Cross-border reproductive treatment with oocyte donation: what comes next?

References

• Knoppers BM, LeBris S. Recent advances in medically assisted conception: legal, ethical and social issues. Am. J. Law Med.17, 329–361 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. ESHRE Task Force on ethics and law 15: Cross-border reproductive care. Hum. Reprod.23, 2182–2184 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferraretti AP, Pennings G, Gianaroli L, Natali F, Magli MC. Cross-border reproductive care: a phenomenon expressing the controversial aspects of reproductive technologies. Reprod. Biomed. Online20, 261–266 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren K, Adamson D, Zegers-Hochschild F, de Mouzon J. Cross-border fertility care – International Committee Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies Global Survey: 2006 data and estimates. Fertil. Steril.94, e4–e10 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shenfield F, de Mouzon J, Pennings G et al. The ESHRE Task Force on Cross Border Reproductive Care. Cross border reproductive care in six European countries. Hum. Reprod.25, 1361–1368 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth E. Fertility patients’ experiences of cross-border reproductive care. Fertil. Steril.94, e11–e15 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes EG, DeJean D. Cross-border fertility services in North America: a survey of Canadian and American providers. Fertil. Steril.94, e16–e19 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKelvey A, David AL, Shenfield F, Jauniaux ER. The impact of cross-border reproductive care or ‘fertility tourism’ on NHS maternity services. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol.116, 1520–1523 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila V, Tiitinen A, Foudila T, Hovatta O. Obstetric and perinatal outcome after oocyte donation: comparison with in-vitro fertilization pregnancies. Hum. Reprod.13, 483–490 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashta O. Fertility groups call for border regulations to protect IVF patients. Br. Med. J.341, c4982 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Pennings G, Autin C, Decleer W et al. Cross-border reproductive care in Belgium. Hum. Reprod.24, 3108–3118 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum. Reprod.15, 1856–1864 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins J, Cook J. Cross-border reproductive care: now and into the future. Fertil. Steril.94, e25–e26 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matorras R. Reproductive exile versus reproductive tourism. Hum. Reprod.20, 3571–3572 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inhorn C, Patrizio P. Rethinking reproductive ‘tourism’ as reproductive ‘exile’. Fertil. Steril.92, 904–906 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keith LG, Oleszzczuk JJ, Keith DM. Multiple gestation: reflections on epidemiology, causes, and consequences. Int. J. Fertil. Womens Med.45, 206–214 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soderstrom-Anttila V, Sajanemi N, Tiitnen A, Hovatta O. Health and development of children born after oocyte donation compared with that of those born after in-vitro fertilization, and parents’ attitudes regarding secrecy. Hum. Reprod.13, 2009–2015 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones HW Jr, Cooke I, Kempers R, Brinsden P, Saunders D. International Federation of Fertility Societies Surveillance 2010: preface. Fertil. Steril.95, 491 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen VM, Wilson RD, Cheung A; Genetics Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC); Reproductive Endocrinology Infertility Committee of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC). Pregnancy outcomes after assisted reproductive technology. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can.28, 220–250 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorn P, Dill S. The role of patients’ organizations in cross-border reproductive care. Fertil. Steril.94, e23–e24 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittaker A, Speier A. ‘Cycling overseas’: care, commodification, and stratification in cross-border reproductive travel. Med. Anthropol.29, 363–383 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil. Steril.93, 455–466 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Winter A, Daniluk JC. A gift from the heart: the experiences of women whose egg donations helped their sisters become mothers. J. Counseling Dev.82, 483–495 (2004).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yee S, Hitkari JA, Greenblatt EM. A follow-up study of women who donated oocytes to known recipient couples for altruistic reasons. Hum. Reprod.22, 2040–2050 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nahman M. Materializing Israeliness: difference and mixture in transnational ova donation. Sci. Cult.15, 199–213 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Siegel-Itzkovich J. Romanian police raid clinic run by Israelis, accusing them of buying women’s eggs and selling them for profit. Br. Med. J.339, 3003 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Kraske M, Ludwig U. [The babyborders] Der Spiegel46, 108–118 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Donchin A. Reproductive tourism and the quest for global gender justice. Bioethics24, 323–332 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merlet F, Sénémaud B. [Care of the oocyte donors: regulation of the donation, the secret face of the reproductive tourism.] Gynecol. Obstet. Fertil.38, 36–44 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenney NJ, McGowan ML. Looking back: egg donors’ retrospective evaluations of their motivations, expectations, and experiences during their first donation cycle. Fertil. Steril.93, 455–466 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luk J, Arici A. Does the ovarian reserve decrease from repeated ovulation stimulations? Curr. Opin. Obstet. Gynecol.22, 177–182 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brinton LA. Long-term effects of ovulation-stimulating drugs on cancer risk. Reprod. Biomed. Online15, 38–44 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderon-Margalit R, Friedlander Y, Yanetz R et al. Cancer risk after exposure to treatments for ovulation induction. Am. J. Epidemiol.169, 365–375 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer W, Schneider J, Schultz N. US oocyte donors: a retrospective study of medical and psychosocial issues. Hum. Reprod.24, 3144–3149 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels K. Anonymity and openness and the recruitment of gamete donors. Part 2: oocyte donors. Hum. Fertil.10, 223–231 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braverman AM, Corson SL. A comparison of oocyte donors’ and gestational carriers/surrogates’ attitudes towards third-party reproduction. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet.19, 462–469 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patrick M, Smith AL, Meyer WR, Bashford RA. Anonymous oocyte donation: a follow-up questionnaire. Fertil. Steril.75, 1034–1036 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith E, Bermann J, Martin C, Williams-Jones B. Reproductive tourism in Argentina: clinic accreditation and its implications for consumers, health professionals and policy makers. Dev. World Bioeth.10, 59–69 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Health Forum. The legislative inconsistency behind cross-border reproductive care. Focus on Reproduction, 18–19 January 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Storrow RF. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care. Hum. Reprod.25, 2939–2943 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies T. Cross-border reproductive care: quality and safety challenges for the regulator. Fertil. Steril.94, e20–e22 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shenfield F, Pennings G, De Mouzon J, Ferraretti AP, Goossens V; ESHRE Task Force ‘Cross Border Reproductive Care’ (CBRC). ESHRE’s good practice guide for cross-border reproductive care for centers and practitioners. Hum. Reprod.26, 1625–1627 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, Tarlatzis B, Devroey P. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 14: equity of access to assisted reproductive technology. Hum. Reprod.23, 772–774 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mainland L, Wilson E. Principles of the First International Forum on Cross-Border Reproductive Care. Fertil. Steril.94, e1–e3 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tober D. Semen as gifts, semen as goods. In: Commodifying Bodies. Scheper-Hughes N, Wacant LJD (Eds). Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA, 31–62 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Bharadwaj A. Biosociality and biocrossings: encounters with assisted conception and embryonic stem cells in India. In: Biosocialities, Genetics and the Social Sciences: Making Biologies and Identities. Gibbon S, Novas C (Eds). Routledge, NY, USA, 98–116 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pennings G. International parenthood via procreative tourism. In: Contemporary Rthical Dilemmas in Assisted Reproduction. Shenfield F, Sureau C (Eds), Informa Healthcare, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK, 43–56 (2006).
   Google Scholar