Implications of multiple cesarean deliveries

References

• Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Ventura SJ, Osterman MJK, Wilson EC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2010. National Vital Statistics Reports. 61(1), National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD (2012).
   Google Scholar
• NIH state-of-the-science conference statement on cesarean delivery on maternal request. NIH Consens. State Sci. Statements 23(1), 1–29 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Frigoletto FDJr, Ryan KJ, Phillippe M. Maternal mortality rate associated with cesarean section: an appraisal. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 136(7), 969–970 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• Sachs BP, Kobelin C, Castro MA, Frigoletto F. The risks of lowering the cesarean delivery rate. N. Engl. J. Med. 340(1), 54–57 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silver RM, Landon MB, Rouse DJ et al. Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 107(6), 1226–1232 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyell DJ. Adhesions and perioperative complications of repeat cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205( Suppl. 6), S11–S18 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark EA, Silver RM. Long-term maternal morbidity associated with repeat cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205( Suppl. 6), S2–S10 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall NE, Fu R, Guise JM. Impact of multiple cesarean deliveries on maternal morbidity: a systematic review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(3), 2624 e261–e268 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lynch CM, Kearney R, Turner MJ. Maternal morbidity after elective repeat caesarean section after two or more previous procedures. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 106(1), 10–13 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Eller AG, Porter TF, Soisson P, Silver RM. Optimal management strategies for placenta accreta. BJOG 116(5), 648–654 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gielchinsky Y, Mankuta D, Rojansky N, Laufer N, Gielchinsky I, Ezra Y. Perinatal outcome of pregnancies complicated by placenta accreta. Obstet. Gynecol. 104(3), 527–530 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balayla J, Bondarenko HD. Placenta accreta and the risk of adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. J. Perinat. Med. 41(2), 141–149 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshak CR, Ramos GA, Eskander R et al. Effect of predelivery diagnosis in 99 consecutive cases of placenta accreta. Obstet. Gynecol. 115(1), 65–69 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belfort MA. Indicated preterm birth for placenta accreta. Semin. Perinatol. 35(5), 252–256 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurol-Urganci I, Cromwell DA, Edozien LC et al. Risk of placenta previa in second birth after first birth cesarean section: a population-based study and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 11, 95 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Q, Wen SW, Oppenheimer L et al. Association of caesarean delivery for first birth with placenta previa and placental abruption in second pregnancy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 114(5), 609–613 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. First-birth cesarean and placental abruption or previa at second birth(1). Obstet. Gynecol. 97(5 Pt 1), 765–769 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Getahun D, Oyelese Y, Salihu HM, Ananth CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet. Gynecol. 107(4), 771–778 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tikkanen M. Placental abruption: epidemiology, risk factors and consequences. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 90(2), 140–149 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crane JM, Van den Hof MC, Dodds L, Armson BA, Liston R. Maternal complications with placenta previa. Am. J. Perinatol. 17(2), 101–105 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Nisenblat V, Barak S, Griness OB, Degani S, Ohel G, Gonen R. Maternal complications associated with multiple cesarean deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 108(1), 21–26 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grobman WA, Gersnoviez R, Landon MB et al. Pregnancy outcomes for women with placenta previa in relation to the number of prior cesarean deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol. 110(6), 1249–1255 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukerrou M, Lambaudie E, Collinet P, Crepin G, Cosson M. A history of cesareans is a risk factor in vaginal hysterectomies. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 82(12), 1135–1139 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafay Pillet MC, Leonard F, Chopin N et al. Incidence and risk factors of bladder injuries during laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: a 14.5 years experience in a continuous series of 1501 procedures. Hum. Reprod. 24(4), 842–849 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rooney CM, Crawford AT, Vassallo BJ, Kleeman SD, Karram MM. Is previous cesarean section a risk for incidental cystotomy at the time of hysterectomy? A case-controlled study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193(6), 2041–2044 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Wang BS, Zhou LF, Coulter D et al. Effects of caesarean section on maternal health in low risk nulliparous women: a prospective matched cohort study in Shanghai, China. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 10, 78 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Pell JP, Dobbie R. Caesarean section and risk of unexplained stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy. Lancet 362(9398), 1779–1784 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray R, Quigley MA, Hockley C, Kurinczuk JJ, Goldacre M, Brocklehurst P. Caesarean delivery and risk of stillbirth in subsequent pregnancy: a retrospective cohort study in an English population. BJOG 114(3), 264–270 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richter R, Bergmann RL, Dudenhausen JW. Previous caesarean or vaginal delivery: which mode is a greater risk of perinatal death at the second delivery? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 132(1), 51–57 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill SM, Kearney PM, Kenny LC et al. Caesarean delivery and subsequent stillbirth or miscarriage: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 8(1), e54588 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallin MC, Ekström P, Maršál K, Källén K. Apgar score and perinatal death after one previous caesarean delivery. BJOG 117, 1088–1097 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bahtiyar MO, Julien S, Robinson JN et al. Prior cesarean delivery is not associated with an increased risk of stillbirth in a subsequent pregnancy: analysis of U.S. perinatal mortality data, 1995–1997. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 195(5), 1373–1378 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Landau R, Bollag L, Ortner C. Chronic pain after childbirth. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 22(2), 133–145 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macrae WA. Chronic pain after surgery. Br. J. Anaesth. 87(1), 88–98 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luijendijk RW, Jeekel J, Storm RK, Schutte PJ, Hop WC, Drogendijk AC et al. The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann. Surg. 225(4), 365–369 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Almeida EC, Nogueira AA, Candido dos Reis FJ, Rosa e Silva JC. Cesarean section as a cause of chronic pelvic pain. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 79(2), 101–104 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Loos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet. Gynecol. 111(4), 839–846 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolajsen L, Sorensen HC, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following Caesarean section. Acta. Anaesthesiol. Scand. 48(1), 111–116 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kainu JP, Sarvela J, Tiippana E, Halmesmaki E, Korttila KT. Persistent pain after caesarean section and vaginal birth: a cohort study. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth. 19(1), 4–9 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulandi T, Agdi M, Zarei A, Miner L, Sikirica V. Adhesion development and morbidity after repeat cesarean delivery. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 201(1), 56 e51–e56 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morales KJ, Gordon MC, Bates GWJr. Postcesarean delivery adhesions associated with delayed delivery of infant. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 196(5), 461 e461–e466 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps MG, Watabe B, Clemons JL, Weitzen S, Myers DL. Risk factors for bladder injury during cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 105(1), 156–160 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman MS, Gasem T, Al Suleiman SA, Al Jama FE, Burshaid S, Rahman J. Bladder injuries during cesarean section in a university hospital: a 25-year review. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 279(3), 349–352 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Took S, Platt R, Tulandi T. Adhesion-related small-bowel obstruction after gynecologic operations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 180(2 Pt 1), 313–315 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Andolf E, Thorsell M, Kallen K. Cesarean delivery and risk for postoperative adhesions and intestinal obstruction: a nested case-control study of the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 203(4), 406 e401–e406 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenberg MB, Daniels K, Blumenfeld YJ, Caughey AB, Lyell DJ. Do adhesions at repeat cesarean delay delivery of the newborn? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 205(4), 380 e1–e5 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Shi Z, Ma L, Yang Y et al. Adhesion formation after previous caesarean section-a meta-analysis and systematic review. BJOG 118(4), 410–422 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapustian V, Anteby EY, Gdalevich M, Shenhav S, Lavie O, Gemer O. Effect of closure versus nonclosure of peritoneum at cesarean section on adhesions: a prospective randomized study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 206(1), 56 e51–e54 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Guido M et al. Effect of avoiding bladder flap formation in caesarean section on repeat caesarean delivery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 159(2), 300–304 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Fogertey P, Roehl K, Stamilio D, Macones GA. Utility of the bladder flap at cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol. 119(4), 815–821 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oral E, Elter K. The impact of cesarean birth on subsequent fertility. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol. 19(3), 238–243 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Collin SM, Marshall T, Filippi V. Caesarean section and subsequent fertility in sub-Saharan Africa. BJOG 113(3), 276–283 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Smith GC, Wood AM, Pell JP, Dobbie R. First cesarean birth and subsequent fertility. Fertil. Steril. 85(1), 90–95 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick JS, Tierney EF, Lawson HW, Strauss LT, Klein L, Atrash HK. Previous cesarean delivery and the risk of ectopic pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol. 87(2), 297–301 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• O'Neill S, Khashan A, Kenny L et al. Caesarean section and subsequent ectopic pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 120(6), 671–680 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotas MA, Haberman S, Levgur M. Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies: etiology, diagnosis, and management. Obstet. Gynecol. 107(6), 1373–1381 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurkovic D, Hillaby K, Woelfer B, Lawrence A, Salim R, Elson CJ. Cesarean scar pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 21(3), 310 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Einenkel J, Stumpp P, Kosling S, Horn LC, Hockel M. A misdiagnosed case of caesarean scar pregnancy. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 271(2), 178–181 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Herman A, Weinraub Z, Avrech O, Maymon R, Ron-El R, Bukovsky Y. Follow up and outcome of isthmic pregnancy located in a previous caesarean section scar. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 102(10), 839–841 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Troendle J, Reddy UM et al. Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 203(4), 326 e321–e326 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Landon MB. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Clin. Perinatol. 35(3), 491–504 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 115: vaginal birth after previous cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol. 116, 450–463 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Branch DW, Silver RM. Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 55(4), 946–960 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Landon MB, Hauth JC, Leveno KJ et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery. N. Engl. J. Med. 351(25), 2581–2589 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macones GA, Peipert J, Nelson DB et al. Maternal complications with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: a multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 193(5), 1656–1662 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, Fallon D, Yoshida MM. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet. Gynecol. 76(5 pt 1), 750–754 (1990).
   Google Scholar
• Miller DA, Diaz FG, Paul RH. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a 10-year experience. Obstet. Gynecol. 84(2) 255–258 (1994).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmgren CM. Uterine rupture associated with VBAC. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 55(4), 978–987 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang J, Landy HJ, Branch DW et al. Contemporary patterns of spontaneous labor with normal neonatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol. 116(6), 1281–1287 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker JH, Bax L, Amer-Wahlin I et al. ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram in intrapartum fetal monitoring: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol. 119(1), 145–154 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Spong CY, Berghella V, Wenstrom KD, Mercer BM, Saade GR. Preventing the first cesarean delivery: summary of a joint Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Workshop. Obstet. Gynecol. 120(5), 1181–1193 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar