Application of preimplantation genetic diagnosis and screening in assisted reproduction

References

• Handyside AH, Kontoganni E, Hardy K, Winston R. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature344, 768–770 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Ginsberg N, Lifchez A et al. Analysis of the first polar body: preconception genetic diagnosis. Hum. Reprod.5, 826–829 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, Winston RMK, Delhanty JDA. Dual fluorescent in situ hybridisation for simultaneous detection of X and Y chromosome-specific probes for the sexing of human preimplantation embryonic nuclei. Hum. Genet.89, 18–22 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, Winston RMK, Delhanty JDA. Pregnancies following the diagnosis of sex in preimplantation embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. Br. Med. J.306, 1382–1383 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos Hum. Reprod.8, 2185–2191 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Dailey T, Sultan KM, Grifo J, Cohen J. The use of first polar bodies for preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol. Hum. Reprod.1, 1014–1020 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cieslak J, Freidine M et al. Pregnancies following preconception diagnosis of common aneuploidies by fluorescent in-situ hybridization. Hum. Reprod.10, 1923–1927 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Chiu D. Maternal-age specific rates of numerical chromosome abnormalities with special reference to trisomy. Hum. Genet.70, 11–17 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Cohen J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in older patients – but of course! Hum. Reprod.12, 413–414 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon JW, Talansky BE. Assisted fertilization by zona drilling: a mouse model for correction of oligospermia. J. Exp. Zool.239, 347–381 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Malter HE, Cohen J. Partial zona dissection of the human oocytes: a non-traumatic method using a micromanipulation to assist zona pellucida penetration. Fertil. Steril.51, 139–148 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cieslak J, Ivakhnenko V, Wolf G et al. Three-dimensional partial zona dissection for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and assisted hatching. Fertil. Steril.71, 308–313 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Montag M, van der Ven K, Delacrétaz G et al. Efficient preimplantation genetic diagnosis using laser assisted microdissection of the zona pellucida for polar body biopsy followed by primed in situ labelling (PRINS). J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.14, 455–456 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Boada M, Carrera M, De La Iglesia C et al. Successful use of a laser for human embryo biopsy in preimplantation genetic diagnosis: report of two cases. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.15, 301–305 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Rink K, Delacrétaz G, Salathé R et al. Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective-delivered 1.48 µm diode laser. Lasers Surg. Med.18, 52–62 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montag M, van der Ven K, Delacrétaz G et al. Laser assisted microdissection of zona pellucida facilitates polar body biopsy. Fertil. Steril.69, 539–542 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M et al. Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation diagnosis in the human. Zygote5, 351–354 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joris H, De Vos A, Janssens R, Devroey P, Liebars I, Van Steirteghem A. Comparison of the results of human embryo biopsy and outcome of PGD after zona drilling using acid tyrode medium or a laser. Hum. Reprod.18, 1896–1902 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H. Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit der Polkörperdiagnostik in Deutschland. J. Fertil. Reprod.4, 7–12 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Montag M, van der Ven K, van der Ven H. Polar body biopsy. In: Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Techniques: Laboratory and Clinical Perspectives. Gardner, Weissman, Howles, Shoham (Eds). Taylor & Francis Medical Text Books, Lancaster, UK, 391–404 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Montag M, van der Ven K, Dorn C, van der Ven H. Outcome of laser-assisted polar body biopsy. Reprod. BioMedicine Online9, 425–429 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Chatzimeletiou K, Morrison EE, Panagiotidis Y et al. Comparison of effects of zona drilling by non-contact infrared laser or acid tyrode’s on the development of human biopsied embryos as revealed by blastomere viability, cytoskeletal analysis and molecular cytogenetics. Reprod. BioMedicine Online11, 697–710 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Krzyminska UB, Lutjen J, O’Neill C. Assessment of the viability and pregnancy potential of mouse embryos biopsied at different preimplantation stages of development. Hum. Reprod.5, 203–208 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Tarin J, Conaghan J, Winston R, Handyside AH. Human embryo biopsy on the 2nd day after insemination for preimplantation diagnosis: removal of a quarter of embryo retards cleavage. Fertil. Steril.58, 970–976 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Hardy K, Martin K, Leese J, Winston R, Handyside AH. Human preimplantation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum. Reprod.5, 708–714 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansis C, Edwards RG. Cell differentiation in the preimplantation human embryo. Reprod. BioMedicine Online6, 215–220 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Bahce M. Effect of different biopsy procedures on implantation rates. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on PGD. Antalya, Turkey (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Munne S. Comment 2 on Staessen et al. (2004). Two-cell biopsy and PGD pregnancy outcome. Hum. Reprod.20, 2363–2364 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Munné S, Cohen J, Sable D. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for advanced maternal age and other indications. Fertil. Steril.78, 234–236 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffreys A, Wilson V, Neumann R, Keyte J. Amplification of human microsatellites by the polymerase chain reaction: towards DNA fingerprinting of single cells. Nuc. Acids Res.16, 10953–10971 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sermon K. Current concepts in preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD): a molecular biologist’s view. Hum. Reprod. Update8, 11–20 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scriven P, Handyside AH, Ogilvie C. Chromosome translocations, segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn.18, 1437–1449 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Escudero T, Sandalinas M, Sable D, Cohen J. Gamete segregation in female carriers of Robertsonian translocations. Cytogenet. Cell Genet.90, 303–308 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Stern C, Pertile M, Norris H, Hale L, Baker HWG. Chromosome translocations in couples with in-vitro fertilization implantation failure. Hum. Reprod.14, 2097–2101 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Ven K, Peschka B, Montag M et al. Increased frequency of congenital chromosomal aberrations in female partners of couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod.13, 48–54 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conn CM, Cozzi J, Harper JC et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for couples at risk of Down syndrome pregnancy due to parental translocation or mosaicism. J. Med. Genet.36, 45–50 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis of translocations. Fertil. Steril.73, 1209–1218 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S. Preimpantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod. BioMedicine Online4, 183–196 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Current features of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Reprod. BioMedicine Online5, 296–301 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Conn C, Harper J, Winston R, Delhanty J. Infertile couples with Robertsonian translocations: preimplantation genetic analysis of embryos reveals chaotic cleavage divisions. Hum. Genet.102, 117–123 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche E, Staessen C, Vegetti W et al. Preimpantation genetic diagnosis and sperm analysis by fluorescence in-situ hybridization for the most common reciprocal translocation (11;22). Mol. Hum. Reprod.5, 682–690 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwarsson E, Malgren H, Inzunza J et al. Highly abnormal cleavage divisions in preimplantation embryos from translocation carriers. Prenat. Diagn.20, 1038–1047 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP et al. Possible interchromosomal effect in embryos generated by gametes from translocation carriers. Hum. Reprod.17, 3201–3207 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE preimplantation genetic diagnosis consortium: data collection III (May 2001). Hum. Reprod.17, 223–246 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Sermon K, Moutou C, Harper J et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IV: May – December 2001. Hum. Reprod.20, 19–34 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Harper JC, Boelaert K, Geraerdts J et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: cycles from January – December 2002 with pregnancy follow-up to October 2003. Hum. Reprod.21, 3–21 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Chen N, Funkhouser J et al. A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortuses. Ann. Hum. Genet.44, 151–178 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delhanty J, Griffin D, Handyside AH et al. Detection of aneuploidy and chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos during preimplantation sex determination by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH). Hum. Mol. Genet.2, 1183–1185 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini L, Martini E, Geraerdts JPM et al. Comparison of gonosomal aneuploidy in spermatozoa of normal fertile men and those with severe male factor detected by in-situ hybridization. Mol. Hum. Reprod.3, 431–438 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Cavallini G et al. Frequency of aneuploidy in sperm from patients with extremely severe male factor infertility. Hum. Reprod.20, 2140–2152 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.19, 2849–2858 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti AP, Munné S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with a poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil. Steril.72, 837–844 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Magli C, Bahce M et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of the aneuploidies most commonly found in sponatneous abortions and live births: XY, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22. Prenat. Diagn.18, 1459–1466 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munné S, Magli C, Cohen J et al. Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos. Hum. Reprod.14, 2191–2199 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod. BioMedicine Online7, 91–97 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahraman S, Bahce M, Samli H et al. Healthy births and ongoing pregnancies obtained by preimplantation genetic diagnosis in patients with advanced maternal age and recurrent implantation failure. Hum. Reprod.15, 2003–2007 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. Comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy screening in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.19, 2849–2858 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M et al. Differences in chromosome suspectibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod. BioMedicine Online8, 81–90 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdelhady I, Colls P, Sandalinas M, Escudero T, Munné S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical abnormalities for 13 chromosomes. Reprod. BioMedicine Online6, 226–231 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Montag M, Limbach N, Sabarstinski M et al. Polar body biopsy and aneuploidy testing by simultaneous detection of 6 chromosomes. Prenat. Diagn.25, 867–871 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Munne S, Velilla E, Colls P et al.Self-correction of chromosomally abnormal embryos n culture and implications for stem cell production. Fertil. Steril.84, 1328–1334 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Liu J, Tsai YL, Zheng XZ et al. Feasability study of repeated fluorescent in-situ hybridization in the same blastomeres for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Mol. Hum. Reprod.4, 972–977 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Schröck E, du Manoir S, Veldman T et al. Multicolour spectral karyotyping of human chromosomes. Science273, 494–497 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung J, Weier HUG, Goldberg JD, Pedersen RA. Multilocus genetic analysis of single interpahse cells by spectral imaging. Hum. Genet.107, 615–622 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weier HUG, Munné S, Lersch RA et al. Towards a full karyotype screening of interphase cells: FISH and chip technology. Mol. Cell Endocrinol.183, S41–S45 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kallionemi A, Kallionemi OP, Sudar D et al. Comparative genomic hybridisation for molecular cytogenetic analysis of solid tumors. Science258, 818–821 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D, Sherlock JK, Handyside AH, Delhanty JDA. Detailed chromosomal and molecular genetic analysis of single cells by whole genome amplification and comparative genomic hybridization. Nucleic Acids Res.27, 1214–1218 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wells D. Delhanty JDA. Comprehensive chromosomal analysis of human preimplantation embryos using whole genome analysis and CGH. Mol. Hum. Reprod.6, 1055–1062 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voullaire L, Wilton L, Slater H, Williamson R. Detection of aneuploidy in single cells using comparative genomic hybridisation. Prenat. Diagn.19, 846–851 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilton L, Williamson R, McBain J, Edgar D, Voullaire L. Birth of a healthy infant after preimplantation confirmation of euploidy by comparative genomic hybridization. N. Engl. J. Med.22, 1537–1541 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Wilton L. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and chromosome analysis of blastomeres using comparative genomic hybridization. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 33–41 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albertson DG, Ylstra B, Segraves R et al. Quantitative mapping of amplicon structures by array CGH identifies CYP24 as a candidate oncogene. Nat. Genet.25, 144–146 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater HR, Bailey DK, Ren H et al. High-resolution identification of chromosomal abnormalities using oligonucleotide arrays containing 116,204 SNPs. Am. J. Hum. Genet.77, 709–726 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuzaki H, Dong S, Loi H et al. Genotyping over 100,000 SNPs on a pair of oligonucleotide arrays. Nat. Methods1, 109–111 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn.21, 767–780 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebner T, Moser M, Tews G. Possible applications of a non-contact 1.48 µm wavelength diode laser in assisted reproduction technologies. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 425–435 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuliev A, Cieslak C, Ilkevitch Y, Verlonsky Y. Chromosomal abnosmalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies. Reprod. BioMedicine Online6, 54–59 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munné S et al. Over a decade of experience with preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a multicenter report. Fertil. Steril.82, 292–294 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar