Attitudes towards home birth in the USA

References

• Lake R, Epstein A. Your Best Birth: Know All Your Options, Discover the Natural Choices, and Take Back the Birth Experience. Wellness Central, NY, USA (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brann AW, Cefalo RC. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (1983).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, ACOG Committee on Obstetrics: Maternal and Fetal Medicine, March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (2nd Edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (1988).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, ACOG Committee on Obstetrics: Maternal and Fetal Medicine. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (3rd Edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Fetus and Newborn, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (4th Edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (1997).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (5th Edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (2002).
   Google Scholar
• American Academy of Pediatrics; American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation. Guidelines for Perinatal Care (6th Edition). American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington DC, USA (2007).
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Statement of Policy 37: Home Delivery. May 1975; amended March 1979.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Statement of Policy 37: Home Delivery. May 1975; reaffirmed September 1999; withdrawn October 2002.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Statement of Policy 81: Out-of-Hospital Births in the United States. October 2006; replaced May 2007.
   Google Scholar
• ACOG Statement on Home Births. ACOG News Release (6 February 2008).
   Google Scholar
• Leslie MS, Romano A. Appendix: Birth can safely take place at home and in birthing centers. The Coalition for Improving Maternity Services: evidence basis for the ten steps of mother-friendly care. J. Perinat. Educ.16(1), 81S–84S (2007).
   Google Scholar
• International Childbirth Education Association. ICEA position statement and review: The Birth Place (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Lothian J, DeVries C. The Official Lamaze Guide: Giving Birth With Confidence. Meadowbrook Press, NY, USA, 39–62 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Lowe NK. The ‘authorities’ resolve against home birth. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs.38, 1–3 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cheyney M, Everson C. Narratives of risk: speaking across the hospital/homebirth debate. Anthropology News7–8 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd RE. Home birth emergencies in the United States: the trouble with transport. In: Unhealthy Health Policy: A Critical Anthropological Examination. Castro A, Merrill S (Eds). AltaMira Press, MD, USA, 329–350 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Vedam S, Stoll K, White S, Schummers L. Nurse-midwives’ experiences with planned home birth: impact on attitudes and practice. Birth36(4), 274–282 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Durnell-Schuiling K, Sipe T, Fullerton J. Findings from the analysis of the American College of Nurse-Midwives’ membership surveys: 2000–2003. J. Midwifery Womens Health50(1), 8–15 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goer H. Obstetric Myths Versus Research Realities.Bergin & Garvey, NY, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Korte D, Scaer R. A Good Birth, a Safe Birth. Harvard Common Press, MA, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin IM. Spiritual Midwifery. The Book Publishing Company, TN, USA, 49 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Gaskin IM. Ina May’s Guide to Childbirth. Bantam, NY, USA (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Bailes A, Jackson ME. Shared responsibility in home birth practice: collaborating with clients. J. Midwifery Womens Health.45(6), 537–543 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sakala C. Midwifery care and out-of-hospital birth settings: how do they reduce unnecessary cesarean section births? Soc. Sci. Med.37(10), 1233–1250 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakala C. Content of care by independent midwives: assistance with pain in labor and birth. Soc. Sci. Med.26(11), 1141–1158 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd R, Johnson CB. Mainstreaming Midwives: The Politics of Change. Routledge, NY, USA (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Frye A. Holistic midwifery: A Comprehensive Textbook for Midwives in Homebirth Practice (Volume 1): Care During Pregnancy. Labrys Press, OR, USA (1995).
   Google Scholar
• Frye A. Holistic Midwifery: A Comprehensive Textbook for Midwives in Homebirth Practice (Volume II): Care of the Mother and Baby From the Onset of Labor Through the First Hours After Birth. Labrys Press, OR, USA (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Rooks JP. Midwifery and Childbirth in America. Temple UP, PA, USA, 256–257 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Morison S, Hauck Y, Percival P, McMurray A. Constructing a home birth environment through assuming control. Midwifery14(4), 233–241 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison S, Percival P, Hauck Y, McMurray A. Birthing at home: the resolution of expectations. Midwifery15(1), 32–39 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham JD. Experiences of Australian mothers who gave birth either at home, at a birth centre, or in hospital labour wards. Soc. Sci. Med.36(4), 475–483 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CSE. Preparing for the first birth: mothers’ experiences at home and in hospital in Australia. J. Perinat. Educ.17(4), 21–32 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CSE. ‘Reacting to the unknown’: experiencing the first birth at home or in hospital in Australia. Midwifery (2008) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Dahlen HG, Barclay LM, Homer CSE. The novice birthing: theorising first time mothers’ experiences of birth at home and in hospital in Australia. Midwifery26(1), 53–63 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain C. Women’s choice of home or hospital birth. J. Fam. Practice.12(6), 1033–1038 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman L, Hood J. Consumer involvement in the South Australian state policy for planned home birth. Birth36(1), 78–82 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spurrett B. Home births and the women’s perspective in Australia. Med. J. Aust.149(6), 289–290 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bastian H. Personal beliefs and alternative childbirth choices: a survey of 552 women who planned to give birth at home. Birth20(4), 186–192 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Janssen PA, Carty EA, Reime B. Satisfaction with planned place of birth among midwifery clients in British Columbia. J. Midwifery Womens Health.51(2), 91–97 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain M, Soderstrom B, Kaitell C, Stewart P. Consumer interest in alternatives to physician-centred hospital birth in Ottawa. Midwifery7(2), 74–81 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zelek B, Orrantia E, Poole H, Strike J. Home or away? Factors affecting where women choose to give birth. Can. Fam. Physician53(1), 78–83 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Viisainen K. Negotiating control and meaning: home birth as a self-constructed choice in Finland. Soc. Sci. Med.52(7), 1109–1121 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viisainen K, Gissler M, Räikkönen O, Perälä ML, Hemminki E. Interest in alternative birth settings in Finland. Acta Obstet. Gyn. Scan.77(7), 729–735 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dupuis O, de Tayrac R, Poilpot S et al. Accouchement à domicile: opinion des femmes françaises et risque périnatal. Résultats de l’enquête DOM 2000. Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.30(9), 677–683 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prato R, Germinario C, Pastore R et al.Opinions of women regarding a planned home birth project in Apulia (Southern Italy). Ann. Ig.17(2), 129–138 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brezinka C. The end of home delivery midwifery in German-speaking sections of Upper Italy. Zentralbl. Gynäkol.115(11), 511–519 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borquez HA, Wiegers TA. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing centre and at home in The Netherlands. Midwifery22(4), 339–347 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Der Hulst LA, van Teijlingen ER, Bonsel GJ, Eskes M, Bleker OP. Does a pregnant woman’s intended place of birth influence her attitudes toward and occurrence of obstetric interventions? Birth31(1), 28–33 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiaens W, Gouwy A, Bracke P. Does a referral from home to hospital affect satisfaction with childbirth? A cross-national comparison. BMC Health Serv. Res.7, 109 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiegers TA, Van der Zee J, Kerssens JJ, Keirse MJ. Home birth or short-stay hospital birth in a low risk population in The Netherlands. Soc. Sci. Med.46(11), 1505–1511 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Christiaens W, Bracke P. Place of birth and satisfaction with childbirth in Belgium and The Netherlands. Midwifery25(2), e11–e19 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Pop VJ, Wijnen HA, van Montfort M et al. Blues and depression during early puerperium: home versus hospital deliveries. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.102(9), 701–706 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerssens JJ. Patient satisfaction with home-birth care in The Netherlands. J. Adv. Nurs.20(2), 344–350 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleiverda G, Steen AM, Andersen I, Treffers PE, Everaerd W. Place of delivery in The Netherlands: maternal motives and background variables related to preferences for home or hospital confinement. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.36(1–2), 1–9 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson TR, Callister LC, Freeborn DS, Beckstrand RL, Huender K. Dutch women’s perceptions of childbirth in The Netherlands. MCN Am. J. Matern. Child Nurs.32(3), 170–177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abel S, Kearns RA. Birth places: a geographical perspective on planned home birth in New Zealand. Soc. Sci. Med.33(7), 825–834 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasslacher B. Birth at home. N. Z. Nurs. J.81(4), 25–26 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hildingsson I, Waldenström U, Rådestad I. Swedish women’s interest in home birth and in-hospital birth center care. Birth30(1), 11–22 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren H, Hildingsson I, Rådestad I. A Swedish interview study: parents’ assessment of risks in home births. Midwifery22(1), 15–22 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sjöblom I, Nordström B, Edberg AK. A qualitative study of women’s experiences of home birth in Sweden. Midwifery22(4), 348–355 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shaw R, Kitzinger C. Calls to a home birth helpline: empowerment in childbirth. Soc. Sci. Med.61(11), 2374–2383 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Donovan M, Connolly G, Zainal S, Byrne P. Attitude to home birth in an antenatal population at the Rotunda Hospital. Ir. Med. J.93(7), 207–208 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fordham S. Women’s views of the place of confinement. Br. J. Gen. Pract.47(415), 77–80 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Longworth L, Ratcliffe J, Boulton M. Investigating women’s preferences for intrapartum care: home versus hospital births. Health Soc. Care Comm.9(6), 404–413 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beech BA. Ethics, home births and NHS trusts. Bull. Med. Ethics167, 20–22 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Newburn M. Culture, control and the birth environment. Pract. Midwife6(8), 20–25 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• L’Esperance CM. Home birth – a manifestation of aggression? J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs.8(4), 227–230 (1979).
   Google Scholar
• Morse JM, Park C. Home birth and hospital deliveries: a comparison of the perceived painfulness of parturition. Res. Nurs. Health11(3), 175–181 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cameron J, Chase ES, O’Neal S. Home birth in Salt Lake County, Utah. Am. J. Public Health69(7), 716–717 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClain C. Women’s choice of home or hospital birth. J. Fam. Pract.12(6), 1033–1038 (1981).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schneider D. Planned out-of-hospital births, New Jersey, 1978–1980. Soc. Sci. Med.23(10), 1011–1015 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• O’Connor BB. The home birth movement in the United States. J. Med. Philos.18(2), 147–174 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klassen PE. Blessed Events: Religion and Home Birth in America. Princeton University Press, NJ, USA (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Davis-Floyd R. Birth as an American Rite of Passage. University of California Press, CA, USA (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Edwards NP. Birthing Autonomy: Women’s Experiences of Planning Home Births. Routledge, London, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Freeze R. Born free: unassisted childbirth in North America. In: Theses and Dissertations.University of Iowa, IA, USA (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Boucher D, Bennett C, McFarlin B, Freeze R. Staying home to give birth: why women in the United States choose home birth. J. Midwifery Womens Health54, 119–126 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lothian J. Being safe: making the decision to have a planned home birth in the US. Presented at: The 2009 Lamaze International Conference. Orlando, FL, USA, 1–4 October 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Declercq ER. Public opinion toward midwifery and home birth: an exploratory analysis. J. Nurse Midwifery28(3), 19–21 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson KC, Daviss B. Outcomes of planned home births with certified professional midwives: large prospective study in North America. Br. Med. J.330, 1416 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lindgren HE, Hildingsson IM, Christensson K, Rådestad IJ. Transfers in planned home births related to midwife availability and continuity: a nationwide population-based study. Birth35(1), 9–15 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren HE, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.87(7), 751–759 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG115(5), 554–559 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• de Jonge A, van der Goes B, Ravelli Aet al. Perinatal mortality and morbidity in a nationwide cohort of 529,688 low-risk planned home and hospital births. BJOG116(9), 1177–1184 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LAet al. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ181(6–7), 377–383 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutton EK, Reitsma AH, Kaufman K. Outcomes associated with planned home and planned hospital births in low-risk women attended by midwives in Ontario, Canada, 2003–2006: a retrospective cohort study. Birth3(3), 180–189 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Latendresse G, Murphy PA, Fullerton JT. A description of the management and outcomes of vaginal birth after cesarean birth in the homebirth setting. J. Midwifery Womens Health50(5), 386–391 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohain JS. Episiotomy, hospital birth and cesarean section: technology gone haywire – what is the sutured tear rate at first births supposed to be? Midwifery Today Int. Midwife85, 24–25 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Borquez HA, Wiegers TA. A comparison of labour and birth experiences of women delivering in a birthing centre and at home in The Netherlands. Midwifery22(4), 339–347 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symon A, Winter C, Inkster M, Donnan P. Outcomes for births booked under an independent midwife and births in NHS maternity units: matched comparison study. Br. Med. J.338, b2060 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kennare RM, Keirse MJNC, Tucker GR, Chan AC. Planned home and hospital .births in South Australia, 1991–2006: differences in outcomes. Med. J. Aust.192, 76–80 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fullerton JT, Navarro AM, Young SH. Outcomes of planned home birth: an integrative review. J. Midwifery Womens Health.52(4), 323–333 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oakley A. Essays on Women, Medicine and Health. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, UK (1993).
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 10. Induction of Labor (1999).
   Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Surgery and Patient Choice. ACOG Committee Opinion no. 395. Obstet. Gynecol.111, 243–247 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Vaginal Birth After Previous Cesarean Delivery. ACOG Practice Bulletin no. 54. Obstet. Gynecol.104, 203–212 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Plante LA. Mommy, what did you do in the industrial revolution? Meditations on the rising cesarean rate. Int. J. Fem. Approaches Bioeth.2(1), 140–114 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC policy statement: midwifery. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.25(3), 239 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists/Royal College of Midwives. Joint statement No.2: Home births (2007).
   Google Scholar