Lymph node imaging techniques in gynecologic malignancies: a systematic review of the literature

References

• Horowitz NS, Dehdashti F, Herzog TJ et al. Prospective evaluation of FDG-PET for detecting pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastasis in uterine corpus cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.95(3), 546–551 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardesty LA, Sumkin JH, Hakim C, Johns C, Nath M. The ability of helical CT to preoperatively stage endometrial carcinoma. Am. J. Roentgenol.176, 603–606 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkel K, Kaji Y, Yu KK et al. Radiologic staging in patients with endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis. Radiology212(3), 711–718 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Todo Y, Sakuragi N, Nishida R et al. Combined use of magnetic resonance imaging, CA 125 assay, histologic type, and histologic grade in the predicition of lymph node metastasis in endometrial carcinoma. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.188, 1265–1272 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arduino S, Leo L, Febo G, Tessarolo M, Wierdis T, Lanza A. Complications of pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in patients with endometrial cancer. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.18(3), 208–210 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi M, Ghezzi F, Riva C, Miglierina M, Buttarelli M, Bolis P. Postoperative complications after pelvic lymphadenectomy for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer. J. Surg. Oncol.78(4), 232–237 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuoppala T, Tomas E, Heinonen PK. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.270(1), 25–30 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pilka R, Kudela M, Dzvincuk P, Lubusky D. Preoperative detection of lymph nodes by means of computer tomography in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Ceska Gynekol.69, 237–239 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Connor JP, Andrews JI, Anderson B, Buller RE. Computed tomography in endometrial carcinoma. Obstet. Gynecol.95, 692–696 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manfredi R, Mirk P, Maresca C et al. Local-regional staging of endometrial carcinoma: role of MR imaging in surgical planning. Radiology231, 372–378 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taïeb S, Ceugnart L, Leblanc E, Chevalier A, Cabaret V, Querleu D. IRM des cancers de l’endomètre: apports et limites. Bull. Cancer89, 693–698 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Ascher SM, Cooper C, Scoutt L, Imaoka I, Hricak H. Diagnostic imaging techniques in gynecologic oncology. In: Principles and Practice of Gynecologic Oncology. Hoskins WJ (Ed.), Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PA, USA 223–268 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Belhocine T, de Barsy C, Hustinx R, Willems-Foidart J. Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the post-therapy surveillance of endometrial cancer. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging29, 1132–1139 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tingulstad S, Skjeldestad FE, Halvorsen TB, Hagen B. Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer. Obstet. Gynecol.101, 885–891 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Fianza A, Campani R, Dore R, Babilonti L, Tateo S. The clinical value of computed tomography and lymphography in detecting lymph node metastases from epithelial ovarian cancer. Fortschr. Röntgenstr.157, 162–166 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Burghardt E, Girardi F, Lahousen M, Tamussino K, Stattner H. Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.40, 103–106 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedetti Panici P, Maggioni A, Hacker N et al. Systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy versus resection of bulky nodes only in optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.97, 560–566 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tempany CM, Zou KH, Silverman SG, Brown DL, Kurtz AB, McNeil BJ. Staging of advanced ovarian cancer: comparison of imaging modalities – report from the Radiological Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology215(3), 761–767 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama Y, Nishida T, Ushijima K et al. Detection of lymph node metastasis in ovarian carcinoma and uterine corpus carcinoma by preoperative computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.21, 551–556 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Petru E, Schmidt F, Mikosch P et al. Abdominopelvic computed tomography in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer5, 252–255 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Medl M, Kulenkampff KJ, Stiskal M, Peters-Engl C, Leodolter S, Czembirek H. Magnetic resonance imaging in the preoperative evaluation of suspected ovarian masses. Anticancer Res.15, 1123–1126 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz AB, Tsimikas JV, Tempany CM et al. Diagnosis and staging of ovarian cancer: comparative values of Doppler and conventional US, CT, and MR imaging correlated with surgery and histopathologic analysis – report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology212(1), 19–27 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohaib SA, Moskovic EC. Imaging in vulval cancer. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.17(4), 543–556 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soper JT. Radiographic imaging in gynecologic oncology. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.44(3), 485–494 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouzier R, Haddad B, Dubernard G, Dubois P, Paniel BJ. Inguinofemoral dissection for carcinoma of the vulva: effect of modifications of extent and technique on morbidity and survival. J. Am. Coll. Surg.196, 442–450 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang SH, Sood AK, Sorosky JI, Anderson B, Buller RE. Preservation of the saphenous vein during inguinal lymphadenectomy decreases morbidity in patients with carcinoma of the vulva. Cancer89, 1520–1525 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall TB, Barton DP, Trott PA et al. The role of ultrasound-guided cytology of groin lymph nodes in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: 5-year experience in 44 patients. Clin. Radiol.58(5), 367–371 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawnaur JM, Reynolds K, Wilson G, Hillier V, Kitchener HC. Identification of inguinal lymph node metastases from vulval carcinoma by magnetic resonance imaging: an initial report. Clin. Radiol.57(11), 995–1000 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Land R, Herod J, Moskovic E et al. Routine computerized tomography scanning, groin ultrasound with or without fine needle aspiration cytology in the surgical management of primary squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer16, 312–317 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abang Mohammed DK, Uberoi R, de B Lopes A, Monaghan JM. Inguinal node status by ultrasound in vulva cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.77(1), 93–96 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moskovic EC, Shepherd JH, Barton DP, Trott PA, Nasiri N, Thomas JM. The role of high resolution ultrasound with guided cytology of groin lymph nodes in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva: a pilot study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.106, 863–867 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohaib SA, Richards PS, Ind T et al. MR imaging of the vulva. Am. J. Roentgenol.178, 373–377 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn DE, Dehdashti F, Gibb RK et al. Prospective evaluation of positron emission tomography for the detection of groin node metastases from vulvar cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.85(1) , 179–184 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averette HE, Ford JH, Dudan RC, Girtanner RE, Hoskins WJ, Lutz MH. Staging of cervical cancer. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.18(3), 215–232 (1975).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lagasse LD, Creasman WT, Shingleton HM, Ford JH, Blessing JA. Results and complications of operative staging in cervical cancer: experience of the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Gynecol. Oncol.9(1), 90–98 (1980).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedet JL, Odicino F, Maisonneuve P et al. Carcinoma of the cervix uteri. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.83, 41–78 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logmans A, Kruyt RH, de Bruin HG, Cox PH, Pillay M, Trimbos JB. Lymphedema and lymphocysts following lymphadenectomy may be prevented by omentoplasty: a pilot study. Gynecol. Oncol.75(3), 323–327 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martimbeau PW, Kjorstad KE, Kolstad P. Stage IB carcinoma of the cervix, the Norwegian Radium Hospital, 1968–1970: results of treatment and major complications. I. Lymphedema. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.131(4), 389–394 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raatz D, Borner P. Laparoscopy assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (LAVRH) for cervical carcinoma – perioperative parameters and complications. Zentralbl. Gynakol.123(3), 136–142 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bortolozzi G, Mangili G, Raimondo V, Uderzo A, Zanetta M. Le complicanze linfatiche nella terapia del cervico-carcinoma clinico. Casistica del decennio 1971–1980 (1.157 pazienti). Ann. Ost. Gin. Med. Perin.107, 296–304 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mamsen A, Ledertoug S, Hørlyck A et al. The possible role of ultrasound in early cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.56, 187–190 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung TH, Yang WT, Yu MY, Lo WK, Ho SH. New development of laparoscopic ultrasound and laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy in the management of patients with cervical carcinoma. Gynecol. Oncol.71, 87–93 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang WT, Lam WW, Yu MY, Cheung TH, Metreweli C. Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. Am. J. Roentgenol.175(3), 759–766 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Choi BI, Lee HP et al. Uterine cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MR findings. Radiology175, 45–51 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Choi BI, Han JK et al. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: comparison of CT and MRI in 99 patients. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.17, 633–640 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellomi M, Bonomo G, Landoni F et al. Accuracy of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of lymph node involvement in cervix carcinoma. Eur. Radiol.15(12), 2469–2474 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Subak LL, Hricak H, Powell CB, Azizi L, Stern JL. Cervical carcinoma: computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative staging. Obstet. Gynecol.86, 43–50 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oellinger JJ, Blohmer JU, Michniewicz K et al. Pre-operative staging of cervical cancer: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) with histologic results. Zentralbl. Gynakol.122, 82–91 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genolet PM, Hänggi W, Dreher E. Bilan d’extension tumorale lors de cancer invasif du col utérin. Gynäk. Geburtshilfliche. Rundsch.33, 180–184 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kokka F, Vorgias G, Tserkezoglou A et al. Preoperative work-up of early cervical cancer (stages Ib–IIa). Eur. J. Gynaec. Oncol.24, 175–177 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: a systematic review. Gynecol. Oncol.91, 59–66 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narayan K, Hicks RJ, Jobling T, Bernshaw D, McKenzie AF. A comparison of MRI and PET scanning in surgically staged loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer: potential impact on treatment. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer.11, 263–271 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park W, Park YJ, Huh SJ et al. The usefulness of MRI and PET imaging for the detection of parametrial involvement and lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.35, 260–264 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belhocine T, Thille A, Fridman V et al. Contribution of whole-body 18FDG PET imaging in the management of cervical cancer. Gynecol. Oncol.78, 90–97 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Yu KK, Hricak H, Subak LL, Zaloudek CJ, Powell CB. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma: phased array coil fast spin-echo versus body coil spin-echo T2-weighted MR imaging. Am. J. Roentgenol.171, 707–711 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheu MH, Chang CY, Wang JH, Yen MS. Preoperative staging of cervical carcinoma with MR imaging: a reappraisal of diagnostic accuracy and pitfalls. Eur. Radiol.11, 1828–1833 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawighorst H, Schoenberg SO, Knapstein PG et al. Staging of invasive cervical carcinoma and of pelvic lymph nodes by high resolution MRI with a phased-array coil in comparison with pathological findings. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.22, 75–81 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang LJ, Wong YC, Chen CJ, Huang KG, Hsueh S. Cervical carcinoma: MR imaging with integrated endorectal/phased-array coils: a pilot study. Eur. Radiol.11, 1822–1827 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heuck A, Scheidler J, Kimmig et al. Lymph node staging in cervix cercinomas: the results of high-resolution magnetic resonance tomography (MRT) with a phased-array coil. Röfo.166, 210–215 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reinhardt MJ, Ehritt-Braun C, Vogelgesang D et al. Metastatic lymph nodes in patients with cervical cancer: detection with MR imaging and FDG PET. Radiology218, 776–782 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI, Han MC. Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic lymph node metastasis with MR imaging. Radiology190, 807–811 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi HJ, Roh JW, Seo SS et al. Comparison of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the presurgical detection of lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cervical carcinoma. Cancer106, 914–922 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawnaur JM, Johnson RJ, Buckley CH, Tindall V, Isherwood I. Staging, volume estimation and assessment of nodal status in carcinoma of the cervix: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with surgical findings. Clin. Rad.49, 443–452 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SH, Kim SH, Choi HJ, Park BK, Lee HK. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging staging of uterine cervical carcinoma. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.28, 620–627 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose PG, Adler LP, Rodriguez M, Faulhaber PF, Abdul-Karim FW, Miraldi F. Positron emission tomography for evaluating para-aortic nodal metastasis in locally advanced cervical cancer before surgical staging: a surgicopathologic study. J. Clin. Oncol.17, 41–45 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühnel G, Horn LC, Fischer U et al.18F-FDG-Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie bei Zervixkarzinom: erste Ergebnisse. Zentralbl. Gynakol.123, 229–235 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chou HH, Chang TC, Yen TC et al. Low value of [18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in primary staging of early-stage cervical cancer before radical hysterectomy. J. Clin. Oncol.24, 123–128 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal MR. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer. JAMA278, 1096–1101 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boss EA, Barentsz JO, Massuger LF, Boonstra H. The role of MR imaging in invasive cervical carcinoma. Eur. Radiol.10, 256–270 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M et al. Lymph node metastasis in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology283, 272–279 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Weissleder R, Elizondo G, Wittenberg J, Lee AS, Josephson L, Brady TJ. Ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide: an intravenous contrast agent for assessing lymph nodes with MR imaging. Radiology175(2), 494–498 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzai Y, Prince MR. Iron oxide-enhanced MR lymphography: the evaluation of cervical lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging7(1), 75–81 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vassallo P, Matei C, Heston WD, McLachlan SJ, Koutcher JA, Castellino RA. AMI-227-enhanced MR lymphography: usefulness for differentiating reactive from tumor-bearing lymph nodes. Radiology193(2), 501–506 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudgins PA, Anzai Y, Morris MR, Lucas MA. Ferumoxtran-10, a superparamagnetic iron oxide as a magnetic resonance enhancement agent for imaging lymph nodes: a Phase 2 dose study. Am. J. Neuroradiol.23(4), 649–656 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harisinghani MG, Barentsz J, Hahn PF et al. Noninvasive detection of clinically occult lymph-node metastases in prostate cancer. N. Engl. J. Med.348(25), 2491–2499 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller TM, Michel SC, Fröhlich J et al. USPIO-enhanced MRI for preoperative staging of gynecological pelvic tumors: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol.14, 937–944 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockall AG, Sohaib SA, Harisinghani MG et al. Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J. Clin. Oncol.23(12), 2813–2821 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will O, Purkayastha S, Chan C et al. Diagnostic precision of nanoparticle-enhanced MRI for lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol.7, 52–60 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anzai Y, Piccoli CW, Outwater EK et al. Evaluation of neck and body metastases to nodes with ferumoxtran 10-enhanced MR imaging: Phase III safety and efficacy study. Radiology228(3), 777–788 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harisinghani MG, Weissleder R. Sensitive, noninvasive detection of lymph node metastases. PloS. Med.1(3), 202–209 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahara T, Imai Y, Yamashita T, Yasuda S, Nasu S, Van Cauteren M. Diffusion weighted whole body imaging with background body signal suppression (DWIBS): technical improvement using free breathing, STIR and high resolution 3D display. Radiat. Med.22(4), 275–282 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo Y, Cai YQ, Cai ZL et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging16(2), 172–178 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naganawa S, Sato C, Kumada H, Ishigaki T, Miura S, Takizawa O. Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix. Eur. Radiol.15(1), 71–78 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodhams R, Matsunaga K, Iwabuchi K et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of malignant breast tumors: the usefulness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value and ADC map for the detection of malignant breast tumors and evaluation of cancer extension. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.29(5), 644–649 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumi M, Sakihama N, Sumi T et al. Discrimination of metastatic cervical lymph nodes with diffusion-weighted MR imaging in patients with head and neck cancer. Am. J. Neuroradiol.24(8), 1627–1634 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickles MD, Gibbs P, Sreenivas M, Turnbull LW. Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal and malignant prostate tissue at 3.0T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging23(2), 130–134 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu FY, Jao JC, Chen CY et al. Effect of intravenous gadolinium-DTPA on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance images for evaluation of focal hepatic lesions. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.29(2), 176–180 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar