Advances in technologies for laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery

References

• Buratto L, Ferrari M. Excimer laser intraestromal keratomileusis: case reports. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.18, 37–41 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Siganos DS, Tsilimbaris MK. A Corneal flap technique for laser in situ keratomileusis. Human Studies. Arch. Ophthalmol.109, 1699–1702 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kremer FB, Dufek M. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract. Surg.11, 244–247 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Gomes M. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using manual disection. J. Refract. Surg.11, 239–243 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Fiander DC, Tayfour F. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis in 124 myopic eyes. J. Refract. Surg.11, 234–238 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bas AM, Onnis R. Excimer laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. J. Refract. Surg.11, 229–233 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Augustine JM, Chester TM. Laser in situ keratomileusis for the reduction of myopia: an evaluation of clinical results. J. Am. Optom. Assoc.67, 721–731 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Guell JL. Experience with laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.22, 1391 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varley GA, Huang D, Rapuano CJ, Schallhorn S, Boxer-Wachler BS, Sugar A. LASIK for hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism and mixed astigmatism. A report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology111, 1604–1617 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaycock PD, O’Brart DPS, Rajan MS, Marshall J. 5-year follow up of LASIK for hyperopia. Ophthalmology112, 191–199 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sukimoto Y, Rosenblatt M, Azar DT. Laser eye surgery for refractive errors. Lancet367, 1432–1447 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sato T. Crosswise incisions of Descemet’s membrane for the treatment of advanced keratoconus. Acta Soc. Ophthalmol. (Jpn)146, 469–470 (1942).
   Google Scholar
• Durnev VV. Characteristics of Surgical Correction of Myopia After 16 and 32 Peripheral Anterior Radial Non-perforating Incisions. Surgery of Anomalies in Ocular Refraction. Fyodorov SN (Ed.). The Moscow Research Institute of Ocular Microsurgery, Moscow, Russia 33–35. (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Steinert RF, Bafna S. Surgical correction of moderate myopia: which method should you choose? II. PRK and LASIK are the treatments of choice. Surv. Ophthalmol.43, 157–179. (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Bases de la queratoplastia refractiva. Arch Soc. Am. Oftalmol. Optom.5, 1979 (1965).
   Google Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Keratomileusis. Int. Surg.48, 103–117 (1967).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Queratomileusis para la corrección de la myopia. Arch. Soc. Am. Oftalmol. Optom.5, 27–48 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Barraquer JI. Method for cutting lamellar grafts in frozen Corneas. New orientations for refractive surgery. Arch Soc. Am. Ophthalmol.1, 237 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• Taboada J, Archibald CJ. An extreme sensitivity in the Corneal epithelium to far UV-ArF excimer laser pulses. Proceedings of the Aerospace Medical Association, 52 Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA. 8–9 (1981).
   Google Scholar
• Trokel SL, Srinivasan R, Braren B. Excimer laser surgery of the Cornea. Am. J. Ophthalmol.96, 710–715 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruiz LA, Rowsey JJ. in situ myopic keratomileusis (abstract). Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.29, 392 (1988).
   Google Scholar
• Ruiz LA. Cheratomileusi automatizzata in situ. In: Della Miopia Assile Mediante Cheratomileusi. Buratto L, Ferrari M (Eds). Chirurgia Milano, CAMO, 137–142 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg. Med.10, 463–468 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buratto L, Ferrari M, Genisi C. Myopic keratomileusis with the excimer laser: one year follow-up. Refract. Corneal Surg.9, 12–19 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Behrens A, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Rummelt C, Seitz B. Experimental evaluation of two current-generation automated microkeratomes: The Hansatome and the Supratome. Am. J. Ophthalmol.129, 59–67 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang MA, Chuck RS. Total anterior corneal surface and epithelial stem cell harvesting: current microkeratomes and beyond. Expert Rev. Med. Devices1, 251–258 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stonecipher K, Ignacio TS, Stonecipher M. Advances in refractive surgery: microkeratome and femtosecond laser flap creation in relation to safety, efficacy, predictability and biomechanical stability. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.17, 368–372 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim T, Yang S, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Comparison of the intralase femtosecond laser mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis. Am. J. Ophthalmol.141, 833–839 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crews KR, Mifflin MD, Olson RJ. Complications of automated lamellar keratoplasty [letter]. Arch. Ophthalmol.112, 1514–1515 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Friedman RF, Chodosh J, Wolf TC. Catastrophic complications of automated lamellar keratoplasty [letter]. Arch. Ophthalmol.115, 925–926 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sugar A. Outcome of Cornea, iris, and lens perforation during automated lamellar keratectomy [letter]. Arch. Ophthalmol.114, 1144–1145 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duffey RJ. Thin flap laser in situ keratomileusis: flap dimensions with the Moria LSK-One manual microkeratome using 100-µm head. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 1159–1162 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Javaloy J, Vidal MT, Quinto A, De Rojas V, Alió JL. Quality assessment model of 3 different microkeratomes trough confocal microscopy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 1300–1309 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 804–811 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muallem MS, Yoo SY, Romano AC, Schiffman JC, Culbertson WW. Corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using the Moria M2 microkeratome. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 1902–1908 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Katsanevaki VJ, Kalyvianaki MI, Naoumidi II. Advances in subepithelial excimer refractive surgery techniques: Epi-LASIK. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.14, 207–212 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Duffey RG, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2002 ISRS survey. J. Refract. Surg.19, 357–363 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Kalyvianaki MI, Katsanevaki VJ, Ginis HS. Epi-LASIK: Preliminary clinical results of an alternative surface ablation procedure. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 879–885 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabler B, Winkler von Mohrenfelds C et al. Vitality of epithelial cells after alcohol exposure during laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy flap preparation. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.28, 1841–1846 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim S-H, Sah W-J, Lim Y-W, Hahn T-W. Twenty per-cent alcohol toxicity on rabbit corneal epithelial cells: electron microscopy study. Cornea21, 388–392 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CC, Chang J-H, Lee JB et al. Human Corneal epithelial cell viability and morphology after dilute alcohol exposure. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43, 2593–2602 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stramer BM, Zieske JD, Jung J-C et al. Molecular mechanisms controlling the fibrotic repair phenotype in cornea: implications for surgical outcomes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 4237–4246 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan CCK, Moshegov CN. Amadeus microkeratome: experience with the first 2000 cases and lessons learned. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.33, 356–359 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jackson DW, Wang L, Koch D. Accuracy and precision of the Amadeus microkeratome in producing LASIK flaps. Cornea22, 504–507 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tehrani M, Schäfer S, Dick B. Evaluation of cut quality using the Amadeus microkeratome with different settings. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 2415–2419 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitazawa Y, Maekawa E, Sasaki S, Tokoro T, Mochizuki M, Ito S. Cooling effect on excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.25, 1349–55 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holzer MP, Rabsilber TM, Auffarth GU. Femtosecond laser-assited corneal flap cuts: morphology, accuracy, and histopatology. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.47, 2828–2831 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz RM, Liu X, Elner VM et al. Photodisruption in the human cornea as a function of laser pulse width. J. Refract. Surg.13, 653–658 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z et al. Randomized prospective clinical study compared induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes. Potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 97–105 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim T et al. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.47, 599–604 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordan LT, Slade SG, Baker RN et al. Femtosecond laser flap creation for laser in situ keratomileusis: six-month follow-up of initial U.S clinical series. J. Refract. Surg.19, 8–14 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugar A. Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgery. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.13, 246–249 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.1, 120–126 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Binder PS, Akers PH, Deg JK, Zavala EY. Refractive keratoplasty; microkeratome evaluation. Arch. Ophthalmol.100, 802–806 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Solomon R, Donnenfeld E, Perry H, Solomon K. Scanning electron microscopy ultrastructural comparison of femtosecond laser vs microkeratome lamellar keratectomy. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology. New Orleans, LA, San Francisco, USA, October 23–26, 91 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Tran DB, Binder PS. A 60 kHz IntraLase femtosecond laser creates a smoother LASIK stromal bed surface compared to a Zyoptix XP mechanical microkeratome in human donor eyes. J. Refract. Surg.4, 331–337 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Binder PS. One thousand consecutive IntraLase laser in situ keratomileusis flaps. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.32, 962–969 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder PS. Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.29, 2419–2429 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald MB, Liu JC, Byrd TJ et al. Central photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Partially sighted and normally sighted eyes. Ophthalmology98, 1327–1337 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrósio R Jr, Wilson SE. LASIK vs LASEK vs PRK: Advantages and indications. Semin. in Ophthalmol.18, 2–10 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersh PS, Carr JD. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmic Practice13, 126–133 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Garrison BJ, Srinivasan R. Microscopic model for the ablative photodecompensation of polymers by far ultraviolet radiation (193 nm). Appl. Phys. Lett.44, 849–852 (1984).
   Google Scholar
• Jellinek HH, Srinivasan R. Theory of etching of polymers by far-ultraviolet, high-intensity pulsed laser and long-term irradiation. J. Phys. Chem.88, 3048 (1984).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gimbel HV, Anderson Penno EE. LASIK complications. Prevention and management. SLACK Incorporated, NJ, USA, 27 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Stulting RD, Lahners WJ, Carr JD. Advances in refractive surgery. 1975 to the present. Cornea19, 741–753 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teplick SB. Broad-beam scanning lasers highlight current refractive surgery technology. Primary Care Optometry News, September (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Slade SG. Abnormal induced topograpy. Central Islands. In: Excimer Laser Refractive Surgery. Practice and Principles. Machat JJ (Ed). SLACK Incorporated, NJ, USA, 399 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• O’Donell CB, Kemmer J, O’Donell FE Jr. Ablation smoothness as a function of excimer laser delivery system. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.22, 682–685 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colin J, Cochener B, Gallinaro C. Central steeps islands immediately following excimer photorefractive keratectomy for myopia [letter]. Refract. Corneal Surg.9, 395–396 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr JD, Thompson KP, Stulting RD et al. Ablation profilometry and outcome of LASIK. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.37, S62 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Castillo A, Romero F, Martín-Valverde JA et al. Management and treatment of central steep islands alter excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J. Refract. Surg.12, 715–720 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hersh PS, Shah SI, Holladay JT. Corneal asphericity following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Summit PRK Topographic Study Group. Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers27, 421–428 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RR, Saedy NF, Mc Donnell PJ. Clinical analysis of steep central islands after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Arch. Ophthalmol.114, 377–381 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGhee CN, Bryce IG. Natural history of central topographic islands following excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.22, 1151–1158 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson DA, Haight DH, Kelly SE et al. Influence of ablation plume dynamics on the formation of central islands in excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology104, 823–830 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manche EE, Maloney RK, Smith RJ. Treatment of topographic central islands following refractive surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.24, 464–470 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zaldivar R, Davidorf JM, Oscherow S. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia from -5.50 to -11.50 diopters with astigmatism. J. Refract. Surg.14, 19–25 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaldivar R, Davidorf JM, Shultz MS et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for low myopia and astigmatism with a scanning spot excimer laser. J. Refract. Surg.13, 614–619 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chitkara DK, Rosen E, Gore C, Howes F, Kowalewski E. Tracked-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia using the autonomous scanning and tracking laser. 12-month results. Ophthalmology109, 965–972 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai Y-Y, Lin J-M. Ablation centration after active eye-tracker-assisted photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.26, 28–34 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Eldine MS, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T, Hütz W. Improvement in photorefractive Corneal laser surgery results using an active eye-tracking system. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.27, 1000–1006 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lin DY, Manche EE. Custom-contoured ablation pattern method for the treatment of decentered ablations. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 1675–1684 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mulhern MG, Foley-Nolan A, O’Keefe M, Condon PI. Topographical analysis of ablation centration after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.23, 488–494 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrell J, Bechara SJ, Nesburn A et al. The effect of globe fixation on ablation zone centration in photorefractive keratectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.119, 612–619 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pande M, Hillman JS. Optical zone centration in keratorefractive surgery; entrance pupil center, visual axis, coaxially sighted corneal reflex, or geometric corneal centre? Ophthalmology10, 1930–1237 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Seiler T, McDonell PJ. Excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Surv. Ophthalmol.40, 89–118 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amano S, Tanaka S, Shimizu K. Topographical evaluation of centration of excimer laser myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.20, 616–619 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uozato H, Guyton DL. Centering Corneal surgical procedures. Am. J. Ophthalmol.103, 264–275; erratum, 852 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Seiler T. Icreased higher-order optical aberrations after laser refractive surgery; a problem of subclinical decentration. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.27, 362–369 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chernyak DA. From wavefront device to laser: an alignment method for complete registration of the ablation to the cornea. J. Refract. Surg.21, 463–468 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lawless MA, Hodge C. Wavefront’s role in corneal refractive surgery. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol.33, 199–209 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Helmholtz H. Handbuch der Physiologischen Optik. Leizpig: Leopold Voss137–147 (1867).
   Google Scholar
• Koller T, Iseli HP, Hafezi F, Mrochen M, Seiler T. Q-factor customized ablation profile for the correction of myopic astigmatism. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.32, 584–589 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.14, 46–52 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdon W, Bullimore M, Maloney RK. Visual performance after photorefractive keratectomy. Arch. Ophthalmol.114, 1465–1472 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiler T, Kahle G, Kriegerowski M. Excimer laser (193 nm) myopic keratomileusis in sighted and blind human eyes. Refract. Corneal Surg.6, 165–173 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Brart DPS, Lohmann CP, Fitzke FW et al. Disturbances in night vision after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. Eye8, 46–51 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holladay JT, Dudeja DR, Chang J. Functional vision and Corneal changes after laser in situ keratomileusis determined by contrast sensitivity, glare testing, and corneal topography. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.25, 663–669 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler T, Genth U, Holschbach A, Derse M. Aspheric photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser. Refract. Corneal Surg.9, 166–172 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Applegate RA, Howland HC. Refractive surgery, optical aberrations, and visual performance. J. Refract. Surg.13, 295–299 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler T, Kaemmerer M, Mierdel P, Krinke H-E. Ocular optical aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy for myopia and myopic astigmatism, Arch. Ophthalmol.118, 17–21 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiler T, Dastljerdi MH. Customized corneal ablation. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.13, 356–260 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Alessio G, Boscia F, La Tegola MG et al. Topography-driven excimer laser for the treatment of decentralized myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology108, 1695–1703 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alessio G, Boscia F, La Tegola MG et al. Corneal interactive programmed topographic ablation customized photorefractive keratectomy for correction of postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Ophthalmology108, 2029–2037 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gimbel HV, Stoll SB. Photorefractive keratectomy with customized segmental ablation to correct irregular astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract. Surg.17, 229–232 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Klyce SD. Basics of wavefront. In: Subspeciality day: refractive surgery comes of age. ISRS/AAO, San Francisco, USA, 165–166 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Thibos LN, Applegate RA, Schwiegerling JT, Webb R. Standards for reporting the optical aberrations of eyes. J. Refract. Surg.18, 652–660 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bille JF, Harner CFH, Loesel FH. Aberration-Free Refractive Surgery. New Frontiers in Vision. Springer7 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kanjani N, Jacob S, Agarwal A et al. Wavefront- and topography-guided ablation in myopic eyes using Zyoptix. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 398–402 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bühren J, Kohnen T. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the 3.1 Zyoptix system. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.32, 1166–1174 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seiler T, Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M. Operative correction of ocular aberrations to improve visual acuity. J. Refract. Surg.16, 619–622 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: early results in three eyes. J. Refract. Surg.16, 116–121 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Kaemmerer M, Seiler T. Clinical results of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis 3 months after surgery. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.27, 201–207 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mrochen M, Hafezi F, Jankov M, Seiler T. Ablationsprofile in der kornealen refraktiven Laserchirurgie: Gegenwärtige und Zuküntfige Konzepte. Ophthalmologe103, 175–183 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohnen T. Classification of excimer laser profiles. [From the editor]. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.32, 543–544 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandoval HP, Fernández de Castro LE, Vroman DT, Solomon KD. Refractive surgery survey 2004. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 221–233 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Bühren J, Kühne C, Mirshahi A. Wavefront-guided LASIK with the Zyoptix 3.1 system for the correction of myopia and compound myopic astigmatism with 1-year follow-up; clinical outcome and higher-order aberrations. Ophthalmology111, 2175–2185 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T. Combining wavefront and topography data for excimer laser surgery: The future of customized ablation? J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 285–286 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Mirshahi A, Bühren J, Gerhardt D, Kohnen T. In-vivo and in-vitro repeatability of Hartmann–Shack aberrometry. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.29, 2295–2301 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netto MV, Dupps W Jr, Wilson SE. Wavefront-guided ablation : evidence for efficacy compared to traditional ablation. Am. J. Ophthalmol.141, 360–368 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lafond G, Solomon L. Retreatment of central islands after photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.25, 188–196 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buzard KA, Fundingsland BR. Treatment of irregular astigmatism with a broad beam excimer laser. J. Refract. Surg.13, 624–636 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mrochen M, Kruegger RR, Bueeler M, Seiler T. Aberration-sensing and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: management of decentered ablation. J. Refract. Surg.18, 418–429 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Zernike pilynomial fitting fails to represent all visually significant Corneal aberrations. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 4676–4681 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiely PM, Smith G, Carney LG. The mean shape of the human Cornea. Opt. Acta. (Lond.)29, 1027–1040 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Gatinel D, Malet J, Hoang-Xuan T, Azar DT. Analysis of customized corneal ablations : theoretical limitations of increasing negative asphericity. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.43, 941–948 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manns F, Ho H, Parel J-M, Culbertson W. Ablation profiles for wavefront-guided correction of myopia and primary spherical aberration. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.28, 766–774 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman ST, Ellis W, Frucht-Pery J et al. Regression of effect following radial thermokeratoplasty in humans. Refract. Corneal Surg.5, 288–291 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durrie DS, Schumer DJ, Cavanaugh TB. Holmium: YAG laser thermokeratoplasty for hyperopia. J. Refract. Corneal Surg.10, 277–280 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Basuk WL, Zisman M, Waring GO 3rd et al. Complications of hexagonal keratectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.117, 37–49 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedlander MH, Werblin TP, Kaufman HE, Granet NS. Clinical results of keratophakia and keratomileusis. Ophthalmology88, 716–720 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gartry DS, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy with an argon fluoride excimer laser: a clinical study. Refract. Corneal Surg.7, 420–435 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rashad KM. Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of hyperopia from +1.25 to +5.00 diopters with the Technolas Keracor 117C laser. J. Refract. Surg.17, 113–122 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tabbara KF, El-Sheikh HF, Islam SM. Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of hyperopia from +0.50 to +11.50 diopters with the Keracor 117C laser. J. Refract. Surg.17, 123–128 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ditzen K, Fielder J, Pieger S. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism using the Meditec MEL 70 spot scanner. J. Refract. Surg.18, 430–434 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salz JJ, Stevens CA, LADARVision Hyperopic Stoudy Group. LASIK correction of spherical hyperopia, hyperopic astigmatism and mixed astigmatism with the LADARVision excimer laser system. Ophthalmology109, 1647–1656, discussion 1657–1658 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carones F, Vigo L, Scandola E. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic and mixed astigmatism with LADARVision using 7 to 10-mm ablation diameters. J. Refract. Surg.19, 548–554 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zadok D, Raifkup F, Landau D, Frucht-Pery J. Long-term evaluation of hyperopic laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.29, 2181–2188 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jin GJC, Lyle A, Merkley KH. Laser in situ keratomileusis for primary hyperopia. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 776–784 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arbelaez MC, Knorz MC. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia and hyperopic astigmatism. J. Refract. Surg.15, 406–414 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ditzen K, Huschka H, Pieger S. Laser in situ keratomileusis for hyperopia. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.24, 42–47 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnen T, Mahmoud K, Bürhen J. Comparison of corneal higher-order aberrations induced by myopic and hyperopic LASIK. Ophthalmology112, 1692–1698 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald MB, Durrie D, Asbell P, Maloney R, Nichamin L. Treatment of presbyopia with Conductive Keratoplasty®. Six Month results of the 1-year United States FDA Clinical Trial. Cornea23, 661–668 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jain S, Ou R, Azar DT. Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. Ophthalmology108, 1430–1433 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DB. Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.27, 1449–1455 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schor C, Landsman L, Erickson P. Ocular dominance and the interocular suppression of blur in monovision. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Opt.64, 723–730 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erickson P, Mcgill EC. Role of visual acuity, stereoacuity, and ocular dominance in monovision patient success. Optom. Vis. Sci.69, 761–764 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins M, Goode A, Brown B. Distance visual acuity and monovision. Optom. Vis. Sci.70, 723–728 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcgill EC, Erickson P. The effect of monovision lenses on the near-point range of single binocular vision. J. Am. Optom. Assoc.62, 828–831 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mcgill EC, Erickson P. Sighting dominance and monovision distance binocular fusional ranges. J. Am. Optom. Assoc.62, 828–831 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright KW, Guemes A, Kapadia MS, Wilson SE. Binocular function and patient satisfaction after monovision induced by myopic photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.25, 177–182 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch D, Kohnen T, Mc Donell P et al. Hyperopia correction by non-contact holmium : YAG laser thermal keratoplasty. U.S Phase IIA. Clinical Study with 2-year follow-up. Ophthalmology104, 1938–1947 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alio JL, Chaubard JJ, Caliz A, Sala E, Patel S. Correction of presbyopia by technovision central multifocal LASIK (presbyLASIK). J. Refract. Surg.22, 453–460 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinowitz YS. Ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.17, 421–426 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis NI. Corneal ectasia induced by laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.17, 1796–1802 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Randleman JB. Post-laser in-situ keratomileusis ectasia: current understanding and future directions. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.17, 406–412 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffey RJ, Leaming D. US trends in refractive surgery: 2004 ISRS/AAO Survey. J. Refract. Surg.21, 742–748 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim H, Song IK, Joo CK. Keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis clinicopathological case report. Ophthalmologica220, 58–64 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spirn MJ, Dawson DG, Rubinfeld RS et al. Histopathological analysis of postlaser-assisted in situ keratomileusis Corneal ectasia with intraestromal Corneal ring segments. Arch. Ophthalmol.123, 1604–1607 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Ruiz-Oblitas L, Munuera JM, Aliseda D, García-Layana A, Moreno-Montañés J. Optical coherence tomography evaluation of the corneal cap and stromal bed features after laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia and astigmatism. Ophthalmology107, 81–88 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harto MA, Maldonado MJ, Cisneros AL, Pérez-Torregrosa VT, Menezo JL. Comparison of Intersecting trapezoidal keratotomy and arcuate transverse keratotomy in the correction of high astigmatism. J. Refract. Surg.12, 585–594 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Arnau V, Martínez-Costa R et al. Reproducibility of digital image analysis for measuring corneal haze after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.123, 31–41 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Arnau V, Navea A et al. Direct objetive quantification of corneal haze after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy for high myopia. Ophthalmology103, 1970–1978 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ. Intraoperative MMC after excimer laser surgery for myopia. Ophthalmology109, 826 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Torregrosa V, Menezo JL, Harto MA, Maldonado MJ, Cisneros AL. Digital system measurement of the decentration of high myopia IOLs (Worst-Fechner Iris Claw Lenses). J. Refract. Surg.11, 26–30 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, García-Feijoó J, Benítez Del Castillo JM, Teutsch P. Cataractous changes due to posterior chamber flattening with a posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens secondary to the administration of pilocarpine. Ophthalmology113, 1283–288 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Juberías JR, Pinero DP, Álvarez-Vidal A, Rutzen AR. Flap tearing during lift-flap laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.31, 2016–2018 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ. Undersurface ablation of the flap for laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment. Ophthalmology109, 1453–1464 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC, Díez-Cuenca M, Piñero DP. posterior corneal curvature changes after undersurface ablation of the flap and in-the-bed LASIK retreatment. Ophthalmology113, 1125–1133 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Juberias JR, Rodriguez-Conde R. Corneal flap thickness and tissue laser ablation in myopic LASIK. Ophthalmology109, 1042–1043 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC, Diez-Cuenca M, Pinero D. Repeatability and reproducibility of posterior corneal curvature measurements by combined scanning-slit and Placido-disk topography after LASIK. Ophthalmology113, 1918–926 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen D, Lam AK. Intrasession and intersession repeatability of the Pentacam system on posterior corneal assessment in the normal human eye. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.33, 448–454 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain R, Dilraj G, Grewal SP. Repeatability of corneal parameters with Pentacam after laser in situ keratomileusis. Indian J. Ophthalmol.255, 341–347 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hashemi H, Mehravaran S. Corneal changes after laser refractive surgery for myopia: comparison of Orbscan II and Pentacam findings. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.33, 841–847 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quisling S, Sjoberg S, Zimmerman B, Goins K, Sutphin J. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconic eyes. Ophthalmology113, 1629–1632 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolino JB, Khachikian SS, Cortese MJ, Belin MW. Long-term stability of the posterior cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.33, 1366–1370 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciolino JB, Belin MW. Changes in the posterior cornea after laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 1426–1431 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Quintela E, Samapunphong S et al. Posterior corneal surface changes alter refractive surgery. Ophthalmology108, 1415–1422 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura R, Negishi K, Saiki M et al. No forward shifting of posterior corneal surface in eyes undergoing LASIK. Ophthalmology114(6), 1104–1110 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ. Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis posterior ablation platform. Arch. Ophthalmol.123, 988–990 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Taneri S, Azar DT. Ablation on the undersurface of a LASIK flap. Instrument and method for continuous eye tracking. Ophthalmologe104, 132–136 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Rodriguez-Galietero A, Cano-Parra J. Menezo JL, Díaz Llopis M. Goldmann applanation tonometry using sterile disposable silicone tonometer shields. Ophthalmology103, 815–821 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ. Corneal epithelial alterations resulting from use of chlorine-disinfected contact tonometer after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology105, 1546–1549 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menezo JL, Maldonado MJ, Muñoz G, Cisneros AL. Combined procedure for glaucoma and cataract: a retrospective study. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.20, 498–503 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Nieto JC. Comments on: LASIK and dry eye. Compr. Ophthalmol. Update8, 87–89 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Juberías JR. Subtarsal flap dislocation after superior hinge laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient with borderline mental illness. J. Refract. Surg.19, 169–171 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maldonado MJ, Juberías JR, Moreno H, Montañés J. Extensive corneal epithelial defect associated with internal hordeolum after uneventful laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.28, 1701–1702 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Marshall J. Presented at ESCRS, Stockholm, 5–9 September 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim TI, Choi HJ, Pak JH, Tchah H. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.47(2), 599–604 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiatt JA, Wachler BS, Grant C. Reversal of laser in situ keratomileusis-induced ectasia with intraocular pressure reduction. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.31, 1652–1655 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randleman JB, Rusell B, Ward Ma et al. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology110, 267–275 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward MA. Contact lens management following corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmol. Clin. North Am.16, 395–403 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Kim MK, Lee JL. Optimization of contact lens fitting in keratectasia patients after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.30, 1057–1066 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donell C, Welham L, Doyle S. Contact lens management of keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Eye Contact Lens30, 144–146 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lovisolo CF, Fleming JF. Intracorneal ring segments for iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis or photorefractive keratectomy. J. Refract. Surg.18, 535–541 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alio J, Salem T, Artola A, Osman A. Intracorneal rings to correct corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.28, 1568–1574 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siganos CS, Kymionis GD, Astyrakakis N, Pallikaris IG. Management of corneal ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis with INTACS. J. Refract. Surg.18, 43–46 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kymionis GD, Siganos CS, Kounis G et al. Management of post-LASIK corneal ectasia with Intacs inserts: one-year results. Arch. Ophthalmol.121, 322–326 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pokroy R, Levinger S, Hirsh A. Single Intacs segment for postlaser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.30, 1685–1695 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guell JL. Are intracorneal rings still useful in refractive surgery? Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol.16, 260–265 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen cross-linking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol.135, 620–627 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Speck A et al. A new treatment of keratectasia after LASIK using collagen with riboflavin/UVA light cross-linking. Klin. Monatsbl. Augenheilkd222, 430–436 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alio JL, Claramonte PJ, Caliz A, Ramzy MI. Corneal modeling of keratoconus by conductive keratoplasy. J. Cataract. Refract. Surg.31, 190–197 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wirbelauer C, Pham DT. Continuous monitoring of Corneal thickness changes during LASIK with online optical coherence pachymetry. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.30, 2559–2568 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bagayev SN, Gelikonov VM, Gelikonov GV et al. Optical coherence tomography for in situ monitoring of laser Corneal ablation. J. Biomed. Opt.7, 633–642 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar