NaviStar^® ThermoCool^® catheter for ventricular tachycardia

References

• Marchlinski FE, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, Zado E. Linear ablation lesions for control of unmappable ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathy. Circulation101(11), 1288–1296 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiga WL, Worley SJ, Hummel J et al. Prospective randomized comparison of cooled radiofrequency versus standard radiofrequency energy for ablation of typical atrial flutter. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25(8), 1172–1178 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H. Catheter ablation of atrial flutter: do outcomes of catheter ablation with “large-tip” versus “cooled-tip” catheters really differ? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.15(10), 1131–1132 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Costa A, Cucherat M, Pichon N et al. Comparison of the efficacy of cooled-tip and 8-mm-tip catheters for radiofrequency catheter ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus: a meta-analysis. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.28(10), 1081–1087 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixit S, Gerstenfeld EP, Callans DJ et al. Comparison of cool tip versus 8-mm tip catheter in achieving electrical isolation of pulmonary veins for long-term control of atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized pilot study. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.17(10), 1074–1079 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horlitz M, Schley P, Shin DI et al. Circumferential pulmonary vein ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation using an irrigated-tip catheter. Am. J. Cardiol.94(7), 945–947 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jais P, Shah DC, Haissaguerre M et al. Prospective randomized comparison of irrigated-tip versus conventional-tip catheters for ablation of common flutter. Circulation101(7), 772–776 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macle L, Jais P, Weerasooriya R et al. Irrigated-tip catheter ablation of pulmonary veins for treatment of atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.13(11), 1067–1073 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marrouche NF, Dresing T, Cole C et al. Circular mapping and ablation of the pulmonary vein for treatment of atrial fibrillation: impact of different catheter technologies. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.40(3), 464–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas SP, Aggarwal G, Boyd AC, Jin Y, Ross DL. A comparison of open irrigated and non-irrigated tip catheter ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. Europace6(4), 330–335 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines D. Biophysics of ablation: application to technology. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.15(10 Suppl.), S2–S11 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmers TA, de Bakker JM, Coronel R et al. Effects of intracavitary blood flow and electrode-target distance on radiofrequency power required for transient conduction block in a Langendorff-perfused canine model. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.31(1), 231–235 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines DE, Verow AF. Observations on electrode-tissue interface temperature and effect on electrical impedance during radiofrequency ablation of ventricular myocardium. Circulation82(3), 1034–1038 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen HH, Chen X, Pietersen A, Svendsen JH, Haunso S. Temperature-controlled radiofrequency ablation of cardiac tissue: an in vitro study of the impact of electrode orientation, electrode tissue contact pressure and external convective cooling. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.3(3), 257–262 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa H, Wittkampf FH, Yamanashi WS et al. Inverse relationship between electrode size and lesion size during radiofrequency ablation with active electrode cooling. Circulation98(5), 458–465 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan RC, Johnson SB, Seward JB, Packer DL. The effect of ablation electrode length and catheter tip to endocardial orientation on radiofrequency lesion size in the canine right atrium. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25(1), 4–13 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines DE, Watson DD, Verow AF. Electrode radius predicts lesion radius during radiofrequency energy heating. Validation of a proposed thermodynamic model. Circ. Res.67(1), 124–129 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otomo K, Yamanashi WS, Tondo C et al. Why a large tip electrode makes a deeper radiofrequency lesion: effects of increase in electrode cooling and electrode-tissue interface area. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.9(1), 47–54 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto N, Kishi R, Kasugai H et al. Experimental study on the effectiveness and safety of radiofrequency catheter ablation with the cooled ablation system. Circ. J.67(2), 154–158 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruffy R, Imran MA, Santel DJ, Wharton JM. Radiofrequency delivery through a cooled catheter tip allows the creation of larger endomyocardial lesions in the ovine heart. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.6(12), 1089–1096 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa H, Yamanashi WS, Pitha JV et al. Comparison of in vivo tissue temperature profile and lesion geometry for radiofrequency ablation with a saline-irrigated electrode versus temperature control in a canine thigh muscle preparation. Circulation91(8), 2264–2273 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper JM, Sapp JL, Tedrow U et al. Ablation with an internally irrigated radiofrequency catheter: learning how to avoid steam pops. Heart Rhythm1(3), 329–333 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruce GK, Bunch TJ, Milton MA, Sarabanda A, Johnson SB, Packer DL. Discrepancies between catheter tip and tissue temperature in cooled-tip ablation: relevance to guiding left atrial ablation. Circulation112(7), 954–960 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss C, Antz M, Eick O, Eshagzaiy K, Meinertz T, Willems S. Radiofrequency catheter ablation using cooled electrodes: impact of irrigation flow rate and catheter contact pressure on lesion dimensions. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.25(4 Pt 1), 463–469 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorwarth U, Fiek M, Remp T et al. Radiofrequency catheter ablation: different cooled and noncooled electrode systems induce specific lesion geometries and adverse effects profiles. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26(7 Pt 1), 1438–1445 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Wittkampf FH, Pitha JV, Lazzara R, Jackman WM. Comparison of electrode cooling between internal and open irrigation in radiofrequency ablation lesion depth and incidence of thrombus and steam pop. Circulation113(1), 11–19 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anh DJ, Hsia HH, Reitz B, Zei P. Epicardial ablation of post-infarction ventricular tachycardia with an externally irrigated catheter in a patient with mechanical aortic and mitral valves. Heart Rhythm DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.01.011 (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamane T, Jais P, Shah DC et al. Efficacy and safety of an irrigated-tip catheter for the ablation of accessory pathways resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation102(21), 2565–2568 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheinman MM. NASPE survey on catheter ablation. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.18(8), 1474–1478 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H. Cooled ablation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.15(10 Suppl.), S12–S17 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Gursoy S, Chiladakis I, Kuck KH. First lessons from radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with ventricular tachycardia. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.16(3 Pt 2), 687–691 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morady F, Harvey M, Kalbfleisch SJ, el-Atassi R, Calkins H, Langberg JJ. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with coronary artery disease. Circulation87(2), 363–372 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P et al. Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation88(4 Pt 1), 1647–1670 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim YH, Sosa-Suarez G, Trouton TG et al. Treatment of ventricular tachycardia by transcatheter radiofrequency ablation in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation89(3), 1094–1102 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonska BD, Cao K, Schaumann A, Dorszewski A, von zur Muhlen F, Kreuzer H. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in 136 patients with coronary artery disease: results and long-term follow-up. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.24(6), 1506–1514 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao K, Gonska BD. Catheter ablation of incessant ventricular tachycardia: acute and long-term results. Eur. Heart J.17(5), 756–763 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman SA, Hsia HH, Cossu SF, Chmielewski IL, Buxton AE, Miller JM. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia: long-term success and the significance of inducible nonclinical arrhythmias. Circulation96(10), 3499–3508 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strickberger SA, Man KC, Daoud EG et al. A prospective evaluation of catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia as adjuvant therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Circulation96(5), 1525–1531 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson WG, Friedman PL, Kocovic D, Sager PT, Saxon LA, Pavri B. Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction. Circulation98(4), 308–314 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calkins H, Epstein A, Packer D et al. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease using cooled radiofrequency energy: results of a prospective multicenter study. Cooled RF Multi Center Investigators Group. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35(7), 1905–1914 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabar A, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Wellens HJ. Use of a saline-irrigated tip catheter for ablation of ventricular tachycardia resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation: early experience. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.12(2), 153–161 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soejima K, Delacretaz E, Suzuki M et al. Saline-cooled versus standard radiofrequency catheter ablation for infarct-related ventricular tachycardias. Circulation103(14), 1858–1862 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy VY, Neuzil P, Taborsky M, Ruskin JN. Short-term results of substrate mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia using a saline-irrigated catheter. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(12), 2228–2236 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDA CDRH. Navistar™ ThermoCool® deflectable diagnostic/ablation catheter – P040036 Labeling.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner W, Cardinal R, Dubuc M et al. Epicardial and endocardial mapping of ventricular tachycardia in patients with myocardial infarction. Is the origin of the tachycardia always subendocardially localized? Circulation84(3), 1058–1071 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkmer M, Ouyang F, Deger F et al. Substrate mapping vs. tachycardia mapping using CARTO in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia: impact on outcome of catheter ablation. Europace8(11), 968–976 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma A, Marrouche NF, Schweikert RA et al. Relationship between successful ablation sites and the scar border zone defined by substrate mapping for ventricular tachycardia post-myocardial infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.16(5), 465–471 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenal A, Glez-Torrecilla E, Ortiz M et al. Ablation of electrograms with an isolated, delayed component as treatment of unmappable monomorphic ventricular tachycardias in patients with structural heart disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.41(1), 81–92 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khongphatthanayothin A, Kosar E, Nademanee K. Nonfluoroscopic three-dimensional mapping for arrhythmia ablation: tool or toy? J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.11(3), 239–243 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason JW. The electrophysiologic study versus electrocardiographic monitoring I. A comparison of seven antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with ventricular tachyarrhythmias. N. Engl. J. Med.329(7), 452–458 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connolly SJ, Dorian P, Roberts RS et al. Comparison of β-blockers, amiodarone plus beta-blockers, or sotalol for prevention of shocks from implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the OPTIC Study: a randomized trial. JAMA295(2), 165–171 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bokhari F, Newman D, Greene M, Korley V, Mangat I, Dorian P. Long-term comparison of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator versus amiodarone: eleven-year follow-up of a subset of patients in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). Circulation110(2), 112–116 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• No authors listed. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. The Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. N. Engl. J. Med.337(22), 1576–1583 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Credner SC, Klingenheben T, Mauss O, Sticherling C, Hohnloser SH. Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: incidence, management and prognostic implications. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32(7), 1909–1915 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villacastin J, Almendral J, Arenal A et al. Incidence and clinical significance of multiple consecutive, appropriate, high-energy discharges in patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators. Circulation93(4), 753–762 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadoul N, Mletzko R, Anselme F et al. Incidence and clinical relevance of slow ventricular tachycardia in implantable cardioverter-defibrillator recipients: an international multicenter prospective study. Circulation112(7), 946–953 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeney MO, Wathen MS, Volosin K et al. Appropriate and inappropriate ventricular therapies, quality of life, and mortality among primary and secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients: results from the Pacing Fast VT REduces Shock ThErapies (PainFREE Rx II) trial. Circulation111(22), 2898–2905 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradaus R, Block M, Brachmann J et al. Mortality, morbidity, and complications in 3344 patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: results from the German ICD Registry EURID. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.26(7 Pt 1), 1511–1518 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine J, Dorian P, Baker B et al. Quality of life in the Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study (CIDS). Am. Heart J.144(2), 282–289 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilge AK, Ozben B, Demircan S, Cinar M, Yilmaz E, Adalet K. Depression and anxiety status of patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator and precipitating factors. Pacing Clin. Electrophysiol.29(6), 619–626 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckardt L, Breithardt G. Is there a role for amiodarone in the era of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator? Heart Rhythm3(4), 484–487 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan HH, Maisel WH, Ho C et al. Effect of radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia on left ventricular function in patients with prior myocardial infarction. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol.7(3), 243–247 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Rawahi N, Davis DR, Birnie DH et al. The use of a novel magnetic navigation system for remote catheter ablation of ischemic ventricular tachycardia. Can. J. Cardiol.22(Suppl. D), 58D (2006).
   Google Scholar