Oocyte cryopreservation: a technical and clinical update

References

• Sherman JK, Lin TP. Survival of unfertilized mouse eggs during freezing and thawing. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med.98, 902–905 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• Whittingham DG. Fertilization in vitro and development to term of unfertilized mouse oocytes previously stored at -196 degrees C. J. Reprod. Fertil.49, 89–94 (1977).
   Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J. Maturation at high frequency of germinal–vesicle-stage mouse oocytes after cryopreservation: alterations in cytoplasmic, nuclear, nucleolar and chromosomal structure and organization associated with vitrification. Hum. Reprod.4, 883–898 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Candy CJ, Wood MJ, Whittingham DG, Merriman JA, Choudhury N. Cryopreservation of immature mouse oocytes. Hum. Reprod.9, 1738–1742 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Aono N, Abe Y, Hara K, Sasada H, Sato E, Yoshida H. Production of live offspring from mouse germinal vesicle-stage oocytes vitrified by a modified stepwise method, SWEID. Fertil. Steril.84(Suppl. 2), 1078–1082 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chen C. Pregnancy after human oocyte cryopreservation. Lancet1, 884–886 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuleshova L, Gianaroli L, Magli C, Ferraretti A, Trounson A. Birth following vitrification of a small number of human oocytes: case report. Hum. Reprod.14, 3077–3079 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth TL, Lanzendorf SE, Sandow BA et al. Cryopreservation of human prophase I oocytes collected from unstimulated follicles. Fertil. Steril.61, 1077–1082 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toth TL, Baka SG, Veeck LL, Jones HW Jr, Muasher S, Lanzendorf SE. Fertilization and in vitro development of cryopreserved human prophase I oocytes. Fertil. Steril.61, 891–894 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker MJ, Wright G, Morton PC, Massey JB. Birth after cryopreservation of immature oocytes with subsequent in vitro maturation. Fertil. Steril.70, 578–579 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, van der Ven H, Krebs D. [Initial results of the cryopreservation of human oocytes]. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd46, 643–644 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K, van der Ven H, Reinecke A, Hartje M, Krebs D. Cryopreservation of human oocytes. Hum. Reprod.2, 695–700 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Uem JF, Siebzehnrubl ER, Schuh B, Koch R, Trotnow S, Lang N. Birth after cryopreservation of unfertilized oocytes. Lancet1, 752–753 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker M, Wright G, Morton P, Shanguo L, Massey J, Kort H. Preliminary experience with human oocyte cryopreservation using 1,2-propanediol and sucrose. Hum. Reprod.11, 1513–1515 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R, Ciotti PM, Magrini O, Flamigni C. Birth of a healthy female after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of cryopreserved human oocytes. Fertil. Steril.68, 724–726 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polak de Fried E, Notrica J, Rubinstein M, Marazzi A, Gomez Gonzalez M. Pregnancy after human donor oocyte cryopreservation and thawing in association with intracytoplasmic sperm injection in a patient with ovarian failure. Fertil. Steril.69, 555–557 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porcu E, Fabbri R, Ciotti PM. Cycles of human oocyte cryopreservation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection; results of 112 cycles. Fertil. Steril.72, S2 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Wurfel W, Schleyer M, Krusmann G, Hertwig IV, Fiedler K. [Fertilization of cryopreserved and thawed human oocytes (Cryo-Oo) by injection of spermatozoa (ICSI) – medical management of sterility and case report of a twin pregnancy]. Zentralbl. Gynakol.121, 444–448 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Porcu E, Fabbri R, Seracchioli R. Obstetric, perinatal outcome and follow up of children concieved from cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil. Steril.74, S48 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marsella T, Rocchetta G, Venturoli S, Flamigni C. Human oocyte cryopreservation: new perspectives regarding oocyte survival. Hum. Reprod.16, 411–416 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winslow K, Yang D, Blohm PL, Brown SE, Jossim P, Nguyen K. Oocyte cryopreservation; a three year follow up of sixteen births. Fertil. Steril.76, S120 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Bertolino MV, Pasqualini RS. Birth of two babies using oocytes that were cryopreserved in a choline-based freezing medium. Hum. Reprod.17, 3149–3152 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Borini A, Bonu MA, Coticchio G, Bianchi V, Cattoli M, Flamigni C. Pregnancies and births after oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil. Steril.82, 601–605 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi V, Coticchio G, Fava L, Flamigni C, Borini A. Meiotic spindle imaging in human oocytes frozen with a slow freezing procedure involving high sucrose concentration. Hum. Reprod.20, 1078–1083 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Chen SU, Lien YR, Chen HF, Chang LJ, Tsai YY, Yang YS. Observational clinical follow-up of oocyte cryopreservation using a slow-freezing method with 1,2-propanediol plus sucrose followed by ICSI. Hum. Reprod.20, 1975–1980 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Borini A, Sciajno R, Bianchi V, Sereni E, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Clinical outcome of oocyte cryopreservation after slow cooling with a protocol utilizing a high sucrose concentration. Hum. Reprod.21, 512–517 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi Setti PE, Albani E, Novara PV, Cesana A, Morreale G. Cryopreservation of supernumerary oocytes in IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum. Reprod.21, 370–375 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Santis L, Cino I, Rabellotti E et al. Oocyte cryopreservation: clinical outcome of slow-cooling protocols differing in sucrose concentration. Reprod. Biomed Online14, 57–63 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Parmegiani L, Cognigni GE, Bernardi S et al. Freezing within 2 h from oocyte retrieval increases the efficiency of human oocyte cryopreservation when using a slow freezing/rapid thawing protocol with high sucrose concentration. Hum. Reprod.23, 1771–1777 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Katayama KP, Stehlik J, Kuwayama M, Kato O, Stehlik E. High survival rate of vitrified human oocytes results in clinical pregnancy. Fertil. Steril.80, 223–224 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebermann J, Tucker MJ, Sills ES. Cryoloop vitrification in assisted reproduction: analysis of survival rates in > 1000 human oocytes after ultra-rapid cooling with polymer augmented cryoprotectants. Clin. Exp. Obstet. Gynecol.30, 125–129 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Kato O, Leibo SP. Highly efficient vitrification method for cryopreservation of human oocytes. Reprod. Biomed Online11, 300–308 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lucena E, Bernal DP, Lucena C, Rojas A, Moran A, Lucena A. Successful ongoing pregnancies after vitrification of oocytes. Fertil. Steril.85, 108–111 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, Antinori S. Cryotop vitrification of human oocytes results in high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Reprod. Biomed Online14, 72–79 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon TK, Lee DR, Cha SK, Chung HM, Lee WS, Cha KY. Survival rate of human oocytes and pregnancy outcome after vitrification using slush nitrogen in assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil. Steril.88, 952–956 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Domingo J, Perez S, Crespo J, Remohi J, Pellicer A. Vitrification: an effective new approach to oocyte banking and preserving fertility in cancer patients. Clin. Transl. Oncol.10, 268–273 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Bellver J, Domingo J et al. New options in assisted reproduction technology: the Cryotop method of oocyte vitrification. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 68–72 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keskintepe L, Agca Y, Sher G, Keskintepe M, Maassarani G. High survival rate of metaphase II human oocytes after first polar body biopsy and vitrification: determining the effect of previtrification conditions. Fertil. Steril. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.114 (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Sher G, Keskintepe L, Mukaida T et al. Selective vitrification of euploid oocytes markedly improves survival, fertilization and pregnancy-generating potential. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 524–529 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ghetler Y, Yavin S, Shalgi R, Arav A. The effect of chilling on membrane lipid phase transition in human oocytes and zygotes. Hum. Reprod.20, 3385–3389 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford P, Merot J, Jawerbaum A, Gimeno MA, Capurro C, Parisi M. Water permeability in rat oocytes at different maturity stages: aquaporin-9 expression. J. Membr. Biol.176, 151–158 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Jackowski S, Leibo SP, Maxur P. Glycerol permeabilities of fertilized and infertilized mouse ova. J. Exp. Zool.212, 329–341 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sereni E, Bonu M, Borini A. High survival rates after cryopreservation of human prophase oocytes. Fertil. Steril.74(Suppl. 1), S161 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Senn A, Vozzi C, Chanson A, De Grandi P, Germond M. Prospective randomized study of two cryopreservation policies avoiding embryo selection: the pronucleate stage leads to a higher cumulative delivery rate than the early cleavage stage. Fertil. Steril.74, 946–952 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maneiro E, Ron-Corzo A, Julve J, Goyanes VJ. Surface area/volume ratio and growth equation of the human early embryo. Int. J. Dev. Biol.35, 139–143 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Fabbri R, Porcu E, Marsella T et al. Technical aspects of oocyte cryopreservation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.169, 39–42 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dumoulin JC, Bergers-Janssen JM, Pieters MH, Enginsu ME, Geraedts JP, Evers JL. The protective effects of polymers in the cryopreservation of human and mouse zonae pellucidae and embryos. Fertil. Steril.62, 793–798 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Nottola SA, Macchiarelli G, Coticchio G et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation using different sucrose concentrations. Hum. Reprod.22, 1123–1133 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nottola SA, Coticchio G, De Santis L et al. Ultrastructure of human mature oocytes after slow cooling cryopreservation with ethylene glycol. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 368–377 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gook DA, Osborn SM, Johnston WI. Cryopreservation of mouse and human oocytes using 1,2-propanediol and the configuration of the meiotic spindle. Hum. Reprod.8, 1101–1109 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Blerkom J, Davis PW. Cytogenetic, cellular, and developmental consequences of cryopreservation of immature and mature mouse and human oocytes. Microsc. Res. Tech.27, 165–193 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gook DA, Schiewe MC, Osborn SM, Asch RH, Jansen RP, Johnston WI. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo development of human oocytes cryopreserved using 1,2-propanediol. Hum. Reprod.10, 2637–2641 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazem R, Thompson LA, Srikantharajah A, Laing MA, Hamilton MP, Templeton A. Cryopreservation of human oocytes and fertilization by two techniques: in-vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod.10, 2650–2654 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Magistrini M, Szollosi D. Effects of cold and of isopropyl-N-phenylcarbamate on the second meiotic spindle of mouse oocytes. Eur. J. Cell Biol.22, 699–707 (1980).
   Google Scholar
• McWilliams RB, Gibbons WE, Leibo SP. Osmotic and physiological responses of mouse zygotes and human oocytes to mono- and disaccharides. Hum. Reprod.10, 1163–1171 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen S. Detrimental effects of sodium during mouse oocyte cryopreservation. Biol. Reprod.59, 395–400 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson MH, Pickering SJ. The effect of dimethylsulphoxide on the microtubular system of the mouse oocyte. Development100, 313–324 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH. Cryoprotection of human oocytes: inappropriate exposure to DMSO reduces fertilization rates. Hum. Reprod.6, 142–143 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Pickering SJ, Johnson MH. The influence of cooling on the organization of the meiotic spindle of the mouse oocyte. Hum. Reprod.2, 207–216 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pickering SJ, Braude PR, Johnson MH, Cant A, Currie J. Transient cooling to room temperature can cause irreversible disruption of the meiotic spindle in the human oocyte. Fertil. Steril.54, 102–108 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sathananthan AH, Kirby C, Trounson A, Philipatos D, Shaw J. The effects of cooling mouse oocytes. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.9, 139–148 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Boiso I, Marti M, Santalo J, Ponsa M, Barri PN, Veiga A. A confocal microscopy analysis of the spindle and chromosome configurations of human oocytes cryopreserved at the germinal vesicle and metaphase II stage. Hum. Reprod.17, 1885–1891 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rienzi L, Martinez F, Ubaldi F et al. Polscope analysis of meiotic spindle changes in living metaphase II human oocytes during the freezing and thawing procedures. Hum. Reprod.19, 655–659 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coticchio G, De Santis L, Rossi G et al. Sucrose concentration influences the rate of human oocytes with normal spindle and chromosome configurations after slow-cooling cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod.21, 1771–1776 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Rubio C, Gerli S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Use of fluorescence in situ hybridization to assess the chromosomal status of embryos obtained from cryopreserved oocytes. Fertil. Steril.75, 354–360 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Ruppert-Lingham CJ, Paynter SJ, Godfrey J, Fuller BJ, Shaw RW. Developmental potential of murine germinal vesicle stage cumulus–oocyte complexes following exposure to dimethylsulphoxide or cryopreservation: loss of membrane integrity of cumulus cells after thawing. Hum. Reprod.18, 392–398 (2003).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cha KY, Koo JJ, Ko JJ, Choi DH, Han SY, Yoon TK. Pregnancy after in vitro fertilization of human follicular oocytes collected from nonstimulated cycles, their culture in vitro and their transfer in a donor oocyte program. Fertil. Steril.55, 109–113 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker MJ, Morton PC, Wright G, Sweitzer CL, Massey JB. Clinical application of human egg cryopreservation. Hum. Reprod.13, 3156–3159 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu J, Zhang L, Wang X. In vitro maturation, fertilization and embryo development after ultrarapid freezing of immature human oocytes. Reproduction121, 389–393 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SE, Son WY, Lee SH, Lee KA, Ko JJ, Cha KY. Chromosome and spindle configurations of human oocytes matured in vitro after cryopreservation at the germinal vesicle stage. Fertil. Steril.68, 920–926 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fawole AO, Oladapo OT. An evaluation of embryo, zygote and oocyte cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology. Afr. J. Med. Med. Sci.36, 325–334 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Minasi MG, Casciani V, Iacobelli M et al. Evaluation of slush nitrogen vitrification on cumulus enclosed or cumulus free human oocytes. Presentee at: The 24th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE. Barcelona, Spain, 7–9 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Imoedemhe DG, Sigue AB. Survival of human oocytes cryopreserved with or without the cumulus in 1,2-propanediol. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.9, 323–327 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Paynter SJ. A rational approach to oocyte cryopreservation. Reprod. Biomed Online10, 578–586 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Vajta G, Nagy ZP. Are programmable freezers still needed in the embryo laboratory? Review on vitrification. Reprod. Biomed Online12, 779–796 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambrosini G, Andrisani A, Porcu E et al. Oocytes cryopreservation: state of art. Reprod. Toxicol.22, 250–262 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Porcu E, Bazzocchi A, Notarangelo L, Paradisi R, Landolfo C, Venturoli S. Human oocyte cryopreservation in infertility and oncology. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes.15, 529–535 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Coticchio G, Bonu MA, Sciajno R, Sereni E, Bianchi V, Borini A. Truths and myths of oocyte sensitivity to controlled rate freezing. Reprod. Biomed Online15, 24–30 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Yoon TK, Kim TJ, Park SE et al. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer program. Fertil. Steril.79, 1323–1326 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chian RC, Huang JY, Gilbert L et al. Obstetric outcomes following vitrification of in vitro and in vivo matured oocytes. Fertil. Steril.91(6), 2391–2398 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bielanski A, Bergeron H, Lau PC, Devenish J. Microbial contamination of embryos and semen during long term banking in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology46, 146–152 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bielanski A, Nadin-Davis S, Sapp T, Lutze-Wallace C. Viral contamination of embryos cryopreserved in liquid nitrogen. Cryobiology40, 110–116 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuwayama M, Vajta G, Ieda S, Kato O. Comparison of open and closed methods for vitrification of human embryos and the elimination of potential contamination. Reprod. Biomed Online11, 608–614 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Perez S, De los Santos MJ, Zulategui J, Domingo J, Remohi J. Effect of different cryopreservation protocols on the metaphase II spindle in human oocytes. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 350–359 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Camus A, Clairaz P, Ersham A, Van Kappel AL, Savic G, Staub C. [The comparison of the process of five different vitrification devices]. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.34, 737–745 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Mullen SF, Li M, Li Y, Chen ZJ, Critser JK. Human oocyte vitrification: the permeability of metaphase II oocytes to water and ethylene glycol and the appliance toward vitrification. Fertil. Steril.89, 1812–1825 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Stachecki JJ, Garrisi J, Sabino S, Caetano JP, Wiemer KE, Cohen J. A new safe, simple and successful vitrification method for bovine and human blastocysts. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 360–367 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil. Steril.82, 993–998 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kavoussi SK, Fisseha S, Smith YR, Smith GD, Christman GM, Gago LA. Oocyte cryopreservation in a woman with mosaic Turner syndrome: a case report. J. Reprod. Med.53, 223–226 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang D, Brown SE, Nguyen K, Reddy V, Brubaker C, Winslow KL. Live birth after the transfer of human embryos developed from cryopreserved oocytes harvested before cancer treatment. Fertil. Steril.87, 1469 e1461–e1464 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Porcu E, Venturoli S, Damiano G et al. Healthy twins delivered after oocyte cryopreservation and bilateral ovariectomy for ovarian cancer. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 265–267 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Meirow D. Fertility preservation in cancer patients using stored ovarian tissue: clinical aspects. Curr. Opin. Endocrinol. Diabetes Obes.15, 536–547 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Bedaiwy MA, El-Nashar SA, El Saman AM et al. Reproductive outcome after transplantation of ovarian tissue: a systematic review. Hum. Reprod.23(12), 2709–2717 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedaiwy MA, Jeremias E, Gurunluoglu R et al. Restoration of ovarian function after autotransplantation of intact frozen–thawed sheep ovaries with microvascular anastomosis. Fertil. Steril.79, 594–602 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JY, Buckett WM, Gilbert L, Tan SL, Chian RC. Retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: a case report on a new strategy of fertility preservation in women with borderline ovarian malignancy. Gynecol. Oncol.105, 542–544 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Demirtas E, Elizur SE, Holzer H et al. Immature oocyte retrieval in the luteal phase to preserve fertility in cancer patients. Reprod. Biomed Online17, 520–523 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JY, Tulandi T, Holzer H, Tan SL, Chian RC. Combining ovarian tissue cryobanking with retrieval of immature oocytes followed by in vitro maturation and vitrification: an additional strategy of fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril.89, 567–572 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oktay K, Demirtas E, Son WY, Lostritto K, Chian RC, Tan SL. In vitro maturation of germinal vesicle oocytes recovered after premature luteinizing hormone surge: description of a novel approach to fertility preservation. Fertil. Steril.89, 228 e219–e222 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Otte S, Thill M, Schopper B et al. Fertility preservation in breast cancer: oocyte freezing after IVM & ovarian cortex cryopreservation versus oocyte freezing after modified stimulation. Presented at: The 24th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE. Barcelona, Spain, 7–9 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chian RC, Gilbert L, Huang JY et al. Live birth after vitrification of in vitro matured human oocytes. Fertil. Steril.91(2), 372–376 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Omland AK, Fedorcsak P, Storeng R, Dale PO, Abyholm T, Tanbo T. Natural cycle IVF in unexplained, endometriosis-associated and tubal factor infertility. Hum. Reprod.16, 2587–2592 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benagiano G, Gianaroli L. The new Italian IVF legislation. Reprod. Biomed Online9, 117–125 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cil A, Oktem O, Oktay K. A meta-analytic comparison of oocyte vitrification to slow freezing: time trends and the current state of the technology. Fertil. Steril.90(Suppl. 1), S269 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kuwayama M, Leibo SP. Efficiency of the cryotop method to cryopreserve human oocytes: analysis of in vitro and in vivo results at eleven IVF clinics. Fertil. Steril.90(suppl. 1), S281–S282 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine; The Practice Committee of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology. Ovarian tissue and oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil. Steril.86, S142–S147 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konc J, Kanyo K, Varga E, Kriston R, Cseh S. Births resulting from oocyte cryopreservation using a slow freezing protocol with propanediol and sucrose. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med.54, 205–210 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eroglu A, Toner M, Toth TL. Beneficial effect of microinjected trehalose on the cryosurvival of human oocytes. Fertil. Steril.77, 152–158 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Stachecki JJ, Cohen J, Willadsen SM. Cryopreservation of unfertilized mouse oocytes: the effect of replacing sodium with choline in the freezing medium. Cryobiology37, 346–354 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boldt J, Tidswell N, Sayers A, Kilani R, Cline D. Human oocyte cryopreservation: 5-year experience with a sodium-depleted slow freezing method. Reprod. Biomed Online13, 96–100 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petracco A, Azambuja R, Okada L, Michelon J, Oliani A, Badalotti M. Comparison of embryo quality between sibling embryos originating from frozen or fresh oocytes. Reprod. Biomed Online13, 497–503 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Borini A, Lagalla C, Bonu MA, Bianchi V, Flamigni C, Coticchio G. Cumulative pregnancy rates resulting from the use of fresh and frozen oocytes: 7 years’ experience. Reprod. Biomed Online12, 481–486 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Bianchi V, Coticchio G, Distratis V, Di Giusto N, Flamigni C, Borini A. Differential sucrose concentration during dehydration (0.2 mol/l) and rehydration (0.3 mol/l) increases the implantation rate of frozen human oocytes. Reprod. Biomed Online14, 64–71 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borini A, Bianchi V, Bonu MA et al. Evidence-based clinical outcome of oocyte slow cooling. Reprod. Biomed Online15, 175–181 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, Antinori S. Three years of clinical application in human oocytes vitrification: high survival rate and healthy deliveries. Presented at: The 24th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE. Barcelona, Spain, 7–9 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Chang CC, Shapiro DB, Bernal DP, Wright G, Kort HI, Nagy ZP. Two successful pregnancies obtained following oocyte vitrification and embryo re-vitrification. Reprod. Biomed Online16, 346–349 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen GA, Cai XY, Lian Y, Zheng XY, Qiao J, Chen XN, Ye RH. Normal birth from cryopreserved embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection of frozen semen into vitrified human oocytes. Hum. Fertil. (Camb.)11, 49–51 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Cobo A, Kuwayama M, Perez S, Ruiz A, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method. Fertil. Steril.89, 1657–1664 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fioravanti J, Alegretti JR, Hassun PA, Motta ELA, Serafini PC, Smith GD. Prospective randomized comparison of human oocyte freezing and vitrification: an update. Fertil. Steril.88(Suppl. 1), S13 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Garcia G, Santos R, Arenas ML, Gonzalez O, Ramirez P, Patrizio P. Comparitive study of human oocyte cryopreservation by vitrification or slow freezing. Fertil. Steril.90(Suppl. 1), S291–S292 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wang WH, Meng L, Hackett RJ, Odenbourg R, Keefe DL. Limited recovery of meiotic spindles in living human oocytes after cooling–rewarming observed using polarized light microscopy. Hum. Reprod.16, 2374–2378 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larman MG, Minasi MG, Rienzi L, Gardner DK. Maintenance of the meiotic spindle during vitrification in human and mouse oocytes. Reprod. Biomed Online15, 692–700 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao YX, Xing Q, Li L et al. Comparison of survival and embryonic development in human oocytes cryopreserved by slow-freezing and vitrification. Fertil. Steril. DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.069 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Coticchio G, Distratis V, Borini A, Maione M, Macchiarelli G, Nottola SA. Reduced ultrastructural damage in human oocytes cryopreserved after dehydration involving single-step propanediol exposure. Abstracts of the 24th Annual Meeting of the ESHRE. Barcelona, Spain, 7–9 July (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nottola SA, Coticchio G, Sciajno R et al. Ultrastructural changes in human metaphase II oocytes cryopreserved by vitrification. Presented at: The 24th annual meeting of the ESRE. Barcelona, Spain 7–9 July 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Borini A, Cattoli M, Mazzone S et al. Survey of 105 babies born after slow-cooling oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil. Steril.88(Suppl. 1), S13 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Chavez-Badiola A, Ruvalcaba-Castellon LA, Zheng J, Garcia-Amador MI. Technique safety: oocyte vitrification. Live births’ long-term follow-up. Fertil. Steril.90(suppl. 1), S205 (2008).
   Google Scholar