Minimally invasive facial rejuvenation: current concepts and future expectations

References

• Fisher GJ, Varani J, Voorhees JJ. Looking older: fibroblast collapse and therapeutic implications. Arch. Dermatol. 144(5), 666–672 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Knaggs H. A new source of aging? J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 8(2), 77–82 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W et al. Radiofrequency facial rejuvenation: evidence-based effect. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 64(3), 524–535 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kligman AM. Early destructive effect of sunlight on human skin. JAMA 210(13), 2377–2380 (1969).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaar M, Eller MS, Gilchrest BA. Fifty years of skin aging. J. Investig. Dermatol. Symp. Proc. 7(1), 51–58 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uitto J. The role of elastin and collagen in cutaneous aging: intrinsic aging versus photoexposure. J. Drugs Dermatol. 7(2 Suppl.), s12–16 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, Attia S, Saleh F, Ahmad H, Uitto J. Effect of topical tretinoin on photoaged facial skin: a histometric, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural study. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 3(4), 191–201 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim KH, Geronemus RG. Nonablative laser and light therapies for skin rejuvenation. Arch. Facial Plast. Surg. 6(6), 398–409 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mandy SH. Satisfying patient expectations with soft-tissue augmentation. Dermatol. Online J. 15(7), 1 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W et al. Electro-optical synergy technique: a new and effective nonablative approach to skin aging. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 3(12), 22–30 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rohrer TE. Lasers and cosmetic dermatologic surgery for aging skin. Clin. Geriatr. Med. 17(4), 769–794 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder WJ, Blitzer A, Brin MF. Treatment of hyperfunctional lines of the face with botulinum toxin A. Dermatol. Surg. 24(11), 1198–1205 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matarasso SL. The use of injectable collagens for aesthetic rejuvenation. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 25(3), 151–157 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle MA. Minimally invasive techniques for improving the appearance of the aging face. Expert Rev. Dermatol. 2(4), 427–435 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Alexiades-Armenakas MR, Dover JS, Arndt KA. The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 58(5), 719–737 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiyeh BS, Dibo SA. Nonsurgical nonablative treatment of aging skin: radiofrequency technologies between aggressive marketing and evidence-based efficacy. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 33(3), 283–294 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman A, Wollina U. Facial rejuvenation for middle-aged women: a combined approach with minimally invasive procedures. Clin. Interv. Aging. 5(23), 293–299 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DeHoratius DM, Dover JS. Nonablative tissue remodeling and photorejuvenation. Clin. Dermatol. 25(5), 474–479 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konda D, Thappa DM. Age reversing modalities: an overview. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 79(1), 3–8 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts WE. Skin type classification systems old and new. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 529–533 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battle EJ, Soden CJ. The use of lasers in darker skin types. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 28(2), 130–140 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hantash BM, Gladstone HB. Current role of resurfacing lasers. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 144(3), 229–241 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orringer JS, Voorhees JJ, Hamilton T et al. Dermal matrix remodeling after nonablative laser therapy. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 53(5), 405–410 (2005).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadick NS. Update on non-ablative light therapy for rejuvenation: a review. Lasers Surg. Med. 32(2), 120–128 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dierickx CC, Anderson RR. Visible light treatment of photoaging. Dermatol. Ther. 18(3), 191–208 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adamic M, Troilius A, Adatto M, Drosner M, Dahmane R. Vascular lasers and IPL: guidelines for care from the European Society for Laser Dermatology (ESLD). J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 9(2), 113–124 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson JS, Majaron B, Kelly KM. What is nonablative photorejuvenation of human skin? Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 21(4), 238–250 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spendel S, Prandl EC, Schintler MV et al. Treatment of spider leg veins with the KTP (532 nm) laser--a prospective study. Lasers Surg. Med. 31(3), 194–201 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassuto DA, Ancona DM, Emanuelli G. Treatment of facial telangiectasias with a diode-pumped Nd:YAG laser at 532 nm. J. Cutan. Laser Ther. 2(3), 141–146 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weiss RA, Weiss MA, Beasley KL, Munavalli G. Our approach to non-ablative treatment of photoaging. Lasers Surg. Med. 37(1), 2–8 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zdinak LA, Summerfield ME. Nonablative skin therapies. Ophthalmol. Clin. North Am. 18(2), 237–248 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg DJ, Sarradet D, Hussain M, Krishtul A, Phelps R. Clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural changes after nonablative treatment with a 595-nm flashlamp-pumped pulsed dye laser: comparison of varying settings. Dermatol. Surg. 30(7), 979–982 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldi F. Laser: a review. Clin. Dermatol. 26(6), 590–601 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishi K, Okabe K, Ninomiya R et al. Early serial Q-switched ruby laser therapy for medium-sized to giant congenital melanocytic naevi. Br. J. Dermatol. 161(2), 345–352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi JE, Kim JW, Seo SH et al. Treatment of Becker's nevi with a long-pulse alexandrite laser. Dermatol. Surg. 35(7), 1105–1108 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbach A, Lee SJ, Johr RH. Treatment of medium-brown solar lentigines using an alexandrite laser designed for hair reduction. Arch. Dermatol. 138(4), 547–548 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Waibel JS. Photorejuvenation. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 445–457 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Moawad O et al. Intense pulsed light photorejuvenation: a histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. J. Drugs Dermatol. 10(11), 1246–1252 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss RA, McDaniel DH, G. GR. Review of nonablative photorejuvenation: reversal of the aging effects of the sun and environmental damage using laser and light sources. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 22(2), 93–106 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor L, Carmi N, Fodor A, Ramon Y, Ullmann Y. Intense pulsed light for skin rejuvenation, hair removal, and vascular lesions: a patient satisfaction study and review of the literature. Ann. Plast. Surg. 62(4), 345–349 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galeckas KJ. Update on lasers and light devices for the treatment of vascular lesions. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27(4), 276–284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barolet D. Light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in dermatology. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27(4), 227–238 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trelles MA, Mordon S, Calderhead RG. Facial rejuvenation and light: our personal experience. Lasers Med. Sci. 22(2), 93–99 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamban AT. Current and new treatments of photodamaged skin. Facial Plast. Surg. 25(5), 337–346 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gold MH. Photodynamic therapy for cosmetic uses on the skin: an update 2010. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 145(4), 525–541 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akaraphanth R, Kanjanawanitchkul W, Gritiyarangsan P. Efficacy of ALA-PDT vs blue light in the treatment of acne. Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 23(5), 186–190 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrer S, Kohl E, Feise K et al. Photodynamic therapy for skin rejuvenation: review and summary of the literature--results of a consensus conference of an expert group for aesthetic photodynamic therapy. J. Dtsch. Dermatol. Ges. 11(2), 137–148 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmieder GJ, Huang EY, Jarratt M. A multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled phase 2 study of blue light photodynamic therapy with aminolevulinic acid HCl 20% topical solution for the treatment of actinic keratoses on the upper extremities: the effect of occlusion during the drug incubation period. J. Drugs Dermatol. 11(12), 1483–1489 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton CA, Szeimies RM, Sidoroff A, Braathen LR. European guidelines for topical photodynamic therapy part 2: emerging indications – field cancerization, photorejuvenation and inflammatory/infective dermatoses. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol 27(6), 672–679 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang G, Xiang LF, Gold MH. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-based photodynamic intense pulsed light therapy shows better effects in the treatment of skin photoaging in Asian skin: a prospective, single-blinded, controlled trial. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 3(3), 40–43 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Sanclemente G, Medina L, Villa JF, Barrera LM, Garcia HI. A prospective split-face double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of methyl aminolevulinate + red-light in patients with facial photodamage. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 25(1), 49–58 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor L, Gordon CR, Swanson EW et al. Dermaplaning, topical oxygen, and photodynamic therapy: a systematic review of the literature. Aesthetic. Plast. Surg. 35(6), 1151–1159 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xi Z, Shuxian Y, Zhong L et al. Topical 5-aminolevulinic acid with intense pulsed light versus intense pulsed light for photodamage in Chinese patients. Dermatol. Surg. 37(1), 31–40 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DJ. Nonablative dermal remodeling: does it really work? Arch. Dermatol. 138(10), 1366–1368 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hardaway CA, Ross EV. Nonablative laser skin remodeling. Dermatol. Clin. 20(1), 97–111 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang Y, Ren Q, Liu H, Zhang J. Effects of the 1,320-nm Nd:YAG laser on transepidermal water loss, histological changes, and collagen remodeling in skin. Lasers Med. Sci. 21(3), 147–152 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elsaie ML, Lloyd HW. Latest laser and light-based advances for ethnic skin rejuvenation. Indian J. Dermatol. 53(2), 49–53 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W et al. Effects of the Nd:YAG 1320-nm laser on skin rejuvenation: clinical and histological correlations. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 13(3), 98–106 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doshi SN, Alster TS. 1,450 nm long-pulsed diode laser for nonablative skin rejuvenation. Dermatol. Surg. 31(9 Pt 2), 1223–1226 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nouri K, Ballard CJ. Laser therapy for acne. Clin. Dermatol. 24(1), 26–32 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty SD, Doherty CB, Markus JS, Markus RF. A Paradigm for facial skin rejuvenation. Facial Plast. Surg. 25(4), 245–251 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fournier N, Dahan S, Barneon G et al. Nonablative remodeling: clinical, histologic, ultrasound imaging, and profilometric evaluation of a 1540 nm Er:glass laser. Dermatol. Surg. 27(9), 799–806 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera AE. Acne scarring: a review and current treatment modalities. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 59(4), 659–676 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grema H, Greve B, Raulin C. Facial rhytides--subsurfacing or resurfacing? A review. Lasers Surg. Med. 32(5), 405–412 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Medhat W et al. Multiple minimally invasive erbium:YAG laser mini-peels for skin rejuvenation: an objective assessment. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 11(2), 122–130 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman R, Hibst R. Pulsed 2.94 um Er:YAG laser skin ablation-experimental results and first clinical application. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 15(4), 389–393 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Majaron B, Kelly KM, Park HB, Verkruysse W, Nelson JS. Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing using repetitive long-pulse exposure and cryogen spray cooling: i. histological study. Lasers Surg. Med. 28(2), 121–130 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majaron B, Plestenjak P, Lukac M. Quantitative investigation of thermal damage in Er:YAG laser skin resurfacing. Proc. SPIE 3245(4), 366–373 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Majaron B, Srinivas SM, Huang HL, Nelson JS. Deep coagulation of dermal collagen with repetitive Er:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers Surg. Med. 26(2), 215–222 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinisch L. Scatter-limited phototherapy: a model for laser treatment of skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 30(5), 381–388 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drnovsek-Olup B, Beltram M, Pizem J. Repetitive Er:YAG laser irradiation of human skin: a histological evaluation. Lasers Surg. Med. 35(2), 146–151 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christian MM. Microresurfacing using the variable-pulse erbium:YAG laser: a comparison of the 0.5- and 4-ms pulse durations. Dermatol. Surg. 29(6), 605–611 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunzi-Rapp K, Dierickx CC, Cambier B, Drosner M. Minimally invasive skin rejuvenation with erbium: YAG laser used in thermal mode. Lasers Surg. Med. 38(10), 899–907 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DJ. Lasers for facial rejuvenation. Am. J. Clin. Dermatol. 4(4), 225–234 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habbema L, Verhagen R, Van Hal R, Liu Y, Varghese B. Minimally invasive non-thermal laser technology using laser-induced optical breakdown for skin rejuvenation. J. Biophotonics 5(2), 194–199 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, Abd-El-Raheem T, Abdel-Wahab H et al. Fractional versus ablative erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser resurfacing for facial rejuvenation: an objective evaluation. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 68(1), 103–112 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narurkar VA. Nonablative fractional resurfacing in the male patient. Dermatol. Ther. 20(6), 430–435 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy BY, Hantash BM. Emerging technologies in aesthetic medicine. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 521–527 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Geronemus R, Goldberg D et al. Multicenter study of noninvasive radiofrequency for periorbital tissue tightening. Lasers Surg. Med. 33(4), 232–242 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narurkar VA. Nonablative fractional laser resurfacing. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 473–483 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geraghty LN, Biesman B. Clinical evaluation of a single wavelength fractional laser and a novel multi-wavelength fractional laser in the treatment of photodamaged skin. Lasers Surg. Med. 41(6), 408–416 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laubach HJ, Tannous Z, Anderson RR, Manstein D. Skin responses to fractional photothermolysis. Lasers Surg. Med. 38(2), 142–149 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jih MH, Goldberg LH, Kimyai-Asadi A. Fractional photothermolysis for photoaging of hands. Dermatol. Surg. 34(1), 73–78 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber EM, Tanzi EL, Alster TA. Side effects and complications of fractional photothermolysis. Experience with 961 treatments. Dermatol. Surg. 34(4), 301–307 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Datta HS, Mitra SK, Paramesh R, Patwardhan B. Theories and management of aging: modern and ayurveda perspectives. Evid. Based Complement. Alternat. Med. 10(1), 1–6 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lolis MS, Goldberg DJ. Radiofrequency in cosmetic dermatology: a review. Dermatol. Surg. 38(11), 1765–1776 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Felipe I, Del Cueto SR, Perez E, Redondo P. Adverse reactions after nonablative radiofrequency: follow-up of 290 patients. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 6(3), 163–166 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Biesman BS, Pope K. Monopolar radiofrequency treatment of the eyelids: a safety evaluation. Dermatol. Surg. 33(2), 794–801 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alster TS, Lupton JR. Nonablative cutaneous remodeling using radiofrequency devices. Clin. Dermatol. 25(5), 487–491 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogle MA, Dover JS. Tissue tightening technologies. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 491–499 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay A. Burns thermage: monopolar radiofrequency. Aesth. Surg. J. 25(2), 638–642 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ruiz-Esparza J. Nonablative radiofrequency for facial and neck rejuvenation. A faster, safer, and less painful procedure based on concentrating the heat in key areas: the ThermaLift concept. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 5(1), 68–75 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bassichis BA, Dayan S, Thomas JR. Use of a nonablative radiofrequency device to rejuvenate the upper one-third of the face. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 130(40), 397–406 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bogle MA, Ubelhoer N, Weiss RA, Mayoral F, Kaminer MS. Evaluation of the multiple pass, low fluence algorithm for radiofrequency tightening of the lower face. Lasers Surg. Med. 39(3), 210–217 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor MB, Prokopenko I. Split-face comparison of radiofrequency versus long-pulse Nd-YAG treatment of facial laxity. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 8(1), 17–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alhalabi SM, Agha OQ, Hantash BM. Nonablative radiofrequency for skin rejuvenation: a review of the literature. Expert Rev. Dermatol. 7(6), 589–599 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Winstanley DA, Uebelhoer NS. Future considerations in cutaneous photomedicine. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27(4), 301–308 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart N, Lim AC, Lowe PM, Goodman G. Lasers and laser-like devices: part one. Australas. J. Dermatol. 54(3), 173–183 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HS, Jang WS, Cha YJ et al. Multiple pass ultrasound tightening of skin laxity of the lower face and neck. Dermatol. Surg. 38(1), 20–27 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solish N, Lin X, Axford-Gatley RA, Strangman NM, Kane M. A randomized, single-blind, postmarketing study of multiple energy levels of high-intensity focused ultrasound for noninvasive body sculpting. Dermatol. Surg. 38(1), 58–67 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadick NS. Overview of ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and body contouring with cellulite reduction. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 28(4), 250–256 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadick NS. Combination radiofrequency and light energies: electro-optical synergy technology in esthetic medicine. Dermatol. Surg. 31(9 Pt 2), 1211–1217 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitter PJ, Stephen Mulholland R. Report of a new technique for enhanced non-invasive skin rejuvenation using a dual mode pulsed light and radio-frequency energy source: selective radio-thermolysis. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 1(3), 142–143 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alhalabi SM, Hantash BM. Nonablative skin tightening: a review of the literature. Dermatol. Surg. 2(3), 5–21 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Trelles MA, Allones I, Velez M. Non-ablative facial skin photorejuvenation with an intense pulsed light system and adjunctive epidermal care. Lasers Med. Sci. 18(2), 104–111 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammes S, Greve B, Raulin C. Electro-optical synergy (ELOS) technology for non-ablative skin rejuvenation: a preliminary prospective study. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 20(9), 1070–1075 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kist D, Burns AJ, Sanner R, Counters J, Zelickson B. Ultrastructural evaluation of multiple pass low energy versus single pass high energy radio-frequency treatment. Lasers Surg. Med. 38(2), 150–154 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JE, Chang S, Won CH et al. Combination treatment using bipolar radiofrequency-based intense pulsed light, infrared light and diode laser enhanced clinical effectiveness and histological dermal remodeling in Asian photoaged skin. Dermatol. Surg. 38(1), 68–76 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadick NS, Makino Y. Selective electro-thermolysis in aesthetic medicine: a review. Lasers Surg. Med. 34(2), 91–97 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ogden S, Griffiths TW. A review of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures. Br. J. Dermatol. 159(3), 1036–1050 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glaser DA, Patel U. Enhancing the eyes: use of minimally invasive techniques for periorbital rejuvenation. J. Drugs Dermatol. 9(8 Suppl.), s118–128 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, Attia S, Saleh F et al. Effect of topical tretinoin, chemical peeling and dermabrasion on p53 expression in facial skin. Eur. J. Dermatol. 13(5), 433–438 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, Attia S, Saleh F, Ahmad H, Uitto J. Trichloroacetic acid peeling versus dermabrasion: a histometric, immunohistochemical, and ultrastructural comparison. Dermatol. Surg. 30(2 pt 1), 179–188 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer TC, Perosino E, Poli F, Viera MS, Dreno B. Chemical peels in aesthetic dermatology: an update 2009. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 24(3), 281–292 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aust MC, Fernandes D, Kolokythas P, Kaplan HM, Vogt PM. Percutaneous collagen induction therapy: an alternative treatment for scars, wrinkles and skin laxity. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 121(2), 1421–1429 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fernandes D, Signorini M. Combating photoaging with percutaneous collagen induction. Clin. Dermatol. 26(2), 192–199 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkhawam L, Alam M. Dermabrasion and microdermabrasion. Facial Plast. Surg. 25(5), 301–310 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimipour DJ, Karimipour G, Orringer JS. Microdermabrasion: an evidence-based review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 125(1), 372–377 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimes PE. Microdermabrasion. Dermatol. Surg. 31(9 Pt 2), 1160–1165 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhalla M, Thami GP. Microdermabrasion: reappraisal and brief review of literature. Dermatol. Surg. 32(6), 809–814 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savardekar P. Microdermabrasion. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 73(4), 277–279 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briden E, Jacobsen E, Johnson C. Combining superficial glycolic acid (alpha-hydroxy acid) peels with microdermabrasion to maximize treatment results and patient satisfaction. Cutis. 79(1 Suppl.), 13–16 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kempiak SJ, Uebelhoer N. Superficial chemical peels and microdermabrasion for acne vulgaris. Semin. Cutan. Med. Surg. 27(3), 212–220 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monheit GD, Baumann LS, Gold MH et al. Novel hyaluronic acid dermal filler: dermal gel extra physical properties and clinical outcomes. Dermatol. Surg. 36(3), 1833–1841 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith SR, Jones D, Thomas JA, Murphy DK, Beddingfield Fr. Duration of wrinkle correction following repeat treatment with Juvéderm hyaluronic acid fillers. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 302(10), 757–762 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer K, Lupo MP. Making the right choices: attaining predictable aesthetic results with dermal fillers. J. Drugs Dermatol. 9(5), 458–465 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C et al. Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin. J. Eur. Acad. Dermatol. Venereol. 26(3), 292–301 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carruthers J, Cohen SR, Joseph JH, Narins RS, Rubin M. The science and art of dermal fillers for soft-tissue augmentation. J. Drugs Dermatol. 8(4), 335–350 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grippaudo FR, Mattei M. High-frequency sonography of temporary and permanent dermal fillers. Skin Res. Technol. 16(3), 265–269 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niamtu J3rd. Complications in fillers and Botox. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. Clin. North Am. 21(1), 13–21 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel U, Fitzgerald R. Facial shaping: beyond lines and folds with fillers. J. Drugs Dermatol. 9(8), s129–137 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer K. Dermal fillers and combinations of fillers for facial rejuvenation. Dermatol. Clin. 27(4), 427–432 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berbos ZJ, Lipham WJ. Update on botulinum toxin and dermal fillers. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 21(5), 387–395 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowe NJ, Shah A, Lowe PL, Patnaik R. Dosing, efficacy and safety plus the use of computerized photography for botulinum toxins type A for upper facial lines. J. Cosmet. Laser Ther. 12(2), 106–111 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon RW. Botox cosmetic for lip and perioral enhancement. Dent. Today 28(5), 94–97 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowler PJ. Dermal and epidermal remodeling using botulinum toxin type A for facial, non reducible, hyperkinetic lines: two case studies. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 7(3), 241–244 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carruthers A, Carruthers J. Botulinum toxin products overview. Skin Therapy Lett. 13(6), 1–4 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doddaballapur S. Microneedling with dermaroller. J. Clin. Aesthet. Dermatol. 2(2), 110–111 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Clementoni MT, Broscher M, Munavalli GS. Photodynamic photorejuvenation of the face with a combination of microneedling, red light, and broadband pulsed light. Lasers Surg. Med. 42(2), 150–159 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majid I. Microneedling therapy in atrophic facial scars: an objective assessment. J. Cutan. Aesthet. Surg. 2(1), 26–30 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badran MM, Kuntsche J, Fahr A. Skin penetration enhancement by a microneedle device (Dermaroller®) in vitro: Dependency on needle size and applied formulation. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 36(4–5), 511–523 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora S, Bhandaree Gupta P. Automated microneedling device – a new tool in dermatologist’s kit. J. Pak. Assoc. Dermatol. 22(4), 354–357 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Kim JH, Park HY, Jung M, Choi EH. Automicroneedle therapy system combined with topical tretinoin shows better regenerative effects compared with each individual treatment. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 38(1), 57–65 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacarrubba F, Tedeschi A, Nardone B, Micali G. Mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation: assessment of the subepidermal low-echogenic band by ultrasound evaluation with cross-sectional B-mode scanning. Dermatol. Ther. 21( Suppl. 3), S1–S5 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Domyati M, El-Ammawi TS, Moawad O et al. Efficacy of mesotherapy in facial rejuvenation: a histological and immunohistochemical evaluation. Int. J. Dermatol. 51(8), 913–919 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atiyeh BS, Ibrahim AE, Dibo SA. Cosmetic mesotherapy: between scientific evidence, science fiction, and lucrative business. Aesth. Plast. Surg. 32(6), 842–849 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iorizzo M, De Padova MP, Tosti A. Biorejuvenation: theory and practice. Clin. Dermatol. 26(2), 177–181 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager C, Brenner C, Habicht J, Wallich R. Bioactive reagents used in mesotherapy for skin rejuvenation in vivo induce diverse physiological processes in human skin fibroblasts in vitro: a pilot study. Exp. Dermatol. 21(1), 72–75 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotunda AM, Kolodney MS. Mesotherapy and phosphatidylcholine injections: historical clarification and review. Dermatol. Surg. 32(4), 465–480 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toledo LS. Emerging techniques in aesthetic plastic surgery. Clin. Plast. Surg. 36(2), 177–180 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedamurthy M. Mesotherapy. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 73(1), 60–62 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown SA. The science of mesotherapy: chemical anarchy. Aesth. Surg. J. 26(1), 95–98 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim DH, Je YJ, Kim CD et al. Can platelet-rich plasma be used for skin rejuvenation? evaluation of effects of platelet-rich plasma on human dermal fibroblast. Ann. Dermatol. 23(4), 424–431 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freymiller EG. Platelet-rich plasma: evidence to support its use. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 62(8), 1047–1048 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrotniak M, Bielecki T, Gazdzik TS. Current opinion about using the platelet-rich gel in orthopaedics and trauma surgery. Ortop. Traumatol. Rehabil. 9(3), 227–238 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhanot S, Alex JC. Current applications of platelet gels in facial plastic surgery. Facial Plast. Surg. 18(1), 27–33 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kakudo N, Minakata T, Mitsui T et al. Proliferation-promoting effect of platelet-rich plasma on human adipose-derived stem cells and human dermal fibroblasts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 122(5), 1352–1360 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kakudo N, Kushida S, Kusumoto K. Platelet-rich plasma: the importance of platelet separation and concentration. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 123(3), 1135–1136 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaoemer A, Kern S, Kluter H, Bieback K. Human AB serum and thrombin-activated platelet-rich plasma are suitable alternatives to fetal calf serum for the expansion of mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue. Stem Cells 25(5), 1270–1278 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karimipour DJ, Rittie L, Hammerberg C et al. Molecular analysis of aggressive microdermabrasion in photoaged skin. Arch. Dermatol. 145(10), 1114–1122 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redaelli A, Romano D, Marciano A. Face and neck revitalization with platelet-rich plasma (PRP): clinical outcome in a series of 23 consecutively treated patients. J. Drugs Dermatol. 9(5), 466–472 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charruyer A, Ghadially R. What's new in dermatology: epidermal stem cells. G. Ital. Dermatol. Venereol. 146(1), 57–67 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WS, Park BS, Sung JH. Protective role of adipose-derived stem cells and their soluble factors in photoaging. Arch. Dermatol. Res. 301(5), 329–336 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim WS, Park BS, Park SH, Kim HK, Sung JH. Antiwrinkle effect of adipose-derived stem cell: activation of dermal fibroblast by secretory factors. J. Dermatol. Sci. 53(2), 96–102 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxson S, Lopez EA, Yoo D, Danilkovitch-Miagkova A, Leroux MA. Concise review: role of mesenchymal stem cells in wound repair. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 1(2), 142–149 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis CJ. Stem cell application in acute burn care and reconstruction. J. Wound Care 22(1), 7–8, 10, 12–16 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar