Minimally invasive esophagectomy: an overview

References

• Orringer MB, Marshall B, Chang AC, Lee J, Pickens A, Lau C. Two thousand transhiatal eosphagectomies: changing trends, lessons learned. Ann. Surg.246, 363–374 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulscher JB, Tijssen JG, Obertop H, van Lanschot JJ. Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72, 306–313 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rindani R, Martin CJ, Cox MR. Transhiatal versus Ivor–Lewis oesophagectomy: is there a difference? Aust. NZ J. Surg.69, 187–194 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stein HJ, Siewert JR. Improved prognosis of resected esophageal cancer. World J. Surg.28, 520–525 (2004)
   Google Scholar
• Law S, Wong J. Current management of esophageal cancer. J. Gastrointest. Surg.9, 291–310 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hulscher JB, van Sandick JW, de Boer AG et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. N. Engl. J. Med.347, 1662–1669 (2002)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omloo JM, Lagarde SM, Hulscher JBF et al. Extended transthoracic resection compared with limited transhiatal resection for adenocarcinoma of the mid/distal esophagus. Five-year survival of a randomized clinical trial. Ann. Surg.246, 992–1001 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cushieri A, Shimi S, Banting S. Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. J. R. Coll. Surg. Edinb.37, 7–11 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dallemagne B, Weerts JM, Jehaes C et al. Case report: subtotal oesophagectomy by thoracoscopy and laparoscopy. Min. Invas. Ther.1, 183–185 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaula AL, Hashiba K, Ferreira EA et al. Laparoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy with esophagogastroplasty. Surg. Laparosc. Endosc.5, 1–5 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lui HP, Chang CH, Lin PJ et al. Video-assisted endoscopic esophagectomy with stapled intrathoracic esophagogatric anastomosis. World J. Surg.745–747 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Robertson GSM, Lloyd DM, Wicks ACB, Veitch PS. No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy. Br. J. Surg.83, 675–678 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bizeki C, Kent MS, Luketich JD et al. Initial experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. Ann. Thorac. Surg.82, 402–407 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann. Surg.248, 1081–1091 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Law S, Wong J. Use of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. Lancet Oncol.3, 215–222 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gemmell EH, McCulloch P. Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro-oesophageal cancer. Br. J. Surg.94, 1461–1467 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Decker G, Coosemans W, DeLeyn P et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for cancer. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.35, 13–21 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law S. Minimally invasive techniques for oesophageal cancer surgery. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol.20, 925–940 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Biere SSA, Cuesta MA, Van Der Peet DL. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Minerva Chir.64, 121–133 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulscher JBF, ter Hofstede E, Kloek J, Obertop H, de Haan P, Lanschot JJ. Injury to the major airways during subtotal esophagectomy: Incidence, management, and sequelae. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.120, 1093–1096 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Outcomes in 222 patients. Ann. Surg.238, 486–495 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berisford RG, Wajed SA, Sanders D, Rucklidge MWM. Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy. Br. J. Surg.95, 602–610 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pierie JP, de Graaf PW, van Vroonhoven JS et al. The vascularisation of a gastric tube as a substitute for the oesophagus is affected by its diameter. Dis. Esophagus11, 231–235 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas JM. Comparison of outcomes between open and minimally invasive esophagectomy. Ann. Surg.245, 232–240 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holscher AH, Schneider PM, Gutschow C, Schroder W. Laparoscopic ischemic conditioning of the stomach for esophageal replacement. Ann. Surg.245, 241–246 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen NT, Follette DM, Wolfe BM, Schneider PD, Roberts P, Goodnight JE. Comparison of minimally invasive esophagectomy with transthoracic and transhiatal oesophagectomy. Arch. Surg.135, 920–925 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zingg U, McQuinn A, DiValentino D et al. Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer. Ann. Thorac. Surg.87, 911–919 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Walther B, Johasson J, Johnsson F et al. Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis. Ann. Surg. Oncol.238, 794–802 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Griffin SM, Shaw IH, Dresner SM. Early complications after Ivor-Lewis subtotal esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy: risk factors and management. J. Am. Coll. Surg.194, 285–297 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mariette C, Taillier G, Van Seuningen I et al. Factors affecting postoperative course and survival after en bloc resection for esophageal carcinoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78, 117–183 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann. Thorac. Surg.75, 217–222 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position – experience of 130 patients. J. Am. Coll. Surg.203, 7–16 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian T, Martin JT, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: a teaching hospital’s first year experience. Dis. Esophagus21, 220–225 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Song SY, Na KJ, Oh SG, Ahn BH. Learning curves of minimally invasive esophageal cancer surgery. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.35, 689–693 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Balzeby JM, Farndon JR, Donovan J, Aldrson DA. A prospective longitudinal study examining the quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer. Cancer88, 1781–1787 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Leibman S, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, Martin I, Thomas J. Minimally invasive esophagectomy. Short and long-term outcomes. Surg. Endosc.20, 428–433 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann. Surg.236, 177–183 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osugi H, Takemura M, Higashino M et al. Learning curve of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy and extensive lymphadenectomy for squamous cell cancer of the thoracic esophagus and results. Surg. Endosc.17, 515–519 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Itami A, Watanabe G, Tanaka E et al. Upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer through a thoracoscopic approach. Surg. Endosc.22, 2741 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kawahara K, Maekawa T, Okabayashi K et al. Video-assisted thoraco-scopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg. Endosc.13, 218–223 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luketich J, Pennathur A, Catalano PJ et al. Results of a Phase II multicenter study of minimally invasive esophagectomy (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E2202). J. Clin. Oncol.27, 15S(Suppl.), (2009) (Abstract 4516).
   Google Scholar