Implants for total hip arthroplasty

References

• Raman R, Kamath RP, Parikh A, Angus PD. Revision of cemented hip arthroplasty using a hydroxyapatite-ceramic-coated femoral component. J. Bone Joint Surg.87-B, 1061–1067 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ince A, Rupp J, Frommelt L, Katzer A, Gille J, Lohr JF. Is ‘aseptic’ loosening of the prosthetic cup after total hip replacement due to nonculturable bacterial pathogens in patients with low-grade infection? Clin. Infect. Dis.39(11), 1599–1603 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruckhans AR, Dustmann HO. Indications, methods, and results of cemented, hybrid, and cement-free implantation of THR. Surg. Technol. Int.12, 253–257 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harris WH. Hybrid total hip replacement: rationale and intermediate clinical results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.333, 155–164 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Moran CG, Tourret LJ. Recent advances: orthopaedics. BMJ322(7291), 902–905 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fraser J. Knee and hip joint replacements. Longer lasting prostheses. Aust. Fam. Physician11(1109–11), 1114–1115 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Hemmerich A, Brown H, Smith S, Marthandam SS, Wyss UP. Hip, knee, and ankle kinematics of high range of motion activities of daily living. J. Orthop. Res.24(4), 770–781 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston RC, Schmidt GL. Hip motion measurements for selected activities of daily living. Clin. Orthop.72, 205–215 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Hip joint loading during walking and running, measured in 2 patients. J. Biomech.26, 969–990 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A, Linke H. Hip joint forces during load carrying. Clin. Orthop.335, 190–201 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergmann G, Graichen F, Rohlmann A. Is staircase walking a risk for the fixation of hip implants? J. Biomech.28, 535–553 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller MO, Bergmann G, Deuretzbacher G et al. Musculo-skeletal loading conditions at the hip during walking and stair climbing. J. Biomech.34, 883–893 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asayama I, Chamnongkich S, Simpson KJ, Kinsey TL, Mahoney OM. Reconstructed hip joint position and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty20, 414–420 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamaguchi T, Naito M, Asayama I, Ishiko T. Total hip arthroplasty: the relationship between posterolateral reconstruction, abductor muscle strength, and femoral offset. J. Orthop. Surg.12, 164–167 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• McGrory BJ, Morrey BF, Cahalan TD, An KN, Cabanela ME. Effect of femoral offset on range of motion and abductor muscle strength after total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.77-B, 865–869 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Asayama I, Naito M, Fujisawa M, Kambe T. Relationship between radiographic measurements of reconstructed hip joint position and the Trendelenburg sign. J. Arthroplasty17, 747–51 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Baar ME, Dekker J, Oostendorp RA et al. The effectiveness of exercise therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a randomized clinical trial. J. Rheum.25, 2432–2439 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein G, Kullich W, Schnitker J, Schwann H. Efficacy and tolerance of an oral enzyme combination in painful osteoarthritis of the hip. A double-blind, randomized study comparing oral enzymes with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin. Exp. Rheumatol.24, 25–30 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesenhutter CW, Boice JA, Ko A et al. Evaluation of the comparative efficacy of etoricoxib and ibuprofen for treatment of patients with osteoarthritis: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Mayo Clin. Proc.80, 470–479 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh G, Fort JG, Goldstein JL et al. Celecoxib versus naproxen and diclofenac in osteoarthritis patients: SUCCESS-I study. Am. J. Med.119, 255–266 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spektor G, Fuster V. Drug insight: cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitors and cardiovascular risk – where are we now? Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc. Med.2(6), 290–300 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reginster JY, Bruyere O, Fraikin G, Henrotin Y. Current concepts in the therapeutic management of osteoarthritis with glucosamine. Bull. Hosp. Joint Diseases63(1–2), 31–36 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones PR, Hukins DW, Porter ML, Davies KE, Hardinge K, Taylor CJ. Bending and fracture of the femoral component in cemented total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Eng.14(1), 9–15 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wixson RL, Stulberg SD, Mehlhoff M. Total hip replacement with cemented, uncemented, and hybrid prostheses: a comparison of clinical and radiographic results at two to four years. J. Bone Joint Surg.73-A(2), 257–270 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Kim YH. Titanium and cobalt-chrome cementless femoral stems of identical shape produce equal results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.427, 148–156 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Lavernia C, D’Apuzzo M, Hernandez V, Lee D. Thigh pain in primary total hip arthroplasty: the effects of elastic moduli. J. Arthroplasty19(7 Suppl. 2), 10–16 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC, Pedersen DR. An analysis of collar function and the use of titanium in femoral prostheses. Clin. Orthop.158, 270–277 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Jaffe WL, Jarolem KL. Normalized and proportionalized cemented femoral stem designs. A 10-year clinical study. J. Arthroplasty10(Suppl.), S39–S44 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Crowninshield RD, Jennings JD, Laurent ML, Maloney WJ. Cemented femoral component surface finish mechanics. Clin. Orthop.355, 90–102 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Karrholm J, Malchau H, Snorrason F, Herberts P. Micromotion of femoral stems in total hip arthroplasty. A randomized study of cemented, hydroxyapatite-coated, and porous-coated stems with roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg.76-A(11), 1692–705 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Middleton RG, Howie DW, Casti K, Sharpe P. Effects of design changes on cemented tapered femoral stem fixation. Clin. Orthop.355, 47–56 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Noble PC, Collier MB, Maltry JA, Kamaric E, Tullos HS. Pressurization and centralization enhance the quality and reproducibility of cement mantles. Clin. Orthop.355, 77–89 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen DR, Crowninshield RD, Brand RA, Johnston RC. An axisymmetric model of acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty. J. Biomech.15(4), 305–315 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritter MA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Brugo G. Metal-backed acetabular cups in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.72-A, 672–677 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Ranawat CS, Peters LE, Umlas ME. Fixation of the acetabular component: the case for cement. Clin. Orthop.344, 207–215 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy TH, Salvati EA, Ranawat CS, Wilson PD. A fifteen-year follow-up study of one hundred Charnley low-friction arthroplasties. Orthop. Clin. North Am.19(3), 467–476 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh BF, Wallrichs S, Dewitz Met al. Charnley low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Twenty-year results with cement. J. Arthroplasty9(3), 229–234 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulte KR, Callaghan JJ, Kelley SS, Johnston RC. The outcome of Charnley total hip arthroplasty with cement after a minimum twenty-year follow-up. The results of one surgeon. J. Bone Joint Surg.75-A(7), 961–975 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Barrack RL, Mulroy RD, Harris WH. Improved cementing techniques and femoral component loosening in young patients with hip arthroplasty. A 12-year radiographic review. J. Bone Joint Surg.74-B(3), 385–389 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulroy WF, Estok DM, Harris WH. Total hip arthroplasty with use of so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A fifteen-year-average follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.77-A(12), 1845–1852 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Skutek M, Mikkelsen S, Winemaker M, Robertson D. The Harris Design-2 total hip replacement fixed with so-called second-generation cementing techniques. A ten to fifteen-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg.80-A(12), 1775–1780 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Oishi CS, Walker RH, Colwell CW. The femoral component in total hip arthroplasty: six to eight-year follow-up of one hundred consecutive patients after use of a third-generation cementing technique. J. Bone Joint Surg.76-A(8), 1130–1136 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Mallory TH, Lombardi AV, Leith JR et al. Minimal 10 year follow-up of a tapered cementless femoral component in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty16, 49–54 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Oh SH, Kim JS. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a second generation cementless total hip prosthesis in patients younger than fifty years of age. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A, 109–114 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabek CH, Nayak N. A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty: radiographic evaluation and stability J. Bone Joint Surg.78-A, 1214–1225 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Vresilovic EJ, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH. Incidence of thigh pain after uncemented total hip arthroplasty as a function of femoral stem size. J. Arthroplasty11, 304–311 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaffe WL, Scott DF. Total hip arthroplasty with hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses. J. Bone Joint Surg.78-A, 1918–1934 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kienapfel H, Sprey C, Wilke A, Griss P. Implant Fixation by bone ingrowth. J. Arthroplasty14, 355–336 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Proximally coated ingrowth prostheses: a review. Clin. Orthop.344, 139–149 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Kneif D, Downing MR, Ashcroft GP et al. The correlation between immediate radiolucent lines and early implant migration in cemented acetabular components. J. Arthroplasty21(2), 215–220 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brick GW, Poss R. Long-term follow-up of cemented total hip replacement for osteoarthritis. Rheum. Dis. Clin. North Am.14(3), 565–577 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmiento A, Natarajan V, Gruen TA, McMahon M. Radiographic performance of two different total hip cemented arthroplasties. A survivorship analysis. Orthop. Clin. North Am.19(3), 505–515 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clohisy JC, Harris WH. The Harris–Galante porous-coated acetabular component with screw fixation: an average ten-year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg.81-A, 66–73 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kim YH. Long-term results of the cementless porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis. J. Bone Joint Surg.87-B(5), 623–627 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Torga Spak R, Stuchin SA. Cementless porous-coated sockets without holes implanted with pure press-fit technique. J. Arthroplasty20(1), 4–10 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valle AG, Zoppi A, Peterson MG, Salvati EA. Clinical and radiographic results associated with a modern, cementless modular cup design in total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A(9), 1998–2004 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Gaffey JL, Callaghan JJ, Pedersen DR, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM, Johnston RC. Cementless acetabular fixation at fifteen years. A comparison with the same surgeon’s results following acetabular fixation with cement. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A(2), 257–261 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Hagio K, Sugano N, Takashina M, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Ochi T. Embolic events during total hip arthroplasty: an echocardiographic study. J. Arthroplasty18, 186–192 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. Thirty-day mortality following hip arthroplasty for acute fracture. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A(9), 1983–1988 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh MA, Krackow KA. In-hospital deaths following elective total joint arthroplasty. Orthopedics27(4), 407–411 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Keisu KS, Hozack WJ, Sharkey PF, Rothman RH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with an uncemented femoral component: a long term study of the taperloc stem. J. Arthroplasty19, 151–156 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumbleton J, Manley MT. Hydroxyapatite-coated prostheses in total hip and knee arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A, 2526–2540 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z. Comparative results of a distal modular sleeve, circumferential coating, and stiffness relief using the Anatomic Porous Replacement II. J. Arthroplasty11(4), 419–428 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaunay CP, Kapandji AI. Primary total hip arthroplasty with the Karl Zweymuller first-generation cementless prosthesis. A 5- to 9-year retrospective study. J. Arthroplasty11(6), 643–652 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Nayak N. Results of the cementless Mallory-Head primary total hip arthroplasty: a 5 to 7 year review. Iowa Orthop. J.16, 20–34 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulliken BD, Nayak N, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Bullas R. Early radiographic results comparing cemented and cementless total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty11(1), 24–33 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faraj AA, Yousuf M. Anterior thigh pain after cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int. Orthop.29(3), 149–151 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuley JP, Szuszczewicz ES, Young A, Engh CA. Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years and younger. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.418, 119–125 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulliken BD, Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Nayak N. A tapered titanium femoral stem inserted without cement in a total hip arthroplasty. Radiographic evaluation and stability. J. Bone Joint Surg.78-A(8), 1214–1225 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hozack W, Gardiner R, Hearn S, Eng K, Rothman R. Taperloc femoral component. A 2–6-year study of the first 100 consecutive cases. J. Arthroplasty9(5), 489–493 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hozack WJ, Booth B. Clinical and radiographic results with the Trilock femoral component – a wedge-fit porous ingrowth stem design. Semin. Arthroplasty1(1), 64–69 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engh CA Jr, Hopper RH Jr, Engh CA Sr. Distal ingrowth components. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.420, 135–141 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ragab AA, Kraay MJ, Goldberg VM. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of total hip arthroplasty with insertion of an anatomically designed femoral component without cement for the treatment of primary osteoarthritis. A study with a minimum of six years of follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. 1999, 81-A(2), 210–208 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Kim JS, Cho SH. Primary total hip arthroplasty with the AML total hip prosthesis. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.360, 147–158 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Sinha RK, Dungy DS, Yeon HB. Primary total hip arthroplasty with a proximally porous coated femoral stem. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A, 1254–1261 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty 7 to 10 year results. Clin. Orthop.333, 134–146 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg VM, Ninomiya KG, Kraay M. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: a 7 to eleven year follow-up. Clin. Orthop.333, 147–154 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Rasquinha VJ, Dua V, Rodriguez JA, Ranawat CS. Fifteen-year survivorship of a collarless, cemented normalized femoral stem in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty with a modified third-generation cement technique. J. Arthroplasty18(7 Suppl. 1), 86–94 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sporer SM, Callaghan JJ, Olejniczak JP, Goetz DD, Johnston RC. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty in patients under the age of 50: a 5 to 10 year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty13, 485–491 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollard TC, Baker RP, Eastaugh-Waring SJ, Bannister GC. Treatment of the young active patient with osteoarthritis of the hip: a five- to seven-year comparison of hybrid total hip arthroplasty and metal-on-metal resurfacing. J. Bone Joint Surg.88-B(5), 592–600 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Tuli R, Parvizi J. Alternative bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Expert Rev. Med. Devices2(4), 445–452 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santavirta S, Bohler M, Harris WH et al. Alternative materials to improve total hip replacement tribology. Acta Orthop. Scand.74(4), 380–388 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumbleton JH, Manley MT, Edidin AA. A literature review of the association between wear rate and osteolysis in total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty17, 649–661 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKellop HA. Bearing surfaces in total hip replacements: state of the art and future developments. Instr. Course Lect.50, 165–179 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke JC, Manaka M, Green DD et al. Current status of zirconia used in total hip implants. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A, 73–84 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Hopper RH, Young AM, Orishimo KF, Engh CA. Effect of terminal sterilization with gas plasma or g radiation on wear of polyethylene liners. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A, 464–468 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Harris WH. Cross-linked polyethylene: Why the enthusiasm? Instr. Course Lect.50, 181–184 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manley MT, Capello WN, D’Antonio JA, Edidin AA. Highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners for reduction in wear in total hip arthroplasty. Proceedings of the 67th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery. Orlando, Florida, March, 605 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Shen FW, Lu B, Campbell P, Salovey R. Effects of sterilization method and other modifications on the wear resistance of acetabular cups made of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene: a hip simulator study. J. Bone Joint Surg.82-A, 1708–1725 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Hozack WH, Turner J et al. Mechanical properties of retrieved highly cross-linked Crossfire liners after short-term implantation. J. Arthroplasty20, 840–849 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz SM, Manley M, Wang A, Taylor S, Dumbleton J. Comparison of properties of annealed crosslinked (Crossfire) and conventional polyethylene as hip bearing materials. Bull. Hosp. Joint Dis.61, 17–26 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z, Shahrdar C, Sirianni L, Boutary M, Yun A. Clinical performance of a Durasol highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liner for total hip arthroplasty at five years.J. Bone Joint Surg.87-A, 1816–1821 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• D’Antonio JA, Manley MT, Capello WN et al. Five-year experience with Crossfire highly cross-linked polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.441, 143–150 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ries MD, Pruitt L. Effect of cross-linking on the microstructure and mechanical properties of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.440, 149–156 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradford L, Baker DA, Graham J, Chawan A, Ries MD, Pruitt LA. Wear and surface cracking in early retrieved highly cross-linked polyethylene acetabular liners. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A, 1271–1282 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald SJ, McCalden RW, Chess DG et al. Metal-on-metal versus polyethylene in hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Clin. Orthop.406, 282–296 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korovessis P, Petsinis G, Repanti M, Repantis T. Metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Five to nine-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg.88-A, 1183–1191 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Davies AP, Willert HG, Campbell PA, Learmonth ID, Case CP. An unusual lymphocytic perivascular infiltration in tissues around contemporary metal-on-metal joint replacements. J. Bone Joint Surg.87-A, 18–27 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Willert H-G, Buchhorn GH, Fayyazi A et al. Metal-on-metal bearings and hypersensitivity in patients with artificial hip joints. A clinical and histomorphological study. J. Bone Joint Surg.87-A, 28–36 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Campbell P, Shen FW, McKellop H. Biologic and tribologic considerations of alternative bearing surfaces. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.418, 98–111 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• McKellop H, Park SH, Chiesa R et al. In vivo wear of three types of metal on metal hip prostheses during two decades of use. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.329(Suppl.), S128–S140 (1996).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visuri TI, Pukkala E, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P. Cancer incidence and causes of death among total hip replacement patients: a review based on Nordic cohorts with a special emphasis on metal-on-metal bearings. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. (H)220, 399–407 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savarino L, Granchi D, Ciapetti G et al. Ion release in patients with metal-on-metal hip bearings in total joint replacement: a comparison with metal-on-polyethylene bearings. J. Biomed. Materials Res.63, 467–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lhota C, Szekeres T, Steffan I, Zhuber K, Zweymuller K. Four-year study of cobalt and chromium blood levels in patients managed with two different metal-on-metal total hip replacements. J. Orthop. Res.21, 189–195 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SY, Kyung HS, Ihn JC, Cho MR, Koo KH, Kim CY. Cementless Metasul metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty in patients less than fifty years old. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-A, 2475–2481 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long WT, Dorr LD, Gendelman V. An American experience with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasties: a 7-year follow-up study. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 29–34 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M. Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics26, 39–46 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, Bierbaum B. New experience with alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty. J. Arhtroplasty17, 390–397 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garino JP, Marks R, Dinh V, Leyen S. Modern ceramic component fracture: trends and recommendations based on improved reporting methods. Proceedings of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery. February 23-27, Washington. 352 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• William G. Ceramics for total hip replacement: what a surgeon should know. Orthopedics21, 173–177 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutin P, Christel P, Dorlot JM et al. The use of dense alumina-on-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J. Biomed. Materials Res.22, 1203–1232 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allain J, Roudot-Thoraval F, Delecrin J et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head: a multicenter survivorship study. J. Bone Joint Surg.85-A, 825–830 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bizot P, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L. Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11-year evaluation. J. Bone Joint Surg.86-B, 190–194 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• D’Antonio J, Capello W, Manley M, Naughton M, Sutton K. Alumina ceramic bearings for total hip arthroplasty: five-year results of a prospective randomized study. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.436, 164–171 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park YS, Hwang SK, Choy WS, Kim YS, Moon YW, Lim SJ. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J. Bone Joint Surg.88-A, 780–787 (2006).
   Google Scholar