The vanishing twin: prevalence and consequences for outcome after assisted reproduction

References

• Stoeckel W. Lehbuch der Geburtschilfe. Gustav Fischer, Jena, Germany (1945).
   Google Scholar
• Finberg HJ, Birnholz JC. Ultrasound observations in multiple gestation with first trimester bleeding: the blighted twin. Radiology132, 137–142 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy HJ, Keith LG. The vanishing twin: a review. Hum. Reprod.4, 177–183 (1998).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tharapel AT, Elias S, Shulman LP et al. Resorbed co-twin as an explanation for discrepant chorionic villus results: NonHmosaic 47,XX, +16 in villi (direct and culture) with normal (46,XX) amniotic fluid and neonatal blood. Prenat. Diagn.9, 467–472 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landy HJ, Weiner S, Corson SL et al. The ‘vanishing twin’: ultrasonographic assessment of fetal disappearance in the first trimester. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.155, 14–19 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hvidtjørn D, Grove J, Schendel D et al. ‘Vanishing embryo syndrome’ in IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod.20, 2550–2551 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann G, Gundrun C, Drake L, Bertsche A. Frequency and effect of vaginal bleeding on pregnancyoutcome during the first 3 weeks after positive B-hCG test results following IVF-ET. Fertil. Steril.74, 609–610 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezeshki K, Feldman J, Stein DE, Lobel SM, Grazi RV. Bleeding and spontaneous abortion after therapy for infertility. Fertil. Steril.74, 504–508 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MA, Mittendorf R, Lieberman E, Monson RR. Adverse infant outcomes associated with first-trimester vaginal bleeding. Obstet. Gynecol.78, 14–18 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss JL, Malone FD, Vidaver J et al. Threatened miscarriage: a risk for poor pregnancy outcome, a population based screening study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.190, 745–750 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De sutter P, Bontinck J, Schutysers V, Van der Elst J, Gerris J, Dhont M. First-trimester bleeding and pregnancy outcome in singletons after assisted reproduction. Hum. Reprod.21, 1907–1911 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Taylor SN, Lu PY et al. Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy: incidence and effect on outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.186, 77–83 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tummers P, De Sutter P, Dhont M. Risk of spontaneous abortion in singleton and twin pregnancies after IVF/ICSI. Hum. Reprod.18, 1720–1723 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Sala GB, Nucera G, Gallinelli A, Nicoli A, Villani MT, Blickstein I. Spontaneous embryonic loss following in vitro fertilization: incidence and effect on outcomes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.191, 741–746 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, la Cour Freiesleben N, Nyboe Andersen A. consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies. Hum. Reprod.20, 2821–2829 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey RP, Sartor BM, Pyrzak R. What is the most relevant standard of success in assisted reproduction? No single outcome measure is satisfactory when evaluating success in assisted reproduction; both twin and singletons births should be counted as successes. Hum. Reprod.19, 783–787 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N. Engl. J. Med.346, 731–737 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster PAL. Number of gestational sacs and singleton IVF preterm birth. Hum. Reprod.19(Suppl. 1) O245–O285 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• La Sala GB, Nucera G, Gallinelli A, Nicoli A, Villani MT, Blickstein I. Spontaneous embryonic loss after in vitro fertilization with and without intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil. Steril.82, 1536–9136 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinborg A, Lidegaard O, Freiesleben NC, Andersen AN. Vanishing twins: a predictor of small-for-gestational age in IVF singletons. Hum. Reprod.22, 2707–2714 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen AN, Goossens V, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, de Mouzon J, Nygren KG. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe 2003. Results generated from European registers by ESHRE. Hum. Reprod.22, 1513–1525 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone J, Belogolovkin V, Matho A, Berkowitz RL, Moshier E, Eddleman K. Evolving trends in 2000 cases of multifetal pregnancy reduction: a single-center experience. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.197, 394.e1–394.e4 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodd J. Multifetal pregnancy reduction of triplet and higher-order multiple pregnancies to twins. Fertil. Steril.81, 1420–1422 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belogolovkin V, Ferrara L, Moshier E, Gandhi M, Eddleman K, Stone J. Differences in fetal growth, discordancy, and placental pathology in reduced versus nonreduced twins. Am. J. Perinatol.24, 575–580 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Depp R, Macones GA, Rosenn MF, Turzo E, Wapner RJ, Weinblatt VJ. Multifetal pregnancy reduction: evaluation of fetal growth in the remaining twin. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.174, 1233–1240 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audibert F, Boullier M, Boithias C, Kerbrat V, Vial M, Frydman R. Embryo reduction and birth weight discordance in dichorionic twins. Hum. Reprod.18, 437–440 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papageorghiou AT, Vigdou K, Bakoulas V, Sebire NJ, Nicolaides KH. Risk of miscarriage and early preterm birth in trichorionic triplet pregnancies with embryo reduction versus expectant management: new data and systematic review. Hum. Reprod.21, 1912–1917 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petterson B, Nelson KB, Watson L, Stanley F. Twins, triplets, and cerebral palsy in births in Western Australia in the 1980’s. Br. Med. J.307, 1239–1243 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pharoah POD, Adi Y. Consequences of in-utero death in a twin pregnancy. Lancet355, 1597–1602 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scher AI, Petterson B, Blair E et al. The risk of mortality or cerebral palsy in twins: a collaborative population-based study. Pediatr. Res.52, 671–681 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmerhorst FM, Perquin DAM, Donker D, Keirse MJNC. Perinatal outcome of singletons and twins after assisted conception: a systematic review of controlled studies. Br. Med. J.328, 261–265 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis. Obstet. Gynecol.103, 551–563 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schieve LA, Ferre C, Peterson HB et al. Perinatal outcome among singleton infants conceived through asssisted reproductive technology in the united states. Obstet. Gynecol.103, 1144–1153 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen M, Bower C, Milne E, de Klerk N, Kurinczuk JJ. Assisted reproductive technologies and the risk of birth defects – a systematic review. Hum. Reprod.20, 328–338 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Olausson PO. in vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden: risk for congenital malformations after different IVF methods. Birth Defects Res. (Part A)73, 162–169 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömberg B, Dahlquist G, Ericson A, Finnström O, Köster M, Stjernquist K. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilisation: a population based study. Lancet359, 461–465 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren K-G, Olausson PO. in vitro fertilization in Sweden: child morbidity including cancer risk. Fertil. Steril.84, 605–610 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lidegaard Ø, Pinborg A, Nyboe Andersen A. Imprinting diseases and IVF. Danish National IVF cohort study. Hum. Reprod.20, 950–954 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sutter P, Veldeman L, Kok P, Szymczak N, Van der Elst J, Dhont M. Comparison of outcome of pregnancy after intra-uterine insemination (IUI) and IVF. Hum. Reprod.20, 1642–1646 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ombelet W, Martens G, De Sutter P et al. Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study. Hum. Reprod.21, 1025–1032 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Ludwig M. Parameters of ovarian stimulation are not associated with the birth weight after IVF in women aged 25–35 years: an analysis of 32.000 singletons. Hum. Reprod.22(Suppl. 1) 103 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Baart EB, Martini E, Eijkemans MJ et al. Milder ovarian stimulation for in-vitro fertilization reduces aneuploidy in the human preimplantation embryo: a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.22, 980–988 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen TB, Baird DD, Olsen J, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AJ. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.89, 594–599 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Draper ES, Kurinczuk JJ, Abrams KR, Clarke M. Assessment of separate contributions to perinatal mortality of infertility history and treatment: a case-control analysis. Lancet353, 1746–1749 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandian Z, Bhattacharya S, Templeton A. Review of unexplained infertility and obstetric outcome: a 10 year review. Hum. Reprod.16, 2593–2597 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso O, Baird DD. Infertility and preterm delivery, birthweight, and caesarean section: a study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Hum. Reprod.18, 2478–2484 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso O, Olsen J. Subfecundity and neonatal mortality: longitudinal study within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Br. Med. J.330, 393–394 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhu JL, Basso O, Obel C, Bille C, Olsen J. Infertility, infertility treatment, and congenital malformations: Danish national birth cohort. Br. Med. J.333, 679 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Neubourg D, Gerris J, Mangelschots K et al. The obstetrical and neonatal outcome of babies born after single-embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI compares favourably to spontaneously conceived babies. Hum. Reprod.21, 1041–1046 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Sutter P, Delbaere I, Gerris J et al. Birthweight of singletons after assisted reproduction is higher after single- than after double-embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.21, 2633–2637 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg AT, Carlsson P, Bergh C. Randomized single versus double embryo transfer: obstetric and paediatric outcome and a cost–effectiveness analysis. Hum. Reprod.21, 210–216 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poikkeus P, Gissler M, Unkila-Kallio L, Hyden-Granskog C, Tiitinen A. Obstetric and neonatal outcome after single embryo transfer. Hum. Reprod.22, 1073–1079 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurin A, Hausken J, Hillensjö T et al. Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization. N. Engl. J. Med.351(23), 2392–2402 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar