Advances in understanding the genetic causes and mechanisms of female germ cell aneuploidy

References

• Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat. Rev. Genet.2, 280–291 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassold T, Hall H, Hunt P. The origin of human aneuploidy: where we have been, where we are going. Hum. Mol. Genet.16(Spec. No. 2), R203–R208 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Ferraretti AP. Chromosomal abnormalities in embryos. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.183(Suppl. 1), S29–S34 (2001).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munne S. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis of numerical and structural chromosome abnormalities. Reprod. Biomed. Online4, 183–196 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuliev A, Cieslak J, Ilkevitch Y, Verlinsky Y. Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of 6,733 human oocytes in preimplantation diagnosis for age-related aneuploidies. Reprod. Biomed. Online6, 54–59 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yanagida M. Basic mechanism of eukaryotic chromosome segregation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.360, 609–621 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. Un menage a quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell112, 423–440 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderiesz C, Ferraretti A, Magli C et al. Effect of recombinant human gonadotrophins on human, bovine and murine oocyte meiosis, fertilization and embryonic development in vitro. Hum. Reprod.15, 1140–1148 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillier SG. Gonadotropic control of ovarian follicular growth and development. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.179, 39–46 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht NB. Molecular mechanisms of male germ cell differentiation. Bioessays20, 555–561 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt PA, Hassold TJ. Sex matters in meiosis. Science296, 2181–2183 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pacchierotti F, Adler ID, Eichenlaub-Ritter U, Mailhes JB. Gender effects on the incidence of aneuploidy in mammalian germ cells. Environ. Res.104, 46–69 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton D. Biological aging and the etiology of aneuploidy. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 266–272 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolstenholme J, Angell RR. Maternal age and trisomy – a unifying mechanism of formation. Chromosoma109, 435–438 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenbusch B. The incidence of aneuploidy in human oocytes assessed by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Hereditas141, 97–105 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicolaidis P, Petersen MB. Origin and mechanisms of non-disjunction in human autosomal trisomies. Hum. Reprod.13, 313–319 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Cavallini G et al. Predicting aneuploidy in human oocytes: key factors which affect the meiotic process. Hum. Reprod.25, 2374–2386 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailhes JB, Marchetti F. Mechanisms and chemical induction of aneuploidy in rodent germ cells. Cytogenet. Genome Res.111, 384–391 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Handel MA, Schimenti JC. Genetics of mammalian meiosis: regulation, dynamics and impact on fertility. Nat. Rev. Genet.11, 124–136 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Cruz R, Roig I, Caldes MG. Maternal origin of the human aneuploidies. Are homolog synapsis and recombination to blame? Notes (learned) from the underbelly. Genome Dyn.5, 128–136 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Martin RH. Meiotic errors in human oogenesis and spermatogenesis. Reprod. Biomed. Online16, 523–531 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angell RR. Predivision in human oocytes at meiosis I: a mechanism for trisomy formation in man. Hum. Genet.86, 383–387 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Angell RR. Aneuploidy in older women. Higher rates of aneuploidy in oocytes from older women. Hum. Reprod.9, 1199–1200 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anahory T, Andreo B, Regnier-Vigouroux G et al. Sequential multiple probe fluorescence in-situ hybridization analysis of human oocytes and polar bodies by combining centromeric labelling and whole chromosome painting. Mol. Hum. Reprod.9, 577–585 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C, Demaille J. Maternal aging and chromosomal abnormalities: new data drawn from in vitro unfertilized human oocytes. Hum. Genet.112, 195–203 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plachot M. Genetic analysis of the oocyte – a review. Placenta24(Suppl. B), S66–S69 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Rodman TC. Chromatid disjunction in unfertilized ageing oocytes. Nature233, 191–193 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupisti S, Conn CM, Fragouli E et al. Sequential FISH analysis of oocytes and polar bodies reveals aneuploidy mechanisms. Prenat. Diagn.23, 663–668 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pellestor F, Andreo B, Arnal F, Humeau C, Demaille J. Mechanisms of non-disjunction in human female meiosis: the co-existence of two modes of malsegregation evidenced by the karyotyping of 1397 in-vitro unfertilized oocytes. Hum. Reprod.17, 2134–2145 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mailhes JB, Young D, London SN. 1,2-propanediol-induced premature centromere separation in mouse oocytes and aneuploidy in one-cell zygotes. Biol. Reprod.57, 92–98 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mailhes JB, Young D, London SN. Postovulatory ageing of mouse oocytes in vivo and premature centromere separation and aneuploidy. Biol. Reprod.58, 1206–1210 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yin H, Baart E, Betzendahl I, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Diazepam induces meiotic delay, aneuploidy and predivision of homologues and chromatids in mammalian oocytes. Mutagenesis13, 567–580 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jeffreys CA, Burrage PS, Bickel SE. A model system for increased meiotic nondisjunction in older oocytes. Curr. Biol.13, 498–503 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dailey T, Dale B, Cohen J, Munne S. Association between nondisjunction and maternal age in meiosis-II human oocytes. Am. J. Hum. Genet.59, 176–184 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellestor F, Anahory T, Hamamah S. The chromosomal analysis of human oocytes. An overview of established procedures. Hum. Reprod. Update11, 15–32 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vialard F, Petit C, Bergere M et al. Evidence of a high proportion of premature unbalanced separation of sister chromatids in the first polar bodies of women of advanced age. Hum. Reprod.21, 1172–1178 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonoda E, Matsusaka T, Morrison C et al. Scc1/Rad21/Mcd1 is required for sister chromatid cohesion and kinetochore function in vertebrate cells. Dev. Cell1, 759–770 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoque MT, Ishikawa F. Cohesin defects lead to premature sister chromatid separation, kinetochore dysfunction, and spindle-assembly checkpoint activation. J. Biol. Chem.277, 42306–42314 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uhlmann F. Chromosome cohesion and separation: from men and molecules. Curr. Biol.13, R104–R114 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kerrebrock AW, Miyazaki WY, Birnby D, Orr-Weaver TL. The Drosophilamei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation. Genetics130, 827–841 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miyazaki WY, Orr-Weaver TL. Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants. Genetics132, 1047–1061 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodges CA, Revenkova E, Jessberger R, Hassold TJ, Hunt PA. SMC1β-deficient female mice provide evidence that cohesins are a missing link in age-related nondisjunction. Nat. Genet.37, 1351–1355 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartman T, Stead K, Koshland D, Guacci V. Pds5p is an essential chromosomal protein required for both sister chromatid cohesion and condensation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Cell. Biol.151, 613–626 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panizza S, Tanaka T, Hochwagen A, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K. Pds5 cooperates with cohesin in maintaining sister chromatid cohesion. Curr. Biol.10, 1557–1564 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thein KH, Kleylein-Sohn J, Nigg EA, Gruneberg U. Astrin is required for the maintenance of sister chromatid cohesion and centrosome integrity. J. Cell. Biol.178, 345–354 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cukurcam S, Hegele-Hartung C, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. Meiosis-activating sterol protects oocytes from precocious chromosome segregation. Hum. Reprod.18, 1908–1917 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Losada A, Yokochi T, Kobayashi R, Hirano T. Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes. J. Cell. Biol.150, 405–416 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomonaga T, Nagao K, Kawasaki Y et al. Characterization of fission yeast cohesin: essential anaphase proteolysis of Rad21 phosphorylated in the S phase. Genes Dev.14, 2757–2770 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Amon A. Role of Polo-like kinase CDC5 in programming meiosis I chromosome segregation. Science300, 482–486 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu HG, Koshland D. Chromosome morphogenesis: condensin-dependent cohesin removal during meiosis. Cell123, 397–407 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peter M, Castro A, Lorca T et al. The APC is dispensable for first meiotic anaphase in Xenopus oocytes. Nat. Cell. Biol.3, 83–87 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Neill GT, Kaufman MH. Influence of postovulatory aging on chromosome segregation during the second meiotic division in mouse oocytes: a parthenogenetic analysis. J. Exp. Zool.248, 125–131 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steuerwald NM, Steuerwald MD, Mailhes JB. Post-ovulatory aging of mouse oocytes leads to decreased Mad2 transcripts and increased frequencies of premature centromere separation and anaphase. Mol. Hum. Reprod.11, 623–630 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitajima TS, Sakuno T, Ishiguro K et al. Shugoshin collaborates with protein phosphatase 2A to protect cohesin. Nature441, 46–52 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riedel CG, Katis VL, Katou Y et al. Protein phosphatase 2A protects centromeric sister chromatid cohesion during meiosis I. Nature441, 53–61 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Shu H, Qi W, Mahmood NA, Mumby MC, Yu H. PP2A is required for centromeric localization of Sgo1 and proper chromosome segregation. Dev. Cell10, 575–585 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sluder G, McCollum D. Molecular biology. The mad ways of meiosis. Science289, 254–255 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schultz RM, Montgomery RR, Belanoff JR. Regulation of mouse oocyte meiotic maturation: implication of a decrease in oocyte cAMP and protein dephosphorylation in commitment to resume meiosis. Dev. Biol.97, 264–273 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekel N. Regulation of oocyte maturation. The role of cAMP. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci.541, 211–216 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita M, Mita K, Yoshida N, Kondo T. Molecular mechanisms of the initiation of oocyte maturation: general and species-specific aspects. Prog. Cell. Cycle Res.4, 115–129 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekel N. Cellular, biochemical and molecular mechanisms regulating oocyte maturation. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol.234, 19–25 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunphy WG, Kumagai A. The Cdc25 protein contains an intrinsic phosphatase activity. Cell67, 189–196 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautier J, Solomon MJ, Booher RN, Bazan JF, Kirschner MW. Cdc25 is a specific tyrosine phosphatase that directly activates p34Cdc2. Cell67, 197–211 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strausfeld U, Labbe JC, Fesquet D et al. Dephosphorylation and activation of a p34Cdc2/cyclin B complex in vitro by human CDC25 protein. Nature351, 242–245 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arion D, Meijer L, Brizuela L, Beach D. Cdc2 is a component of the M phase-specific histone H1 kinase: evidence for identity with MPF. Cell55, 371–378 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Draetta G, Beach D. Activation of Cdc2 protein kinase during mitosis in human cells: cell cycle-dependent phosphorylation and subunit rearrangement. Cell54, 17–26 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi T, Aoki F, Mori M, Yamashita M, Nagahama Y, Kohmoto K. Activation of p34Cdc2 protein kinase activity in meiotic and mitotic cell cycles in mouse oocytes and embryos. Development113, 789–795 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulka J Jr, Jung T, Moor RM. The fall of biological maturation promoting factor (MPF) and histone H1 kinase activity during anaphase and telophase in mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.32, 378–382 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collas P, Sullivan EJ, Barnes FL. Histone H1 kinase activity in bovine oocytes following calcium stimulation. Mol. Reprod. Dev.34, 224–231 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kikuchi K, Izaike Y, Noguchi J et al. Decrease of histone H1 kinase activity in relation to parthenogenetic activation of pig follicular oocytes matured and aged in vitro. J. Reprod. Fertil.105, 325–330 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swain JE, Smith GD. Reversible phosphorylation and regulation of mammalian oocyte meiotic chromatin remodeling and segregation. Soc. Reprod. Fertil. Suppl.63, 343–358 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Murray AW. MAP kinases in meiosis. Cell92, 157–159 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Takenaka K, Moriguchi T, Nishida E. Activation of the protein kinase p38 in the spindle assembly checkpoint and mitotic arrest. Science280, 599–602 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee J, Miyano T, Moor RM. Localisation of phosphorylated MAP kinase during the transition from meiosis I to meiosis II in pig oocytes. Zygote8, 119–125 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fan HY, Sun QY. Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade during oocyte maturation and fertilization in mammals. Biol. Reprod.70, 535–547 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sobajima T, Aoki F, Kohmoto K. Activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes. J. Reprod. Fertil.97, 389–394 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Verlhac MH, Kubiak JZ, Clarke HJ, Maro B. Microtubule and chromatin behavior follow MAP kinase activity but not MPF activity during meiosis in mouse oocytes. Development120, 1017–1025 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordo AC, He CL, Smith S, Fissore RA. Mitogen activated protein kinase plays a significant role in metaphase II arrest, spindle morphology, and maintenance of maturation promoting factor activity in bovine oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev.59, 106–114 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solc P, Schultz RM, Motlik J. Prophase I arrest and progression to metaphase I in mouse oocytes: comparison of resumption of meiosis and recovery from G2-arrest in somatic cells. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16, 654–664 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paules RS, Buccione R, Moschel RC, Vande Woude GF, Eppig JJ. Mouse Mos protooncogene product is present and functions during oogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA86, 5395–5399 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sagata N. What does Mos do in oocytes and somatic cells? Bioessays19, 13–21 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dekel N. Protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in the meiotic cell cycle of mammalian oocytes. Rev. Reprod.1, 82–88 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hashimoto N. Role of c-mos proto-oncogene product in the regulation of mouse oocyte maturation. Horm. Res.46(Suppl. 1), 11–14 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sagata N. Meiotic metaphase arrest in animal oocytes: its mechanisms and biological significance. Trends Cell. Biol.6, 22–28 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colledge WH, Carlton MB, Udy GB, Evans MJ. Disruption of c-mos causes parthenogenetic development of unfertilized mouse eggs. Nature370, 65–68 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hashimoto N, Watanabe N, Furuta Y et al. Parthenogenetic activation of oocytes in c-mos-deficient mice. Nature370, 68–71 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyman AA, Mitchison TJ. Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores. Nature351, 206–211 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karsenti E. Mitotic spindle morphogenesis in animal cells. Semin. Cell Biol.2, 251–260 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Doree M, Le Peuch C, Morin N. Onset of chromosome segregation at the metaphase to anaphase transition of the cell cycle. Prog. Cell. Cycle Res.1, 309–318 (1995).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth K. Disseminating the genome: joining, resolving, and separating sister chromatids during mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet.35, 673–745 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma W, Baumann C, Viveiros MM. NEDD1 is crucial for meiotic spindle stability and accurate chromosome segregation in mammalian oocytes. Dev. Biol.339, 439–450 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schatten G, Simerly C, Schatten H. Microtubule configurations during fertilization, mitosis, and early development in the mouse and the requirement for egg microtubule-mediated motility during mammalian fertilization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA82, 4152–4156 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudat F, Manova K, Yuen JP, Jasin M, Keeney S. Chromosome synapsis defects and sexually dimorphic meiotic progression in mice lacking Spo11. Mol. Cell6, 989–998 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romanienko PJ, Camerini-Otero RD. The mouse Spo11 gene is required for meiotic chromosome synapsis. Mol. Cell6, 975–987 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan L, Liu JG, Hoja MR, Wilbertz J, Nordqvist K, Hoog C. Female germ cell aneuploidy and embryo death in mice lacking the meiosis-specific protein SCP3. Science296, 1115–1118 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang H, Hoog C. Structural damage to meiotic chromosomes impairs DNA recombination and checkpoint control in mammalian oocytes. J. Cell. Biol.173, 485–495 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kuznetsov S, Pellegrini M, Shuda K et al. RAD51C deficiency in mice results in early prophase I arrest in males and sister chromatid separation at metaphase II in females. J. Cell. Biol.176, 581–592 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lipkin SM, Moens PB, Wang V et al. Meiotic arrest and aneuploidy in MLH3-deficient mice. Nat. Genet.31, 385–390 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champoux JJ. DNA topoisomerases: structure, function, and mechanism. Annu. Rev. Biochem.70, 369–413 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang JC. Cellular roles of DNA topoisomerases: a molecular perspective. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.3, 430–440 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb J, Reddy RK, Park C, Handel MA. Analysis of expression and function of topoisomerase I and II during meiosis in male mice. Mol. Reprod. Dev.46, 489–498 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mailhes JB, Marchetti F, Phillips GL Jr, Barnhill DR. Preferential pericentric lesions and aneuploidy induced in mouse oocytes by the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen.14, 39–51 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marchetti F, Bishop JB, Lowe X, Generoso WM, Hozier J, Wyrobek AJ. Etoposide induces heritable chromosomal aberrations and aneuploidy during male meiosis in the mouse. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA98, 3952–3957 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagstrom KA, Holmes VF, Cozzarelli NR, Meyer BJ. C. elegans condensin promotes mitotic chromosome architecture, centromere organization, and sister chromatid segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Genes Dev.16, 729–742 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie BD, Hogan E, Koshland D. In vivo dissection of the chromosome condensation machinery: reversibility of condensation distinguishes contributions of condensin and cohesin. J. Cell. Biol.156, 805–815 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ono T, Fang Y, Spector DL, Hirano T. Spatial and temporal regulation of Condensins I and II in mitotic chromosome assembly in human cells. Mol. Biol. Cell.15, 3296–3308 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marston AL, Amon A. Meiosis: cellcycle controls shuffle and deal. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.5, 983–997 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Schleiffer A. From a single double helix to paired double helices and back. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.359, 99–108 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• van Heemst D, Heyting C. Sister chromatid cohesion and recombination in meiosis. Chromosoma109, 10–26 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Revenkova E, Jessberger R. Keeping sister chromatids together: cohesins in meiosis. Reproduction130, 783–790 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto I, Pezzi N, Buesa JM et al. STAG2 and Rad21 mammalian mitotic cohesins are implicated in meiosis. EMBO Rep.3, 543–550 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haering CH, Lowe J, Hochwagen A, Nasmyth K. Molecular architecture of SMC proteins and the yeast cohesin complex. Mol. Cell9, 773–788 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra MT, Viera A, Gomez R et al. Involvement of the cohesin Rad21 and SCP3 in monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores during mouse meiosis I. J. Cell. Sci.117, 1221–1234 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R. Association of mammalian SMC1 and SMC3 proteins with meiotic chromosomes and synaptonemal complexes. J. Cell. Sci.113(Pt 4), 673–682 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Watanabe Y, Kitajima TS. Shugoshin protects cohesin complexes at centromeres. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.360, 515–521, discussion 521 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parisi S, McKay MJ, Molnar M et al. Rec8p, a meiotic recombination and sister chromatid cohesion phosphoprotein of the Rad21p family conserved from fission yeast to humans. Mol. Cell Biol.19, 3515–3528 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eijpe M, Offenberg H, Jessberger R, Revenkova E, Heyting C. Meiotic cohesin Rec8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3. J. Cell. Biol.160, 657–670 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto I, Suja JA, Pezzi N et al. Mammalian STAG3 is a cohesin specific to sister chromatid arms in meiosis I. Nat. Cell. Biol.3, 761–766 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prieto I, Tease C, Pezzi N et al. Cohesin component dynamics during meiotic prophase I in mammalian oocytes. Chromosome Res.12, 197–213 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revenkova E, Eijpe M, Heyting C, Gross B, Jessberger R. Novel meiosis-specific isoform of mammalian SMC1. Mol. Cell Biol.21, 6984–6998 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexandru G, Uhlmann F, Mechtler K, Poupart MA, Nasmyth K. Phosphorylation of the cohesin subunit Scc1 by Polo/Cdc5 kinase regulates sister chromatid separation in yeast. Cell105, 459–472 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Losada A, Hirano M, Hirano T. Cohesin release is required for sister chromatid resolution, but not for condensin-mediated compaction, at the onset of mitosis. Genes Dev.16, 3004–3016 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumara I, Vorlaufer E, Stukenberg PT et al. The dissociation of cohesin from chromosomes in prophase is regulated by Polo-like kinase. Mol. Cell9, 515–525 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clyne RK, Katis VL, Jessop L et al. Polo-like kinase Cdc5 promotes chiasmata formation and cosegregation of sister centromeres at meiosis I. Nat. Cell. Biol.5, 480–485 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauf S, Roitinger E, Koch B, Dittrich CM, Mechtler K, Peters JM. Dissociation of cohesin from chromosome arms and loss of arm cohesion during early mitosis depends on phosphorylation of SA2. PLoS Biol.3, e69 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger IC, Hauf S, Meinke A, Peters JM. Two distinct pathways remove mammalian cohesin from chromosome arms in prophase and from centromeres in anaphase. Cell103, 399–410 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann F. Chromosome cohesion and segregation in mitosis and meiosis. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.13, 754–761 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clarke AS, Tang TT, Ooi DL, Orr-Weaver TL. Polo kinase regulates the Drosophila centromere cohesion protein MEI-S332. Dev. Cell8, 53–64 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JY, Hayashi-Hagihara A, Orr-Weaver TL. Roles and regulation of the Drosophila centromere cohesion protein MEI-S332 family. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.360, 543–552 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pahlavan G, Polanski Z, Kalab P, Golsteyn R, Nigg EA, Maro B. Characterization of Polo-like kinase 1 during meiotic maturation of the mouse oocyte. Dev. Biol.220, 392–400 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasierbek P, Jantsch M, Melcher M, Schleiffer A, Schweizer D, Loidl J. A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. Genes Dev.15, 1349–1360 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siomos MF, Badrinath A, Pasierbek P et al. Separase is required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I in Caenorhabditis elegans. Curr. Biol.11, 1825–1835 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee J, Okada K, Ogushi S, Miyano T, Miyake M, Yamashita M. Loss of Rec8 from chromosome arm and centromere region is required for homologous chromosome separation and sister chromatid separation, respectively, in mammalian meiosis. Cell Cycle5, 1448–1455 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelis C, Ciosk R, Nasmyth K. Cohesins: chromosomal proteins that prevent premature separation of sister chromatids. Cell91, 35–45 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka T, Fuchs J, Loidl J, Nasmyth K. Cohesin ensures bipolar attachment of microtubules to sister centromeres and resists their precocious separation. Nat. Cell. Biol.2, 492–499 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamieniecki RJ, Shanks RM, Dawson DS. Slk19p is necessary to prevent separation of sister chromatids in meiosis I. Curr. Biol.10, 1182–1190 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katis VL, Galova M, Rabitsch KP, Gregan J, Nasmyth K. Maintenance of cohesin at centromeres after meiosis I in budding yeast requires a kinetochore associated protein related to MEI-S332. Curr. Biol.14, 560–572 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kitajima TS, Kawashima SA, Watanabe Y. The conserved kinetochore protein shugoshin protects centromeric cohesion during meiosis. Nature427, 510–517 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salic A, Waters JC, Mitchison TJ. Vertebrate shugoshin links sister centromere cohesion and kinetochore microtubule stability in mitosis. Cell118, 567–578 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabitsch KP, Gregan J, Schleiffer A, Javerzat JP, Eisenhaber F, Nasmyth K. Two fission yeast homologs of DrosophilaMEI-S332 are required for chromosome segregation during meiosis I and II. Curr. Biol.14, 287–301 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang Z, Sun Y, Harley SE, Zou H, Yu H. Human Bub1 protects centromeric sister-chromatid cohesion through Shugoshin during mitosis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 18012–18017 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGuinness BE, Hirota T, Kudo NR, Peters JM, Nasmyth K. Shugoshin prevents dissociation of cohesin from centromeres during mitosis in vertebrate cells. PLoS Biol.3, e86 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchetti F, Venkatachalam S. The multiple roles of Bub1 in chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis. Cell Cycle9, 58–63 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llano E, Gomez R, Gutierrez-Caballero C et al. Shugoshin-2 is essential for the completion of meiosis but not for mitotic cell division in mice. Genes Dev.22, 2400–2413 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra MT, Gomez R, Viera A et al. Sequential assembly of centromeric proteins in male mouse meiosis. PLoS Genet.5, e1000417 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Goulding SE, Earnshaw WC. Shugoshin: a centromeric guardian senses tension. Bioessays27, 588–591 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang X, Dai W. Shugoshin, a guardian for sister chromatid segregation. Exp. Cell. Res.310, 1–9 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregan J, Rabitsch PK, Sakem B et al. Novel genes required for meiotic chromosome segregation are identified by a high-throughput knockout screen in fission yeast. Curr. Biol.15, 1663–1669 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimini D. Detection and correction of merotelic kinetochore orientation by Aurora B and its partners. Cell Cycle6, 1558–1564 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggins S, Walczak CE. Captivating capture: how microtubules attach to kinetochores. Curr. Biol.13, R449–R460 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rieder CL, Maiato H. Stuck in division or passing through: what happens when cells cannot satisfy the spindle assembly checkpoint. Dev. Cell7, 637–651 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmon ED, Cimini D, Cameron LA, DeLuca JG. Merotelic kinetochores in mammalian tissue cells. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. Biol. Sci.360, 553–568 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cimini D. Merotelic kinetochore orientation, aneuploidy, and cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta1786, 32–40 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amor DJ, Kalitsis P, Sumer H, Choo KH. Building the centromere: from foundation proteins to 3D organization. Trends Cell. Biol.14, 359–368 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vagnarelli P, Earnshaw WC. Chromosomal passengers: the four-dimensional regulation of mitotic events. Chromosoma113, 211–222 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simerly C, Balczon R, Brinkley BR, Schatten G. Microinjected centromere [corrected] kinetochore antibodies interfere with chromosome movement in meiotic and mitotic mouse oocytes. J. Cell. Biol.111, 1491–1504 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder CL, Salmon ED. The vertebrate cell kinetochore and its roles during mitosis. Trends Cell. Biol.8, 310–318 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JM, Earnshaw WC, Vagnarelli P. Mammalian centromeres: DNA sequence, protein composition, and role in cell cycle progression. Exp. Cell. Res.246, 249–262 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Earnshaw WC, Cooke CA. Analysis of the distribution of the INCENPs throughout mitosis reveals the existence of a pathway of structural changes in the chromosomes during metaphase and early events in cleavage furrow formation. J. Cell. Sci.98(Pt 4), 443–461 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meraldi P, Honda R, Nigg EA. Aurora kinases link chromosome segregation and cell division to cancer susceptibility. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.14, 29–36 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giet R, Petretti C, Prigent C. Aurora kinases, aneuploidy and cancer, a coincidence or a real link? Trends Cell. Biol.15, 241–250 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki WY, Orr-Weaver TL. Sister-chromatid cohesion in mitosis and meiosis. Annu. Rev. Genet.28, 167–187 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stern BM. Mitosis: Aurora gives chromosomes a healthy stretch. Curr. Biol.12, R316–R318 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka TU, Rachidi N, Janke C et al. Evidence that the Ipl1–Sli15 (Aurora kinase–INCENP) complex promotes chromosome bi-orientation by altering kinetochore–spindle pole connections. Cell108, 317–329 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahonen LJ, Kallio MJ, Daum JR et al. Polo-like kinase 1 creates the tension-sensing 3F3/2 phosphoepitope and modulates the association of spindle-checkpoint proteins at kinetochores. Curr. Biol.15, 1078–1089 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio MJ, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT, Gorbsky GJ. Inhibition of Aurora B kinase blocks chromosome segregation, overrides the spindle checkpoint, and perturbs microtubule dynamics in mitosis. Curr. Biol.12, 900–905 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knowlton AL, Lan W, Stukenberg PT. Aurora B is enriched at merotelic attachment sites, where it regulates MCAK. Curr. Biol.16, 1705–1710 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt E, Sanhaji M, Klein W, Seidel T, Wordeman L, Eichenlaub-Ritter U. MCAK is present at centromeres, midspindle and chiasmata and involved in silencing of the spindle assembly checkpoint in mammalian oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod.16(9), 665–684 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee BH, Kiburz BM, Amon A. Spo13 maintains centromeric cohesion and kinetochore coorientation during meiosis I. Curr. Biol.14, 2168–2182 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katis VL, Matos J, Mori S, Shirahige K, Zachariae W, Nasmyth K. Spo13 facilitates monopolin recruitment to kinetochores and regulates maintenance of centromeric cohesion during yeast meiosis. Curr. Biol.14, 2183–2196 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Adams RR, Eckley DM, Vagnarelli P et al. Human INCENP colocalizes with the Aurora-B/AIRK2 kinase on chromosomes and is overexpressed in tumour cells. Chromosoma110, 65–74 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shang C, Hazbun TR, Cheeseman IM et al. Kinetochore protein interactions and their regulation by the Aurora kinase Ipl1p. Mol. Biol. Cell.14, 3342–3355 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewar H, Tanaka K, Nasmyth K, Tanaka TU. Tension between two kinetochores suffices for their bi-orientation on the mitotic spindle. Nature428, 93–97 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolton MA, Lan W, Powers SE, McCleland ML, Kuang J, Stukenberg PT. Aurora B kinase exists in a complex with survivin and INCENP and its kinase activity is stimulated by survivin binding and phosphorylation. Mol. Biol. Cell.13, 3064–3077 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong C, Fan HY, Lian L et al. Polo-like kinase-1 is a pivotal regulator of microtubule assembly during mouse oocyte meiotic maturation, fertilization, and early embryonic mitosis. Biol. Reprod.67, 546–554 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ditchfield C, Johnson VL, Tighe A et al. Aurora B couples chromosome alignment with anaphase by targeting BubR1, Mad2, and CenP-E to kinetochores. J. Cell. Biol.161, 267–280 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goto H, Kiyono T, Tomono Y et al. Complex formation of Plk1 and INCENP required for metaphase–anaphase transition. Nat. Cell. Biol.8, 180–187 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SS, Hussein D, Wang Y, Elderkin S, Morrow CJ. Kinetochore localisation and phosphorylation of the mitotic checkpoint components Bub1 and BubR1 are differentially regulated by spindle events in human cells. J. Cell. Sci.114, 4385–4395 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lens SM, Medema RH. The survivin/Aurora B complex: its role in coordinating tension and attachment. Cell Cycle2, 507–510 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson VL, Scott MI, Holt SV, Hussein D, Taylor SS. Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, CenP-E, CenP-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J. Cell. Sci.117, 1577–1589 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampson MA, Renduchitala K, Khodjakov A, Kapoor TM. Correcting improper chromosome–spindle attachments during cell division. Nat. Cell. Biol.6, 232–237 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor SS, Scott MI, Holland AJ. The spindle checkpoint: a quality control mechanism which ensures accurate chromosome segregation. Chromosome Res.12, 599–616 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauf S, Cole RW, LaTerra S et al. The small molecule Hesperadin reveals a role for Aurora B in correcting kinetochore–microtubule attachment and in maintaining the spindle assembly checkpoint. J. Cell. Biol.161, 281–294 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen HG, Chinnappan D, Urano T, Ravid K. Mechanism of Aurora-B degradation and its dependency on intact KEN and A-boxes: identification of an aneuploidy-promoting property. Mol. Cell Biol.25, 4977–4992 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mailhes JB. Faulty spindle checkpoint and cohesion protein activities predispose oocytes to premature chromosome separation and aneuploidy. Environ. Mol. Mutagen.49, 642–658 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieder CL, Palazzo RE. Colcemid and the mitotic cycle. J. Cell. Sci.102(Pt 3), 387–392 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rieder CL, Schultz A, Cole R, Sluder G. Anaphase onset in vertebrate somatic cells is controlled by a checkpoint that monitors sister kinetochore attachment to the spindle. J. Cell. Biol.127, 1301–1310 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen PR, Martineau SN, Margolis RL. Chemical induction of mitotic checkpoint override in mammalian cells results in aneuploidy following a transient tetraploid state. Mutat. Res.372, 181–194 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee JY, Orr-Weaver TL. The molecular basis of sister-chromatid cohesion. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol.17, 753–777 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fang G. Checkpoint protein BubR1 acts synergistically with Mad2 to inhibit anaphase-promoting complex. Mol. Biol. Cell.13, 755–766 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vigneron S, Prieto S, Bernis C, Labbe JC, Castro A, Lorca T. Kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint proteins: who controls whom? Mol. Biol. Cell.15, 4584–4596 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li M, Li S, Yuan J et al. Bub3 is a spindle assembly checkpoint protein regulating chromosome segregation during mouse oocyte meiosis. PLoS One4, e7701 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Y, Benezra R. Identification of a human mitotic checkpoint gene: hsMAD2. Science274, 246–248 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicklas RB. How cells get the right chromosomes. Science275, 632–637 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor SS, Ha E, McKeon F. The human homologue of Bub3 is required for kinetochore localization of Bub1 and a Mad3/Bub1-related protein kinase. J. Cell. Biol.142, 1–11 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musacchio A, Hardwick KG. The spindle checkpoint: structural insights into dynamic signalling. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol.3, 731–741 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj R, Yu H. The spindle checkpoint, aneuploidy, and cancer. Oncogene23, 2016–2027 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell BJ, Moree B, Farrar EM, Stewart S, Fang G, Salmon ED. Spindle checkpoint protein dynamics at kinetochores in living cells. Curr. Biol.14, 953–964 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K. How do so few control so many? Cell120, 739–746 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wassmann K, Niault T, Maro B. Metaphase I arrest upon activation of the Mad2-dependent spindle checkpoint in mouse oocytes. Curr. Biol.13, 1596–1608 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsurumi C, Hoffmann S, Geley S, Graeser R, Polanski Z. The spindle assembly checkpoint is not essential for CSF arrest of mouse oocytes. J. Cell. Biol.167, 1037–1050 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Homer HA, McDougall A, Levasseur M, Yallop K, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. Mad2 prevents aneuploidy and premature proteolysis of cyclin B and securin during meiosis I in mouse oocytes. Genes Dev.19, 202–207 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang D, Ma W, Li YH et al. Intra-oocyte localization of Mad2 and its relationship with kinetochores, microtubules, and chromosomes in rat oocytes during meiosis. Biol. Reprod.71, 740–748 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallio M, Eriksson JE, Gorbsky GJ. Differences in spindle association of the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2 in mammalian spermatogenesis and oogenesis. Dev. Biol.225, 112–123 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ma W, Zhang D, Hou Y et al. Reduced expression of Mad2, BCL2, and MAP kinase activity in pig oocytes after in vitro aging are associated with defects in sister chromatid segregation during meiosis II and embryo fragmentation after activation. Biol. Reprod.72, 373–383 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Li M, Ma W et al. Localization of mitotic arrest deficient 1 (Mad1) in mouse oocytes during the first meiosis and its functions as a spindle checkpoint protein. Biol. Reprod.72, 58–68 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chung E, Chen RH. Spindle checkpoint requires Mad1-bound and Mad1-free Mad2. Mol. Biol. Cell.13, 1501–1511 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brunet S, Pahlavan G, Taylor S, Maro B. Functionality of the spindle checkpoint during the first meiotic division of mammalian oocytes. Reproduction126, 443–450 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland S, Nagarajan P, Polyzos A et al. Heterozygosity for a Bub1 mutation causes female-specific germ cell aneuploidy in mice. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106, 12776–12781 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McGuinness BE, Anger M, Kouznetsova A et al. Regulation of APC/C activity in oocytes by a Bub1-dependent spindle assembly checkpoint. Curr. Biol.19, 369–380 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reis A, Madgwick S, Chang HY, Nabti I, Levasseur M, Jones KT. Prometaphase APCcdh1 activity prevents non-disjunction in mammalian oocytes. Nat. Cell. Biol.9, 1192–1198 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai W, Wang Q, Liu T et al. Slippage of mitotic arrest and enhanced tumor development in mice with BubR1 haploinsufficiency. Cancer Res.64, 440–445 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel LS, Liberal V, Chatterjee A et al. Mad2 haplo-insufficiency causes premature anaphase and chromosome instability in mammalian cells. Nature409, 355–359 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanks S, Coleman K, Reid S et al. Constitutional aneuploidy and cancer predisposition caused by biallelic mutations in BUB1B. Nat. Genet.36, 1159–1161 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonn MA, McCarroll R, Murray AW. Requirement of the spindle checkpoint for proper chromosome segregation in budding yeast meiosis. Science289, 300–303 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Michel L, Diaz-Rodriguez E, Narayan G, Hernando E, Murty VV, Benezra R. Complete loss of the tumor suppressor Mad2 causes premature cyclin B degradation and mitotic failure in human somatic cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101, 4459–4464 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dobles M, Liberal V, Scott ML, Benezra R, Sorger PK. Chromosome missegregation and apoptosis in mice lacking the mitotic checkpoint protein Mad2. Cell101, 635–645 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H. Regulation of APC–Cdc20 by the spindle checkpoint. Curr. Opin. Cell. Biol.14, 706–714 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Lees E. Identification of an overlapping binding domain on Cdc20 for Mad2 and anaphase-promoting complex: model for spindle checkpoint regulation. Mol. Cell Biol.21, 5190–5199 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morrow CJ, Tighe A, Johnson VL, Scott MI, Ditchfield C, Taylor SS. Bub1 and Aurora B cooperate to maintain BubR1-mediated inhibition of APC/CCdc20. J. Cell. Sci.118, 3639–3652 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawashima SA, Yamagishi Y, Honda T, Ishiguro K, Watanabe Y. Phosphorylation of H2A by Bub1 prevents chromosomal instability through localizing shugoshin. Science327, 172–177 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitajima TS, Hauf S, Ohsugi M, Yamamoto T, Watanabe Y. Human Bub1 defines the persistent cohesion site along the mitotic chromosome by affecting Shugoshin localization. Curr. Biol.15, 353–359 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meraldi P, Sorger PK. A dual role for Bub1 in the spindle checkpoint and chromosome congression. EMBO J.24, 1621–1633 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin S, Wang Q, Liu JH et al. Bub1 prevents chromosome misalignment and precocious anaphase during mouse oocyte meiosis. Cell Cycle5, 2130–2137 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perera D, Tilston V, Hopwood JA, Barchi M, Boot-Handford RP, Taylor SS. Bub1 maintains centromeric cohesion by activation of the spindle checkpoint. Dev. Cell13, 566–579 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kienitz A, Vogel C, Morales I, Muller R, Bastians H. Partial downregulation of Mad1 causes spindle checkpoint inactivation and aneuploidy, but does not confer resistance towards taxol. Oncogene24, 4301–4310 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baker DJ, Jeganathan KB, Cameron JD et al. BubR1 insufficiency causes early onset of aging-associated phenotypes and infertility in mice. Nat. Genet.36, 744–749 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalitsis P, Earle E, Fowler KJ, Choo KH. Bub3 gene disruption in mice reveals essential mitotic spindle checkpoint function during early embryogenesis. Genes Dev.14, 2277–2282 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ikui AE, Yang CP, Matsumoto T, Horwitz SB. Low concentrations of taxol cause mitotic delay followed by premature dissociation of p55CDC from Mad2 and BubR1 and abrogation of the spindle checkpoint, leading to aneuploidy. Cell Cycle4, 1385–1388 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailhes JB, Carabatsos MJ, Young D, London SN, Bell M, Albertini DF. Taxol-induced meiotic maturation delay, spindle defects, and aneuploidy in mouse oocytes and zygotes. Mutat. Res.423, 79–90 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Homer HA, McDougall A, Levasseur M, Murdoch AP, Herbert M. RNA interference in meiosis I human oocytes: towards an understanding of human aneuploidy. Mol. Hum. Reprod.11, 397–404 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steuerwald N, Cohen J, Herrera RJ, Sandalinas M, Brenner CA. Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol. Hum. Reprod.7, 49–55 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grondahl ML, Yding Andersen C, Bogstad J, Nielsen FC, Meinertz H, Borup R. Gene expression profiles of single human mature oocytes in relation to age. Hum. Reprod.25, 957–968 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duncan FE, Chiang T, Schultz RM, Lampson MA. Evidence that a defective spindle assembly checkpoint is not the primary cause of maternal age-associated aneuploidy in mouse eggs. Biol. Reprod.81, 768–776 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glickman MH, Ciechanover A. The ubiquitin–proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. Physiol Rev.82, 373–428 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig JM, Choo KH. Kiss and break up – a safe passage to anaphase in mitosis and meiosis. Chromosoma114, 252–262 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Goldberg AL. Functions of the proteasome: the lysis at the end of the tunnel. Science268, 522–523 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coux O, Tanaka K, Goldberg AL. Structure and functions of the 20S and 26S proteasomes. Annu. Rev. Biochem.65, 801–847 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt JE, Weaver J, Jones KT. Spatial regulation of APCCdh1-induced cyclin B1 degradation maintains G2 arrest in mouse oocytes. Development137, 1297–1304 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover DM, Hagan IM, Tavares AA. Polo-like kinases: a team that plays throughout mitosis. Genes Dev.12, 3777–3787 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumara I, Gimenez-Abian JF, Gerlich D et al. Roles of Polo-like kinase 1 in the assembly of functional mitotic spindles. Curr. Biol.14, 1712–1722 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariae W, Nasmyth K. Whose end is destruction: cell division and the anaphase-promoting complex. Genes Dev.13, 2039–2058 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters JM. The anaphase-promoting complex: proteolysis in mitosis and beyond. Mol. Cell9, 931–943 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Fix O, Peters JM, Kirschner MW, Koshland D. Anaphase initiation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled by the APC-dependent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor Pds1p. Genes Dev.10, 3081–3093 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhlmann F, Lottspeich F, Nasmyth K. Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1. Nature400, 37–42 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salah SM, Nasmyth K. Destruction of the securin Pds1p occurs at the onset of anaphase during both meiotic divisions in yeast. Chromosoma109, 27–34 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagting A, Den Elzen N, Vodermaier HC, Waizenegger IC, Peters JM, Pines J. Human securin proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1. J. Cell. Biol.157, 1125–1137 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasmyth K. Segregating sister genomes: the molecular biology of chromosome separation. Science297, 559–565 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waizenegger I, Gimenez-Abian JF, Wernic D, Peters JM. Regulation of human separase by securin binding and autocleavage. Curr. Biol.12, 1368–1378 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buonomo SB, Clyne RK, Fuchs J, Loidl J, Uhlmann F, Nasmyth K. Disjunction of homologous chromosomes in meiosis I depends on proteolytic cleavage of the meiotic cohesin Rec8 by separin. Cell103, 387–398 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jallepalli PV, Waizenegger IC, Bunz F et al. Securin is required for chromosomal stability in human cells. Cell105, 445–457 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agarwal R, Cohen-Fix O. Mitotic regulation: the fine tuning of separase activity. Cell Cycle1, 255–257 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herbert M, Levasseur M, Homer H, Yallop K, Murdoch A, McDougall A. Homologue disjunction in mouse oocytes requires proteolysis of securin and cyclin B1. Nat. Cell. Biol.5, 1023–1025 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch-Volders M, Cundari E, Verdoodt B. Towards a unifying model for the metaphase/anaphase transition. Mutagenesis13, 321–335 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang D, Nicklas RB. ‘Anaphase’ and cytokinesis in the absence of chromosomes. Nature382, 466–468 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nasmyth K, Peters JM, Uhlmann F. Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids. Science288, 1379–1385 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lejeune J, Gautier M, Turpin R. [Study of somatic chromosomes from 9 mongoloid children.]. CR Hebd. Seances Acad. Sci.248, 1721–1722 (1959).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penrose L. The relative effects of paternal and maternal age in mongolism. J. Genet.27, 219–224 (1933).
   Google Scholar
• Niault T, Hached K, Sotillo R et al. Changing Mad2 levels affects chromosome segregation and spindle assembly checkpoint control in female mouse meiosis I. PLoS One2, e1165 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schlecht U, Primig M. Mining meiosis and gametogenesis with DNA microarrays. Reproduction125, 447–456 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hutchins JR, Toyoda Y, Hegemann B et al. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science328, 593–599 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bettencourt-Dias M, Giet R, Sinka R et al. Genome-wide survey of protein kinases required for cell cycle progression. Nature432, 980–987 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prawitt D, Brixel L, Spangenberg C et al. RNAi knock-down mice: an emerging technology for post-genomic functional genetics. Cytogenet. Genome Res.105, 412–421 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein P, Svoboda P, Schultz RM. Transgenic RNAi in mouse oocytes: a simple and fast approach to study gene function. Dev. Biol.256, 187–193 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar