Anatomic and physiologic rationale for various technologies for primary total hip arthroplasty

References

• Eskelinen A, Remes V, Helenius I et al. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop.77(1), 57–70 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajaratnam SS, Jack C, Tavakkolizadeh A et al. Long-term results of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral component in total hip replacement: a 15- to 21 year follow-up study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(1), 27–30 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grubl A, Chiari C, Gruber M, Kaider A, Gottsauner-Wolf F. Cementless total hip arthroplasty with a tapered, rectangular titanium stem and a threaded cup: a minimum ten-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.84-A(3), 425–431 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gabbar OA, Rajan RA, Londhe S, Hyde ID. Ten- to twelve-year follow-up of the furlong hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem and threaded acetabular cup in patients younger than 65 years. J. Arthroplasty23(3), 413–417 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone DE, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS et al. Total hip arthroplasty with a cemented, polished, collared femoral stem and a cementless acetabular component. A follow-up study at a minimum of ten years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.89(1), 126–132 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holtgrewe JL, Hungerford DS. Primary and revision total hip replacement without cement and with associated femoral osteotomy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.71(10), 1487–1495 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Papagelopoulos PJ, Trousdale RT, Lewallen DG. Total hip arthroplasty with femoral osteotomy for proximal femoral deformity. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (332), 151–162 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Paavilainen T, Hoikka V, Solonen KA. Cementless total replacement for severely dysplastic or dislocated hips. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.72(2), 205–211 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peltonen JI, Hoikka V, Poussa M, Paavilainen T, Kaitila I. Cementless hip arthroplasty in diastrophic dysplasia. J. Arthroplasty7(Suppl.), 369–376 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Ragland PS, Etienne G, Seyler TM, Schmalzried TP. Hip resurfacing arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.14(8), 454–463 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont MA, McGrath MS, Ulrich SD et al. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(Suppl. 3), 45–51 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Grigoris P, Dorey FJ. Evolution and future of surface replacement of the hip. J. Orthop. Sci.3(3), 169–186 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skaggs DL, Tolo VT. Legg–Calve–Perthes disease. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.4(1), 9–16 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Boyd HS, Ulrich SD, Seyler TM, Marulanda GA, Mont MA. Resurfacing for Perthes disease: an alternative to standard hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 80–85 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bizot P, Hannouche D, Nizard R, Witvoet J, Sedel L. Hybrid alumina total hip arthroplasty using a press-fit metal-backed socket in patients younger than 55 years. A six- to 11 year evaluation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.86(2), 190–194 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Su EP, Le Duff MJ. Surface arthroplasty in young patients with hip arthritis secondary to childhood disorders. Orthop. Clin North Am.36(2), 223–230 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Faugere MC, Mackel AM et al. Structural and cellular assessment of bone quality of proximal femur. Bone14(3), 231–242 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reitman RD, Emerson R, Higgins L, Head W. Thirteen year results of total hip arthroplasty using a tapered titanium femoral component inserted without cement in patients with type C bone. J. Arthroplasty18(7 Suppl. 1), 116–121 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kelly SJ, Robbins CE, Bierbaum BE, Bono JV, Ward DM. Use of a hydroxyapatite-coated stem in patients with Dorr Type C femoral bone. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 112–116 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kirsh G, Roffman M, Kligman M. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip replacements in patients 65 years of age and over. Bull. Hosp. Jt Dis.60(1), 5–9 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kligman M, Kirsh G. Hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty in osteoporotic patients. Bull. Hosp. Jt Dis.59(3), 136–139 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keisu KS, Orozco F, Sharkey PF et al. Primary cementless total hip arthroplasty in octogenarians. Two to eleven-year follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.83-A(3), 359–363 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damborg F, Nissen N, Jorgensen HR, Abrahamsen B, Brixen K. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) around the cemented Exeter stem: a prospective study in 18 women with 5 years follow-up. Acta Orthop.79(4), 494–498 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Wan Z, Gruen T. Functional results in total hip replacement in patients 65 years and older. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (336), 143–151 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Ogino D, Kawaji H, Konttinen L et al. Total hip replacement in patients eighty years of age and older. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(9), 1884–1890 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wan Z, Dorr LD, Woodsome T, Ranawat A, Song M. Effect of stem stiffness and bone stiffness on bone remodeling in cemented total hip replacement. J. Arthroplasty14(2), 149–158 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collis DK, Mohler CG. Comparison of clinical outcomes in total hip arthroplasty using rough and polished cemented stems with essentially the same geometry. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.84-A(4), 586–592 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Parvizi J, Holiday AD, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. The Frank Stinchfield Award. Sudden death during primary hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (369), 39–48 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Patel PD, Potts A, Froimson MI. The dislocating hip arthroplasty: prevention and treatment. J. Arthroplasty22(4 Suppl. 1), 86–90 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soong M, Rubash HE, Macaulay W. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J. Am. Acad. Orthop. Surg.12(5), 314–321 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callaghan JJ, Heithoff BE, Goetz DD et al. Prevention of dislocation after hip arthroplasty: lessons from long-term followup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (393), 157–162 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Berry DJ, von Knoch M, Schleck CD, Harmsen WS. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.87(11), 2456–2463 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne G, Ragland PS, Mont MA. Use of constrained acetabular liners in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics28(5), 463–469; quiz 470–461 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Beaule PE. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (429), 108–116 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Mallory TH et al. The long-term outcome of 755 consecutive constrained acetabular components in total hip arthroplasty examining the successes and failures. J. Arthroplasty20(7 Suppl. 3), 93–102 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berend KR, Lombardi AV Jr, Welch M, Adams JB. A constrained device with increased range of motion prevents early dislocation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.447, 70–75 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Goetz DD, Capello WN, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD, Johnston RC. Salvage of total hip instability with a constrained acetabular component. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (355), 171–181 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Guyen O, Chen QS, Bejui-Hugues J, Berry DJ, An KN. Unconstrained tripolar hip implants: effect on hip stability. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.455, 202–208 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyen O, Pibarot V, Vaz G et al. Unconstrained tripolar implants for primary total hip arthroplasty in patients at risk for dislocation. J. Arthroplasty22(6), 849–858 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuckler JM, Moore KD, Lombardi AV Jr, McPherson E, Emerson R. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty19(8 Suppl. 3), 41–44 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters CL, McPherson E, Jackson JD, Erickson JA. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J. Arthroplasty22(6 Suppl. 2), 140–144 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stuchin SA. Anatomic diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty: a preliminary report. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(Suppl. 3), 52–56 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Ball ST, Le Duff MJ, Dorey FJ. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9 year followup. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.460, 159–164 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mont MA, Seyler TM, Ulrich SD et al. Effect of changing indications and techniques on total hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 63–70 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McBryde CW, Revell MP, Thomas AM, Treacy RB, Pynsent PB. The influence of surgical approach on outcome in Birmingham hip resurfacing. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(4), 920–926 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M et al. The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(11), 1431–1438 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steffen RT, Pandit HP, Palan J et al. The five-year results of the Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty: an independent series. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.90(4), 436–441 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brubaker SM, Brown TE, Manaswi A et al. Treatment options and allograft use in revision total hip arthroplasty the acetabulum. J. Arthroplasty22(7 Suppl. 3), 52–56 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Hendrich C, Engelmaier F, Mehling I et al. Cementless acetabular reconstruction and structural bone-grafting in dysplastic hips. Surgical technique. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.89(Suppl. 2 Pt 1), 54–67 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Spangehl MJ, Berry DJ, Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Uncemented acetabular components with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip: results at five to twelve years. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.83-A(10), 1484–1489 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Moskal JT, Higgins ME, Shen J. Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(3), 691–695 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sporer SM, Paprosky WG. The use of a trabecular metal acetabular component and trabecular metal augment for severe acetabular defects. J. Arthroplasty21(6 Suppl. 2), 83–86 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rose PS, Halasy M, Trousdale RT et al. Preliminary results of tantalum acetabular components for THA after pelvic radiation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.453, 195–198 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Argenson JN, Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM. Anatomy of the dysplastic hip and consequences for total hip arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 40–45 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bernasek TL, Haidukewych GJ, Gustke KA, Hill O, Levering M. Total hip arthroplasty requiring subtrochanteric osteotomy for developmental hip dysplasia: 5- to 14 year results. J. Arthroplasty22(6 Suppl. 2), 145–150 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Park MS, Kim KH, Jeong WC. Transverse subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy in primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe hip developmental dysplasia. J. Arthroplasty22(7), 1031–1036 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masonis JL, Patel JV, Miu A et al. Subtrochanteric shortening and derotational osteotomy in primary total hip arthroplasty for patients with severe hip dysplasia: 5 year follow-up. J. Arthroplasty18(3 Suppl. 1), 68–73 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zadeh HG, Hua J, Walker PS, Muirhead-Allwood SK. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty with subtrochanteric derotational osteotomy for severe femoral anteversion. J. Arthroplasty14(6), 682–688 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Onodera S, Majima T, Ito H et al. Cementless total hip arthroplasty using the modular S-ROM prosthesis combined with corrective proximal femoral osteotomy. J. Arthroplasty21(5), 664–669 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Yasgur DJ, Stuchin SA, Adler EM, DiCesare PE. Subtrochanteric femoral shortening osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for high-riding developmental dislocation of the hip. J. Arthroplasty12(8), 880–888 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Biant LC, Bruce WJ, Assini JB, Walker PM, Walsh WR. Primary total hip arthroplasty in severe developmental dysplasia of the hip. Ten-year results using a cementless modular stem. J. Arthroplasty24(1), 27–32 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly DA. The S-rOM modular femoral stem in dysplasia of the hip. Orthopedics28(9 Suppl.), S1069–S1073 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Harada Y, Mitsuhashi S, Suzuki C et al. Anatomically designed prosthesis without cement for the treatment of osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip: 6- to 13 year follow-up study. J. Orthop. Sci.12(2), 127–133 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakai T, Sugano N, Ohzono K, Lee SB, Nishii T. The custom femoral component is an effective option for congenital hip dysplasia. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.451, 146–153 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Flecher X, Parratte S, Aubaniac JM, Argenson JN. Three-dimensional custom-designed cementless femoral stem for osteoarthritis secondary to congenital dislocation of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(12), 1586–1591 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ, Harvey N, Hoberg M. Improved survivorship of hybrid metal-on-metal hip resurfacing with second-generation techniques for Crowe-I and II developmental dysplasia of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(Suppl. 3), 12–20 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Naal FD, Schmied M, Munzinger U, Leunig M, Hersche O. Outcome of hip resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with developmental hip dysplasia. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0456-4 (2008) [Epub ahead of print].
   Google Scholar
• Amstutz HC, Antoniades JT, Le Duff MJ. Results of metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing for Crowe type-I and II developmental dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.89(2), 339–346 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke HJ, Jinnah RH, Brooker AF, Michaelson JD. Total replacement of the hip for avascular necrosis in sickle cell disease. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.71(3), 465–470 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moran MC, Huo MH, Garvin KL, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA. Total hip arthroplasty in sickle cell hemoglobinopathy. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. (294), 140–148 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Mousawi F, Malki A, Al-Aradi A et al. Total hip replacement in sickle cell disease. Int Orthop, 26(3), 157–161 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Acurio MT, Friedman RJ. Hip arthroplasty in patients with sickle-cell haemoglobinopathy. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.74(3), 367–371 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hickman JM, Lachiewicz PF. Results and complications of total hip arthroplasties in patients with sickle-cell hemoglobinopathies. Role of cementless components. J. Arthroplasty12(4), 420–425 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Oh KJ, Imrie S, Hwang K et al. Total hip arthroplasty using the miniature Anatomic Medullary Locking stem. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.447, 85–91 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Haber D, Goodman SB. Total hip arthroplasty in juvenile chronic arthritis: a consecutive series. J. Arthroplasty13(3), 259–265 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ain MC, Andres BM, Somel DS, Fishkin Z, Frassica FJ. Total hip arthroplasty in skeletal dysplasias: patient selection, preoperative planning, and operative techniques. J. Arthroplasty19(1), 1–7 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kitsoulis PB, Stafilas KS, Siamopoulou A, Soucacos PN, Xenakis TA. Total hip arthroplasty in children with juvenile chronic arthritis: long-term results. J. Pediatr. Orthop.26(1), 8–12 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb JP, Kannan V, Dandachli W et al. Learning how to resurface cam-type femoral heads with acceptable accuracy and precision: the role of computed tomography-based navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(Suppl. 3), 57–64 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Romanowski JR, Swank ML. Imageless navigation in hip resurfacing: avoiding component malposition during the surgeon learning curve. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90 Suppl. 3, 65–70 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seyler TM, Lai LP, Sprinkle DI, Ward WG, Jinnah RH. Does computer-assisted surgery improve accuracy and decrease the learning curve in hip resurfacing? A radiographic analysis. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(Suppl. 3), 71–80 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim YH, Kim JS, Yoon SH. Long-term survivorship of the Charnley Elite Plus femoral component in young patients. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(4), 449–454 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geller JA, Malchau H, Bragdon C et al. Large diameter femoral heads on highly cross-linked polyethylene: minimum 3 year results. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.447, 53–59 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Somford MP, Bolder SB, Gardeniers JW, Slooff TJ, Schreurs BW. Favorable survival of acetabular reconstruction with bone impaction grafting in dysplastic hips. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.466(2), 359–365 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kobayashi S, Saito N, Nawata M et al. Total hip arthroplasty with bulk femoral head autograft for acetabular reconstruction in developmental dysplasia of the hip. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.85-A(4), 615–621 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Atilla B, Ali H, Aksoy MC et al. Position of the acetabular component determines the fate of femoral head autografts in total hip replacement for acetabular dysplasia. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.89(7), 874–878 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• de Jong PT, Haverkamp D, van der Vis HM, Marti RK. Total hip replacement with a superolateral bone graft for osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia: a long-term follow-up. J. Bone Joint Surg. Br.88(2), 173–178 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Rozkydal Z, Janicek P, Smid Z. Total hip replacement with the CLS expansion shell and a structural femoral head autograft for patients with congenital hip disease. J. Bone Joint Surg.87(4), 801–807 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ito H, Hirayama T, Tanino H, Matsuno T, Minami A. Tight fit technique in primary hybrid total hip arthroplasty for patients with hip dysplasia. J. Arthroplasty22(1), 57–64 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Chiavetta JB, Parvizi J, Shaughnessy WJ, Cabanela ME. Total hip arthroplasty in patients with dwarfism. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.86-A(2), 298–304 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Yun AG, Martin S, Zurakowski D, Scott R. Bipolar hemiarthroplasty in juvenile rheumatoid arthritis: long-term survivorship and outcomes. J. Arthroplasty17(8), 978–986 (2002).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babisch JW, Layher F, Amiot LP. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.90(2), 357–365 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorr LD, Malik A, Wan Z, Long WT, Harris M. Precision and bias of imageless computer navigation and surgeon estimates for acetabular component position. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.465, 92–99 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parratte S, Argenson JN. Validation and usefulness of a computer-assisted cup-positioning system in total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, controlled study. J. Bone Joint Surg. Am.89(3), 494–499 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar