Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine pathology

References

• Doubilet PM. Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference statement on postmenopausal bleeding. J. Ultrasound Med.20, 1037–1042 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Timor-Tirtsch IE. Color Doppler mapping in gynecology. In: US in Gynecology. Timor-Tritsch IE, Goldstein SR (Eds). Churchill-Livinstone, PA, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill MJ. Sonohysterography. Radiol. Clin. North Am.41, 781–797 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL. Three-dimensional US in gynecology: current status and future perspectives. Curr. Women’s Health Rev.1, 1–14 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kupesic S, Kurjak A, Skenderovic S, Bjelos D. Screening for uterine abnormalities by three-dimensional US improves perinatal outcome. J. Perinat. Med.30, 9–17 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Salim R, Jurkovic D. Assessing congenital uterine anomalies: the role of three-dimensional ultrasonography. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol.18, 29–36 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Torre R, Prosperi Porta R, Franco C et al. Three-dimensional sonography and hysterosalpingosonography in the diagnosis of uterine anomalies. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.30, 190–192 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Salim R, Woelfer B, Backos M, Regan L, Jurkovic D. Reproducibility of three-dimensional US diagnosis of congenital uterine anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.21, 578–582 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salim R, Lee C, Davies A, Jolaoso B, Ofuasia E, Jurkovic D. A comparative study of three-dimensional saline infusion sonohysterography and diagnostic hysteroscopy for the classification of submucous fibroids Hum. Reprod.20, 253–257 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa AC, Pomini F, Fattorossi A et al. Doppler velocimetry and cytofluorimetric analysis in uterine myomas. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.53, 139–142 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Kanelopoulos N, Dendrinos S, Oikonomou A, Panagopoulos P, Markussis V. Doppler-US as a predictor of uterine fibroid response to GnRH therapy. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.82, 41–47 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McLucas B, Perrella R, Goodwin S, Adler L, Dalrymple J. Role of uterine artery Doppler flow in fibroid embolization. J. Ultrasound Med.21, 113–120 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muniz CJ, Fleischer AC, Donnelly EF, Mazer MJ. Three-dimensional color Doppler sonography and uterine artery arteriography of fibroids: assessment of changes in vascularity before and after embolization. J. Ultrasound Med.21, 129–133 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Szabó I, Szánthó A, Csabay L, Csapó Z, Szirmai K, Papp Z. Color Doppler ultrasonography in the differentiation of uterine sarcomas from uterine leiomyomas. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.23, 29–34 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aviram R, Ochshorn Y, Markovitch O et al. Uterine sarcomas versus leiomyomas: gray-scale and Doppler sonographic findings. J. Clin. Ultrasound33, 10–13 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Exacoustos C, Romanini ME, Amadio A et al. Can gray-scale and color Doppler sonography differentiate between uterine leiomyosarcoma and leiomyoma? J. Clin. Ultrasound35, 449–457 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dueholm M. Transvaginal US for diagnosis of adenomyosis: a review. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.20, 569–582 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazot M, Daraï E, Rouger J, Detchev R, Cortez A, Uzan S. Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.20, 605–611 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFarlin BL. US assessment of the endometrium for irregular vaginal bleeding. J. Midwifery Womens Health.51, 440–449 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lev-Sagie A, Hamani Y, Imbar T, Hurwitz A, Lavy Y. The significance of intrauterine lesions detected by US in asymptomatic postmenopausal patients. BJOG112, 379–381 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Zornoza A. Transvaginal ultrasonographic measurement of endometrial thickness: an intra-observer and inter-observer reproducibility study. Radiography7, 101–104 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Epstein E, Valentin L. Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of US measurements of endometrial thickness in postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.20, 486–491(2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Römer T. Hormone replacement therapy and bleeding disorders. Gynecol. Endocrinol.22, 140–144 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGonigle KF, Smith DD, Marx HF et al. Uterine effects of tamoxifen: a prospective study. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer16, 814–820 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martínez-Rubio MP, Alcázar JL. Ultrasonographic and pathological endometrial findings in asymptomatic postmenopausal women taking antihypertensive drugs. Maturitas46, 27–32 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Opmeer BC, van Doom HC, Heintz AP, Burger CW, Bossuyt PM, Mol BW. Improving the existing diagnostic strategy by accounting for characteristics of the women in the diagnostic work up for postmenopausal bleeding. BJOG114, 51–58 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Getpook C, Wattanakumtornkul S. Endometrial thickness screening in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res.32, 588–592 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Bindman R, Kerlikowske K, Feldstein VA et al. Endovaginal US to exclude endometrial cancer and other endometrial abnormalities. JAMA280, 1510–1517 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta JK, Chien PF, Voit D, Clark TJ, Khan KS. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in women with postmenopausal bleeding: a meta-analysis. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.81, 799–816 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Bindman R, Weiss E, Feldstein V. How thick is too thick? When endometrial thickness should prompt biopsy in postmenopausal women without vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.24, 558–565 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shushan A, Revel A, Rojansky N. How often are endometrial polyps malignant? Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.58, 212–215 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Parra J, Rodriguez Oliver A, López Criado S, Parrilla Fernández F, Montoya Ventoso F. Hysteroscopic evaluation of endometrial polyps. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet.95, 144–148 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieng M, Qvigstad E, Sandvik L, Jorgensen H, Langebrekke A, Istre O. Hysteroscopic resection of symptomatic and asymptomatic endometrial polyps. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.14, 189–194 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein SR, Monteagudo A, Popiolek D, Mayberry P, Timor-Tirtsch I. Evaluation of endometrial polyps. Am J. Obstet. Gynecol.186, 669–674 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perez-Medina T, Bajo J, Huertas MA, Rubio A. Predicting atypia inside endometrial polyps. J. Ultrasound Med.21, 125–128 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berliere M, Radikov G, Galant C, Piette P, Marbaix E, Donnez J. Identification of women at high risk of developing endometrial cancer on tamoxifen. Eur. J. Cancer36, S27–S36 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• ACOG committee opinion. No. 336: Tamoxifen and uterine cancer. Obstet. Gynecol.107, 1475–1478 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garuti G, Cellani F, Centinaio G, Sita G, Nalli G, Luerti M. Baseline endometrial assessment before tamoxifen for breast cancer in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol. Oncol.98, 63–67 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sheikh M, Sawhney S, Khurana A, Al-Yatama M. Alteration of sonographic texture of the endometrium in post-menopausal bleeding. A guide to further management. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.79, 1006–1010 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Galan MJ, Mínguez JA, García-Manero M. Transvaginal color Doppler sonography versus sonohysterography in the diagnosis of endometrial polyps. J. Ultrasound Med.23, 743–748 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sadoon S, Salman G, Smith G, Henson C, McCullough W. Ultrasonographic endometrial thickness for diagnosing endometrial pathology in postmenopausal bleeding. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.27, 406–408 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Jurado M, López-García G. Comparative study of transvaginal ultrasonography and CA 125 in the preoperative evaluation of myometrial invasion in endometrial carcinoma. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.14, 210–214 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• De Smet F, De Brabanter J, Van den Bosch T et al. New models to predict depth of infiltration in endometrial carcinoma based on transvaginal sonography. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.27, 664–671 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yahata T, Aoki Y, Tanaka K. Prediction of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial carcinoma: comparison of magnetic resonance imaging, transvaginal ultrasonography, and gross visual inspection. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.28, 193–195 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takac I. Transvaginal ultrasonography with and without saline infusion in assessment of myometrial invasion of endometrial cancer. J. Ultrasound Med.26, 949–955 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Berridge DL, Winter TC. Saline infusion sonohysterography: technique, indications, and imaging findings. J. Ultrasound Med.23, 97–112 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries LD, Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Moret E, Heintz AP. Comparison of transvaginal sonography, saline infusion sonography, and hysteroscopy in premenopausal women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J. Clin. Ultrasound28, 217–223 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Errasti T, Zornoza A. Saline infusion sonohysterography in endometrial cancer: assessment of malignant cells dissemination risk. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.79, 321–322 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dessole S, Rubattu G, Farina M et al. Risks and usefulness of sonohysterography in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.194, 362–368 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein RB, Bree RL, Benson CB et al. Evaluation of the woman with postmenopausal bleeding: Society of Radiologists in US-Sponsored Consensus Conference statement. J. Ultrasound Med.20, 1025–1036 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E, Valentin L. Managing women with post-menopausal bleeding. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol.18, 125–143 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkhuizen FP, Mol BW, Brölmann HA, Heintz AP. Cost-effectiveness of the use of transvaginal sonography in the evaluation of postmenopausal bleeding. Maturitas45, 275–282 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark TJ, Barton PM, Coomarasamy A, Gupta JK, Khan KS. Investigating postmenopausal bleeding for endometrial cancer: cost-effectiveness of initial diagnostic strategies. BJOG113, 502–510 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein E, Valentin L. Rebleeding and endometrial growth in women with postmenopausal bleeding and endometrial thickness < 5 mm managed by dilatation and curettage or US follow-up: a randomized controlled study. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.18, 499–504 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fleischer AC, Shappell HW, Parker LP, Hanemann CW. Color Doppler sonography of endometrial masses. J. Ultrasound Med.21, 861–865 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Develioglu OH, Bilgin T, Yalcin OT, Ozalp S. Transvaginal ultrasonography and uterine artery Doppler in diagnosing endometrial pathologies and carcinoma in postmenopausal bleeding. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.268, 175–180 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badawy AM, Abu-Elata M. Can colour Doppler ultrasonography predict the prognosis of endometrial hyperplasia? J. Obstet. Gynaecol.23, 282–284 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arslan M, Erdem A, Erdem M, Yazici G, Himmetoglu O, Gursoy R. Transvaginal color Doppler ultrasonography for prediction of pre-cancerous endometrial lesions. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.80, 299–306 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dragojevic S, Mitrovic A, Dikic S, Canovic F. The role of transvaginal color Doppler sonography in evaluation of abnormal uterine bleeding. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.271, 332–335 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilailak S, Jirapinyo M, Theppisai U. Transvaginal Doppler sonography: is there a role for this modality in the evaluation of women with postmenopausal bleeding? Maturitas50, 111–116 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Castillo G, Mínguez JA, Galán MJ. Endometrial blood flow mapping using transvaginal power Doppler sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.21, 583–588 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timmerman D, Verguts J, Konstantinovic ML et al. The pedicle artery sign based on sonography with color Doppler imaging can replace second-stage tests in women with abnormal vaginal bleeding. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.22, 166–171 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opolskiene G, Sladkevicius P, Valentin L. US assessment of endometrial morphology and vascularity to predict endometrial malignancy in women with postmenopausal bleeding and sonographic endometrial thickness ≥ 4.5 mm. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.30, 332–340 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Ajossa S, Floris S, Bargellini R, Gerada M, Guerriero S. Reproducibility of endometrial vascular patterns in endometrial disease as assessed by transvaginal power Doppler sonography in women with postmenopausal bleeding. J. Ultrasound Med.25, 159–163 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee CN, Cheng WF, Chen CA, Chu JS, Hsieh CY, Hsieh FJ. Angiogenesis of endometrial carcinomas assessed by measurement of intratumoral blood flow, microvessel density, and vascular endothelial growth factor levels. Obstet. Gynecol.96, 615–621 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Galán MJ, Jurado M, López-García G. Intratumoral blood flow analysis in endometrial carcinoma: correlation with tumor characteristics and risk for recurrence. Gynecol. Oncol.84, 258–262 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emoto M, Tamura R, Shirota K, Hachisuga T, Kawarabayashi T. Clinical usefulness of color Doppler US in patients with endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. Cancer94, 700–706 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Greco P, Vimercati A, Cormio G, Loverro G, Selvaggi L. Intratumoral blood flow characteristics and prognostic factors in patients with endometrial carcinoma. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet.267, 1–3 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Galván R, Laparte C, García-Manero M, Mazaira J, Alcázar JL. Three-dimensional power Doppler angiography in women with postmenopausal bleeding and thickened endometrium. Presented at: 17th World Congress on US in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Florence, Italy, 7–11 October 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Mercé LT, Alcázar JL, López C et al. Clinical usefulness of 3-dimensional sonography and power Doppler angiography for diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. J. Ultrasound Med.26, 1279–1287 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odeh M, Vainerovsky I, Grinin V, Kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Three-dimensional endometrial volume and 3-dimensional power Doppler analysis in predicting endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Gynecol. Oncol.106, 348–353 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcázar JL, Mercé LT, Manero MG, Bau S, López-García G. Endometrial volume and vascularity measurements by transvaginal 3-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography in stimulated and tumoral endometria: an interobserver reproducibility study. J. Ultrasound Med.24, 1091–1098 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercé LT, Alcázar JL, Engels V, Troyano J, Bau S, Bajo JM. Endometrial volume and vascularity measurements by transvaginal three-dimensional ultrasonography and power Doppler angiography in stimulated and tumoral endometria: intraobserver reproducibility. Gynecol. Oncol.100, 544–550 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lev-Toaff AS, Pinheiro LW, Bega G, Kurtz AB, Goldberg BB. Three-dimensional multiplanar sonohysterography: comparison with conventional two-dimensional sonohysterography and X-ray hysterosalpingography. J. Ultrasound Med.20, 295–306 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvestre C, Child TJ, Tulandi T, Tan SL. A prospective study to evaluate the efficacy of two- and three-dimensional sonohysterography in women with intrauterine lesions. Fertil. Steril.79, 1222–1225 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Kroon CD, Louwe LA, Trimbos JB, Jansen FW. The clinical value of 3-dimensional saline infusion sonography in addition to 2-dimensional saline infusion sonography in women with abnormal uterine bleeding. J. Ultrasound Med.23, 1433–1440 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padilla LA, Radosevich DM, Milad MP. Limitations of the pelvic examination for evaluation of the female pelvic organs. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.88, 84–88 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castillo G, Alcázar JL, Jurado M. Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol. Oncol.92, 965–969 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kew FM, Ashton VJ, Cruickshank DJ. Tolerability of transvaginal ultrasonography as an ovarian cancer screening test. J. Med. Screen.11, 45–47 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins. ACOG practice bulletin. Clinical management guidelines for obstetrician-gynecologists. Number 81. Obstet. Gynecol.109, 1233–1248 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ely JW, Kennedy CM, Clark EC, Bowdler NC. Abnormal uterine bleeding: a management algorithm. J. Am. Board Fam. Med.19, 590–602 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin L. High-quality gynecological US can be highly beneficial, but poor-quality gynecological US can do harm. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.13, 1–7 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hall R, Ogburn T, Rogers RG. Teaching and evaluating US skill attainment: competency-based resident US training for AIUM accreditation. Obstet. Gynecol. Clin. North Am.33, 305–323 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benacerraf BR, Shipp TD, Bromley B. Improving the efficiency of gynecologic sonography with 3-dimensional volumes: a pilot study. J. Ultrasound Med.25, 165–171 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benacerraf BR. Inversion mode display of 3D sonography: applications in obstetric and gynecologic imaging. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.187, 965–971 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timor-Tritsch IE, Monteagudo A. Three and four-dimensional US in obstetrics and gynecology. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.19, 157–175 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ferrer-Roca O, Kurjak A, Mario Troyano-Luque J, Bajo Arenas J, Luis Mercé A, Diaz-Cardama A. Tele-virtual sonography. J. Perinat. Med.34, 123–129 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar