15
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review

Developments in diagnostic tools for corneal ectasia

&
Pages 475-481 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ, Frenschock O, Georgiadis A. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg. Med.10, 463–468 (1990).
  • Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.14, 46–52 (1988).
  • Randleman JB, Russell B, Ward MA, Thompson KP, Stulting RD. Risk factors and prognosis for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology110, 267–275 (2003).
  • Giledi O, Daya SM. Unexpected flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.29, 1825–1826 (2003).
  • Binder PS, Lindstrom RL, Stulting RD et al. Keratoconus and corneal ectasia after LASIK. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.31, 2035–2038 (2005).
  • Guirao A. Theoretical elastic response of the cornea to refractive surgery: risk factors for keratectasia. J. Refract. Surg.21, 176–185 (2005).
  • Amoils SP, Deist MB, Gous P et al. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis for less than -4.0 to -7.0 diopters of myopia. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.26, 967–977 (2000).
  • Lifshitz T, Levy J, Klemperer I, Levinger S. Late bilateral keratectasia after LASIK in a low myopic patient. J. Refract. Surg.21, 494–496 (2005).
  • Hyojin K, Choi J-S, Joo C-K. Corneal ectasia after PRK; clinicopathologic case report. Cornea25, 845–848 (2006).
  • Seiler T, Quurke AW. Iatrogenic keratectasia after LASIK in a case of forme fruste keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.24, 1007–1009 (1998).
  • McLeod SD, Kisla TA, Caro NC, McMahon TT. Iatrogenic keratoconus: corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia. Arch. Ophthalmol.118, 282–284 (2000).
  • Malecaze F, Coullet J, Calvas P, Fournié P, Arné J-L, Brodaty C. Corneal ectasia after photorefractive keratectomy for low myopia. Ophthalmology113, 742–746 (2006).
  • Krachmer JH, Feder RS, Belin MW. Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders. Surv. Ophthalmol.28, 293–322 (1984).
  • Amsler M. The ‘forme fruste’ of keratoconus. Wien. Klin. Wochenschr.8, 842–843 (1961).
  • Levy D, Hutchings H, Rouland JF et al. Videokeratographic anomalies in familial keratoconus. Ophthalmology111, 867–874 (2004).
  • Lafond G, Bazin R, Lajoie C. Bilateral severe keratoconus after laser in situ keratomileusis in a patient with forme fruste keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.27, 1115–1118 (2001).
  • Alpins N, Stamatelatos G. Customized photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy using combined topographic and refractive data for myopia and astigmatism in eyes with forme fruste and mild keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 591–602 (2007).
  • Rabinowitz YS, McDonnell PJ. Computer-assisted corneal topography in keratoconus. Refract. Corneal Surg.5, 400–408 (1989).
  • Smolek MK, Klyce SD. Current keratoconus detection methods compared with a neural network approach. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.38, 2290–2299 (1997).
  • Rabinowitz YS, Rasheed K. KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.25, 1327–1335 (1999).
  • Maeda N, Klyce SD, Smolek MK, Thompson HW. Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.35, 2749–2757 (1994).
  • Oshika T, Tanabe T, Tomidokoro A, Amano S. Progression of keratoconus assessed by Fourier analysis of videokeratography data. Ophthalmology109, 339–342 (2002).
  • Tanabe T, Tomidokoro A, Samejima T, Miyata K, Sato M, Kaji Y, Oshika T. Corneal regular and irregular astigmatism assessed by Fourier analysis of videokeratography data in normal and pathologic eyes. Ophthalmology111, 752–757 (2004).
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Stability of LASIK in topographically suspect keratoconus confirmed non-keratoconic by Artemis VHF digital ultrasound epithelial thickness mapping: 1-year follow-up. J. Refract. Surg.25, 569–577 (2009).
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Corneal epithelial thickness profile in the diagnosis of keratoconus. J. Refract. Surg.25, 604–610 (2009).
  • Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J. Refract. Surg.25, 444–450 (2009).
  • Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery. Ophthalmology115, 37–50 (2008).
  • Klein SR, Epstein RJ, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Corneal ectasia following laser in-situ keratomileusis in patients without apparent pre-operative risk factors. Cornea25, 388–403 (2006).
  • Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ. Cornea (2nd Edition). Mosby, MO, USA (2005).
  • Varssano D, Kaiserman I, Hazarbassanov R. Topographic patterns in refractive surgery candidates. Cornea23, 602–607 (2004).
  • Ambrósio R Jr, Klyce SD, Wilson SE. Corneal topographic and pachymetric screening of keratorefractive patients. J. Refract. Surg.19, 24–29 (2003).
  • Rabinowitz YS. Videokeratographic indices to aid in screening for keratoconus. J. Refract. Surg.11, 371–379 (1995).
  • Abad JC, Rubinfeld RS, Del Valle M, Belin MW, Kurstin JM. Vertical D: a novel topographic pattern in some keratoconus suspects. Ophthalmology114, 1020–1026 (2007).
  • Ambrósio R Jr, Alonso RS, Luz A, Coca Velarde LG. Corneal-thickness spatial profile and corneal-volume distribution: tomographic indices to detect keratoconus. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 1851–1859 (2006).
  • Quisling S, Sjoberg S, Zimmerman B, Goins K, Sutphin J. Comparison of Pentacam and Orbscan IIz on posterior curvature topography measurements in keratoconus eyes. Ophthalmology113, 1629–1632 (2006).
  • Rao SN, Raviv T, Majmudar PA, Epstein RJ. Role of Orbscan II in screening keratoconus suspects before refractive corneal surgery. Ophthalmology109, 1642–1646 (2002).
  • Tabbara KF, Kotb AA. Risk factors for corneal ectasia after LASIK. Ophthalmology113, 1618–1622 (2006).
  • Fontes BM, Ambrósio R, Jardim D, Velarde GC, Nosé W. Corneal biomechanical metrics and anterior segment parameters in mild keratoconus. Ophthalmology117(4), 673–679 (2010).
  • Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers. Ophthalmology117(4), 730–737 (2010).
  • Kohlhaas M, Spoerl E, Schilde T, Unger G, Wittig C, Pillunat LE. Biomechanical evidence of the distribution of cross-links in corneas treated with riboflavin and ultraviolet A light. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.32, 279–283 (2006).
  • Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Analysis of quantitative cohesive tensile strength in normal human corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J. Refract. Surg.24, S85–S89 (2008).
  • Chang DH, Stulting RD. Change in intraocular pressure measurements after LASIK the effect of the refractive correction and the lamellar flap. Ophthalmology112, 1009–1016 (2005).
  • Seiler T, Koufala K, Richter G. Iatrogenic keratectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis. J. Refract. Surg.14, 312–317 (1998).
  • Haque S, Simpson T, Jones L. Corneal and epithelial thickness in keratoconus: a comparison of ultrasonic pachymetry, Orbscan II, and optical coherence tomography. J. Refract. Surg.22, 486–493 (2006).
  • Ucakhan OO, Kanpolat A, Ylmaz N, Ozkan M. In vivo confocal microscopy findings in keratoconus. Eye Contact Lens32, 183–191 (2006).
  • Caster AI, Friess DW, Potvin RJ. Absence of keratectasia after LASIK in eyes with preoperative central corneal thickness of 450 to 500 microns. J. Refract. Surg.23, 782–788 (2007).
  • Kymionis GD, Bouzoukis D, Diakonis V et al. Long-term results of thin corneas after refractive laser surgery. Am. J. Ophthalmol.144, 181–185 (2007).
  • Binder PS. Analysis of ectasia after laser in situ keratomileusis: risk factors. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.33, 1530–1538 (2007).
  • Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Silverman RH, Coleman J. Epithelial thickness in the normal cornea: three-dimensional display with artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J. Refract. Surg.24, 571–581 (2008).
  • Nilforoushan M, Speaker M, Marmor M et al. Comparative evaluation of refractive surgery candidates with Placido topography, Orbscan II, Pentacam, and wavefront analysis. J. Cataract Refract. Surg.34, 623–631 (2008).
  • Bahar I, Levinger S, Kremer I. Wavefront-supported photorefractive keratectomy with the Bausch & Lomb Zyoptix in patients with myopic astigmatism and suspected keratoconus. J. Refract. Surg.22, 533–538 (2006).
  • Alió JL, Shabayek MH. Corneal higher order aberrations: a method to grade keratoconus. J. Refract. Surg.22, 539–545 (2006).
  • Kanellopoulos AJ, Binder PS. Collagen cross-linking (CCL) with sequential topography-guided PRK; a temporizing alternative for keratoconus to penetrating keratoplasty. Cornea26, 891–895 (2007).
  • Wollensak G, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Riboflavin/ultraviolet-A-induced collagen crosslinking for the treatment of keratoconus. Am. J. Ophthalmol.135, 620–627 (2003).
  • Wollensak G, Wilsch M, Spoerl E, Seiler T. Collagen fiber diameter in the rabbit cornea after collagen crosslinking by riboflavin/UVA. Cornea23, 503–507 (2004).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.