Risk communication for patients seeking IVF

References

• Wright VC, Chang J, Jeng G et al. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2003. MMWR Surveill. Summ.55(SS04), 1–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oakley L, Doyle P. Predicting the impact of in vitro fertilisation and other forms of assisted conception on perinatal and infant mortality in England and Wales: examining the role of multiplicity. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113, 738–741 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Loft A, Anderson NA. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 8602 children born after in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection: the role of twin pregnancy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.83, 1071–1078 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance – United States, 2000. MMWR Surveill. Summ.52(SS09), 1–16 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Trevena LJ, Davey HM, Barratt A, Butow P, Caldwell P. A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. J. Eval. Clin. Pract.12, 13–23 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FA, Goldman BD, Boccia ML, Skinner M. The effect of format modifications and reading comprehension on recall of informed consent information by low-income patients: a comparison of print, video and computer-based presentations. Patient Educ. Couns.53, 205–216 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman RL, DeWalt DA, Bryant MR et al. Influence of patient literacy on the effectiveness of a primary care-based diabetes disease management program. JAMA292, 1711–1716 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillinger D, Grumback K, Piette J et al. Association of health literacy with diabetes outcomes. JAMA288, 475–482 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell CL, Hill EG, Clancy DE. The relationship between health literacy and diabetes knowledge and readiness to take health actions. Diabetes Educ.33, 144–151 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estrada CS, Martin-Hryniewicz M, Peek BT, Collins C, Byrd JC. Literacy and numeracy skills and anticoagulation control. Am. J. Med. Sci.328, 88–93 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis TC, Williams MV, Marin E, Parker RM, Glass J. Health literacy and cancer communication. CA Cancer J. Clin.52, 134–149 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safeer RS, Keenan J. Health literacy: the gap between physicians and patients. Am. Fam. Physician72, 463–468 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers ES, Wallace LS, Weiss BD. Misperceptions of medical understanding in low-literacy patients: implications for cancer prevention. Cancer Control13, 225–229 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merriman G, Ades T, Seffrin JR. Health literacy in the information age: communicating cancer information to patients and families. CA Cancer J. Clin.52, 130–134 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kools M, van de Wiel MW, Ruiter RA, Kok G. Pictures and text in instructions for medical devices: effects on recall and actual performance. Patient Educ. Couns.64, 104–111 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schapira MM, Nattinger AB, McAuliffe TL. The influence of graphic format on breast cancer risk communication. J. Health Commun.11, 569–582 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards A, Elwyn G, Mulley A. Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures. Br. Med. J.324, 827–830 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman K, Abraham C, Jenkins V, Fallowfield L. Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultation. Psycho-oncology12, 557–566 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartzberg JG, VanGeest JB, Wang CC (Eds). Understanding Health Literacy: Implications for Medicine and Public Health. American Medical Association Press, IL, USA (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zacarcadoolas C, Pleasant AF, Greer DS. Advancing Health Literacy: a Framework for Understanding and Action. Jossey-Bass, CA, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow MK, Riekert KA, Bilderback A et al. Tailored education may reduce health literacy disparities in asthma self-management. Am. J. Resp. Crit. Care Med.172, 980–986 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulous MN. British internet-derived patient information on diabetes mellitus: is it readable? Diabetes Technol. Ther.7, 528–535 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothman RL, Housam R, Weiss H et al. Patient understanding of food labels: the role of literacy and numeracy. Am. J. Prev. Med.31, 391–398 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DP Jr, Brownlee CD, McCoy TP, Pignone MP. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening: a survey study. BMC Fam. Pract.8, 16 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann T, McKenna K. Analysis of stroke patients’ and carers’ reading ability and the content and design of written materials. Patient Educ. Couns.60, 286–293 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang W, Burnett CB, Rowland JH et al. Communication between physicians and older women with localized breast cancer: implications for treatment and patient satisfaction. J. Clin. Oncol.20, 1008–1016 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phillips TG, Hickner J. Calling acute bronchitis a chest cold may improve patient satisfaction with appropriate antibiotic use. J. Am. Board Fam. Pract.18, 459–463 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schmid Mast M, Kindimann A, Langewitz W. Recipients’ perspective on breaking bad news: how you put it really makes a difference. Patient Educ. Couns.58, 244–251 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall TC, Wearn AM. Receiving bad news: patients with haematological cancer reflect on their experience. Palliat. Med.19, 594–601 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillinger D, Piette J, Grumbach K et al. Physician communication with diabetic patients who have low literacy. Arch. Intern. Med.163, 83–90 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattenden J, Watt I, Lewin RJP. Decision-making process in people with symptoms of acute myocardial infarction: qualitative study. Br. Med. J.324, 1006–1009 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gwede CK, Pow-Sang J, Seigne J et al. Treatment decision-making strategies and influences in patients with localized prostate carcinoma. Cancer104, 1381–1390 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology; Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Guidelines on number of embryos transferred. Fertil. Steril.86(5 Suppl.), S51–S52 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reddy UM, Wapner RJ, Rebar RW, Tasca RJ. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop. Obstet. Gynecol.109, 967–977 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Milad MKP, Stout J et al. Patient perceptions of multiple gestations: an assessment of knowledge and risk aversion. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.185, 920–924 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DAM, Donker D et al. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. Br. Med J.328, 261 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Geyter C, De Geyter M, Steimann S et al. Comparative birth weights of singletons born after assisted reproduction and natural conception in previously infertile women. Hum. Reprod.21, 705–712 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blennborn M, Nilsson S, Hillervik C, Hellberg D. The couple’s decision-making in IVF: one or two embryos at transfer? Hum. Reprod.20, 1292–1297 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan GL, Zhang SH, Dokras A et al. The desire of infertile patients for multiple births. Fertil. Steril.81, 500–504 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray S, Shetty A, Rattray A et al. A randomized comparison of alternative methods of information provision on the acceptability of elective single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.19, 911–916 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher ER. Imprinting and assisted reproductive technology. Hum. Mol. Genet.14, R133–R138 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson JR, Williams CJ. Genomic imprinting and assisted reproductive technology: connections and potential risks. Sem. Reprod. Med.23, 285–295 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gosden R, Trasler J, Lucifero D et al. Rare congenital disorders, imprinted genes, and assisted reproductive technology. Lancet361, 9373–9375 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Foresta C, Barolla A, Bartonloni L, Bettella A, Ferlin A. Genetic abnormalities among severely oligospermic men who are candidates for intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.90, 152–156 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aittomaki K, Wennerholm UB, Bergh C, Selbing A, Hazekamp J, Nygren KG. Safety issues in assisted reproduction technology: should ICSI patients have genetic testing before treatment? A practical proposition to help patient information. Hum. Reprod.19, 472–476 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod. Biomed. Online10, 436–441 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Montfoort APA, Dumoulin JCM, Land JA, Coonen E, Dergaag JG, Evers JLH. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles. Hum. Reprod.20, 433–436 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peddie VL, van Teijlingen E, Bhattacharya S. A qualitative study of women’s decision-making at the end of IVF treatment. Hum. Reprod.20, 1944–1945 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hock DL, Seifer DB, Kontopoulos E et al. Practice patterns among board-certified reproductive endocrinologists regarding high-order multiple gestations: a United States national survey. Obstet. Gynecol.99, 763–770 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang G, McNamara TK, Haimovici F, Hornstein MD. Problem drinking in women evaluated for infertility. Am. J. Addict.15, 174–179 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger DA, Frazier LM, Rowland CA. Preconception care and treatment with assisted reproductive technologies. Matern. Child Health J.82, 834–340 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Etchegary H, Perrier C. Information processing in the context of genetic risk: implications for genetic risk communication. J. Genet. Couns. DOI: 10.1007/s10897-006-9082-z (2007) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gore TD, Bracken CC. Testing the theoretical design of a health risk message: reexamining the major tenets of the Extended Parallel Process Model. Health Educ. Behav.32, 27–41 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKay DL, Berkowitz JM, Blumberg JB, Goldberg JP. Communicating cardiovascular disease risk due to elevated homocysteine levels: using the EPPM to develop print materials. Health Educ. Behav.31, 355–371 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson HD, Huffman LH, Fu R et al. Genetic risk assessment and BRCA mutation testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med.143, 362–379 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurmankin AD, Baron J, Armstrong K. Intended message versus message received in hypothetical physician risk communications: exploring the gap. Risk Anal.24, 1337–1347 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan T, Eckert K, Venesoen P, Leslie K, Chin-Yee I. Consenting to blood: what do patients remember? Transfus. Med.15, 461–466 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bikowski RM, Ripsin CM, Lorraine VL. Patient–physician congruence regarding medication regimens. J. Am. Geratri. Soc.49, 1353–1357 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeb BF, Sautner J, Leeb BA, Fassl C, Rintelen B. Lack of agreement between patients’ and physicians’ perspectives of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity changes. Scand. J. Rheumatol.35, 441–446 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haagen EC, Tuil W, Hendriks J, de Gruijn RP, Braat DD, Kremer JA. Current internet use and preferences of IVF and ICSI patients. Hum. Reprod.18, 2073–2078 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmel W, Meyer J, Kochen MM, Michelmann HW. Information needs and visitors’ experience of an internet expert forum on infertility. J. Med. Internet Res.7, e20 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Abusief ME, Hornstein MD, Jain T; American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Assessment of United States fertility clinic websites according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM)/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) guidelines. Fertil. Steril.87, 88–92 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain T, Hornstein MD. Disparities in access to infertility services in a state with mandated insurance coverage. Fertil. Steril.84, 221–223 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nachtigall RD. International disparities in access to infertility services. Fertil. Steril.85, 871–875 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain T. Socioeconomic and racial disparities among infertility patients seeking care. Fertil. Steril.85, 876–881 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker G, Castrillo M, Jackson R, Nachtigall RD. Infertility among low-income Latinos. Fertil. Steril.85, 882–887 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain T, Harlow BL, Hornstein MD. Insurance coverage and outcomes of in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.347, 661–666 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Elements to be considered in obtaining informed consent for ART. Fertil. Steril.86(Suppl. 4), S272–S273 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Stableford S, Mettger W. Plain language: a strategic response to the health literacy challenge. J. Public Health Policy28, 71–93 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerr D. Information in diabetes care: is there a need to dumb down even more? Diabet. Med.24, 561–563 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams K. Comprehending disclosure: must patients understand the risks they run? Med. Law Int.4, 97–109 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Schwendemann WD, O’Brien JM, Barton JR et al. Modifiable risk factors for growth restriction in twin pregnancies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.192, 1440–1442 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke B, Hediger ML, Nugent C et al. Body mass index – specific weight gains associated with optimal birth weights in twin pregnancies. J. Reprod. Med.48, 217–224 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar