Cardiovascular alterations in the parturient undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia

References

• Guise JM, Denman MA, Emeis C et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Obstet. Gynecol.115(6), 1267–1278 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bucklin B, Hawkins J, Anderson J, Ullrich F. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey. Anesthesiology103, 645–653 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman K, Jenkins JG. Failed tracheal intubation in obstetrics: no more frequent but still managed badly. Anaesthesia60(2), 168–171 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsen LC, Pitner R, Camann WR. General anesthesia for cesarean section at a tertiary care hospital 1990–1995: indications and implications. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.7(3), 147–152 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palanisamy A, Mitani AA, Tsen LC. General anesthesia for cesarean delivery at a tertiary care hospital from 2000 to 2005: a retrospective analysis and 10-year update. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.20(1), 10–16 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poppas A, Shroff SG, Korcarz CE et al. Serial assessment of the cardiovascular system in normal pregnancy role of arterial compliance and pulsatile arterial load. Circulation95(10), 2407–2415 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund CJ, Donovan JC. Blood volume during pregnancy. Significance of plasma and red cell volumes. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.98(3), 394–403 (1967).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp JF, Seaward BL, Sleamaker RH, Hiser J. Maternal physiologic adaptations to early human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.159(6), 1456–1460 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabie WC, DiSessa TG, Crocker LG, Sibai BM, Arheart KL. A Longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.170(3), 849–856 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robb AO, Mills NL, Din JN et al. Influence of the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and preeclampsia on arterial stiffness. Hypertension53(6), 952–958 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W. Serial study of factors influencing changes in cardiac output during human pregnancy. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.256(4), H1060–H1065 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueland K, Novy MJ, Peterson EN, Metcalfe J. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. IV. The influence of gestational age on the maternal cardiovascular response to posture and exercise. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.104(6), 856–864 (1969).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters WA, MacGregor WG, Hills M. Cardiac output at rest during pregnancy and the puerperium. Clin. Sci.30(1), 1–11 (1966).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Katz R, Karliner JS, Resnik R. Effects of a natural volume overload state (pregnancy) on left ventricular performance in normal human subjects. Circulation58(3), 434–441 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabie WC, DiSessa TG, Crocker LG, Sibai BM, Arheart KL. A longitudinal study of cardiac output in normal human pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.170(3), 849–856 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson SC, Hunter S, Boys RJ, Dunlop W. Serial changes in pulmonary haemodynamics during human pregnancy: a non-invasive study using Doppler ecochardiography. Clin. Sci.80, 113–117 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornburg KL, Jacobson S-L, Giraud GD, Morton MJ. Hemodynamic changes in pregnancy. Semin. Perinatol.24(1), 11–14 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colditz RB, Josey WE. Central venous pressure in supine position during normal pregnancy. Comparative determinations during first, second and third trimesters. Obstet. Gynecol.36(5), 769–772 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secher NJ, Andersen LH. Changes in the pattern of regional pulmonary blood flow after PGF2 infusion in pregnant women. Cardiovasc. Res.11(1), 26–30 (1977).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Secher NJ, Arnsbo P, Andersen LH, Thomsen A. Measurements of cardiac stroke volume in various body positions in pregnancy and during cesarean section: a comparison between thermodilution and impedance cardiography. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest.39(6), 569–576 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bader RA, Bader ME, Rose DJ, Braunwald E. Hemodynamics at rest and during exercise in normal pregnancy as studied by cardiac catheterization. J. Clin. Invest.34(10), 1524–1536 (1955).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer RA, James MF. Maternal hemodynamic monitoring in obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology109(5), 765–767 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burwell CS, Strayhorn WD, Flickinger DON, Corlette MB, Bowerman EP, Kennedy JA. Circulation during pregnancy. Arch. Intern. Med.62(6), 979 (1938).
   Google Scholar
• Robson SC, Dunlop W, Moore M, Hunter S. Combined Doppler and echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output: theory and application in pregnancy. BJOG94(11), 1014–1027 (1987).
   Google Scholar
• Easterling TR, Watts DH, Schmucker BC, Benedetti TJ. Measurement of cardiac output during pregnancy: validation of Doppler technique and clinical observations in preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol.69(6), 845 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs LD, Salgo IS, Goonewardena S et al. Rapid online quantification of left ventricular volume from real-time three-dimensional echocardiographic data. Eur. Heart J.27(4), 460–468 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansegard J, Urheim S, Lunde K, Malm S, Rabben S. Semi-automated quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Cardiovasc. Ultrasound7(1), 18 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mor-Avi V, Jenkins C, Kühl HP et al. Real-time 3-dimensional echocardiographic quantification of left ventricular volumes: multicenter study for validation with magnetic resonance imaging and investigation of sources of error. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging1(4), 413–423 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleijn SA, Aly MFA, Terwee CB, van Rossum AC, Kamp O. Reliability of left ventricular volumes and function measurements using three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Eur. J. Echocardiogr. doi:10.1093/ejechocard/jer174 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Sugeng L, Mor-Avi V, Weinert L et al. Multimodality comparison of quantitative volumetric analysis of the right ventricle. JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging3(1), 10–18 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Zwaan HB, Geleijnse ML, McGhie JS et al. Right ventricular quantification in clinical practice: two-dimensional vs. three-dimensional echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur. J. Echocardiogr.12(9), 656–664 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kleijn SA, Aly MFA, Terwee CB, van Rossum AC, Kamp O. Comparison between direct volumetric and speckle tracking methodologies for left ventricular and left atrial chamber quantification by three-dimensional echocardiography. Am. J. Cardiol.108(7), 1038–1044 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arias-Godínez JA, Guadalajara-Boo JF, Patel AR, Pandian NG. Function and mechanics of the left ventricle: from tissue Doppler imaging to three dimensional speckle tracking. Arch. Cardiol. Mex.81(2), 114–125 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nesser HJ, Mor-Avi V, Gorissen W et al. Quantification of left ventricular volumes using three-dimensional echocardiographic speckle tracking: comparison with MRI. Eur. Heart J.30(13), 1565–1573 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterling TR, Benedetti TJ, Carlson KL, Watts DH. Measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy by thermodilution and impedance techniques. BJOG96(1), 67–69 (1989).
   Google Scholar
• Swiet M, Talbert DG. The measurement of cardiac output by electrical impedance plethysmography in pregnancy. Are the assumptions valid?. BJOG93(7), 721–726 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Shoemaker WC, Wo CCJ, Bishop MH et al. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation. Crit. Care Med.22(12), 1907–1912 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewkes C, Sear JW, Verhoeff F, Sanders DJ, Foex P. Non-invasive measurement of cardiac output by thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a study of reproducibility and comparison with thermodilution. Br. J. Anaesth.67(6), 788–794 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Milsom I, Forssman L, Biber B. Maternal haemodynamic changes during caesarean section: a comparison of epidural and general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.29(2), 161–167 (1985).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tihtonen K, Kööbi T, Yli-Hankala A, Uotila J. Maternal hemodynamics during cesarean delivery assessed by whole-body impedance cardiography. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.84(4), 355–361 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer RA, Reed AR, van Dyk D et al. hemodynamic effects of ephedrine, phenylephrine, and the coadministration of phenylephrine with oxytocin during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology111(4), 753–765 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer R, Piercy J, Reed A et al. Comparison between pulse waveform analysis and thermodilution cardiac output determination in patients with severe pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Anaesth.106(1), 77–81 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Auler Junior JOC, Torres MLA, Cardoso MM et al. Clinical evaluation of the flotrac/vigileo system for continuous cardiac output monitoring in patients undergoing regional anesthesia for elective cesarean section: a pilot study. Clinics65(8), 793–798 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollman SB, Marx GF. Acute hydration for prevention of hypotension of spinal anesthesia in parturients. Anesthesiology29(2), 374–380 (1968).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyer RA, Farina Z, Joubert IA et al. Crystalloid preload versus rapid crystalloid administration after induction of spinal anaesthesia (coload) for elective caesarean section. Anaesth. Intensive Care32(3), 351–357 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tercanli S, Schneider M, Visca E et al. Influence of volume preloading on uteroplacental and fetal circulation during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in uncomplicated singleton pregnancies. Fetal Diagn. Ther.17(3), 142–146 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark RB, Thompson DS, Thompson CH. Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section. Anesthesiology45(6), 670–674 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Siddik-Sayyid SM, Nasr VG, Taha SK et al. A randomized trial comparing colloid preload to coload during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.109(4), 1219–1224 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park GE, Hauch MA, Curlin F, Datta S, Bader AM. The effects of varying volumes of crystalloid administration before cesarean delivery on maternal hemodynamics and colloid osmotic pressure. Anesth. Analg.83(2), 299–303 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gogarten W, Struemper D, Gramke HF et al. Assessment of volume preload on uteroplacental blood flow during epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol.22(5), 359–362 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology91(6), 1571–1576 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robson SC, Boys RJ, Rodeck C, Morgan B. Maternal and fetal haemodynamic effects of spinal and extradural anaesthesia for elective caesarean section. Br. J. Anaesth.68(1), 54–59 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson S, Hunter S, Boys R, Dunlop W, Bryson M. Changes in cardiac output during epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia44(6), 475–479 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bray JK, Fernando R, Patel NP, Columb MO. Suprasternal Doppler estimation of cardiac output: standard versus sequential combined spinal epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.103(4), 959–964 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer’s solution. Anesth. Analg.81(4), 838–842 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rout C, Rocke DA. Spinal hypotension associated with Cesarean section: will preload ever work?. Anesthesiology91(6), 1565–1567 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Banerjee A, Stocche R, Angle P, Halpern S. Preload or coload for spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis. Can. J. Anaesth.57(1), 24–31 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Teoh WHL, Sia ATH. Colloid preload versus coload for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: the effects on maternal cardiac output. Anesth. Analg.108(5), 1592–1598 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamberlain DP, Chamberlain BDL. Changes in the skin temperature of the trunk and their relationship to sympathetic blockade during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology65(2), 139–143 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown D. Miller’s Anesthesia. Miller RD, EL, Fleisher LA, Wiener-Kronish JP, Young WL (Eds). Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, PA, USA, 1616–1618 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Niswonger JWH, Langmade CF. Cardiovascular changes in vaginal deliveries and cesarean sections. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.107(3), 337–344 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyer RA, Piercy JL, Reed AR, Lombard CJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Hemodynamic changes associated with spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia. Anesthesiology108(5), 802–811 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Continuous invasive blood pressure and cardiac output monitoring during cesarean delivery: a randomized, double-blind comparison of low-dose versus high-dose spinal anesthesia with intravenous phenylephrine or placebo infusion. Anesthesiology109(5), 856–863 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharwood-Smith G, Drummond GB. Hypotension in obstetric spinal anaesthesia: a lesson from pre-eclampsia. Br. J. Anaesth.102(3), 291–294 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyer RA, Reed AR. Spinal hypotension during elective cesarean delivery: closer to a solution. Anesth. Analg.111(5), 1093–1095 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueland K, Gills RE, Hansen JM. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics. I. Cesarean section under subarachnoid block anesthesia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.100(1), 42–54 (1968).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Lee BB, Lau TK, Gin T. A dose-response study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.90(6), 1390–1395 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella SM, Norris MC. Advance prediction of hypotension at cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.5(1), 3–7 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frölich MA, Caton D. Baseline heart rate may predict hypotension after spinal anesthesia in prehydrated obstetrical patients. Can. J. Anaesth.49(2), 185–189 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlgren G, Granath F, Wessel H, Irestedt L. Prediction of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section and its relation to the effect of crystalloid or colloid preload. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.16(2), 128–134 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanss R, Bein B, Ledowski T et al. Heart rate variability predicts severe hypotension after spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology102(6), 1086–1093 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanss R, Bein B, Weseloh H et al. Heart rate variability predicts severe hypotension after spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology104(3), 537–547 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamchad D, Arkoosh VA, Horrow JC et al. Using heart rate variability to stratify risk of obstetric patients undergoing spinal anesthesia. Anesth. Analg.99(6), 1818 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiel C. Changes in heart rate variability may reflect sympatholysis during spinal anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand.51(10), 1297–1304 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark RB, Thompson DS, Thompson CH. Prevention of spinal hypotension associated with cesarean section. Anesthesiology45(6), 670–674 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiran S, Singal NK. A comparative study of three different doses of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in elective caesarean section. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.11(3), 185–189 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asehnoune K, Larousse E, Tadie JM, Minville V, Droupy S, Benhamou D. Small-dose bupivacaine-sufentanil prevents cardiac output modifications after spinal anesthesia. Anesth. Analg.101(5), 1512–1515 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Velde M, Van Schoubroeck D, Jani J, Teunkens A, Missant C, Deprest J. Combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: dose-dependent effects of hyperbaric bupivacaine on maternal hemodynamics. Anesth. Analg.103(1), 187–190 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercauteren MP, Coppejans HC, Hoffmann VH, Mertens E, Adriaensen HA. Prevention of hypotension by a single 5-mg dose of ephedrine during small-dose spinal anesthesia in prehydrated cesarean delivery patients. Anesth. Analg.90(2), 324–327 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Lee BB. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.98(3), 815–821 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kety SS, King BD, Horvath SM, Jeffers WA, Hafkenschiel JH. The effects of an acute reduction in blood pressure by means of differential spinal sympathetic block on the cerebral circulation of hypertensive patients. J. Clin. Invest.29(4), 402–407 (1950).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu SS, Ware PD, Allen HW, Neal JM, Pollock JE. Dose-response characteristics of spinal bupivacaine in volunteers: clinical implications for ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiology85(4), 729–736 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan SZ, Susetio L, Wang YP, Cheng YJ, Liu CC. Low dose of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine combined with epidural lidocaine for cesarean section – a balance block technique. Anesth. Analg.78(3), 474–477 (1994).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ben-David B, Miller G, Gavriel R, Gurevitch A. Low-dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.25(3), 235–239 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi DH, Ahn HJ, Kim JA. Combined low-dose spinal-epidural anesthesia versus single-shot spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.15(1), 13–17 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dyer RA, Joubert IA. Low-dose spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Current Opinion Anesthesiology17(4), 301–308 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vercauteren MP, Coppejans HC, Hoffmann VL, Saldien V, Adriaensen HA. Small-dose hyperbaric versus plain bupivacaine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Anesth. Analg.86(5), 989–993 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarvela PJ, Halonen PM, Korttila KT. Comparison of 9 mg of intrathecal plain and hyperbaric bupivacaine both with fentanyl for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.89(5), 1257–1262 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maruta S. [The observation of the maternal hemodynamics during labor and cesarean section]. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi34(6), 776–784 (1982).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juhani TP, Hannele H. Complications during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a clinical report of one year’s experience. Reg. Anesth. Pain Med.18(2), 128–131 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Caplan RA, Ward RJ, Posner K, Cheney FW. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology68(1), 5–11 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auroy Y, Narchi P, Messiah A, Litt L, Rouvier B, Samii K. Serious complications related to regional anesthesia: results of a prospective survey in France. Anesthesiology87(3), 479 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kopp SL, Horlocker TT, Warner ME et al. Cardiac arrest during neuraxial anesthesia: frequency and predisposing factors associated with survival. Anesth. Analg.100(3), 855–865 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allard R, Hatzakorzian R, Deschamps A, Backman S. Decreased heart rate and blood pressure in a recent cardiac transplant patient after spinal anesthesia. Can. J. Anaesth.51(8), 829–833 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ng K, Parsons J, Cyna AM, Middleton P. Spinal versus epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.4, CD003765 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Ueland K, Akamatsu TJ, Eng M, Bonica JJ, Hansen JM. Maternal cardiovascular dynamics VI. Cesarean section under epidural anesthesia without epinephrine. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.114(6), 775–780 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James CF, Banner T, Caton D. Cardiac output in women undergoing cesarean section with epidural or general anesthesia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.160(5), 1178–1184 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Robson SC, Dunlop W, Hunter S, Boys R, Bryson M. Haemodynamic changes associated with caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.96(6), 642–647 (1989).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alahuhta S, Räsänen J, Jouppila R, Jouppila P, Hollmen A. Effects of extradural bupivacaine with adrenaline for caesarean section on uteroplacental and fetal circulation. Br. J. Anaesth.67(6), 678–682 (1991).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hamlyn E, Douglass C, Plaat F, Crowhurst J, Stocks G. Low-dose sequential combined spinal-epidural: an anaesthetic technique for caesarean section in patients with significant cardiac disease. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.14(4), 355–361 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Archer TL, Knape K, Liles D, Wheeler AS, Carter B. The hemodynamics of oxytocin and other vasoactive agents during neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery: findings in six cases. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.126(6), 671–677 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Larsson C, Saltvedt S, Wiklund I, Pahlen S, Andolf E. Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.85(12), 1448–1452 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer DC SK. Antepartum and postpartum hemorrhage. In: Chestnut’s Obstetric Anesthesia. Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA (Eds). Mosby Elsevier, PA, USA, 829–830 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hendricks CH, Brenner WE. Cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs used post partum. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.108(5), 751–760 (1970).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsen LC. Oxytocin protocols during Cesarean delivery: time to acknowledge the risk/benefit ratios?. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.19(3), 243–245 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langesaeter E, Rosseland LA, Stubhaug A. Haemodynamic effects of repeated doses of oxytocin during Caesarean delivery in healthy parturients. Br. J. Anaesth.103(2), 260–262 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielman FJ, Herbert WNP. Maternal cardiovascular effects of drugs that alter uterine activity. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.43(9), 516–522 (1988).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnstone M. The cardiovascular effects of oxytocic drugs. Br. J. Anaesth.44(8), 826–834 (1972).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabie WC, Ratts TE, Sibai BM. The central hemodynamics of severe preeclampsia. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.161(6 Pt 1), 1443–1448 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang JM, Yang YC, Wang KG. Central and peripheral hemodynamics in severe preeclampsia. Acta. Obstet. Gynecol. Scand.75(2), 120–126 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser W, Wallenburg HC. Central hemodynamic observations in untreated preeclamptic patients. Hypertension17(6), 1072–1077 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendijk R, Trimbos JB, Wallenburg HC. Hemodynamic measurements in preeclampsia: preliminary observations. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.150(3), 232–236 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tihtonen K, Kööbi T, Yli-Hankala A, Huhtala H, Uotila J. Maternal haemodynamics in pre-eclampsia compared with normal pregnancy during caesarean delivery. BJOG113(6), 657–663 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visalyaputra S, Rodanant O, Somboonviboon W, Tantivitayatan K, Thienthong S, Saengchote W. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severe preeclampsia: a prospective randomized, multicenter study. Anesth. Analg.101(3), 862–868 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karinen J, Rasanen J, Alahuhta S, Jouppila R, Jouppila P. Maternal and uteroplacental haemodynamic state in pre-eclamptic patients during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br. J. Anaesth.76(5), 616–620 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Aya AGM, Mangin R, Vialles N et al. Patients with severe preeclampsia experience less hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery than healthy parturients: a prospective cohort comparison. Anesth. Analg.97(3), 867–872 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aya AGM, Vialles N, Tanoubi I et al. Spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension: a risk comparison between patients with severe preeclampsia and healthy women undergoing preterm cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.101(3), 869–875 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark VA, Sharwood-Smith GH, Stewart AVG. Ephedrine requirements are reduced during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in preeclampsia. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.14(1), 9–13 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace DH, Leveno KJ, Cunningham FG, Giesecke AH, Shearer VE, Sidawi JE. Randomized comparison of general and regional anesthesia for cesarean delivery in pregnancies complicated by severe preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol.86, 193–199 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharwood-Smith G, Clark V, Watson E. Regional anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia: spinal anaesthesia is the preferred choice. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.8(2), 85–89 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood DD, Curry R. Spinal versus epidural anesthesia for cesarean section in severely preeclamptic patients: a retrospective survey. Anesthesiology90(5), 1276–1282 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos AC, Birnbach DJ. Spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in severely preeclamptic women: don’t throw out the baby with the bathwater! Anesth. Analg.101, 859–861 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pritchard JA. changes in the blood volume during pregnancy and delivery. Anesthesiology26, 393–399 (1965).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kametas NA, McAuliffe F, Krampl E, Chambers J, Nicolaides KH. Maternal cardiac function in twin pregnancy. Obstet. Gynecol.102(4), 806–815 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell DM. Maternal adaptation in twin pregnancy. Semin. Perinatol.10(1), 14–18 (1986).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Karmakar MK, Critchley LA, Gin T. A prospective comparison of vasopressor requirement and hemodynamic changes during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with multiple gestation versus singleton pregnancy. Anesth. Analg.104(2), 407–411 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bamber JH, Dresner M. Aortocaval compression in pregnancy: the effect of changing the degree and direction of lateral tilt on maternal cardiac output. Anesth. Analg.97(1), 256–258 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein KL, Marx GF. Aortocaval compression and uterine displacement. Anesthesiology40(1), 92–96 (1974).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mendonca C, Griffiths J, Ateleanu B, Collis RE. Hypotension following combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Anaesthesia58(5), 428–431 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella SM. Lateral tilt for pregnant women: why 15 degrees?. Anaesthesia58(9), 835–836 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yun EM, Marx GF, Santos AC. The effects of maternal position during induction of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.87(3), 614 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coppejans HC, Hendrickx E, Goossens J, Vercauteren MP. The sitting versus right lateral position during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery: block characteristics and severity of hypotension. Anesth. Analg.102(1), 243–247 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan PJ, Halpern SH, Tarshis J. The effects of an increase of central blood volume before spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: a qualitative systematic review. Anesth. Analg.92(4), 997–1005 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. Prophylactic ephedrine prevents hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery but does not improve neonatal outcome: a quantitative systematic review. Can. J. Anaesth.49(6), 588–599 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayorinde BT, Buczkowski P, Brown J, Shah J, Buggy DJ. Evaluation of pre-emptive intramuscular phenylephrine and ephedrine for reduction of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean section. Br. J. Anaesth.86(3), 372–376 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark RB, Brunner JA III. Dopamine for the treatment of spinal hypotension during cesarean section. Anesthesiology53(6), 514–517 (1980).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Lee BB. Prophylactic phenylephrine infusion for preventing hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.98(3), 815–821 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Macarthur A, Riley ET. Obstetric anesthesia controversies: vasopressor choice for post-spinal hypotension during cesarean delivery. Int. Anesth. Clin.45(1), 115–132 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS. Vasopressors in obstetrics: what should we be using?. Curr. Opin. Anesth.19(3), 238–243 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts SW, Leveno KJ, Lucas MJ, Sidawi JE. Fetal acidemia associated with regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.85(1), 79–83 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller MD, Brühwiler H, Schüpfer GK, Lüscher KP. Higher rate of fetal acidemia after regional anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Obstet. Gynecol.90(1), 131–134 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds F, Seed PT. Anaesthesia for Caesarean section and neonatal acid–base status: a meta-analysis. Anaesthesia60(7), 636–653 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiss Jr FC, Gobble Jr FL. Effect of sympathetic nerve stimulation on the uterine vascular bed. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.97(7), 962–967 (1967).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adamsons K, Mueller-Heubach E, Myers RE. Production of fetal asphyxia in the rhesus monkey by administration of catecholamines to the mother. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.109(2), 248–262 (1971).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng M, Berges PU, Ueland K, Bonica JJ, Parer JT. The effects of methoxamine and ephedrine in normotensive pregnant primates. Anesthesiology35(4), 354–360 (1971).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ralston DH, Shnider SM, deLorimier AA. Effects of equipotent ephedrine, metaraminol, mephentermine, and methoxamine on uterine blood flow in the pregnant ewe. Anesthesiology40(4), 354–370 (1974).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong C, Eisenach JC. The vascular mechanism of ephedrine’s beneficial effect on uterine perfusion during pregnancy. Anesthesiology76(5), 792–798 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eng M, Beres PU, Parer JT, Bonica JJ, Ueland K. Spinal anesthesia and ephedrine in pregnant monkeys. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.115(8), 1095–1095 (1973).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• James FM, Greiss FC, Kemp RA. An evaluation of vasopressor therapy for maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology33(1), 25–34 (1970).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Tan PE, Ng FF, Karmakar MK. Placental transfer and fetal metabolic effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology111(3), 506–512 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper DW, Carpenter M, Mowbray P, Desira WR, Ryall DM, Kokri MS. Fetal and maternal effects of phenylephrine and ephedrine during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesthesiology97(6), 1582–1590 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A quantitative, systematic review of randomized controlled trials of ephedrine versus phenylephrine for the management of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.94(4), 920–926 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Lau TK, Khaw KS, Lee BB. Comparison of metaraminol and ephedrine infusions for maintaining arterial pressure during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Anesthesiology95(2), 307–313 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee A, Ngan Kee WD, Gin T. A dose-response meta-analysis of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.98(2), 483–490 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Lau TK, Ng FF, Chui K, Ng KL. Randomised double-blinded comparison of phenylephrine vs ephedrine for maintaining blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for non-elective Caesarean section. Anaesthesia63(12), 1319–1326 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Lee A, Khaw KS, Ng FF, Karmakar MK, Gin T. A randomized double-blinded comparison of phenylephrine and ephedrine infusion combinations to maintain blood pressure during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery: the effects on fetal acid–base status and hemodynamic control. Anesth. Analg.107(4), 1295–1302 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smiley RM. Burden of proof. Anesthesiology111(3), 470–472 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Erkinaro T, Kavasmaa T, Pakkila M et al. Ephedrine and phenylephrine for the treatment of maternal hypotension in a chronic sheep model of increased placental vascular resistance. Br. J. Anaesth.96(2), 231–237 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ngan Kee WD, Khaw KS, Ng FF. Prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery: an effective technique using combination phenylephrine infusion and crystalloid cohydration. Anesthesiology103(4), 744–750 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ngan Kee W, Khaw K, Ng F. Comparison of phenylephrine infusion regimens for maintaining maternal blood pressure during spinal anaesthesia for Caesarean section. Br. J. Anaesth.92(4), 468–474 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Tanaka M, Balki M, Parkes RK, Carvalho JCA. ED95 of phenylephrine to prevent spinal-induced hypotension and/or nausea at elective cesarean delivery. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.18(2), 125–130 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George RB, McKeen D, Columb MO, Habib AS. Up–down determination of the 90% effective dose of phenylephrine for the treatment of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in parturients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.110(1), 154–158 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen TK, George RB, White WD, Muir HA, Habib AS. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of four fixed rate infusion regimens of phenylephrine for hemodynamic support during spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery. Anesth. Analg.111(5), 1221–1229 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flo K, Wilsgaard T, Vårtun A, Acharya G. A longitudinal study of the relationship between maternal cardiac output measured by impedance cardiography and uterine artery blood flow in the second half of pregnancy. BJOG117(7), 837–844 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer TL, Knape K, Liles D, Wheeler AS, Carter B. The hemodynamics of oxytocin and other vasoactive agents during neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery: findings in six cases. Int. J. Obstet. Anesth.17(3), 247–254 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar