23
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Key Paper Evaluation

Control of intraocular pressure fluctuation: are combination drugs more effective?

, &
Pages 151-154 | Published online: 09 Jan 2014

References

  • Collaborative Normal-Tension Glaucoma Study Group. Comparison of glaucomatous progression between untreated patients with normal-tension glaucoma and patients with therapeutically reduced intraocular pressures. Am. J. Ophthalmol.126, 487–497 (1998).
  • The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS) 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. The AGIS Investigators. Am. J. Ophthalmol.130, 429–440 (2000).
  • Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Hussein M. Reduction of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression, results from the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Arch. Ophthalmol.120, 1268–1279 (2002).
  • Kass MA, Heuer DK, Higginbotham EJ et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study, a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol.120, 701–713 (2002).
  • Lichter PR, Musch DC, Gillespie BW et al. Interim clinical outcomes in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study comparing initial treatment randomized to medications or surgery. Ophthalmology108, 1943–1953 (2001).
  • Nouri-Mahdavi K, Hoffman D, Coleman AL et al. Predictive factors for glaucomatous visual field progression in the Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study. Ophthalmology111, 1627–1635 (2004).
  • Bengtsson B, Leske MC, Hyman L, Heijl A. Fluctuation of intraocular pressure and glaucoma progression in the early manifest glaucoma trial. Ophthalmology114, 205–209 (2007).
  • Caprioli J. Intraocular pressure fluctuation, an independent risk factor for glaucoma? Arch. Ophthalmol.125, 1124–1125 (2007).
  • Hong S, Seong GJ, Hong YJ. Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and progressive visual field deterioration in patients with glaucoma and low intraocular pressures after a triple procedure. Arch. Ophthalmol.125, 1010–1013 (2007).
  • Nakagami T, Yamazaki Y, Hayamizu F. Prognostic factors for progression of visual field damage in patients with normal-tension glaucoma. Jpn J. Ophthalmol.50, 38–43 (2006).
  • Sherwood MB, Craven ER, Chou C et al. Twice-daily 0.2% brimonidine-0.5% timolol fixed-combination therapy vs monotherapy with timolol or brimonidine in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension, a 12-month randomized trial. Arch. Ophthalmol.124, 1230–1238 (2006).
  • Spaeth GL, Bernstein P, Caprioli J, Schiffman RM. Control of intraocular pressure and fluctuation with fixed-combination brimonidine–timolol versus brimonidine or timolol monotherapy. Am. J. Ophthalmol.151(1), 93–99.e4 (2011).
  • Sommer A, Tielsch JM, Katz J et al. Relationship between intraocular pressure and primary open angle glaucoma among white and black Americans. The Baltimore Eye Survey. Arch. Ophthalmol.109, 1090–1095 (1991).
  • Boyle JE, Ghosh K, Gieser DK, Adamsons IA. A randomized trial comparing the dorzolamide–timolol combination given twice daily to monotherapy with timolol and dorzolamide. Dorzolamide–Timolol Study Group. Ophthalmology105, 1945–1951 (1998).
  • Bell NP, Ramos JL, Feldman RM. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of fixed combination therapy with dorzolamide hydrochloride 2% and timolol maleate 0.5% in glaucoma and ocular hypertension. Clin. Ophthalmol.4, 1331–1346 (2010).
  • Hong S, Kim CY, Seong GJ. Long-term intraocular pressure fluctuation and visual field progression in glaucoma patients with low intraocular pressure after post-trabeculectomy phacoemulsification. J. Ocul. Pharmacol. Ther.23, 571–576 (2007).
  • Day DG, Schacknow PN, Wand M et al. Timolol 0.5%/dorzolamide 2% fixed combination vs timolol maleate 0.5% and unoprostone 0.15% given twice daily to patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Am. J. Ophthalmol.135, 138–143 (2003).
  • Katz LJ. Brimonidine tartrate 0.2% twice daily vs timolol 0.5% twice daily, 1-year results in glaucoma patients. Brimonidine Study Group. Am. J. Ophthalmol.127, 20–26 (1999).
  • Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Day D, Sharpe ED. Efficacy and safety of timolol maleate/latanoprost fixed combination versus timolol maleate and brimonidine given twice daily. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand.81, 242–246 (2003).
  • Stewart WC, Stewart JA, Day DG, Sharpe ED, Jenkins JN. Efficacy and safety of the latanoprost/timolol maleate fixed combination vs concomitant brimonidine and latanoprost therapy. Eye (Lond.)18, 990–995 (2004).
  • Konstas AG, Stewart WC, Topouzis F, Tersis I, Holmes KT, Stangos NT. Brimonidine 0.2% given two or three times daily versus timolol maleate 0.5% in primary open-angle glaucoma. Am. J. Ophthalmol.131, 729–733 (2001).
  • Liu JH, Medeiros FA, Slight JR, Weinreb RN. Comparing diurnal and nocturnal effects of brinzolamide and timolol on intraocular pressure in patients receiving latanoprost monotherapy. Ophthalmology116, 449–454 (2009).
  • Liu JH, Medeiros FA, Slight JR, Weinreb RN. Diurnal and nocturnal effects of brimonidine monotherapy on intraocular pressure. Ophthalmology117, 2075–2079 (2010).
  • Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN. Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.44, 1586–1590 (2003).
  • Mosaed S, Liu JH, Weinreb RN. Correlation between office and peak nocturnal intraocular pressures in healthy subjects and glaucoma patients. Am. J. Ophthalmol.139(2), 320–324 (2005).
  • Stewart WC, Konstas AG, Nelson LA, Kruft B. Meta-analysis of 24-hour intraocular pressure studies evaluating the efficacy of glaucoma medicines. Ophthalmology115(7), 1117–1122.e1 (2005).
  • Wax MB, Camras CB, Fiscella RG, Girkin C, Singh K, Weinreb RN. Emerging perspectives in glaucoma, optimizing 24-hour control of intraocular pressure. Am. J. Ophthalmol.133, S1–S10 (2002).
  • Barkana Y, Anis S, Liebmann J, Tello C, Ritch R. Clinical utility of intraocular pressure monitoring outside of normal office hours in patients with glaucoma. Arch. Ophthalmol.124, 793–797 (2006).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.