Improving ERCP quality and decreasing risk to patients and providers

References

• Cotton PB. Analysis of 59 ERCP lawsuits: mainly about indications. Gastrointest. Endosc. 63(3), 378–382 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PB. Twenty more ERCP lawsuits: why? Poor indications and communications. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72(4), 904 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapral C, Duller C, Wewalka F, Kerstan E, Vogel W, Schreiber F. Case volume and outcome of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: results of a nationwide Austrian benchmarking project. Endoscopy 40(8), 625–630 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy N. Engl. J. Med. 355(13), 909–918 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Glomsaker T, Hoff G, Kvaløy JT, Søreide K, Aabakken L, Søreide JA. Patterns and predictive factors of complications after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br. J. Surg. 100(3), 373–380 (2013).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enochsson L, Swahn F, Arnelo U et al. Nationwide, population-based data from 11,074 ERCP procedures from the Swedish Registry for Gallstone Surgery and ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 72(6), 1175–1184 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice JP, Spier BJ, Gopal DV, Soni A, Reichelderfer M, Pfau PR. Outcomes of sphincter of Oddi manometry when performed in low volumes. Diagn. Ther. Endosc. 2011(2011), 435806–435806 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guda NM, Freeman ML. Are you safe for your patients – how many ERCPs should you be doing? Endoscopy 40, 675–676 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cotton PB, Eisen G, Romagnuolo J et al. Grading the complexity of endoscopic procedures: results of an ASGE working party. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73(8), 868–874 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khashab MA, Tariq A, Tariq U et al. Delayed and unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatolo. 10(10), 1157–1161 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chak A, Cooper GS, Lloyd LE, Hammar PJ, Issa K, Rosenthal GE. Effectiveness of ERCP in cholangitis: a community-based study. Gastrointest Endosc. 52(4), 484–489 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boender J, Nix GA, de Ridder MA et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and biliary drainage in patients with cholangitis due to common bile duct stones. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 90(2), 233–238 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagino M, Takada T, Kawarada Y et al. Methods and timing of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis: Tokyo Guidelines. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 14(1), 68–77 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102(8), 1781–1788 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest. Endosc. 56(5), 652–656 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masci E, Toti G, Mariani A et al. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Am. J. Gastro. 96(2), 417–423 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 102(8), 1781–1788 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymondos K, Panning B, Bachem I et al. Evaluation of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography under conscious sedation and general anesthesia. Endoscopy 34(9), 721–726 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garewal D, Powell S, Milan SJ, Nordmeyer J, Waikar P. Sedative techniques for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 13(6), CD007274–CD007274 (2012).
   Google Scholar
• Berzin TM, Sanaka S, Barnett SR et al. A prospective assessment of sedation-related adverse events and patient and endoscopist satisfaction in ERCP with anesthesiologist administered sedation. Clin. Endosc. 73(4), 710–717 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Qadeer MA, Vargo JJ, Dumot JA et al. Capnographic monitoring of respiratory activity improves safety of sedation for endoscopic cholangiopancreatography and ultrasonography. Gastroenterology 136(5), 1568–1576 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 37(3), 383–393 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 105(8), 1753–1761 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Clin. Endosc. 70(1), 80–88 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Mohammad A, Cotton PB, Hawes R et al. Techniques of pancreatic sphincterotomy: lack of expert consensus. Gastrointest. Endosc. 59(5), 210 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J. Gastroenterol. 104(9), 2343–2350 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma D, Kapadia A, Adler DG. Pure versus mixed electrosurgical current for endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy: a meta-analysis of adverse outcomes. Gastrointest. Endosc. 66(2), 283–290 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Elta GH, Barnett JL, Wille RT, Brown KA, Chey WD, Scheiman JM. Pure cut electrocautery current for sphincterotomy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 47(2), 149–153 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sherman S, Earle DT, Bucksot L et al. Does leaving a main pancreatic duct stent in place reduce the incidence of precut biliary sphincterotomy (ES)-induced pancreatitis? A final analysis of a randomized prospective study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 77(2), 209–216 (2013).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tarnasky PR, Palesch YY, Cunningham JT et al. Pancreatic stenting prevents pancreatitis after biliary sphincterotomy in patients with sphincter of Oddi dysfunction. Gastroenterology 115(6), 1518–1524 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazel A, Quadri A, Catalano MF et al. Does a pancreatic duct stent prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized study. Gastrointest. Endosc. 57(3), 291–294 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithline A, Silverman W, Rogers D et al. Effect of prophylactic main pancreatic duct stenting on the incidence of biliary endoscopic sphincterotomy-induced pancreatitis in high-risk patients. Gastrointest. Endosc. 39(5), 652–657 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel R, Tarnasky P, Hennessy WS et al. Does stenting after pancreatic sphincterotomy reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with prior biliary sphincterotomy? Preliminary results of a prospective randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest. Endsosc. 57(3), 291–294 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harewood GC, Pochron NL, Gostout CJ. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial of prophylactic pancreatic stent placement for endoscopic snare excision of the duodenal ampulla. Gastrointest. Endosc. 62(3), 367–370 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsuchiya T, Itoi T, Sofuni A et al. Temporary pancreatic stent to prevent post endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: a preliminary, single-center, randomized controlled trial. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 14(3), 302–307 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sofuni A, Maguchi H, Itoi T et al. Prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis by an endoscopic pancreatic spontaneous dislodgement stent. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 5(10), 1339–1346 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M et al. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest. Endosc. 73(2), 275–282 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman ML, Overby C, Qi D. Pancreatic stent insertion: consequences of failure and results of a modified technique to maximize success. Gastrointest. Endosc. 59(1), 8–14 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 366(15), 1414–1422 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HJ, Kim MH, Diet K et al. Endoscopic hemostasis in sphincterotomy-induced hemorrhage: its efficacy and safety. Endoscopy 31(6), 431–436 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fujita N, Maguchi H, Komatsu Y et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy and endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation for bile duct stones: A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial. Gastrointest. Endosc. 57(2), 151–155 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disario JA, Freeman ML, Bjorkman DJ et al. Endoscopic balloon dilation compared with sphincterotomy for extraction of bile duct stones. Gastroenterology 127(5), 1291–1299 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liu Y, Su P, Lin S et al. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilatation versus endoscopic sphincterotomy in the treatment for choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 27(3), 464–471 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feng Y, Zhu H, Chen X et al. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation and endoscopic sphincterotomy for retrieval of choledocholithiasis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Gastroenterol. 47(6), 655–663 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Attam R, Freeman ML. Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation for large common bile duct stones. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg. 16(5), 618–623 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fatima J, Baron TH, Topazian MD et al. Pancreaticobiliary and duodenal perforations after periampullary endoscopic procedures diagnosis and management. Arch. Surg. 142(5), 448–455 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors. and management. Endoscopy 34(4), 293–298 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan KA, Fontenot BB, Ruddy JM, Mickey S, Adams DB. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography gut perforations: when to wait! When to operate. Am. Surg. 75(6), 477–484 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Enns R, Eloubeidi MA, Mergener K et al. ERCP-related perforations: risk factors and management. Endoscopy 34(4), 293–298 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machado NO. Management of duodenal perforation post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. When and whom to operate and what factors determine the outcome? A review article. JOP 13(1), 18–25 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu HM, Dixon E, May GR, Sutherland FR. Management of perforation after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a population-based review. HPB 8(5), 393–399 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Genzlinger JL, McPhee MS, Fisher JK, Jacob KM, Helzberg JH. Significance of retroperitoneal air after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography with sphincterotomy. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 94(5), 1267–1270 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toner A, Garewal D, Keeling P. Safe anesthesia for ERCP. Anaesthesia 66(5), 390–402 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Motte S, Deviere J, Dumonceau JM, Serruys E, Thys JP, Cremer M. Risk factors for septicemia following endoscopic biliary stenting. Gastroenterology 101(5), 1374–1381 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang WH, Kortan P, Haber GB. Outcome in patients with bifurcation tumors who undergo unilateral versus bilateral hepatic duct drainage. Gastrointest. Endosc. 47(5), 354–362 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bangarulingam SY, Gossard AA, Petersen BT, Ott BJ, Lindor KD. Complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 104(4), 855–860 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isayama H, Kawabe T, Nakai Y et al. Cholecystitis after metallic stent placement in patients with malignant distal biliary obstruction. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 4(9), 1148–1153 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suk KT, Kim HS, Kim JW et al. Risk factors for cholecystitis after metal stent placement in malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest. Endosc. 64(4), 522–529 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 67(6), 791–798 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khashab MA, Tariq A, Tariq U et al. Delayed and unsuccessful endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography are associated with worse outcomes in patients with acute cholangitis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 10(10), 1157–1161 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mettler FA, Bhargavan M, Faulkner K et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources 1950–2007. Radiology. 253(2), 520–531 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin J. The 2007 Recommendations of the international commission on radiological protection. Ann. ICRP 37(2–4), 9–34 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Buls N, Pages J, Mana F et al. Patient and staff exposure during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Br. J. Radiol. 75(893), 435–443 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron TH, Petersen BT, Mergener K. Quality indicators for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest. Endosc. 63(4 Suppl), S29–S34 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conklin LS, Bernstein C, Bartholomew L, Oliva-Hemker M. Medical malpractice in gastroenterology. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 6(6), 677–681 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen S, Bacon B, Berlin JA et al. National Institutes of Health state-of-the-science conference statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy. Gastrointest. Endosc. 56(6), 803–809 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar