Changes in episiotomy practice: evidence-based medicine in action

References

• Kilpatrick S, Garrison E. Normal labor and delivery. In: Obstetrics, Normal and Problem Pregnancies (5th Edition). Gabbe S (Ed.). Churchill Livingston Elsevier, PA, USA, 303–321 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ould F. A Treatise on Midwifery in Three Parts. Nelson & Connor, Dublin, Ireland. (1742).
   Google Scholar
• DeLee JB. The prophylactic forceps operation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.1, 34–44 (1920).
   Google Scholar
• Thacker SB, Banta HD. Benefits and risks of episiotomy: an interpretive review of the English language literature, 1860–1980. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.38(6), 322–338 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sleep J, Grant A, Garcia J, Elbourne D, Spencer J, Chalmers D. The West Berkshire perineal management trial. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.)289(6445), 587–590 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltreider DF, Dixon DM. A study of 710 complete lacerations following central episiotomy. South. Med. J.41, 814–820 (1948).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harrison RF, Brennan M, North PM, Reed JV, Wickam EA. Is routine episiotomy necessary? Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.)288(6435), 1971–1974 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp JM, Bowes WA, Brame RG, Cefalo R. Selected use of midline episiotomy: effect on perineal trauma. Obstet. Gynecol.70(2), 587–590 (1987).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Green JR, Soohoo SL. Factors associated with rectal injury in spontaneous deliveries. Obstet. Gynecol.73(5), 732–738 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiono P, Klebanoff MA, Carey JC. Midline episiotomies: more harm than good? Obstet. Gynecol.75(5), 765–770 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony S, Buitendijk SE, Zondervan KT et al. Episiotomies and the occurrence of severe perineal lacerations. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.101, 1064–1067 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Labrecque M, Baillargeon L, Dallaire M, Tremblay A, Pinault J-J, Gingras S. Association between median episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in primiparous women. Can. Med. Assoc. J.156(6), 797–802 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Bodler-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A et al. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types. J. Reprod. Med.46(8), 752–756 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eason E, Labrecque M, Wells G, Feldman P. Preventing perineal trauma during childbirth: a systematic review. Obstet. Gynecol.95(3), 464–471 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argentine Episiotomy Trial Collaborative Group. Routine vs selective episiotomy: a randomized controlled trial. Lancet342, 1517–1518 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann OM, Hammoud AO, McNeeley SG, DeRose E, Kudish B, Hendrix S. Factors associated with anal sphincter laceration in 40,923 primaparous women. Int. Urogynecol. J.18, 985–990 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Leeuw JW, Struijk PC, Vierhout ME, Wallenburg HCS. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.108(4), 383–387 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Fenner DE, Genberg B, Brahma P, Marek L, DeLancey JO. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(6), 1543–1550 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford LA, Quint EH, Pearl ML, DeLancey JL. Incontinence following rupture of the anal sphincter during delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.82(4), 527–531 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainey HL. Postpartum observation of pelvic tissue damage: further studies. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.70, 800–807 (1955).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritel X, Schaal JP, Fauconnier A, Bertrand V, Levet C, Pigné A. Pelvic floor disorders 4 years after first delivery: a comparative study of restrictive versus systematic episiotomy. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.115(10), 247–252 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Mous M, Muller SA, de Leeuw JW. Long-term effects of anal sphincter rupture during vaginal delivery: faecal incontinence and sexual complaints. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.115(11), 234–238 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen SM, Bondeson H, Istre O, Vilmann P. Perineal rupture following vaginal delivery. Long-term consequences. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.67(4), 315–318 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poen AC, Felt-Bersma RJ, Strijers FL, Dekker GA, Cuesta MA, Meuwissen SG. Third-degree obstetric perineal tears: long term clinical and functional outcomes after primary repair. Br. J. Surg.85(10), 1433–1438 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sleep J, Grant A. West Berkshire perineal management trial: three year followup. Br. Med. J. (Clin. Res. Ed.)295, 749–751 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockner G. Urinary incontinence after perineal trauma at childbirth. Scand. J. Caring Sci.4, 169–172 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein MC, Gauthier JF, Robbins JM et al. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.171(3), 591–598 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sartore A, De Seta F, Maso G, Pregazzi R, Grimaldi E, Guaschino S. The effects of mediolateral episiotomy on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.103(4), 669–673 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejegård H, Ryding EL, Sjögren B. Sexuality after delivery with episiotomy: a long-term follow-up. Gynecol. Obstet. Invest.66, 1–7 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Episiotomy. ACOG Practice Bulletin 71. Obstet. Gynecol.107, 957–962 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delancey J. Episiotomy: what’s the angle? Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.103(1), 5–8 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kearney R, Miller JM, Ashton-Miller JA, DeLancey J. Obstetric factors associated with levator ani muscle injury after vaginal birth. Obstet. Gynecol.107(1), 144–149 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainey HL. Postpartum observation of pelvic tissue damage. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.45, 457–466 (1943).
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann K, Viswanathan M, Palmieri R, Gartlehner G, Thorp J, Lohr KN. Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review. JAMA293(17), 2141–2148 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borghi J, Fox-Rushby J, Bergel E, Abalos E, Hutton G, Carroli G. The cost–effectiveness of routine versus restrictive episiotomy in Argentina. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.186(2), 221–228 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.1, CD000081 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Intrapartum Care: Care of Healthy Women and Their Babies During Childbirth. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Press, London, UK, 168–170 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, Lieberman E. Predictors of episiotomy use at first vaginal delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.96(2), 214–218 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howden NL, Weber AM, Meyn LA. Episiotomy use among residents and faculty compared with private practitioners. Obstet. Gynecol.103(1), 114–118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goode KT, Weiss PM, Koller C, Kimmel S, Hess LW. Episiotomy rates in private vs resident service deliveries: a comparison. J. Reprod. Med.51(3), 190–192 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gossett DR, Dunsmoor Su R. Episiotomy practice in a community hospital practice. J. Reprod. Med.53(10), 803–808 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb DA, Culhane J. Time of day variation in rates of obstetric intervention to assist in vaginal delivery. J. Epidemiol. Community Health56(8), 577–578 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Webb DA, Culhane J. Hospital variation in episiotomy use and the risk of perineal trauma during childbirth. Birth29(2), 132–136 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruderman J, Carroll JC, Reid AJ, Murray MA. Are physicians changing the way they practice obstetrics? CMAJ148(3), 409–415 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Robbins JM, Gauthier RJ, Jorgensen SH, Joshi AK. Physicians’ beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for the women in their care. CMAJ153(6), 769–779 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olatunbosun OA, Eduoard L, Pierson RA. Physicians’ attitudes toward evidence based obstetric practice: a questionnaire survey. Br. Med. J.316, 365–366 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. JAMA282(15), 1458–1465 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigoriadis T, Athanasiou S, Zisou A, Antsaklis A. Episiotomy and perineal repair practices among obstetricians in Greece. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet.106(1), 27–29 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macelod M, Murphy DJ. Operative vaginal delivery and the use of episiotomy – a survey of practice in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Eur. J. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.136, 178–183 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robinson JN, Norwitz ER, Cohen AP, McElrath TF, Lieberman ES. Episiotomy, operative vaginal delivery, and significant perineal trauma in nulliparous women. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.181, 1180–1184 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youssef R, Ramalingam U, Macleod M, Murphy DJ. Cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at instrumental vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112, 941–945 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kudish B, Blackwell S, McNeeley SG et al. Operative vaginal delivery and midline episiotomy: a bad combination for the perineum. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.195, 749–754 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Leeuw JW, de Wit C, Kuijken JPJA, Bruinse HW. Mediolateral episiotomy reduces the risk for anal sphincter injury during operative vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.115, 104–108 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy DJ, Macleod M, Bahl R, Goyder K, Howarth L, Strachan B. A randomized controlled trial of routine versus restrictive use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery: a multicenter pilot study. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.115, 1695–1703 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R et al. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.115, 1688–1694 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Tincello DG, Williams A, Fowler GE, Adams EJ, Richmond DH, Alfirevic Z. Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.110, 1041–1044 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews V, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Jones PW. Are mediolateral episiotomies actually mediolateral? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.112, 1156–1158 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Andrews V, Sultan AH, Thakar R, Jones PW. Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injury: a prospective study. Birth33, 17–22 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Eogan M, Daly L, O’Connell PR, O’Herlihy C. Does the angle of episiotomy affect the incidence of anal sphincter injury? Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.113(2), 190–194 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Goffman D, Heo H, Pardanani S, Merkatz IR, Bernstein PS. Improving shoulder dystocia management among resident and attending physicians using simulations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.199(3), 294.e1–5 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs KM, Miller RS, Berkowitz RL. Optimizing outcomes through protocols, multidisciplinary drills, and simulation. Semin. Perinatol.33(2), 104–108 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boonyasai RT, Windish DM, Chakraborti C, Feldman LS, Rubin HR, Bass EB. Effectiveness of teaching quality improvement to clinicians. JAMA298(9), 1023–1037 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason E, Feldman P. Much ado about a little cut: is episiotomy worthwhile? Clinical commentary. Obstet. Gynecol.95(4), 616–618 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar