Measuring quality of life in urogenital prolapse

References

• Swift SE. The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynaecological health care. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.183, 277–285 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swift SE, Woodman P, O’Boyle A et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition and epidemiology of pelvic organ support defects. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.192, 795–806 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slieker-ten HMCP, Vierhout M, Bloembergen H, Schoenmaker G. Distribution of pelvic organ prolapse in a general population: prevalence, severity, etiology and relation with function of pelvic floor muscles. Presented at: Joint Meeting of ICS and IUGA. Paris, France, 25–27 August 2004 (Abstract).
   Google Scholar
• Olsen AL, Smith VJ, Berstrom VO, Colling JC, Clark AL. Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet. Gynecol.89, 501–506 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown JS, Waetjen LE, Subak LL, Thom DH, Van Den Eeden S, Vittinghoff E. Pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States, 1997. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.186, 712–716 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, Jones D, Spiegelhalter D, Cox D. Quality of life measures in healthcare. 1: applications and issues in assessment. Br. Med. J.305, 1075–1077 (1992).
   Google Scholar
• Robinson D, Anders K, Cardozo L, Bidmead J. Outcome measures in Urogynaecology: the clinician’s perspective. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.18, 273–279 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattiasson A, Djurhuus J, Fonda D, Lose G, Nordling J, Stoher M. Standardisation of outcome studies in patients with lower urinary tract dysfunction: a report on general principles from the standardisation committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol. Urodynam.17, 249 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lose G, Fantl A, Victor A et al. Outcome measures for research in adult women with symptoms of lower urinary tract dysfunction. Neurourol. Urodynam.17, 255 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L, Gonzalez J. Is there a discrepancy between patient and physician quality of life assessment? Neurourol. Urodyn.28(3), 179–182 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Is there a difference in patient and physician quality of life evaluation in pelvic organ prolapse? Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.19(4), 517–520 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black N, Griffiths J, Pope C, Bowling A, Abel P. Impact of surgery for stress incontinence on morbidity: cohort study. Br. Med. J.315, 1493–1498 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgio KL, Matthews KA, Engel BT. Prevalence, incidence and correlates of urinary incontinence in healthy, middle-aged women. J. Urol.146, 1255–1259 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. Definition of health from preamble to the constitution of the WHO basic documents, 28th edition. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1 (1978).
   Google Scholar
• Coulter A. Measuring quality of life. In: Critical Reading In General Practice. Kinmouth AL, Jones R (Eds). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Naughton MJ, Shumaker SA. Assessment of health related quality of life. In: Fundamentals of Clinical Trials (3rd Edition). Furberg CD, DeMets DL (Eds). Mosby Press, MO, USA, 185 (1996).
   Google Scholar
• Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of life measurements. JAMA272(8), 619–626 (1974).
   Google Scholar
• Murawaski BJ. Social support in health and illness; the concept and its measurement. Cancer Nurs.1, 365–371 (1978).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blavis JG, Appell RA, Fantl JA et al. Standards of efficacy for evaluation of treatment outcomes in urinary incontinence: recommendations of the urodynamics society. Neurourol. Urodynam.16, 145–147 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donovan JL, Badia X, Corcos J et al. Symptom and quality of life assessment. In: Incontinence (2nd Edition). Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A (Eds). Health Publication Ltd, Plymouth, UK, 267–316 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Lyons RA, Perry HM, Littlepage BNC. Evidence for the validity of the short form 36 questionnaire (SF-36) in an elderly population. Age Ageing23, 182–184 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunskaar S, Vinsnes A. The quality of life in women with urinary incontinence as measured by the sickness impact profile. J. Am. Geriatric Soc.39, 378–382 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimby A, Milsom I, Molander U, Wiklund I, Ekelund P. The influence of urinary incontinence on the quality of life of elderly women. Age Ageing22, 82–89 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan M, Karlsson J, Bengtsson C, Furunes B, Lapidus L, Lissner L. The Goteberg quality of life instrument – a psychometric evaluation of assessments of symptoms and well being among women in a general population. Scand. J. Prim. Health Care11, 267–275 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weber AM, Walters MD, Piedmonte MR. Sexual function and vaginal anatomy in women before and after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.182(6), 1610–1615 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digesu GA, Khullar V, Cardozo L, Robinson D, Salvatore S. P-QoL: a validated questionnaire to assess the symptoms and quality of life of women with urogenital prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J.16, 176–181 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digesu GA, Santamato S, Khullar V et al. Validation of an Italian version of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.106(2), 184–192 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cam C, Sakalli M, Ay P, Aran T, Cam M, Karateke A. Validation of the prolapse quality of life questionnaire (P-QoL) in a Turkish population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.135(1), 132–135 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lenz F, Stammer H, Brocker K, Rak M, Scherg H, Sohn C. Validation of a German version of the P-QoL questionnaire. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.20(6), 641–649 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svihrova V, Digesu GA, Svihra J, Hudeckova H, Kliment J, Swift S. Validation of the Slovakian version of the P-QoL questionnaire. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.21(1), 53–61 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• de Oliveira MS, Tamanini JT, de Aguiar Cavalcanti G. Validation of the Prolapse Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (P-QoL) in Portuguese version in Brazilian women. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.20(10), 1191–1202 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manchana T, Bunyavejchevin S. Validation of the Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QoL) questionnaire in Thai version. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.21(8), 985–993 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claerhout F, Moons P, Ghesquiere S, Verguts J, De Ridder D, Deprest J. Validity, reliability and responsiveness of a Dutch version of the prolapse quality-of-life (P-QoL) questionnaire. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.21(5), 569–578 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Barber MD, Kuchibhatla MN, Pieper CF, Bump RC. Psychometric evaluation of 2 comprehensive condition-specific quality of life instruments for women with pelvic floor disorders. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.185, 1388–1395 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumaker SA, Wyman JF, Uebersax JS, McClish D, Fantl JA. Health-related quality of life measures for women with urinary incontinence: the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire and the Urogenital Distress Inventory. Continence Program in Women (CPW) Research Group. Qual. Life Res.3, 291–306 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers RG, Kammerer-Doak D, Villarreal A, Coates K, Qualls C. A new instrument to measure sexual function in women with urinary incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.184, 552–558 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12). Int. Urogynecol. J.14, 164–168 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cam C, Sancak P, Karahan N, Sancak A, Celik C, Karateke A. Validation of the short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12) in a Turkish population. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.146(1), 104–107 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellerkmann K, Hoskey K, Kleeman S et al. Changes in sexual function after urinary incontinence surgery using TOT or TVT in women with and without pelvic organ prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J.20(Suppl. 2), S73–S239 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Handa VL, Zyczynski HM, Brubaker L et al.; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Sexual function before and after sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.197(6), 629.e1–6 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR. Global indexes and scales. In: Clinimatrics. Yale University Press, CT, USA, 267–316 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Gill TM, Feinstein AR. A critical appraisal of the quality of life measurements. JAMA272, 6619–6626 (1994).
   Google Scholar
• Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(1), 98–101 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Cardozo L. Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) for urogenital prolapse. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.21(5), 523–528 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Guy W. ECDEU Assessment Manual For Psychopharmacology.. National Institute of Mental Health, US Department of Health, Education and Welfare, MD, USA, 217–222 (1976).
   Google Scholar
• Crosby RD, Kolotkin RL, Rhys Williams G. Defining clinically meaningful change in health-related quality of life. J. Clin. Epidemiol.56, 395 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elkadry EA, Kenton KS, FitzGerald MP, Shott S, Brubaker L. Patient-selected goals: a new perspective on surgical outcome Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.189(6), 1551–1557 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lowenstein L, FitzGerald MP, Kenton K et al. Patient-selected goals: the fourth dimension in assessment of pelvic floor disorders. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.19(1), 81–84 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Gibson J, Steers WD. Patient centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: what is success and is it achieved? Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.187, 88–92 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hullfish KL, Bovbjerg VE, Steers WD. Patient centered goals for pelvic floor dysfunction surgery: long-term follow up. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.191, 201–205 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk T, Sherman R. Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating community mental health programs. Commun. Mental Health J.4, 443–453 (1968).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Payne C, Allee T. Goal achievement provides new insights into interstitial cystitis/painful bladder syndrome symptoms and outcomes. Neurourol. Urodyn.28(1), 13–17 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Becker H, Stuifbergen A, Rogers S, Timmerman G. Goal attainment scaling to measure individual change in intervention studies. Nurs. Res.49, 176–180 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiresuk T, Lund S, Larsen N. Measurement of goal attainment in clinical and health care programs. Drug Intelligence Clin. Pharm.16, 145–153 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bovbjerg VE, Trowbridge ER, Barber MD, Martirosian TE, Steers WD, Hullfish KL. Patient-centered treatment goals for pelvic floor disorders: association with quality-of-life and patient satisfaction. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.200(5), 568 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jones KR, Burney RE, Christy B. Patient expectations for surgery: are they being met? Jt Comm. J. Qual. Improv.26, 349–360 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar