Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of extrauterine pelvic diseases

References

• Bourne T. Can ovarian masses be characterized using ultrasound? Gynecol. Oncol.51(1), 4–6 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendelson EB, Bohm-Velez M, Joseph N, Neiman HL. Gynecologic imaging: comparison of transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. Radiology166(2), 321–324 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman BG, Arger PH, Grumbach K et al. Transvaginal and transabdominal sonography: prospective comparison. Radiology168(3), 639–643 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V et al. Prelaparoscopic assessment of ovarian cysts in reproductive-age women. Gynecol. Endoscop.6(3), 157–167 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Bau A, Atri M. Acute female pelvic pain: ultrasound evaluation. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR21(1), 78–93 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown DL. A practical approach to the ultrasound characterization of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Q.23(2), 87–105 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentin L. Pattern recognition of pelvic masses by grey-scale ultrasound imaging: the contribution of Doppler ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.14(5), 338–347 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin L. Use of morphology to characterize and manage common adnexal masses. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.18(1), 71–89 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Kroon CD, van der Sandt HA, van Houwelingen JC, Jansen FW. Sonographic assessment of non-malignant ovarian cysts: does sonohistology exist? Hum. Reprod.19(9), 2138–2143 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Garau N, Piras B, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Ultrasonography and color Doppler-based triage for adnexal masses to provide the most appropriate surgical approach. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.192(2), 401–406 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions. Hum. Reprod.12(12), 2649–2653 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Gerada M, D’Aquila M, Piras B, Melis GB. “Tenderness-guided” transvaginal ultrasonography: a new method for the detection of deep endometriosis in patients with chronic pelvic pain. Fertil. Steril.88(5), 1293–1297 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP, Mais V, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography associated with colour Doppler energy in the diagnosis of hydrosalpinx. Hum. Reprod.15(7), 1568–1572 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Angiolucci M, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cystic teratoma. Obstet. Gynecol.85(1), 48–52 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Lerner JP, Monteagudo A, Murphy KE, Heller DS. Transvaginal sonographic markers of tubal inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.12(1), 56–66 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Rottem S. Transvaginal ultrasonographic study of the Fallopian tube. Obstet. Gynecol.70(3), 424–428 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lande IM, Hill MC, Cosco FE, Kator NN. Adnexal and cul-de-sac abnormalities: transvaginal sonography. Radiology166(2), 325–332 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tessler FN, Perrella RR, Fleischer AC, Grant EG. Endovaginal sonographic diagnosis of dilated Fallopian tubes. Am. J. Roentgenol.153(3), 523–525 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patten RM, Vincent LM, Wolner-Hanssen P, Thorpe E Jr. Pelvic inflammatory disease. Endovaginal sonography with laparoscopic correlation. J. Ultrasound Med.9(12), 681–689 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacciatore B, Leminen A, Ingman-Friberg S, Ylöstalo P, Paavonen J. Transvaginal sonographic findings in ambulatory patients with suspected pelvic inflammatory disease. Obstet. Gynecol.80(6), 912–916 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Pasalic L, Benic S, Ilijas M. The value of transvaginal color Doppler in the assessment of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultra sound Med. Biol.21(6), 733–738 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atri M, Tran CN, Bret PM, Aldis AE, Kintzen GM. Accuracy of endovaginal sonography for the detection of Fallopian tube blockage. J. Ultrasound Med.13(6), 429–434(1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boardman LA, Peipert JF, Brody JM, Cooper AS, Sung J. Endovaginal sonography for the diagnosis of upper genital tract infection. Obstet. Gynecol.90(1), 54–57 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukeva TA, Aronen HJ, Karjalainen PT, Molander P, Paavonen T, Paavonen J. MR imaging in pelvic inflammatory disease: comparison with laparoscopy. Radiology210(1), 209–216 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, Acord DL, Young SW. Likelihood ratio of sonographic findings in discriminating hydrosalpinx from other adnexal masses. Am. J. Roentgenol.186(4), 1033–1038 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalel Y, Soriano D, Lipitz S, Mashiach S, Achiron R. Contribution of color Doppler flow to the ultrasonographic diagnosis of tubal abnormalities. J. Ultrasound Med.19(9), 645–649 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider V, Partridge JR, Gutierrez F, Hurt WG, Maizels MS, Demay RM. Benign cystic mesothelioma involving the female genital tract: report of 4 cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.145 (3), 355–359 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Philip G, Reilly AL. Benign cystic mesothelioma: case reports. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.91(9), 932–938 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hederstrom E, Forsberg L. Entrapped ovarian cyst: an unusual case of persistent abdominal pain. Acta Radiol.31(3), 285–286 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross MJ, Welch WR, Scully RE. Multilocular peritoneal inclusion cysts (so-called cystic mesotheliomas). Cancer64(6), 1336–1346 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffer FA, Kozakewich H, Colodny A, Goldstein DP. Peritoneal inclusion cysts: ovarian fluid in peritoneal adhesions. Radiology169(1), 189–191 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kurachi H, Murakami T, Nakamura H et al. Imaging of peritioneal pseudocysts: value of MR imaging compared with sonography and CT. Am. J. Roentgenol.161(3), 589–591 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sohaey R, Gardner TL, Woodward PJ, Peterson CM. Sonographic diagnosis of peritoneal inclusion cysts. J. Ultrasound Med.14(12), 913–917 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JS, Lee HJ, Woo SK, Lee TS. Peritoneal inclusion cysts and their relationship to the ovaries: evaluation with sonography. Radiology204(2), 481–484 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jain KA. Imaging of peritoneal inclusion cysts. Am. J. Roentgenol.174(6), 1559–1563 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savelli L, De Iaco P, Ghi T, Bovicelli L, Rosati F, Cacciatore B. Transvaginal sonographic appearance of peritoneal pseudocysts. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.23(3), 284–288 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okaro E, Condous G. Diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities of ultrasound in the management of pelvic pain. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.17(6), 611–617 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, Angiolucci M, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. Role of transvaginal sonography in the diagnosis of peritoneal inclusion cysts. J. Ultrasound Med.23(9), 1193–1200 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Levine CD, Patel UJ, Ghanekar D, Wachsberg RH, Simmons MZ, Stein M. Benign extraovarian mimics of ovarian cancer: distinction with imaging studies. Clin. Imaging21(5), 350–358 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ying W, Li Y, Zhou Y, Xie X. Cyst distortion: a new sonographic sign of peritoneal pseudocyst with regular morphology. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.29(2), 240–241 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barloon TJ, Brown BP, Abu-Youssef MM et al. Paraovarian and paratubal cyst: preoperative diagnosis using transabdominal and transvaginal sonography. J. Clin. Ultrasound24(3), 117–122 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JS, Woo SK, Suh SJ, Morettin LB. Sonographic diagnosis of paraovarian cysts: value of detecting a separate ipsilateral ovary. Am. J. Roentgenol.164(6), 1441–1444 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savelli L, Ghi T, De Iaco P, Ceccaroni M, Venturoli S, Cacciatore B. Paraovarian/paratubal cysts: comparison of transvaginal sonographic and pathological findings to establish diagnostic criteria. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.28(3), 330–334 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpern MB, Sandler MA, Madrazo BL. Sonographic features of parovarian cysts and their complications. Am. J. Roentgenol.143(1), 157–160 (1984).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athey PA, Cooper NB. Sonographic features of paraovarian cysts. Am. J. Roentgenol.144(1), 83–86 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Piras S, Angiolucci M, Marisa O, Melis GB. Diagnosis of paraovarian cysts using transvaginal sonography combined with CA 125 determination. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.28(6), 853–858 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber B, Muller H, Kulz T, Krause A, Reimer T. Simple ovarian cysts in premenopausal patients. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet.57(1), 49–55 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurwitz A, Yagel S, Zion I, Zakut D, Palti Z, Adoni A. The management of persistent clear pelvic cysts diagnosed by ultrasonography. Obstet. Gynecol.72(3), 320–322 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Mallarini G, Ajossa S et al. Transvaginal ultrasound and computed tomography combined with clinical parameters and CA 125 determinations in the differential diagnosis of persistent ovarian cysts in premenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.9(5), 339–343 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Obwegeser R, Deutinger J, Brnascheck G. The risk of malignancy with an apparently simple adnexal cyst on ultrasound. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.253(3), 117–120 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Granberg S, Wikland M, Jansson I. Macroscopic characterisation of ovarian tumors in relation to histological diagnosis: criteria to be used for ultrasound evaluation. Gynecol. Oncol.35(2), 139–144 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann UJ Jr, Gottfried WL, Goldhirsch A. Sonographic patterns of ovarian tumors: prediction of malignancy. Obstet. Gynecol.69(5), 777–781 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth M, Beral V, Maconchie N, Carpenter L, Scott C. A case control study of benign ovarian tumors. J. Epidemiol. Community Health46(5), 528–531 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Lai MP et al. The diagnosis of functional ovarian cysts using transvaginal ultrasound combined with clinical parameters, CA125 determinations, and color Doppler. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.110(1), 83–88 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Castillo G, Jurado M, Garcia GL. Is expectant management of sonographically benign adnexal cysts an option in selected asymptomatic premenopausal women? Hum. Reprod.20(11), 3231–3234 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dordoni D, Zaglio S, Zucca S, Favalli G. The role of sonographically guided aspiration in the clinical management of ovarian cysts. J. Ultrasound Med.12(1), 27–31 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmers RG, Osmers M, Von Maydell B, Wagner B, Kuhn W. Preoperative evaluation of ovarian tumors in premenopause by transvaginosonography. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.175(2), 428–434 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yoffe N, Bronshtein M, Brandes J, Blumenfeld Z. Hemorrhagic ovarian cyst detection by transvaginal sonography: the great imitator. Gynecol. Endocrinol.5(2), 123–129 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Mais V, Risalvato A, Lai MP, Melis GB. The diagnosis of endometriomas using color Doppler energy imaging. Hum. Reprod.13(6), 1691–1695 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Filly RA. The likelihood ratio of sonographic findings for the diagnosis of hemorrhagic ovarian cysts. J. Ultrasound Med.24(5), 607–614 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pascual MA, Hereter L, Tresserra F, Carreras O, Ubeda A, Dexeus S. Transvaginal sonographic appearance of functional ovarian cysts. Hum. Reprod.12(6), 1246–1249 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Errasti T, Jurado M. Blood flow in functional cysts and benign ovarian neoplasms in premenopausal women. J. Ultrasound Med.16(12), 819–824 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aleem F, Pennisi J, Zeitoun K, Predanic M. The role of color Doppler in the diagnosis of endometriomas. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.5(1), 51–54 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koninckx PR, Meuleman C, Demeyere S, Lesaffre E, Cornillie FJ. Suggestive evidence that pelvic endometriosis is a progressive disease, whereas deeply infiltrating endometriosis is associated with pelvic pain. Fertil. Steril.55(4), 759–765 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Mais V, Ajossa S, Paoletti AM, Angiolucci M, Melis GB. Transvaginal ultrasonography combined with CA 125 plasma levels in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil. Steril.65(2), 293–298 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athey PA, Diment DD. The spectrum of ultrasonic findings in endometriosis. J. Ultrasound Med.8(9), 487–491 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moore J, Copley S, Morris J, Lindsell D, Golding S, Kennedy S. A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.20(6), 630–634 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupfer MC, Schwimer SR, Lebovic J. Transvaginal sonographic appearance of endometriomata: spectrum of findings. J. Ultrasound Med.11(4), 129–133 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Angiolucci M, Paoletti AM, Melis GB. The efficiency of transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of endometrioma. Fertil. Steril.60(5), 776–780 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpi E, De Grandis T, Zuccaro G, La Vista A, Sismondi P. Role of transvaginal sonography in the detection of endometriomata. J. Clin. Ultrasound23(4), 163–167 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bhatt S, Kocakoc E, Dogra VS. Endometriosis: sonographic spectrum. Ultrasound Q.22(4), 273–280 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke L, Edwards A, Pollard K. Acoustic streaming in ovarian cysts. J. Ultrasound Med.24(5), 617–621 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Chen DC, Lipson SD, Filly RA. Endometriomas: diagnostic performance of US. Radiology210(3), 739–745 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown DL, Frates MC, Muto MG, Welch WR. Small echogenic foci in the ovaries: correlation with histologic findings. J. Ultrasound Med.23(2), 307–313 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Comerci JT, Licciardi F, Bergh PA, Gregori C, Breen JL. Mature cystic teratoma: a clinicopathologic evaluation of 517 cases and review of literature. Obstet. Gynecol.84(1), 22–28 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronshtein M, Yoffe N, Brandes JM, Blumenfeld Z. Hair as a sonographic marker of ovarian teratomas improved identification using transvaginal sonography and simulation model. J. Clin. Ultrasound19(6), 351–355 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quinn SF, Erickson S, Black WC. Cystic ovarian teratomas: the sonographic appearance of the dermoid plug. Radiology155(2), 477–478 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen L, Sabbagha R. Echo patterns of benign cystic teratomas by transvaginal ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.3(2), 120–123 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caspi B, Appelman Z, Rabinerson D, Elchalal U, Zalel Y, Katz Z. Pathognomonic echo patterns of benign cystic teratomas of the ovary: classification, incidence and accuracy rate of sonographic diagnosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.7(4), 275–279 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM. Imaging of ovarian masses: magnetic resonance imaging. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.34(2), 443–451 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MD, Feldstein VA, Lipson SD, Chen DC, Filly RA. Cystic teratomas of the ovary: diagnostic value of sonography. Am. J. Roentgenol.171(4), 1061–1065 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi B, Appelman Z, Rabinerson D, Zalel Y, Tulandi T, Shoham Z. The growth pattern of ovarian dermoid cysts: a prospective study in premenopausal and postmenopausal women. Fertil. Steril.68(3), 501–505 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalel Y, Seidman DS, Oren M et al. Sonographic and clinical characteristics of struma ovarii. J. Ultrasound Med.19(12), 857–861 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Horrow MM. Ultrasound of pelvic inflammatory disease. Ultrasound Q.20(4), 171–179 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Varras M, Polyzos D, Perouli E, Noti P, Pantazis I, Akrivis CH. Tubo-ovarian abscesses: spectrum of sonographic findings with surgical and pathological correlations. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.30(2–3), 117–121 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fried AM, Kenney CM 3rd, Stigers KB, Kacki MH, Buckley SL. Benign pelvic masses: sonographic spectrum. Radiographics16(2), 321–334 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Sciot C et al. Epithelial tumours of the ovary: CT findings and correlation with US. Radiology178(3), 811–818 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caspi B, Hagay Z, Appelman Z. Variable echogenicity as a sonographic sign in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian mucinous tumors. J. Ultrasound Med.25(12), 1583–1585 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Errasti T, Mínguez JA, Galán MJ, García-Manero M, Ceamanos C. Sonographic features of ovarian cystadenofibromas: spectrum of findings. J. Ultrasound Med.20(8), 915–919 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Athey PA, Malone RS. Sonography of ovarian fibromas/thecomas. J. Ultrasound Med.6(8), 431–436 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung SW, Yuen PM. Ovarian fibroma: a review on the clinical characteristics, diagnostic difficulties, and management options of 23 cases. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.62(1), 1–6 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Risalvato A et al. Diagnosis of adnexal malignancies by using color Doppler energy imaging as a secondary test in persistent masses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.11(4), 277–282 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown DL, Doubilet PM, Miller FH et al. Benign and malignant ovarian masses: selection of the most discriminating gray-scale and Doppler sonographic features. Radiology208(1), 103–110 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marret H, Ecochard R, Giraudeau B, Golfier F, Raudrant D, Lansac J. Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.20(6), 597–604 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Alcázar JL, Coccia ME et al. Complex pelvic mass as a target of evaluation of vessel distribution by color Doppler sonography for the diagnosis of adnexal malignancies: results of a multicenter European study. J. Ultrasound Med.21(10), 1105–1111 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentin L. Imaging in gynecology. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.20(6), 881–906 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB. Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. Obstet. Gynecol.78(1), 70–76 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lerner JP, Timor-Tritsch IE, Federman A, Abramovich G. Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses with an improved, weighted scoring system. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.170(1), 81–85 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs I, Oram D, Fairbanks J, Turner J, Frost C, Grudzinskas JG. A risk of malignancy index incorporating CA 125, ultrasound and menopausal status for the accurate preoperative diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.97(10), 922–929 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tailor A, Jurkovic D, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Campbell S. Sonographic prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.10(1), 41–47 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmerman D, Bourne TH, Tailor A et al. A comparison of methods for preoperative discrimination between malignant and benign adnexal masses: the development of a new logistic regression model. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.181(1), 57–65 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Valentin L, Ameye L, Jurkovic D et al. Which extrauterine pelvic masses are difficult to correctly classify as benign or malignant on the basis of ultrasound findings and is there a way of making a correct diagnosis? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.27(4), 438–444 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buy JN, Ghossain MA, Hugol D et al. Characterization of adnexal masses: combination of color Doppler and conventional sonography compared with spectral Doppler analysis alone and conventional sonography alone. Am. J. Roentgenol.166 (2), 385–393(1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schelling M, Braun M, Kuhn W et al. Combined transvaginal B-mode and color Doppler sonography for differential diagnosis of ovarian tumors: results of a multivariate logistic regression analysis. Gynecol. Oncol.77(1), 78–86 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gotlieb WH, Soriano D, Achiron R et al. CA 125 measurement and ultrasonography in borderline tumors of the ovary. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.183(3), 541–546 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Rinaldo D et al. Preoperative sonographic features of borderline ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.25(1), 50–59 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlanda N, Ferrari MM, Mezzopane R et al. Impact of a multiparameter, ultrasound-based triage on surgical management of adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.20(2), 181–185 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Piras S et al. Three-dimensional quantification of tumor vascularity as a tertiary test after B-mode and power Doppler evaluation for detection of ovarian cancer. J. Ultrasound Med.26(10), 1271–1278 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wølner-Hanssen P. Silent pelvic inflammatory disease: is it overstated? Obstet. Gynecol.86(3), 321–325 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bowman MC, Cooke ID. Comparison of Fallopian tube intraluminal pathology assessed by salpingoscopy with pelvic adhesions. Fertil. Steril.61 (3), 464–469 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ubaldi F, Wisanto A, Camus M, Tournaye H, Clasen K, Devroey P. The role of transvaginal ultrasonography in the detection of pelvic pathologies in the infertility workup. Hum. Reprod.13(2), 330–333 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okaro E, Condous G, Khalid A et al, The use of ultrasound-based ‘soft markers’ for the prediction of pelvic pathology in women with chronic pelvic pain-can we reduce the need for laparoscopy? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113(3), 251–256 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Yazbek J, Helmy S, Ben-Nagi J, Holland T, Sawyer E, Jurkovic D. Value of preoperative ultrasound examination in the selection of women with adnexal masses for laparoscopic surgery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.30(5), 765–770 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seow KM, Lin YH, Hsieh BC et al. Transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography combined with serum CA 125 level for the diagnosis of pelvic adhesions before laparoscopic surgery. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc.10(3), 320–326 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Pansini V et al. Routine clinical examination is not sufficient for diagnosing and locating deeply infiltrating endometriosis. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc.9(2), 115–119 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abrao MS, Gonçalves MO, Dias JA Jr, Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum. Reprod.22(12), 3092–3097 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angioni S, Peiretti M, Zirone M et al. Laparoscopic excision of posterior vaginal fornix in the treatment of patients with deep endometriosis without rectum involvement: surgical treatment and long-term follow-up. Hum. Reprod.21(6), 1629–1634 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinkel K, Chapron C, Balleyguier C, Fritel X, Dubuisson JB, Moreau JF. Magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of deep endometriosis. Hum. Reprod.14(4), 1080–1086 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumontier I, Roseau G, Vincent B et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in severe pelvic endometriosis. Gastroenterol. Clin. Biol.24(12), 1197–1204 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazot M, Detchev R, Cortez A, Amouyal P, Uzan S, Darai E. Transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography for the assessment of pelvic endometriosis: a preliminary comparison. Hum. Reprod.18(8), 1686–1692 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazot M, Malzy P, Cortez A, Roseau G, Amouyal P, Daraï E. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography and rectal endoscopic sonography in the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.30(7), 994–1001 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fedele L, Bianchi S, Portuese A, Borruto F, Dorta M. Transrectal ultrasonography in the assessment of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet. Gynecol.91(3), 444–448 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology232(2), 379–389 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dessole S, Farina M, Rubattu G, Cosmi E, Ambrosini G, Nardelli GB. Sonovaginography is a new technique for assessing rectovaginal endometriosis. Fertil. Steril.79(4), 1023–1027 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bazot M, Thomassin I, Hourani R, Cortez A, Darai E. Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal sonography for deep pelvic endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.24(2), 180–185 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghezzi F, Raio L, Cromi A et al. “Kissing ovaries”: a sonographic sign of moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertil. Steril.83(1), 143–147 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I; International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) Group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.16(5), 500–505 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T et al. Logistic regression model to distinguish between the benign and malignant adnexal mass before surgery: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. J. Clin. Oncol.23(34), 8794–8801 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin L, Ameye L, Testa A et al. Ultrasound characteristics of different types of adnexal malignancies. Gynecol. Oncol.102(1), 41–48 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Valentin L et al. External validation of mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Clin. Cancer Res.13(1), 4440–4447 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Jurkovic D et al. Inclusion of CA 125 does not improve mathematical models developed to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors. J. Clin. Oncol.25(27), 4194–4200 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T et al. Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA 125. J. Natl Cancer Inst.99(22), 1706–1714 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Valentin L et al. OC155: the first prospective evaluation of the IOTA Phase 1 mathematical models to predict the character of an adnexal mass Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.30(4), 414–415 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Bonilla-Musoles F, Raga F, Osborne N. Three-dimensional ultrasound evaluation of ovarian masses. Gynecol. Oncol.59(1), 129–135 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hata T, Yanagihara T, Hayashi K et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic evaluation of ovarian tumours: a preliminary study. Hum. Reprod.14 (3), 858–861 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Anic T, Kosuta D. Three-dimensional ultrasound and power Doppler improve the diagnosis of ovarian lesions. Gynecol. Oncol.76(1), 28–32 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurjak A, Kupesic S, Sparac V, Kosuta D. Three-dimensional ultrasonographic and power Doppler characterisation of ovarian lesions. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.16(4), 365–371 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Kurjak A. Contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional power Doppler sonography for differentiation of adnexal masses. Obstet. Gynecol.96(3), 452–458 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen LS, Escobar PF, Scharm C, Glimco B, Fishman DA. Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound improves the diagnostic accuracy for ovarian cancer prediction. Gynecol. Oncol.82(1), 40–48 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Castillo G. Comparison of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional power-Doppler imaging in complex adnexal masses for the prediction of ovarian cancer. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.192(3), 807–812 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Melis GB. Is three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound better than two-dimensional power Doppler? Gynecol. Oncol.84(2) 352–353 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Testa AC, Mansueto D, Lorusso D et al. Angio power three-dimensional quantitative analysis in gynecologic solid tumors: feasibility and reproducibility. J. Ultrasound Med.23(6), 821–824 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Testa AC, Ajossa S, Ferrandina G et al. Does quantitative analysis of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography have a role in the diagnosis of malignant pelvic solid tumors? A preliminary study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.26(1), 67–72 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Merce LT, Garcia Manero M. Three-dimensional power Doppler vascular sampling: a new method for predicting ovarian cancer in vascularized complex adnexal masses. J. Ultrasound Med.24(5), 689–696 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Rodriguez D, Royo P, Galván R, Ajossa S, Guerriero S. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of 3-dimensional power Doppler vascular indices in assessment of solid and cystic-solid adnexal masses. J. Ultrasound Med.27(1), 1–6 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar