3
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

CD8 T cells in CIN2–3 HPV-16-related lesions: a role in immune evasion

&
Pages 381-384 | Published online: 10 Jan 2014

References

  • de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L et al.; on behalf of the Retrospective International Survey and HPV Time Trends Study Group. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol.11, 1048–1056 (2010).
  • Einstein MH, Schiller JT, Viscidi RP et al. Clinician’s guide to human papillomavirus immunology: knowns and unknowns. Lancet Infect. Dis.9, 347–356 (2009).
  • Koshiol J, Lindsay L, Pimenta JM, Poole C, Jenkins D, Smith JS. Persistent human papillomavirus infection and cervical neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Epidemiol.168(2), 123–137 (2008).
  • Castle PE, Rodríguez AC, Burk RD et al.; for the Proyecto Epidemiologico Guanacaste (PEG) Group. Short term persistence of human papillomavirus and risk of cervical precancer and cancer; population based cohort study. BMJ339, b2569 (2009).
  • Kjær SK, Frederiksen K, Munk C, Iftner T. Long-term absolute risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse following human papillomavirus infection: role of persistence. J. Natl Cancer Inst.102, 1478–1488 (2010).
  • Trimble CL, Clark RC, Thoburn C et al. Human papillomavirus 16-associated cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in humans excludes CD8 T cells from dysplastic epithelium. J. Immunol.185, 7107–7114 (2010).
  • McCredie MR, Sharples KI, Paul C et al. Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive caner in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol.9, 425–434 (2008).
  • Nakagawa M, Stites DP, Patel S et al. Persistence of human papillomavirus type 16 infection is associated with lack of cytotoxic T lymphocyte response to the E6 antigens. J. Infect. Dis.182(2), 595–598 (2000).
  • Welters MJ, de Jong A, van den Eeden SJ et al. Frequent display of human papillomavirus type 16 E6-specific memory T-helper cells in the healthy population as witness of previous viral encounter. Cancer Res.63(3), 636–641 (2003).
  • Trimble CL, Peng S, Thoburn C, Kos F, Wu TC. Naturally occurring systemic immune responses to HPV antigens do not predict regression of CIN2/3. Cancer Immunol. Immunother.5, 799–803 (2010).
  • Brun JL, Dalstein V, Leveque J et al. Regression of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with TG4001 targeted immunotherapy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.204(2), 169.e1–e8 (2011).
  • Kenter GG, Welters MJ, Valentijn AR et al. Vaccination against HPV-16 oncoproteins for vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia. N. Engl. J. Med.361(19), 1838–1847 (2009).
  • van Seters M, van Beurden M, ten Kate FJ et al. Treatment of vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia with topical imiquimod. N. Engl. J. Med.358(14), 1465–1473 (2008).
  • Daayana S, Elkord E, Winters U et al. Phase II trial of imiquimod and HPV therapeutic vaccination in patients with vulval intraepithelial neoplasia. Br. J. Cancer102(7), 1129–1136 (2010).
  • Venuti A, Giovinazzi R, Sedati A, Badaracco G, Flamini S, Marcante ML. From latent HPV infection to high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesion in less than two years. Case report. Eur. J. Gynaecol. Oncol.14(6), 512–514 (1993).
  • Schiffman M, Rodriguez AC. Heterogeneity in CIN3 diagnosis. Lancet Oncol.9(5), 404–406 (2008).
  • Martin-Hirsch PP, Paraskevaidis E, Bryant A, Dickinson HO, Keep SL. Surgery for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.6, CD001318 (2008).
  • Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P et al. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet367(9509), 489–498 (2006).
  • Bhat P, Mattarollo SR, Gosmann C, Frazer IH, Leggatt GR. Regulation of immune responses to HPV infection and during HPV-directed immunotherapy. Immunol. Rev.239(1), 85–98 (2011).
  • Nieto K, Gissmann L, Schädlich L. Human papillomavirus-specific immune therapy: failure and hope. Antivir. Ther.15(7), 951–957 (2010).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.