Hydrosalpinx and the outcome of IVF: current status

References

• Ozmen B, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Hydrosalpinx and IVF: assessment of treatments implemented prior to IVF. Reprod. Biomed. Online14, 235–241 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Brison DR, Lieberman BA. Ovarian response to gonadotropins after laparoscopic salpingectomy of the division of fallopian tubes for hydrosalpinges. Fertil. Steril.85, 1464–1468 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen AN, Yue Z, Meng FJ, Petersen K. Low implantation rate after in-vitro fertilization in patients with hydrosalpinges diagnosed by ultrasonography. Hum. Reprod.9, 1935–1938 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: cumulative results after salpingectomy in a randomized controlled trial. Hum. Reprod.16, 2403–2410 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camus E, Poncelet C, Goffinet F et al. Pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization in cases of tubal infertility with and without hydrosalpinx: a meta-analysis of published comparative studies. Hum. Reprod.14, 1243–1249 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi AJ, Segars JH, Miller BT, Leondires MP. Endometrial cavity fluid is associated with poor ovarian response and increased cancellation rates in ART cycles. Hum. Reprod.16, 2610–2615 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Waldenstrom U, Nilsson L, Hamberger L. Hydrosalpinx reduces in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer pregnancy rates. Hum. Reprod.9, 861–863 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A. The influence of hydrosalpinx on in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer – a review. Hum. Reprod. Update6, 387–395 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A. Why does hydrosalpinx reduce fertility? Hum. Reprod.17, 1141–1145 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer WR, Castelbaum AJ, Somkuti S et al. Hydrosalpinges adversely affect markers of endometrial receptivity. Hum. Reprod.12(7), 1393–1398 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blazar AS, Hogan JW, Seifer DB, Frishman GN, Wheeler CA, Haning RV. The impact of hydrosalpinx on successful pregnancy in tubal factor infertility treated by in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril.67, 517–520 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajonuma LC, Chan LN, Ng EH et al. Characterization of epithelial cell culture from human hydrosalpinges and effects of its conditioned medium on embryo development and sperm motility. Hum. Reprod.18, 291–298 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaiwy MA, Goldberg JM, Falcone T et al. Relationship between oxidative stress and embryotoxicity of hydrosalpingeal fluid. Hum. Reprod.17(3), 601–604 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary GS, Tayler HS. Hydrosalpinx fluid diminishes endometrial cell HOXA10 expression. Fertil. Steril.78, 577–580 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary GS, Kayisli U, Seli E, Bukulmez O, Arici A, Taylor HS. Salpingectomy increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA10 expression in women with hydrosalpinx. Fertil. Steril.87(2), 367–372 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NG EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Ho PC. Comparison of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows among patients with and without hydrosalpinx shown on scanning during in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil. Steril.85, 333–338 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eytan O, Azem F, Gull I, Wolman I, Elad D, Jaffa AJ. The mechanism of hydrosalpinx in embryo implantation. Hum. Reprod.16, 2662–2667 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Déchaud H, Daures JP, Arnal F et al. Done previous salpingectomy improve implantation and pregnancy rates in patients with severe tubal factor infertility who are undergoing in vitro fertilization? A pilot prospective randomized study. Fertil. Steril.69, 1020–1025 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U et al. Hydrosalpinx and IVF outcome: a prospective randomized multicenter trial in Scandinavia on salpingectomy prior to IVF. Hum. Reprod.14, 2762–2769 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson NP, Mak W, Sowter MC. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilization. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.3, CD002125 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Lass A. What effect does hydrosalpinx have on assisted reproduction? What is the preferred treatment for hydrosalpinges? The ovary’s perspective. Hum. Reprod.14, 1674–1677 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shelton KE, Butler L, Tomer JP et al. Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx. Hum. Reprod.11, 523–525 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhulst G, Vandersteen N, Van Steirteghem AC, Devroey P. Bilateral salpingectomy does not compromise ovarian stimulation in an in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer programme. Hum. Reprod.9, 624–628 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strandell A, Lindhard A, Waldenstrom U, Thorburn J. Prophylactic salpingectomy does not impair the ovarian response in IVF treatment. Hum. Reprod.16, 1135–1139 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sagoskin AW, Lessey BA, Mottla GL et al. Salpingectomy or proximal tubal occlusion of unilateral hydrosalpinx increases the potential for spontaneous pregnancy. Hum. Reprod.18, 2634–2637 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray DL, Sagoskin AW, Widra EA, Levy MJ. The adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates and the benefit of surgical correction. Fertil. Steril.69, 41–45 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontoravdis A, Makrakis E, Pantos K, Botsis D, Deligeoroglou E, Creatsas G. Proximal tubal occlusion and salpingectomy result in similar improvement in in vitro fertilization outcome in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertil. Steril.86, 1642–1649 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfield RB, Stones RE, Coates A, Matteri RK, Hesla JS. Proximal occlusion of hydrosalpinx by hysteroscopic placement of microinsert before in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Fertil. Steril.83, 1547–1547 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sowter MC, Akande VA, Williams JA, Hull MG. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx? Hum. Reprod.12, 2147–2150 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinekly MD, Milki AA. Rapid reaccummulation of hydrometra after drainage at embryo transfer in patients with hydrosalpinx. Fertil. Steril.80, 1268–1271 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammdieh N, Afnan M, Evans J, Sharif K, Amso N, Olufowobi O. A postal survery of hydrosalpinx management prior to IVF in the United Kingdom. Hum. Reprod.19, 1009–1012 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar