinetics during high-efficiency hemodialysis. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.9, 877–883 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketchersid TL, van Stone JC. Dialysate potassium. Semin. Dial.4, 46–51 (1991).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumberg A, Roser HW, Zehnder C, Mueller-Brand J. Plasma potassium in patients with terminal renal failure during and after haemodialysis:; relationship with dialytic potassium removal and total body potassium. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.12, 1629–1634 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in chronic renal disease. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.9, S16–S23 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krivitski NM, Depner TA. Cardiac output and central blood volume during hemodialysis: methodology. Adv. Ren. Replace. Ther.6, 225–232 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strobeck JE, Silver MA, Ventura H. Impedance cardiography: noninvasive measurement of cardiac stroke volume and thoracic fluid content (editorial). Congest. Heart Fail.6, 3–6 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• De Maria AN, Raisinghani A. Comparative overview of cardiac output measurement methods: has impedance cardiography come of age? Congest. Heart Fail.6, 7–18 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg BH, Hermann DD, Pranulis MF, Lazio L, Cloutier D. Reproducibility of impedance cardiography hemodynamic measures in clinically stable heart failure patients. Congest. Heart Fail.6, 19–26 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Valderrabano F, Hoerl WH, Jacobs C et al. European best practice guidelines 9–13: anaemia management. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.15(Suppl. 4), 33–42 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen MJ, Deegens JK, Kapinga TH et al. Citrate compared to low molecular weight heparin anticoagulation in chronic hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int.49, 806–813 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apsner R, Buchmayer H, Gruber D, Sunder-Plassmann G. Citrate for long-term hemodialysis: prospective study of 1,009 consecutive high-flux treatments in 59 patients. Am. J. Kidney Dis.45, 557–564 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridel C, Mercadal L, Bene B, Hamani A, Deray G, Petitclerc T. Regional citrate anticoagulation during hemodialysis: a simplified procedure using Duocart biofiltration. Blood Purif.23, 473–480 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar