Overview of current trends in hysterectomy

References

• Dorsey JH, Steinberg EP, Holtz PM. Clinical indications for hysterectomy route: Patient characteristics or physician preference? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.173, 1452–1460 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac SR. Guidelines to determine the route the route of hysterectomy. Obstet. Gynecol.85, 18–23 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Summitt RL Jr, Stovall TG, Steege JF, Lipscomb GH. A multicenter randomized comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in abdominal hysterectomy candidates. Obstet. Gynecol.92, 321–326 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet. Gynecol.95, 787–793 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Eeden SK, Glasser M, Mathias SD, Colwell HH, Pasta DJ, Kunz K. Quality of life, health care utilization, and cost among women undergoing hysterectomy in a managed-care setting. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.178, 91–100 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongers MY, Mol BW, Brölmann HA. Current treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding. Maturitas47, 159–174 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farquhar C, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States. Obstet. Gynecol.99, 229–234 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Materia E, Rossi L, Spadea T et al. Hysterectomy and socioeconomic position in Rome, Italy. J. Epidemiol. Community Health56, 461–465 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mcpherson K, Wennberg JE, Hovind OB, Clifford P. Small area variations in the use of common surgical procedures. An international comparison of New England, England and Norway. N. Engl. J. Med.307, 1310–1314 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepine LA, Hilis SD, Marchbanks PA et al. Hysterectomy surveillance –United States, 1980–1993. MMWR CDC Surveill. Summ.46, 1–15 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilcox LS, Kononin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988–1990. Obstet. Gynecol.83, 549–555 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keshavarz H. Hysterectomy surveillance – United States, 1994–1999. MMWR Surveill. Summ.51, 1–8 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Farquhar CM, Steiner CA. Hysterectomy rates in the United States 1990–1997. Obstet. Gynecol.99, 229–234 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson GF, Shaber RE, Armstrong MA, Hung YY. Hysterectomy rates for benign indications. Obstet. Gynecol.107(6), 1278–1283 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rannestad T, Eikeland O-J, Helland H, Qvarnstrom U. Quality of life, pain, and psychological wellbeing in women suffering from gynecological disorders. J. Womens Health9(8), 897–903 (2000).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. Am. J. Clin. Pathol.94, 435–438 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen L, Hannaford PC, Elliott AM, Lee AJ. Long term effects of hysterectomy on mortality: nested cohort study. BMJ330, 1482–1488 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grover CM, Kupperman M, Kahn JG, Washington AE. Concurrent hysterectomy at bilateral salpingooophorectomy. Benefits, risks and costs. Obstet. Gynecol.88, 907–913 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green A, Purdie D, Bain C et al. Tubal sterilisation, hysterectomy and decreased risk of ovarian cancer. Int. J. Cancer7, 948–951 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Riman T, Persson I, Nilsson S. Hormonal aspects of epithelial ovarian cancer: review of epidemiological evidence. Clin. Endocrinol.49, 695–707 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker WH, Shoupe D, Broder MS, Liu Z, Farquhar C, Berek JS. Elective oophorectomy in the gynaecological patients: is it desirable? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.19, 350–354 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoupe D, Parker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Farquhar C, Berek JS. Elective oophorectomy for benign gynaecological disorders. Menopause14, 580–585 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker WH, Broder MS, Liu Z, Shoupe D, Farquhar C, Berek JS. Ovarian conservation at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet. Gynecol.106, 219–226 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• You JH, Sahota DS, MoYuen P. A cost–utility analysis of hysterectomy, endometrial resection and ablation and medical therapy for menorrhagia. Hum. Reprod.21, 1878–1883 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac SR. Decision-directed hysterectomy: a possible approach to improve medical and economic outcomes. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet.71, 159–169 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: a multicentre randomised trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol. Assess.8, 1–154 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, Fountain J, Mason S, Garry R. Cost–effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy: results from a randomised trial. BMJ328, 134 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac SR, Barhan S, Lister M, Tucker L, Bishop M, Das A. Guidelines for the selection of the route of hysterectomy: application in a resident clinic population. Kovac Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.187, 1521–1527 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varma R, Tahseen S, Lokugamage AU, Kunde D. Vaginal route as the norm when planning hysterectomy for benign conditions: change in practice. Obstet. Gynecol.97, 613–616 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broders MS, Kanouse DE, Mittman BS, Bernstein SJ. The appropriateness of recommendations of hysterectomy. Obstet. Gynecol.95, 377–382 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kammerer-Doak D, Mao J. Vaginal hysterectomy with and without morcellation: the University of New Mexico Hospital’s experience. Obstet. Gynecol.88, 560–563 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magos A, Bournas N, Sinha R, Richardson RE, O’Connor H. Vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. BJOG103, 246–251 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT et al. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for the enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.187, 1561–1565 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH, Retto HF. Laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. J. Gynecol. Surg.6, 185–193 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambaudie E, Occelli B, Boukerrou M, Crepin G, Cosson M. Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women: indications and limitations. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod.30, 325–330 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agostini A, Bretelle F, Cravello L, Maisonneuve AS, Roger V, Blanc B. Vaginal hysterectomy in nulliparous women without prolapse: prospective comparative study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.110, 515–518 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson RE, Bournas N, Magos A. Is laparoscopic hysterectomy a waste of time? Lancet345, 36–41 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querleu D, Cosson M, Paramentier D, Debodinance P. The impact of laparoscopic surgery on vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecol. Endosc.2, 89–91 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kovac SR. Hysterectomy outcomes in patients with similar indications. Obstet. Gynecol.95, 787–793 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ330, 1478–1486 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P et al. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with of without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. Obstet. Gynecol.97, 712–716 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris MB, Olive DL. Changing hysterectomy patterns after introduction of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.171, 340–344 (1992).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskett TF, Clough H. Perioperative morbidity of hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.21(5), 504–506 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L. Three methods for hysterectomy: a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. BJOG107, 1380–1385 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brown DA, Frazer MI. Hysterectomy revisited. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynecol.31, 148 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Querleu D, Cosson M, Parmentier D et al. The impact of laparoscopic surgery on vaginal hysterectomy. Gynaecol. Endosc.2, 89–91 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Davies A, O’Connor H, Magos AL. A prospective study to evaluate oophorectomy at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. BJOG103, 915–920 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT et al. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: a randomized clinical trial. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.187, 1561–1565 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazdisnian F, Kurzel RB, Coe S et al. Vaginal hysterectomy by uterine morcellation: an efficient, non-morbid procedure. Obstet. Gynecol.86, 60–64 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unger JB. Vaginal hysterectomy for the woman with a moderately enlarged uterus weighing 200 to 700 grams. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.180, 1337–1344 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter JE, Ryoo J, Katz A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case–control comparative study with total abdominal hysterectomy. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc.1, 116–121 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Garry R, Reich H, Liu CY. Laparoscopic hysterectomy – definitions and indications. Gynaecol. Endosc.3, 1–3 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in current gynaecological practice. Rev. Gynaecol. Pract.3, 32–40 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Garry R. Towards evidence-based hysterectomy. Gynaecol. Endosc.7, 225–233 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Summit RL, Stovall TG, Lipscomb GH, Ling FW. Randomized comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy with standard vaginal hysterectomy in an outpatient setting. Obstet. Gynecol.80, 895–901 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, Darai E. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared to laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.80, 337–341 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S et al. The evaluate study: two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ328, 129–136 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Gordon S, Wilkins F. Laparoscopic versus abdominal hysterectomy. J. Reprod. Med.37, 247–250 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phipps JH, John M, Nayak S. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with conventional abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.100, 698–700 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raju KS, Auld BJ. A randomised prospective study of laparoscopic vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy each with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.101, 1068–1071 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Olsson JH, Ellstrom M, Hahlin M. A randomised prospective trial comparing laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.103, 345–350 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Langebrekke A, Eraker R, Nesheim BI et al. Abdominal hysterectomy should not be considered as a primary method for uterine removal. A prospective randomized study of 100 patients referred to hysterectomy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.75, 404–407 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marana R, Busacca M, Zupi E et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized multicenter study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.180, 270–275 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcone T, Paraiso MFR, Masha E. Prospective randomized clinical trial of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.180, 955–962 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari MM, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R et al. Identifying the indications for laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective, randomized comparison with abdominal hysterectomy in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids. BJOG107, 620–625 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lumsden MA, Twaddle S, Hawthorn R et al. A randomised comparison and economic evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy. BJOG107, 1386–1391 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schütz K, Possover M, Merker A, Michels W, Schneider A. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for the treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g. Surg. Endos.16, 121–125 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucette RC, Scott JR. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy with abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy. J. Reprod. Med.41(1), 1–6 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kung FT, Hwang FR, Lin H, Tai MC, Hsieh CH, Chang SY. Comparison of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in Taiwan. J. Formos. Med. Assoc.95(10), 769–775 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malur S, Possover M, Michels W, Schneider A. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal versus abdominal surgery in patients with endometrial cancer – a prospective randomized trial. Gynecol. Oncol.80(2), 239–244 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holub Z, Jabor A, Sprongl L, Fischlova D, Urbanek S. Clinical outcome, inflammatory response and tissue trauma in total laparoscopic hysterectomy: comparison to laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Ces. Gynekol.67(6), 315–320 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chapron C, Dubuisson JB, Ansquer Y. Hysterectomy for patients without previous vaginal delivery: results and modalities of laparoscopic surgery. Hum. Reprod.11(10), 2122–2126 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CS, Randall TC, Bandera CA, Rubin SC. Vaginal cuff recurrence of endometrial cancer treated by laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Gynecologic Oncol.88, 62–65 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C et al. Morbidity of 10 110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum. Reprod.16, 1473–1478 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds RK, Advincula AP. Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: technique and initial experience. Am. J. Surg.191, 555–560 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy utilizing a robotic surgical system. JSLS9, 13–15 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Virtanen HS, Makinen JI, Kiilholma PJA. Conserving the cervix at hysterectomy. BJOG102, 587 (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Manyonda I, Stanton S et al. Total versus subtotal hysterectomy: a survey of current views and practice amongst British gynaecologists. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.3, 267–269 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Kjerulff KH, Langenberg PW, Greenaway L et al. Urinary incontinence and hysterectomy in a large prospective cohort study in American women. J. Urol.167, 2088–2092 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thakar R, Ayers S, Clarkson P et al. Outcomes after total and subtotal hysterectomy. N. Engl. J. Med.347, 1318–1329 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learman LA, Summitt RL, Varner RE et al. A randomized comparison of total or supracervical hysterectomy: surgical complications and clinical outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol.102, 453–562 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell SA, Kieser K. Sexuality after hysterectomy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.95, 1045–1051 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Alexander AD, Naji AA, Pinion SB et al. A randomized trial of hysterectomy versus endometrial ablation for dysfunctional uterine bleeding: psychiatric and psychosocial outcome. BMJ312, 280–312 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zobbe V, Gimbel H, Anderson BM et al. Sexuality after total and subtotal hysterectomy. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.83, 191–196 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchionni M, Braco GL, Checcucci V et al. True incidence of vaginal vault prolapse: thirteen years experience. J. Reprod. Med.44, 679–684 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toozs-Hobson P, Boos K, Cardozo L. Management of vaginal vault prolapse. BJOG105, 13–17 (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Dällenbach P, Kaelin-Gambirasio I, Dubuisson JB, Boulvain M. Risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse repair after hysterectomy. Obstet. Gynecol.110(3), 625–632 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marjoribanks J, Lethaby A, Farquhar C. Surgery versus medical therapy for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2, CD003855 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Olive DL, Lindheim SR, Pritts EA. Non-surgical management of leiomyoma: impact on fertility. Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.16, 239–243 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiscella K, Eisinger SH, Meldrum S, Feng C, Fisher SG, Guzick DS. Effect of mifepristone for symptomatic leiomyomata on quality of life and uterine size: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet. Gynecol.108, 1381–1387 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinauer J, Pritts EA, Jackson R, Jacoby AF. Systematic review of mifepristone for the treatment of uterine leiomyomata. Obstet. Gynecol.103, 1331–1336 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson RE Jr, Chelmow D, Strohbehn K, Waldman L, Evantash EG. Relative morbidity of abdominal hysterectomy and myomectomy for management of uterine leiomyomas. Obstet. Gynecol.88, 415–419 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker JL, Foster JT, Friedman AJ. Abdominal hysterectomy or abdominal myomectomy for symptomatic leiomyoma: a comparison of preoperative demography and postoperative morbidity. J. Gynecol. Surg.11, 11–17 (1995).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoo EH, Lee PI, Huh CY et al. Predictors of leiomyoma recurrence after laparoscopic myomectomy. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.14, 690–697 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Parazzini F, Luchini L, Mezzopane R, Tozzi L, Villa L. Recurrence of fibroids after myomectomy: a transvaginal ultrasonographic study. Hum. Reprod.10, 1795–1796 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altgassen C, Kuss S, Berger U, Loning M, Diedrich K, Schneider A. Complications in laparoscopic myomectomy. Surg. Endosc.20, 614–618 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstet. Gynecol.104, 393–406 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polena V, Mergui JL, Perrot N, Poncelet C, Barranger E, Uzan S. Long-term results of hysteroscopic myomectomy in 235 patients. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.130, 232–237 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper K, Parkin D, Garrat A, Grant A. Two year follow up of women randomised to medical management or transcervical resection of the endometrium for heavy menstrual loss: clinical and quality of life outcomes. BJOG,106, 258–265 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Abbott J, Garry R. The surgical management of menorrhagia. Hum. Reprod. Update8, 68–78 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor H, Magos A. Endometrial resection for the treatment of menorrhagia. N. Engl. J. Med.335, 151–156 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor H, Broadbent J, Magos A, McPherson K. Medical research council randomised trial comparing endometrial resection with abdominal hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia. BMJ349, 897–901 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Aberdeen Endometrial Ablation Trials Group. A randomised trial of endometrial ablation versus hysterectomy for the treatment of dysfunctional uterine bleeding: outcomes at four years. BJOG106, 360–366 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Meyer W, Walsh B, Grainger D, Peacock L, Loffer F, Steege J. Thermal balloon and rollerball ablation to treat menorrhagia: a multicenter comparison. Obstet. Gynecol.92, 98–103 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry R. Evidence and techniques in endometrial ablation: consensus. Gynaecol. Endosc.11, 5–17 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lethaby A, Hickey M, Garry R. Endometrial destruction techniques for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.4, CD001501 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Guidelines: the Initial Management of Menorrhagia. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, London, UK (1999).
   Google Scholar
• National Health Committee. Guidelines for the Management of Heavy Menstrual Bleeding. National Health Committee, Auckland, New Zealand (1998).
   Google Scholar
• Schulper M, Dwyer N, Byfor S, Stirrat G. Randomised trial comparing hysterectomy and transcervical endometrial resection: effect on health related quality of life and costs two years after surgery. BJOG103, 142–149 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Hurskainen R, Teperi J, Rissanen P et al. Quality of life and cost–effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system versus hysterectomy for treatment of menorrhagia: a randomised trial. Lancet357, 273–277 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidalgo M, Bahamondes L, Perroti M, Diaz J, Dantas Monteiro C, Petta C. Bleeding patterns and clinical performance of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (Mirena) up to two years. Contraception65, 129–132 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaby A, Cooke I, Rees M. Progesterone/progestogen releasing intrauterine systems versus either placebo or any other medication for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database System Rev.CD002126 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Radesic B, Sharma A. Levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system for treating menstrual disorders: a patient satisfaction questionnaire. Aust. NZ J. Obstet. Gynecol.44, 247–251 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lethaby A, Irvine G, Cameron I. Cyclical progestogens for heavy menstrual bleeding. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.2, CD001016 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru-Vigneron N et al. Arterial embolization to treat uterine myomata. Lancet346(8976), 671–672 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchins FL Jr, Wothington-Kirsch RL, Berkowitz RP. Selective uterine artery embolization as primary treatment for symptomatic leiomyomata uteri. J. Am. Assoc. Gynecol. Laparosc.6, 279–284 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Volkers NA, Hehenkamp WJ, Smit P, Ankum WM, Reekers JA, Birnie E. Economic evaluation of uterine artery embolization versus hysterectomy in the treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids: results from the randomized EMMY trial. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol.19, 1007–1016 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braude P, Reidy J, Nott V, Taylor A, Forman R. Embolization of uterine leiomyomata: current concepts in management. Hum. Reprod. Update6, 603–608 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirst A, Dutton S, Wu O et al. A multi-centre retrospective cohort study comparing the efficacy, safety and cost–effectiveness of hysterectomy and uterine artery embolisation for the treatment of symptomatic uterine fobroids. The HOPEFUL study. Health Technol. Assess12, 1–248 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu T, Zhou S, Zhang J. Ultrasonic therapy for gynaecologic tumors. J. Minim. Invasive Gynecol.15, 667–672 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabinovici J, Inbar Y, Revel A et al. Clinical improvement and shrink-age of uterine fibroids after thermal ablation by magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound surgery. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol.30, 771–777 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar