Single-optic positional accommodating intraocular lenses: a review

References

• Menapace R, Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Leydolt-Koeppl Ch. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a critical review of present and future concepts. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245(4):473-89
   Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Reese S, Jakob C, Seitz B. Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses – dual optic vs mono optic. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2004;24(5):450-7
   Google Scholar
• Glasser A. Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia. Clin Exp Optom 2008;91(3):279-95
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod SD. Optical principles, biomechanics, and initial clinical performance of a dual-optic accommodating intraocular lens (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2006;104:437-52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Richdale K, Sinnott LT, Bullimore MA, et al. Quantification of age-related and per diopter accommodative changes of the lens and ciliary muscle in the emmetropic human eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2013;54(2):1095-105
   Google Scholar
• Macsai MS, Padnick-Silver L, Fontes BM. Visual outcomes after accommodating intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(4):628-33
   Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Tavolato M, De la Hoz F, et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaccommodating and multifocal refractive and diffractive intraocular lenses: comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(12):2494-503
   Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Montalban R, Javaloy J. Visual outcomes with a single-optic accommodating intraocular lens and a low-addition-power rotational asymmetric multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38(6):978-85
   Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Piñero DP, Plaza-Puche AB. Visual outcomes and optical performance with a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation single-optic accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(10):1656-64
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sauder G, Degenring RF, Kamppeter B, Hugger P. Potential of the 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89(10):1289-92
   Google Scholar
• Beiko GH. Comparison of visual results with accommodating intraocular lenses versus mini-monovision with a monofocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39(1):48-55
   Google Scholar
• Ferko J, Ferkova A. IOL Tetraflex, KH 3500 – presbyopia treatment. Oftalmologia 2009;53(4):72-3
   Google Scholar
• Jardim D, Soloway B, Starr C. Asymmetric vault of an accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(2):347-50
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard AL, Bashir A, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods. Clin Exp Optom 2010;93(6):441-52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alió JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Montalban R, Ortega P. Near visual outcomes with single-optic and dual-optic accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38(9):1568-75
   Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Falconio G, et al. Long term results of 1 CU accommodative intraocular lens implantation: 2-year follow-up study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2007;85(4):409-14
   Google Scholar
• Mesci C, Erbil HH, Olgun A, Yaylali SA. Visual performances with monofocal, accommodating, and multifocal intraocular lenses in patients with unilateral cataract. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150(5):609-18
   Google Scholar
• Doane JF, Jackson RT. Accommodative intraocular lenses: considerations on use, function and design. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2007;18(4):318-24
   Google Scholar
• Zheleznyak L, Kim MJ, MacRae S, Yoon G. Impact of corneal aberrations on through-focus image quality of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an adaptive optics bench system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38(10):1724-33
   Google Scholar
• Marchini G, Mora P, Pedrotti E, et al. Functional assessment of two different accommodative intraocular lenses compared with a monofocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology 2007;114(11):2038-43
   Google Scholar
• Ben Yaish S, Zlotnik A, Raveh I, et al. Intraocular omni-focal lens with increased tolerance to decentration and astigmatism. J Refract Surg 2010;26(1):71-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sanders DR, Sanders ML. Visual performance results after Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens implantation. Ophthalmology 2007;114(9):1679-84
   Google Scholar
• Mastropasqua L, Toto L, Nubile M, et al. Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29(7):1307-12
   Google Scholar
• Szigeti A, Kránitz K, Takacs AI, et al. Comparison of long-term visual outcome and IOL position with a single-optic accommodating IOL After 5.5- or 6.0-mm Femtosecond laser capsulotomy. J Refract Surg 2012;28(9):609-13
   Google Scholar
• Cumming JS, Slade SG, Chayet A. Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. Ophthalmology 2001;108(11):2005-9; discussion 2010
   Google Scholar
• Harman FE, Maling S, Kampougeris G, et al. Comparing the 1CU accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal intraocular lenses: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2008;115(6):993-1001; e2
   Google Scholar
• Findl O, Leydolt C. Meta-analysis of accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33(3):522-7
   Google Scholar
• Tahir HJ, Tong JL, Geissler S, et al. Effects of accommodation training on accommodation and depth of focus in an eye implanted with a crystalens intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2010;26(10):772-9
   Google Scholar
• Klaproth OK, Titke C, Baumeister M, Kohnen T. Accommodative intraocular lenses – principles of clinical evaluation and current results. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2011g;228(8):666-75
   Google Scholar
• Ale JB, Manns F, Ho A. Magnifications of single and dual element accommodative intraocular lenses: paraxial optics analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2011;31(1):7-16
   Google Scholar
• Helmholtz H. Ueber die Accomodation des Auges. Albrecht von. Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1855;1(2):1-74
   Google Scholar
• Ale J, Manns F, Ho A. Evaluation of the performance of accommodating IOLs using a paraxial optics analysis. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2010;30(2):132-42
   Google Scholar
• Marchini G, Pedrotti E, Sartori P, Tosi R. Ultrasound biomicroscopic changes during accommodation in eyes with accommodating intraocular lenses: pilot study and hypothesis for the mechanism of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30(12):2476-82
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez Ortega Angel R, Higueras A, Ortiz-Gomariz A, et al. Correction of negative dysphotopsia in Crystalens “Z syndrome”. J Emmetropia 2013;4:101-4
   Google Scholar
• Ehmer A, Mannsfeld A, Auffarth GU, Holzer MP. Dynamic stimulation of accommodation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(12):2024-9
   Google Scholar
• Ho A, Manns F, Parel JM, et al. Predicting the performance of accommodating intraocular lenses using ray tracing. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(1):129-36
   Google Scholar
• María LR, David PP, Francisco JB-M, Rafael JP-C. Clinical and quality of life data correlation with a single-optic. J Optometry 2013;6:25-35
   Google Scholar
• Dick HB. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2005;16(1):8-26
   Google Scholar
• Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Two years experience with the new accommodative 1 CU intraocular lens. Ophthalmologe 2002;99(11):820-4
   Google Scholar
• Küchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2002;18(3):208-16
   Google Scholar
• Cumming JS, Colvard DM, Dell SJ, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT-45 accommodating intraocular lens: results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(5):812-25
   Google Scholar
• Koeppl C, Findl O, Menapace R, et al. Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating intraocular lens: AT-45 Crystalens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31(7):1290-7
   Google Scholar
• Dhital A, Spalton DJ, Gala KB. Comparison of near vision, intraocular lens movement, and depth of focus with accommodating and monofocal intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39(12):1872-8
   Google Scholar
• Kim MJ, Zheleznyak L, Macrae S, et al. Objective evaluation of through-focus optical performance of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses using an optical bench system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011;37(7):1305-12
   Google Scholar
• Pepose JS, Qazi MA, Davies J, et al. Visual performance of patients with bilateral vs combination Crystalens, ReZoom, and ReSTOR intraocular lens implants. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;144(3):347-57
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Naroo SA, et al. Evaluation of an open-field autorefractor’s ability to measure refraction and hence potential to assess objective accommodation in pseudophakes. Br J Ophthalmol 2011;95(4):498-501
   Google Scholar
• Legeais JM, Werner L, Werner L, et al. Pseudoaccommodation: BioComFold versus a foldable silicone intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25(2):262-7
   Google Scholar
• Cleary G, Spalton DJ, Gala KB. A randomized intraindividual comparison of the accommodative performance of the bag-in-the-lens intraocular lens in presbyopic eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150(5):619-27; e1
   Google Scholar
• Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Huber S, et al. Theoretical and measured pseudophakic accommodation after implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121(12):1722-7
   Google Scholar
• Uthoff D, Gulati A, Hepper D, Holland D. Potentially accommodating 1CU intraocular lens: 1-year results in 553 eyes and literature review. J Refract Surg 2007;23(2):159-71
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Merino P, Birkenfeld J, Dorronsoro C, et al. Aberrometry in patients implanted with Accommodative Intraocular Lenses. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157(5):1077-89
   Google Scholar
• Findl O, Kiss B, Petternel V, et al. Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29(4):669-76
   Google Scholar
• Kriechbaum K, Findl O, Koeppl C, et al. Stimulus-driven versus pilocarpine-induced biometric changes in pseudophakic eyes. Ophthalmology 2005;112(3):453-9
   Google Scholar
• Schneider H, Stachs O, Göbel K, Guthoff R. Changes of the accommodative amplitude and the anterior chamber depth after implantation of an accommodative intraocular lens. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244(3):322-9
   Google Scholar
• Stachs O, Schneider H, Stave J, Guthoff R. Potentially accommodating intraocular lenses – an in vitro and in vivo study using three-dimensional high-frequency ultrasound. J Refract Surg 2005;21(1):37-45
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marcos S, Ortiz S, Pérez-Merino P, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of accommodating intraocular lens shift and alignment in vivo. Ophthalmology 2014;121(1):45-55
   Google Scholar
• Detorakis ET, Karavitaki A, Stojanovic N, et al. Anterior chamber angle evaluation with ultrasound biomicroscopy and optical coherence tomography in eyes implanted with a Crystalens. Int Ophthalmol 2014;34(4):781-6
   Google Scholar
• Pérez-Vives C, Montés-Micó R, López-Gil N, et al. Crystalens HD intraocular lens analysis using an adaptive optics visual simulator. Optom Vis Sci 2013;90(12):1413-23
   Google Scholar
• Ale JB, Manns F, Ho A. Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens. Optom Vis Sci 2011;88(7):789-94
   Google Scholar
• Hantera MM, Hamed AM, Fekry Y, Shoheib EA. Initial experience with an accommodating intraocular lens: controlled prospective study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(7):1167-72
   Google Scholar
• Buratto L, Di Meglio G. Accommodative intraocular lenses: short-term visual results of two different lens types. Eur J Ophthalmol 2006;16(1):33-9
   Google Scholar
• Labor PK, Ignacio T, Johnson M, Janku-Lestock L. Accommodating intraocular lens implantation in an epikeratophakia patient. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36(2):347-50
   Google Scholar
• Sanders DR, Sanders ML. US FDA clinical trial of the Tetraflex potentially accommodating IOL: comparison to concurrent age-matched monofocal controls. J Refract Surg 2010;26(10):723-30
   Google Scholar
• Tan N, Zheng D, Ye J. Comparison of visual performance after implantation of 3 types of intraocular lenses: accommodative, multifocal, and monofocal. Eur J Ophthalmol 2014. [Epub ahead of print]
   Google Scholar
• Zamora-Alejo KV, Moore SP, Parker DG, et al. Objective accommodation measurement of the Crystalens HD compared to monofocal intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2013;29(2):133-9
   Google Scholar
• Pallikaris IG, Karavitaki AE, Kymionis GD, et al. Unilateral sulcus implantation of the Crystalens HD. J Refract Surg 2012;28(4):299-301
   Google Scholar
• Brown D, Dougherty P, Gills JP, et al. Functional reading acuity and performance: Comparison of 2 accommodating intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35(10):1711-14
   Google Scholar
• Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Gupta N, et al. Mechanism of action of the tetraflex accommodative intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2010;26(11):858-62
   Google Scholar
• Ang R, Martinez G, Cruz E, et al. Prospective evaluation of visual outcomes with three presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses following cataract surgery. Clin Ophthalmol 2013;7:1811-23
   Google Scholar
• Findl O, Kriechbaum K, Menapace R, et al. Laserinterferometric assessment of pilocarpine-induced movement of an accommodating intraocular lens: a randomized trial. Ophthalmology 2004;111(8):1515-21
   Google Scholar
• Kleinmann G, Werner L, Kaskaloglu M, et al. Postoperative opacification of the peripheral optic region and haptics of a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens: case report and clinicopathologic correlation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32(1):158-61
   Google Scholar
• Neuhann IM, Neuhann TF, Szurman P, et al. Clinicopathological correlation of 3 patterns of calcification in a hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35(3):593-7
   Google Scholar
• Cazal J, Lavin-Dapena C, Marín J, Vergés C. Accommodative intraocular lens tilting. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140(2):341-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yuen L, Trattler W, Boxer Wachler BS. Two cases of Z syndrome with the Crystalens after uneventful cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34(11):1986-9
   Google Scholar