Demands and properties of alloplastic implants for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence

References

• Wall LL, Copas P, Galloway NT. Use of a pedicled rectus abdominis muscle flap sling in the treatment of complicated stress urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.175(6), 1460–1466 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldridge A. Transplantation of fascia for the relief of urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.44, 398–411 (1942).
   Google Scholar
• Ulmsten U, Henriksson L, Johnson P, Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.7(2), 81–86 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Urology61(1), 37–49 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peyrat L, Haillot O, Bruyere F et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urinary incontinence in young and middle-aged women. BJU Int.89(1), 61–66 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fultz NH, Burgio K, Diokno AC et al. Burden of stress urinary incontinence for community-dwelling women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(5), 1275–1282 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bjelic-Radisic V, Dorfer M, Tamussino K, Greimel E. Psychometric properties and validation of the German-language King’s Health Questionnaire in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn.24(1), 63–68 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward KL, Hilton P. A prospective multicenter randomized trial of tension-free vaginal tape and colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence: two-year follow-up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.190(2), 324–331 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer A, Fink T, Zachmann S, Eickenbusch U. Comparison of retropubic and outside-in transoburator sling systems for the cure of female genuine stress urinary incontinence. Eur. Urol.48(5), 799–804 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juma S, Brito CG. Transobturator tape (TOT): two years follow-up. Neurourol. Urodyn.26(1), 37–41 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Burgio KL, Locher JL, Goode PS et al. Behavioral vs drug treatment for urge urinary incontinence in older women: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA280(23), 2034–2035 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shindel AW, Klutke CG. Urethral slings placed by the transobturator approach: evolution in the technique and review of the literature. Curr. Urol. Rep.6(5), 385–392 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rechberger T, Postawski K, Jakowicki JA, Gunja-Smith Z, Woessner JF Jr. Role of fascial collagen in stress urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.179(6 Pt 1), 1511–1514 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, DeSautel M, Anderson A, Badlani G, Kushner L. Collagen synthesis is not altered in women with stress urinary incontinence. Neurourol. Urodyn.23(4), 367–373 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liapis A, Bakas P, Pafiti A et al. Changes in the quantity of collagen type I in women with genuine stress incontinence. Urol. Res.28(5), 323–326 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liapis A, Bakas P, Pafiti A et al. Changes of collagen type III in female patients with genuine stress incontinence and pelvic floor prolapse. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.97(1), 76–79 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cor A, Barbic M, Kralj B. Differences in the quantity of elastic fibres and collagen type I and type III in endopelvic fascia between women with stress urinary incontinence and controls. Urol. Res.31(2), 61–65 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokcu A, Yanik F, Cetinkaya M et al. Histopathological evaluation of the connective tissue of the vaginal fascia and the uterine ligaments in women with and without pelvic relaxation. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.266(2), 75–78 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gabriel B, Denschlag D, Gobel H et al. Uterosacral ligament in postmenopausal women with or without pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.16(6), 475–479 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lang J, Zhu L, Sun Z, Chen J. Clinical study on collagen and stress urinary incontinence. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.29(3), 180–182 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rechberger T, Donica H, Baranowski W, Jakowicki J. Female urinary stress incontinence in terms of connective tissue biochemistry. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.49(3), 187–191 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips CH, Anthony F, Benyon C, Monga AK. Collagen metabolism in the uterosacral ligaments and vaginal skin of women with uterine prolapse. Br. J.Obstet. Gynaecol.113(1), 39–46 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bakas PG, Liapis AE, Zervolea I et al. mRNA assessment for procollagen production in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.15(6), 429–431 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen B, Wen Y, Zhang Z et al. Menstrual phase-dependent gene expression differences in periurethral vaginal tissue from women with stress incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(1), 89–97 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junge K, Klinge U, Rosch R et al. Decreased collagen type I/III ratio in patients with recurring hernia after implantation of alloplastic prostheses. Langenbecks Arch. Surg.389(1), 17–22. (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bakas P, Liapis A, Salamalekis E, Pafiti A, Creatsas G. Tension-free vaginal tape efficacy in relation to collagen quantity of pubocervical fascia. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.57(3), 149–152 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deval B, Haab F. Management of the complications of the synthetic slings. Curr. Opin. Urol.16(4), 240–243 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rackley RR, Abdelmalak JB, Tchetgen MB et al. Tension-free vaginal tape and percutaneous vaginal tape sling procedures. Tech. Urol.7(2), 90–100 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petri E, Frohneberg D, Thüroff JW. Problems with sling procedures. Akt. Urol.12, 31–33 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Miller EA, Amundsen CL, Toh KL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Preoperative urodynamic evaluation may predict voiding dysfunction in women undergoing pubovaginal sling. J. Urol.169(6), 2234–2237 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin AT, Wang SJ, Chen KK, Chang LS. In vivo tension sustained by fascial sling in pubovaginal sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. J. Urol.173(3), 894–897 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spiess PE, Rabah D, Herrera C et al. The tensile properties of tension-free vaginal tape and cadaveric fascia lata in an in vivo rat model. BJU Int.93(1), 171–173 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dietz HP, Mouritsen L, Ellis G, Wilson PD. How important is TVT location? Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.83(10), 904–908 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petros PE, Richardson PA. Midurethral tissue fixation system sling – a ‘micromethod’ for cure of stress incontinence – preliminary report. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynaecol.45(5), 372–375 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peiper C, Klinge U, Junge K, Schumpelick V. [Meshes in inguinal hernia repair]. Zentralbl. Chir.127(7), 573–577 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• LeBlanc KA, Whitaker JM. Management of chronic postoperative pain following incisional hernia repair with Composix mesh: a report of two cases. Hernia6(4), 194–197 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Muller M, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V. Shrinking of polypropylene mesh in vivo: an experimental study in dogs. Eur. J. Surg.164(12), 965–969 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuo HC. Anatomical and functional results of pubovaginal sling procedure using polypropylene mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. J. Urol.166(1), 152–157 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman HB. Simple sling incision for the treatment of iatrogenic urethral obstruction. Urology62(4), 714–718 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith A. Surgery for urinary incontinence in women. In: Incontinence – Third International Consultation. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (Eds). Health publications Ltd, Plymouth, UK 1297–1370 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Rutner AB, Levine SR, Schmaelzle JF. Processed porcine small intestine submucosa as a graft material for pubovaginal slings: durability and results. Urology62(5), 805–809 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gandhi S, Kubba LM, Abramov Y et al. Histopathologic changes of porcine dermis xenografts for transvaginal suburethral slings. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.192(5), 1643–1648 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Unsal B, Kurtis B, Ozcan G, Ozdemir A, Karaoz E. An investigation of resorption and tissue reaction after subcutaneous implantation of collagen based membrane materials in rats. J. Marmara Univ. Dent. Fac.2(4), 609–615 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oliver RF, Grant RA, Cox RW, Cooke A. Effect of aldehyde cross-linking on human dermal collagen implants in the rat. Br. J. Exp. Pathol.61(5), 544–549 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothamel D, Schwarz F, Sager M et al. Biodegradation of differently cross-linked collagen membranes: an experimental study in the rat. Clin. Oral Implants Res.16(3), 369–378 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sclafani AP, Romo T 3rd, Jacono AA et al. Evaluation of acellular dermal graft (AlloDerm) sheet for soft tissue augmentation: a 1-year follow-up of clinical observations and histological findings. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg.3(2), 101–103 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacLeod TM, Sarathchandra P, Williams G, Sanders R, Green CJ. Evaluation of a porcine origin acellular dermal matrix and small intestinal submucosa as dermal replacements in preventing secondary skin graft contraction. Burns30(5), 431–437 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitti VW, Carlson KV, Blaivas JG, Dmochowski RR. Early results of pubovaginal sling lysis by midline sling incision. Urology59(1), 47–52 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bukkapatnam R, Rodriguez LV. Synthetic sling options for stress urinary incontinence. Curr. Urol. Rep.5(5), 374–380 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giri SK, Hickey JP, Sil D et al. The long-term results of pubovaginal sling surgery using acellular cross-linked porcine dermis in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. J. Urol.175(5), 1788–1793 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang YH, Lin AT, Chen KK, Pan CC, Chang LS. High failure rate using allograft fascia lata in pubovaginal sling surgery for female stress urinary incontinence. Urology58(6), 943–946 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paraiso MF, Barber MD, Muir TW, Walters MD. Rectocele repair: a randomized trial of three surgical techniques including graft augmentation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195(6), 1762–1771 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howden NS, Zyczynski HM, Moalli PA et al. Comparison of autologous rectus fascia and cadaveric fascia in pubovaginal sling continence outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.194(5), 1444–1449 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly KJ, Govier FE. Intermediate term failure of pubovaginal slings using cadaveric fascia lata: a case series. J. Urol.167(3), 1356–1358 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida SH, Gregorio E, Grando JP et al. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric allograft fascia for the treatment of female urinary incontinence. Transplant Proc.36(4), 995–996 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Silva-Filho AL, Candido EB, Noronha A, Triginelli SA. Comparative study of autologous pubovaginal sling and synthetic transobturator (TOT) SAFYRE sling in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.273(5), 288–292 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carbone JM, Kavaler E, Hu JC, Raz S. Pubovaginal sling using cadaveric fascia and bone anchors: disappointing early results. J. Urol.165(5), 1605–1611 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owens DC, Winters JC. Pubovaginal sling using Duraderm graft: intermediate follow-up and patient satisfaction. Neurourol. Urodyn.23(2), 115–118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V, Tietze L. Polymers in hernia repair – common polyester vs. polypropylene surgical meshes. J. Mat. Sci.35(19), 4769–4776 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Hermanns B, Schumpelick V. Pathologie traditioneller chirurgischer Netze zur Hernienrepartion nach Langzeitimplantation im Menschen. Chirurg71, 43–51 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slack M, Sandhu JS, Staskin DR, Grant RC. In vivo comparison of suburethral sling materials. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.17(2), 106–110 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL, Hakakha M. Biomaterials for abdominal wall hernia surgery and principles of their applications. Langenbecks Arch. Chir.379(3), 168–171 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Deval B, El Houari Y, Rafii A, Levardon M. [Pubo vaginal and sub urethral slings: review]. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)31(2 Pt 1), 131–143 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tash J, Staskin DR. Artificial graft slings at the midurethra: physiology of continence. Curr. Urol. Rep.4(5), 367–370 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konstantinovic ML, Lagae P, Zheng F et al. Comparison of host response to polypropylene and non-cross-linked porcine small intestine serosal-derived collagen implants in a rat model. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112(11), 1554–1560 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Krambeck AE, Dora CD, Sebo TJ et al. Time-dependent variations in inflammation and scar formation of six different pubovaginal sling materials in the rabbit model. Urology67(5), 1105–1110 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogusiewicz M, Wrobel A, Jankiewicz K et al. Collagen deposition around polypropylene tapes implanted in the rectus fascia of female rats. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.124(1), 106–109 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vinard E, Eloy R, Descotes J et al. Stability of performances of vascular prostheses retrospective study of 22 cases of human implanted prostheses. J. Biomed. Mat. Res.22, 633–648 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trabucchi E, Corsi F, Meinardi C et al. Tissue response to polyester mesh for hernia repair: an ultramicroscopic study in man. Hernia2, 107–112 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Maarek J, Guidon R, Aubin M, Prud’homme R. Molecular weight characterization of virgin and explanted polyester arterial prosthesis. J. Biomed. Mat. Res.18, 881–894 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, Reed WP. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch. Surg.133(4), 378–382 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith A, Rovner E. Long-term chronic complications from Stamey endoscopic bladder neck suspension: a case series. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.17(3), 290–294 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerstenbluth RE, Goldman HB. Simultaneous urethral erosion of tension-free vaginal tape and woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J. Urol.170(2 Pt 1), 525–526 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schulte-Baukloh H, Thalau F, Sturzebecher B, Knispel HH. Pubovaginal bone anchor fixation with polyethylene versus fascia lata slings in the treatment of female stress incontinence: sling material and processing are predominant factors in success. Can. J. Urol.12(2), 2581–2587 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amundsen CL, Flynn BJ, Webster GD. Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome. J. Urol.170(1), 134–137 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobashi KC, Dmochowski R, Mee SL et al. Erosion of woven polyester pubovaginal sling. J. Urol.162(6), 2070–2072 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amid P. Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia1, 5–8 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Hauptmann S, Klosterhalfen B, Mittermayer C et al. Evidence for macrophage-mediated defluorization of a Teflon vascular graft. J. Mat. Sci: Mat. Med.7, 345–348 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Schumpelick V, Kingsnorth G. Incisional hernia of the abdominal wall. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Wille S, Braun M, Heidenreich A, Hofmann R, Engelmann U. Sacral colpopexy with concurrent Burch colposuspension in patients with vaginal vault prolapse. Urol. Int.76(4), 339–344 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yamada T, Kamata S, Nagahama K et al. Polytetrafluoroethylene patch sling for type 2 or type 3 stress urinary incontinence. Int. J. Urol.8(12), 675–680 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbalias G, Liatsikos E, Barbalias D. Use of slings made of indigenous and allogenic material (Goretex) in type III urinary incontinence and comparison between them. Eur. Urol.31(4), 394–400 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U et al. Gentamicin supplementation of polyvinylidenfluoride mesh materials for infection prophylaxis. Biomaterials26(7), 787–793 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laroche G, Marois Y, Schwarz E et al. Polyvinylidene fluoride monofilament sutures: can they be used safely for long-term anastomoses in the thoracic aorta? Artif. Organs19(11), 1190–1199 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher C, Carey M, Dwyer P, Moran P. Pubovaginal or vicryl mesh rectus fascia sling in intrinsic sphincter deficiency. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.12(2), 111–116 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comiter CV. The male sling for stress urinary incontinence: a prospective study. J. Urol.167(2 Pt 1), 597–601 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duckett JR, Tamilselvi A, Moran PA, Richmond D. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) in the United Kingdom. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.24(7), 794–797 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Govier FE, Kobashi KC, Kozlowski PM et al. High complication rate identified in sacrocolpopexy patients attributed to silicone mesh. Urology65(6), 1099–1103 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamada BS, Govier FE, Stefanovic KB, Kobashi KC. High rate of vaginal erosions associated with the mentor ObTape. J. Urol.176(2), 651–654 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuschel S, Schuessler B. Results of a prospective observational study on function and safety of the Safyre-t®, a composite silicone-polypropylene sling system for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J.17, 171–359 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Henze U et al. Morphological correlation of the functional mechanics of the abdominal wall after mesh implantation. Langenbecks Arch. Chir.382(2), 87–94 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klosterhalfen B, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. Functional and morphological evaluation of different polypropylene-mesh modifications for abdominal wall repair. Biomaterials19, 2235–2246 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choe JM. Suprapubic sling adjustment: minimally invasive method of curing recurrent stress incontinence after sling surgery. J. Urol.168(5), 2059–2062 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Junge K, Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B et al. Influence of mesh materials on collagen deposition in a rat model. J. Invest. Surg.15(6), 319–328 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub DA, Hollenbeck BK, Wei JT et al. Complications following surgical intervention for stress urinary incontinence: a national perspective. Neurourol. Urodyn.24(7), 659–665 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fialkow MF, Lentz GM, Miller EA, Miller JL. Complications from transvaginal pubovaginal slings using bone anchor fixation. Urology64(6), 1127–1132 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clemens JQ, DeLancey JO, Faerber GJ, Westney OL, McGuire EJ. Urinary tract erosions after synthetic pubovaginal slings: diagnosis and management strategy. Urology56(4), 589–594 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorell E, Pioner GT, Thorell MR. Synthetic pubovaginal sling (TVT): failure in conservative treatment following vaginal exteriorization. Int. Braz. J. Urol.30(2), 123–124 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huang KH, Kung FT, Liang HM, Chang SY. Management of polypropylene mesh erosion after intravaginal midurethral sling operation for female stress urinary incontinence. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.16(6), 437–440 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffieux X, Bonnet K, Chevalier N et al. [Urinary complications in sub-urethral sling procedures]. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)34(8), 745–756 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• deTayrac R, Deffieux X, Droupy S et al. A prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator suburethral tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.190(3), 602–608 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffieux X, de Tayrac R, Huel C et al. Vaginal mesh erosion after transvaginal repair of cystocele using Gynemesh or Gynemesh-Soft in 138 women: a comparative study. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.18(1), 73–79 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J et al. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur. J. Surg.164(12), 951–960 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Bernasconi F et al. Tension-free vaginal tape (TVT) and intravaginal slingplasty (IVS) for stress urinary incontinence: a multicenter randomized trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195(5), 1338–1342 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poon C, Zimmern P. When the sling is too proximal: a specific mechanism of persistent stress incontinence after pubovaginal sling placement. Urology64(2), 287–291 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Starkman JS, Meints L, Scarpero HM, Dmochowski RR. Vesicovaginal fistula following a transobturator midurethral sling procedure. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.18(1), 113–115 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley CS, Morgan MA, Arya LA, Rovner ES. Vaginal erosion after pubovaginal sling procedures using dermal allografts. J. Urol.169(1), 286–287 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handa VL, Stone A. Erosion of a fascial sling into the urethra. Urology54(5), 923 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webster TM, Gerridzen RG. Urethral erosion following autologous rectus fascial pubovaginal sling. Can. J. Urol.10(6), 2068–2069 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 79: pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet. Gynecol.109(2 Pt 1), 461–473 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Huebner M, Hsu Y, Fenner DE. The use of graft materials in vaginal pelvic floor surgery. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.92(3), 279–288 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maher C, Baessler K. Surgical management of posterior vaginal wall prolapse: an evidence-based literature review. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.17(1), 84–88 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mourtzinos A, Raz S. Repair of vaginal vault prolapse and pelvic floor relaxation using polypropylene mesh. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.18(5), 555–559 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gilleran JP, Zimmern P. An evidence-based approach to the evaluation and management of stress incontinence in women. Curr. Opin. Urol.15(4), 236–243 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar