252
Views
6
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

CT Colonography: an update on current and future indications

Pages 785-794 | Received 08 Nov 2015, Accepted 14 Jan 2016, Published online: 06 Feb 2016

References

  • Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M, et al. ESGAR CT Colonography Working Group. The second ESGAR consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:720–729.
  • Liedenbaum MH, Bipat S, Bossuyt PM, et al. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers. Radiology. 2011;258:477–487.
  • Regge D, Della Monica P, Galatola G, et al. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial. Radiology. 2013;266:168–176.
  • Atkin W, Dadswell E, Wooldrage K, et al. SIGGAR investigators. Computed tomographic colonography versus colonoscopy for investigation of patients with symptoms suggestive of colorectal cancer (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1194–1202.
  • Halligan S, Wooldrage K, Dadswell E, et al. SIGGAR investigators. Computed tomographic colonography versus barium enema for diagnosis of colorectal cancer or large polyps in symptomatic patients (SIGGAR): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet. 2013;381:1185–1193.
  • de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, et al. Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1747–1763.
  • Stoop EM, de Haan MC, de Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:55–64.
  • Sosna J, Sella T, Sy O, et al. Critical analysis of the performance of double-contrast barium enema for detecting colorectal polyps > or = 6 mm in the era of CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:374–385.
  • Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for CT Colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2015;25:331–345.
  • Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: european Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2014;46:897–915.
  • Johnson CD, Chen M-H, Toledano AY, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1207–1217.
  • Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2453–2461.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2191–2200.
  • Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D, et al. Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut. 2009;58:241–248.
  • Chaparro M, Gisbert JP, del Campo L, et al. Accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of polyps and colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestion. 2009;80:1–17.
  • Halligan S, Altman DG, Taylor SA, et al. CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting. Radiology. 2005;237:893–904.
  • Sosna J, Morrin MM, Kruskal JB, et al. CT colonography of colorectal polyps: a metaanalysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:1593–1598.
  • Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:635–650.
  • Rosman AS, Korsten MA. Meta-analysis comparing CT colonography, air contrast barium enema, and colonoscopy. Am J Med. 2007;120:203–210.
  • Plumb AA, Halligan S, Pendsé DA, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of CT colonography for the detection of colonic neoplasia after positive faecal occult blood testing: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1049–1058.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Hassan C, Halligan S, et al. Colorectal Cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection – systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2011;259:393–405.
  • Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31:210–217.
  • Suna N, Köksal AŞ, Yıldız H, et al. Prevalence of advanced histologic features in diminutive colon polyps. Acta Gastroenterol Belg. 2015;78:287–291.
  • Spada C, Barbaro F, Andrisani G, et al. Colon capsule endoscopy: What we know and what we would like to know. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:16948–16955.
  • Tanaka S, Saitoh Y, Matsuda T, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for management of colorectal polyps. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50:252–260.
  • Murino A, Hassan C, Repici A. The diminutive colon polyp: biopsy, snare, leave alone? Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2016;32:38–43.
  • Plumb AA, Fanshawe TR, Phillips P, et al. Small polyps at endoluminal CT colonography are often seen but ignored by radiologists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015;205:W424–31.
  • Tutein Nolthenius CJ, Boellaard TN, de Haan MC, et al. Evolution of screen-detected small (6-9 mm) Polyps After a 3-year surveillance interval: Assessment of growth with CT Colonography Compared with histopathology. Am J Gastroenterol Oct. 2015;20. doi:10.1038/ajg.2015.340.
  • Endoscopic Classification Review Group. Update on the Paris classification of superficial neoplastic lesions in the digestive tract. Endoscopy. 2005;37:570–578.
  • Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oka S, et al. Clinicopathologic features and endoscopic treatment of superficially spreading colorectal neoplasms larger than 20 mm. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:62–66.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Nugent PA, Choi JR, et al. Flat colorectal lesions in asymptomatic adults: implications for screening with CT virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1343–1347.
  • Park SH, Kim SY, Lee SS, et al. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:70–78.
  • Pickhardt PJ, Lam VP, Weiss JM, et al. Carpet lesions detected at CT colonography: clinical, imaging, and pathologic features. Radiology. 2014;270:435–443.
  • Fidler JL, Zhang Z, Herman BA, et al. CT colonography for the detection of nonpolypoid adenomas: sensitivity assessed with restricted national CT colonography trial criteria. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014;203:W614–22.
  • Bianco MA, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, et al. Flat Lesions Italian Network (FLIN). Prevalence of nonpolypoid neoplasia: an Italian multicenter observational study. Endoscopy. 2010;42:279–285.
  • Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T, Rouse RV, et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. JAMA. 2008;299:1027–1035.
  • East JE, Vieth M, Rex DK. Serrated lesions in colorectal cancer screening: detection, resection, pathology and surveillance. Gut. 2015;64:991–1000.
  • Pooler BD, Kim DH, Weiss JM, et al. Colorectal polyps missed with optical colonoscopy despite previous detection and localization with CT colonography. Radiology Aug. 2015;14:150294.
  • Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J, et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.
  • Lee TJ, Rutter MD, Blanks RG, et al. Colonoscopy quality measures: experience from the NHS bowel cancer screening programme. Gut. 2012;61:1050–1057.
  • Radaelli F, Paggi S, Minoli G. Variation of quality of colonoscopy in Italy over five years: a nation-wide observational study. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:28–32.
  • Cirocco WC, Rusin LC. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum. 1995;38:964–968.
  • Zorzi M, Senore C, Da Re F, et al. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy). Gut. 2015;64:1389–1396.
  • Neerincx M, Terhaar Sive Droste JS, Mulder CJ, et al. Colonic work-up after incomplete colonoscopy: significant new findings during follow-up. Endoscopy. 2010;42:730–735.
  • Chang KJ, Rekhi SS Jr, Anderson SW, et al. Fluid tagging for CT colonography: effectiveness of a 2-hour iodinated oral preparation after incomplete optical colonoscopy. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2011;35:91–95.
  • Lara LF, Avalos D, Huynh H, et al. The safety of same-day CT colonography following incomplete colonoscopy with polypectomy. United Eur. 2015;J 3:358–363.
  • Hong N, Park SH. CT colonography in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer: emphasis on pre- and post-surgical evaluation. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:2014–2022.
  • Cha JM, Kozarek RA, La Selva D, et al. Risks and benefits of colonoscopy in patients 90 years or older, compared with younger patients. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Jul. 2015;9:S1542–3565.
  • Gatto NM, Frucht H, Sundararajan V, et al. Risk of perforation after colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy: a population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:230–236.
  • Ko CW, Riffle S, Michaels L, et al. Serious complications within 30 days of screening and surveillance colonoscopy are uncommon. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8:166–173.
  • Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2014;383:1490–1502.
  • Iafrate F, Hassan C, Zullo A, et al. CT colonography with reduced bowel preparation after incomplete colonoscopy in the elderly. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1385–1395.
  • Keeling AN, Slattery MM, Leong S, et al. Limited-preparation CT colonography in frail elderly patients: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:1279–1287.
  • Saunders JH, Miskovic D, Bowman C, et al. Colorectal cancer is reliably excluded in the frail and elderly population by minimal preparation CT. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18:137–143.
  • Iafrate F, Hassan C, Ciolina M, et al. High positive predictive value of CT colonography in a referral centre. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80:e289–292.
  • Moussa OM, Tee M, Khan AU, et al. Computerized tomography providing definitive diagnosis of colonic lipoma: a case series. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:e232–4.
  • Tomimatsu H, Kanematsu M, Goshima S, et al. Uneven haustra on CT colonography: a clue for the detection of transperitoneal invasion from gastric cancer. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37:570–574.
  • Roseau G, Dumontier I, Palazzo L, et al. Rectosigmoid endometriosis: endoscopic ultrasound features and clinical implications. Endoscopy. 2000;32:525–530.
  • Belghiti J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Zacharopoulou C, et al. Contribution of computed tomography enema and magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose multifocal and multicentric bowel lesions in patients with colorectal endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22:776–784.
  • Di Paola V, Manfredi R, Castelli F, et al. Detection and localization of deep endometriosis by means of MRI and correlation with the ENZIAN score. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:568–574.
  • Koutoukos I, Langebrekke A, Young V, et al. Imaging of endometriosis with computerized tomography colonography. Fertility and Sterility. 2011;95:259–260.
  • Van der Wat J, Kaplan M. Modified virtual colonoscopy: a noninvasive technique for the diagnosis of rectovaginal septum and deep infiltrating pelvic endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007;14:638–643.
  • Neri E, Faggioni L, Cerri F, et al. CT colonography versus double-contrast barium enema for screening of colorectal cancer: comparison of radiation burden. Abdom Imag. 2010;35:596–601.
  • Peery AF, Sandler RS. Diverticular disease: reconsidering conventional wisdom. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1532–1537.
  • Cuomo R, Barbara G, Pace F, et al. Italian consensus conference for colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease. United Eur. 2014;J 2:413–442.
  • Von Wagner C, Smith S, Halligan S, et al. Patient acceptability of CT colonography compared with double contrast barium enema: results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial of symptomatic patients. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:2046–2055.
  • Iafrate F, Iussich G, Correale L, et al. Adverse events of computed tomography colonography: an Italian National Survey. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:645–650.
  • Bellini D, Rengo M, De Cecco CN, et al. Perforation rate in CT colonography: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:1487–1496.
  • Sharma PV, Eglinton T, Hider P, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of routine colonic evaluation after radiologically confirmed acute diverticulitis. Ann Surg. 2014;259:263–272.
  • Sai VF, Velayos F, Neuhaus J, et al. Colonoscopy after CT diagnosis of diverticulitis to exclude colon cancer: a systematic literature review. Radiology. 2012;263:383–390.
  • Feingold D, Steele SR, Lee S, et al. Practice parameters for the treatment of sigmoid diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:284–294.
  • Chabok A, Smedh K, Nilsson S, et al. CT-colonography in the follow-up of acute diverticulitis: patient acceptance and diagnostic accuracy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2013;48:979–986.
  • Sali L, Falchini M, Taddei A, et al. Role of preoperative CT colonography in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:3795–3803.
  • Neri E, Turini F, Cerri F, et al. Comparison of CT colonography vs conventional colonoscopy in mapping the segmental location of colon cancer before surgery. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35:589–595.
  • Flor N, Campari A, Ravelli A, et al. Vascular Map Combined with CT Colonography for evaluating candidates for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Korean J Radiol. 2015;16:821–826.
  • Mari FS, Nigri G, Pancaldi A, et al. Role of CT angiography with three-dimensional reconstruction of mesenteric vessels in laparoscopic colorectal resections: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:2058–2067.
  • Lee JH, Park SH, Lee SS, et al. CT colonography in patients who have undergone sigmoid colostomy: a feasibility study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W653–657.
  • Schreuders EH, Ruco A, Rabeneck L, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: a global overview of existing programmes. Gut. 2015;64:1637–1649.
  • Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin. 2008;58:130–160.
  • Berrington de González A, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: a risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:816–823.
  • Sali L, Falchini M, Bonanomi AG, et al. CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14:4499–4504.
  • Sali L, Grazzini G, Ventura L, et al. Computed tomographic colonography in subjects with positive faecal occult blood test refusing optical colonoscopy. Dig Liver Dis. 2013;45:285–289.
  • Regge D, Iussich G, Senore C, et al. Population screening for colorectal cancer by flexible sigmoidoscopy or CT colonography: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial. Trials. 2014;15:97.
  • Sali L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, et al. Reduced and full-preparation CT Colonography, fecal immunochemical test, and colonoscopy for population screening of colorectal cancer: A randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;108(2):djv319. doi:10.1093/jnci/djv319.
  • Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ. Cost-effectiveness of CT colonography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2013;51:89–97.
  • de Haan MC, Thomeer M, Stoker J, et al. Unit costs in population-based colorectal cancer screening using CT colonography performed in university hospitals in The Netherlands. Eur Radiol. 2013;23:897–907.
  • de Haan MC, Pickhardt PJ, Stoker J. CT colonography: accuracy, acceptance, safety and position in organised population screening. Gut. 2015;64:342–350.
  • Plumb AA, Boone D, Fitzke H, et al. Detection of extracolonic pathologic findings with CT colonography: a discrete choice experiment of perceived benefits versus harms. Radiology. 2014;273:144–152.
  • O’Connor OJ, McSweeney SE, McWilliams S, et al. Role of radiologic imaging in irritable bowel syndrome: evidence-based review. Radiology. 2012;262:485–494.
  • American College of Gastroenterology Task Force on Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Brandt LJ, Chey WD, et al. An evidence-based position statement on the management of irritable bowel syndrome. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104(Suppl 1):S1–35.
  • Regge D, Laudi C, Galatola G, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomographic colonography for the detection of advanced neoplasia in individuals at increased risk of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;301:2453–2461.
  • Meyerhardt JA, Mangu PB, Flynn PJ, et al. Follow-Up care, surveillance protocol, and secondary prevention measures for survivors of colorectal cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline endorsement. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:4465–4470.
  • Kim HJ, Park SH, Pickhardt PJ, et al. CT colonography for combined colonic and extracolonic surveillance after curative resection of colorectal cancer. Radiology. 2010;257:697–704.
  • Hassan C, Quintero E, Dumonceau JM, et al. Post-polypectomy colonoscopy surveillance: european Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2013;45:842–851.
  • Rapuri S, Spencer J, Eckels D. Importance of postpolypectomy surveillance and postpolypectomy compliance to follow-up screening – review of literature. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2008;23:453–459.
  • Bojarski C. Malignant transformation in inflammatory bowel disease: prevention, surveillance and treatment – new techniques in endoscopy. Dig Dis. 2009;27:571–575.
  • Jasperson KW, Tuohy TM, Neklason DW, et al. Hereditary and familial colon cancer. Gastroenterology. 2010;138:2044–2058.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.