Should preimplantation genetic diagnosis be offered universally?

References

• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP. The in vivo and in vitro efficiency and efficacy of PGD for aneuploidy. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.183, S13–S18 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Cohen J, Munne S et al. Over a decade of preimplantation genetic diagnosis experience – a multicenter report. Fertil. Steril.82, 292–294 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Gianaroli L. Chromosomal status of human embryo. In: Human Preimplantation Embryo Selection. Elder K, Cohen J (Eds). Informa Healthcare, London, UK, 209–234 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A. Practical Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Springer, NY, USA, 204 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Munné S, Chen S, Colls P et al. Maternal age, morphology, development and chromosome abnormalities in over 6000 cleavage stage embryos. Reprod. Biomed. Online14, 628–634 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Kuliev A. Atlas of Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis. Taylor & Francis, NY, USA, 288 (2005)
   Google Scholar
• Cieslak J, Tur-Kaspa I, Ilkevitch Y, Bernal A, Morris R, Verlinsky Y. Multiple micromanipulations for preimplantation genetic diagnosis do not affect embryo development to the blastocyst stage. Fertil. Steril.85, 1826–1829 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti A, Toschi M, Esposito F, Fasolino MC. The combination of polar body and embryo biopsy does not affect embryo viability. Hum. Reprod.19, 1163–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod. Biomed. Online4, 183–196 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Illkewitch Y, Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis of age-related aneuploidies. Reprod. Biomed. Online6, 54–59 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kahraman S, Benkalifa M, Donmez E. Overall results of aneuploidy screening in 276 couples undergoing assisted reproductive techniques. Prenat. Diagn.24, 307–311 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Verlinsky Y. Frequency and distribution of chromosomal abnormalities in human oocytes. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 193–198 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Merril M, Adkins K, Freemen S, Sherman S. Recombination and maternal age-dependent nondisjunction: molecular studies of trisomy 16. Am. J. Hum. Genet.57, 867–874 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson MB, Mikkelsen M. Nondisjunction in trisomy 21: origin and mechanisms. Cytogenet. Cell Genet.91, 199–203 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherman SL, Peterson MB, Freeman SB. Nondisjunction of chromosome 21 in maternal meiosis I: evidence for a maternal age-dependent mechanism involving reduced recombination. Hum. Mol. Genet.3, 1529–1535 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T and Hunt P. To err in human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet.2, 280–291 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Templado C, Bosch M, Benet J. Frequency and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in human spermatozoa. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 199–205 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuliev A, Kuznetsova I, Cieslak J et al. Aneuploidy in human oogenesis. Presented at: 7th Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society Conference, PGDIS. Melbourne, Australia, 13–16 June 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Magli C, Ferraretti A, Crippa A, Lappi M, Feliciani E, Gianaroli L. First meiosis errors in immature oocytes generated by stimulated cycles. Fertil. Steril.86, 629–635 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S, Bahce M, Sandalinas M et al. Differences in chromosome susceptibility to aneuploidy and survival to first trimester. Reprod. Biomed. Online8, 81–90 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Chromosome abnormalities and their relationship to morphology and development of human embryos. Reprod. Biomed. Online12, 234–253 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Munne S. Preimplantation diagnosis for aneuploidies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization with poor prognosis: identification of the categories for which it should be proposed. Fertil. Steril.72, 837–844 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munné S, Sandalinas M, Escudero T et al. Improved implantation after preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Reprod. Biomed. Online7, 91–97 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Munne S, Fisher J, Warner A et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis significantly reduces pregnancy loss in infertile couples: a multi-center study. Fertil. Steril.85, 326–332 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staessen C, Platteau P, Van Assche E et al. A comparison of blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in couples with advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.19, 2849–2858 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platteau P, Staessen C, Michiels A, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I, Devroey P. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for aneuploidy in patients with unexplained recurrent miscarriages. Fertil. Steril.83, 393–397 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J, Wells D, Munne S. Removal of 2 cells from cleavage stage embryos is likely to reduce the efficacy of chromosomal tests that are used to enhance implantation rates. Fertil. Steril.87, 496–503 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mastenbroek S, Twisk M, Van Echten-Arends J et al. In vitro fertilization with preimplantation genetic screening. N. Engl. J. Med.357, 9–17 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahine LK, Cedar MI. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis does not increase pregnancy rates in patients at risk for aneuploidy. Fertil. Steril.85, 51–56 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denoso P, Staessen C, Fauser BCJM, Devroey P. Current value of preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening in IVF. Hum. Reprod. Update13, 15–25 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti A et al. The beneficial effects of PGD for aneuploidy support extensive clinical application. Reprod. Biomed. Online10, 633–640 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verlinsky Y, Tur-Kaspa I, Cieslak J et al. Preimplantation testing for chromosomal disorders improves reproductive outcome of poor-prognosis IVF patients. Reprod. Biomed. Online11, 219–225 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magli MC, Jones GM, Gras L, Gianaroli L, Korman I, Trounson AO. Chromosome mosaicism in day 3 aneuploid embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts in vitro. Hum. Reprod.15, 1781–1786 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandalinas M, Sadowy S, Alikani M, Calderon G, Cohen J, Munne S. Developmental ability of chromosomally abnormal human embryos to develop to the blastocyst stage. Hum. Reprod.16, 1954–1958 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar