Vaginal agenesis: surgical and nonsurgical strategies

References

• Aittomäki K, Eroila H, Kajanoja P. A population-based study of the incidence of Müllerian aplasia in Finland. Fertil. Steril.76, 24–25 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Quigley CA, De Bellis A, Marschke KB et al. Androgen receptor defects: historical, clinical and molecular perspectives. Endocr. Rev.16, 271–321 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrubbe EH, Willemsen WN, Lemmens JA et al. Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome: distinction between two forms based on excretory urographic, sonographic and laparoscopic findings. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.160, 331–334 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morcel K, Guerrier D, Watrin T, Leveque J. The Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: clinical description and genetics. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. (Paris)8, 539–546 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Biason-Lauber A, Konrad D, Navratil F, Schoenle EJ. A WNT4 mutation associated with Müllerian duct regression and virilization in 46 XX women. N. Engl. J. Med.351, 792–798 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck RT. Formation of artificial vagina without operation (intubation technique). State J. Med.40, 1669 (1940).
   Google Scholar
• Wabrek AY, Milland PR, Wilson WB, Pion RJ. Creation of a neovagina by the Franck nonoperative method. Obstet. Gynecol.37, 408–413 (1971).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ingram JM. The bicycle seat stool in the treatment of vaginal agenesis and stenosis: a preliminary report. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.140, 867–873 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee MH. Nonsurgical treatment of vaginal agenesis using a simplified version of Ingram’s method. Yonsei Med. J.47, 892–895 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargollo PC, Cannon GM Jr, Diamond DA, Thomas P, Burke V, Laufer MR. Should progressive perineal dilatation be considered first-line therapy for vaginal agenesis? J. Urol.182, 1882–1889 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Liao L, Doyle J, Crouch NS et al. Dilation as treatment for vaginal agenesis and hypoplasia: a pilot exploration of benefits and barriers as perceived by patients. J. Obstet. Gynaecol.26, 1144–1148 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Lloyd J, Crouch NS, Minto CL et al. Female genital appearance: ‘normally’ unfolds. BJOG112, 643–646 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldwin JF. The formation of an artificial vagina by intestinal transplantation. Ann. Surg.40, 398 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Alexandrov MG. Formation of artificial vagina from sigmoid colon. Msk Med.3, 185 (1953).
   Google Scholar
• Cai B, Zhang JR, Xi XW, Yan Q, Wan XP. Laparoscopically assisted sigmoid colon vaginoplasty in women with Mayer–Rokitaski–Küster–Hauser syndrome: feasibility and short-term results. BJOG114(12), 1486–1492 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima M, Ruggeri G, Domini M, Gargano T, La Pergola E, Gregori G. Vaginal replacement in the paediatric age group: a 34-year experience of intestinal vaginoplasty in children and young girls. J. Pediatr. Surg.45(10), 2087–2091 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwun KS, Hoon PJ, Cheol LK. Long-term results in patients after rectosigmoid vaginoplasty. Plast. Reconstr. Surg.112, 143–151 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fotopoulou C, Neumann U, Klapp C, Lichtenegger W, Sehouli J. Long-term effects of neovaginal reonstruction with sigmoid loop technique on sexual function and self image in patients with gynaecologic malignancies: results of prospective study. Gynecol. Oncol.111(3), 400–406 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Imparato E, Alfei A, Aspesi G, Meus AL, Spirillo A. Long-term results of sigmoid vaginoplasty in a consecutive series of 62 patients. Int. Urogynecol. J. Pelvic Floor Dysfunct.18(12), 1464–1469 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Karateke A, Haliloglu B, Parlak O, Cam C, Coksuer H. Intestinal vaginoplasty: seven years experience of a tertiary center. Fertil. Steril.94(6), 2312–2315 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syed HA, Malone PS, Hitchcock RJ. Diversion colitis in children with colon vaginoplasty. BJU Int.87, 867–860 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Abbassakoor F, Mahon C, Boolos PR. Diversion colitis in sigmoid neovagina. Colorectal Dis.6, 290–291 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• McIndoe A. The treatment of congenital absence of the vagina. Br. J. Plast. Surg.2, 253 (1950).
   Google Scholar
• Jasonni VM, La Marca A, Naldi S, Matonti G, D’Anna R. The management of vaginal agenesis: report of 104 cases. Fertil. Steril.88, 1653–1656 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu KJ, Lin YS, Chao KC, Chang SP, Lin LY, Bell W. A detachable porous mold facilitates reconstruction of a modified McIndoe neovagina. Fertil. Steril.81, 435–439 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wharton RL. A simple method of constructing a vagina: report of four cases. Am. J. Surg.107, 842 (1938).
   Google Scholar
• Cunha GR, Young P. Role of stroma in oestrogen-induced epithelial proliferation. Epithelial Cell Biol.1, 18–31 (1992).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panici PB, Bellati F, Boni T, Franescangeli F, Frati L, Marchese C. Vaginoplasty using autologous in vitro cultured vaginal tissue in a patient with Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Hum. Reprod.22(7), 2025–2028 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin WV, Chang CY, Shen YY, Tsai HD. Use of autologous buccal mucosa for vaginoplasty: a study of eight cases. Hum. Reprod.18(3), 604–607 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davydov SN. Colpocleisis from the peritoneum of the uterorectal space. Akush Ginekol. (Mosk)2, 45–60 (1969).
   Google Scholar
• Fedele L, Frontino G, Restelli E, Ciappina N, Motta F, Bianchi S. Creation of a neovagina by Davydov’s laparoscopic modified technique in patients with Rokitansky syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.202(1), 33.e1–6 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkowsky A, Czaplicki M, Dobronski P. Twenty years of experience with Krzeski’s cystovaginoplasty for vaginal agenesis in MRKHs: anatomical, histological, cytological and functional results. BJU Int.101, 1433–1440 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vecchietti G, Ardillo C. Sindrome di Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser. Etiologia e clinica. Aplasia vaginale. Corni uterine rudimentali. SEU Roma320–327 (1970).
   Google Scholar
• Borruto E, Chasen ST, Chervenak FA, Fedele L. The Vecchietti procedure for surgical treatment of vaginal agenesis: comparison of laparoscopy and laparotomy. Int. J. Obstet. Gynecol.64, 153–158 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brun JT, Belleannée G, Grafeille N, Aslan AF, Brun GH. Long-term results after neovagina creation in Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome by Vecchietti operation. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.103(2), 168–172 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Saman AM. Retropubic balloon vaginoplasty for management of Mayer–Rokitansky–Küster–Hauser syndrome. Fertil. Steril.93(6), 2016–2019 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Darwish AM. Fine needle vaginoplasty: a simplified novel approach for correction of vaginal aplasia. Fertil. Steril.94(1), 309–312 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Saman AM, Fathalla MM, Nasf AM, Youssef MA. Laparoscopically assisted ballon vaginoplasty for management of vaginal aplasia. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet.98, 134–137 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Williams EA. Congenital absence of the vagina: a simple operation for its relief. Br. J. Obstet. Gynecol.4, 511–512 (1964).
   Google Scholar
• Creatsas G, Deligeoroglou E. Expert opinion: vaginal aplasia: creation of a neovagina following the Creatsas vaginoplasty. Eur. J. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol.131, 248–252 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muir TW, Walters MD. Surgical management of vaginal vault prolapse in a women with a neovagina and pelvic kidneys. Obstet. Gynecol.104(5 Pt 2), 1199–1201 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Calcagno M, Pastore M, Bellati P et al. Early prolapse of a neovagina created with self-dilatation and treated with sacrospinous ligament suspension in a patient with MRKH syndrome: a case report. Fertil. Steril.93(1), 267.e1–4 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer J, Fabricani C, Carr BR. Vaginal vault prolapse after nonsurgical and surgical treatments of a MAAdullerian agenesis. Obstet. Gynecol.99(5 Pt 2), 947–949 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yokomizo R, Murakami T, Naitou H, Yamada A. Treatment for prolapse of the sigmoid neovagina I MRKH syndrome. Obstet. Gynecol.100(5 Pt 2), 1085–1087 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar