Retinal detachment surgery: the dilemma between personal experience and clinical trials

References

• Ramulu PY, Do DV, Corcoran KJ, Corcoran SL, Robin AL. Use of retinal procedures in medicare beneficiaries from 1997 to 2007. Arch. Ophthalmol. 128(10), 1335–1340 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho JD, Liou SW, Tsai CY, Tsai RJ, Lin HC. Trends and outcomes of treatment for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a 9 year nationwide population-based study. Eye (Lond.) 23(3), 669–675 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melis M, Karl RC, Wong SL, Brennan MF, Matthews JB, Roggin KK. Evidence-based surgical practice in academic medical centers: consistently anecdotal? J. Gastrointest. Surg. 14(5), 904–909 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton GF, Grizzard WS. Pneumatic retinopexy. A two-step outpatient operation without conjunctival incision. Ophthalmology 93(5), 626–641 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornambe PE. Pneumatic retinopexy: the evolution of case selection and surgical technique. A twelve-year study of 302 eyes. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 95, 551–578 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hwang JF, Chen SN, Lin CJ. Treatment of inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment by pneumatic retinopexy technique. Retina 31(2), 257–261 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellakwa AF. Long term results of pneumatic retinopexy. Clin. Ophthalmol. 6, 55–59 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davis MJ, Mudvari SS, Shott S, Rezaei KA. Clinical characteristics affecting the outcome of pneumatic retinopexy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 129(2), 163–166 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chan CK, Lin SG, Nuthi AS, Salib DM. Pneumatic retinopexy for the repair of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986–2007). Surv. Ophthalmol. 53(5), 443–478 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holz ER, Mieler WF. View 3: the case for pneumatic retinopexy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 87(6), 787–789 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornambe PE, Brinton DA, Flood TP et al. The complication of pneumatic retinopexy. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 88, 191–210 (1990).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Custodis E. Treatment of retinal detachment by circumscribed diathermal coagulation and by scleral depression in the area of tear caused by imbedding of a plastic implant. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. Augenarztl. Fortbild. 129(4), 476–495 (1956).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schepens CL, Okamura ID, Brockhurst RJ. The scleral buckling procedures. I. Surgical techniques and management. AMA. Arch. Ophthalmol. 58(6), 797–811 (1957).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoff HA, Baras I, Mclean J. Modifications to the custodis procedure for retinal detachment. Arch. Ophthalmol. 73, 160–163 (1965).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wykoff CC, Smiddy WE, Mathen T, Schwartz SG, Flynn HW Jr, Shi W. Fovea-sparing retinal detachments: time to surgery and visual outcomes. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 150(2), 205.e2–210.e2 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen U, Amler S, Osada N, Gerding H. Outcome of surgery after macula-off retinal detachment – results from MUSTARD, one of the largest databases on buckling surgery in Europe results from a large German case series. Acta Ophthalmol. 90(5), 481–486 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haritoglou C, Brandlhuber U, Kampik A, Priglinger SG. Anatomic success of scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment – a retrospective study of 524 cases. Ophthalmologica 224(5), 312–318 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Afrashi F, Akkin C, Egrilmez S, Erakgun T, Mentes J. Anatomic outcome of scleral buckling surgery in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int. Ophthalmol. 26(3), 77–81 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwartz SG, Kuhl DP, McPherson AR, Holz ER, Mieler WF. Twenty-year follow-up for scleral buckling. Arch. Ophthalmol. 120(3), 325–329 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• La Heij EC, Derhaag PF, Hendrikse F. Results of scleral buckling operations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Doc. Ophthalmol. 100(1), 17–25 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wirostko WJ, Covert DJ, Han DP et al. Microbiological spectrum of organisms isolated from explanted scleral buckles. Ophthalmic. Surg. Lasers. Imaging. 40(2), 201–202 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Okamoto F, Yamane N, Okamoto C, Hiraoka T, Oshika T. Changes in higher-order aberrations after scleral buckling surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 115(7), 1216–1221 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okada Y, Nakamura S, Kubo E, Oishi N, Takahashi Y, Akagi Y. Analysis of changes in corneal shape and refraction following scleral buckling surgery. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 44(2), 132–138 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekhuis H, Talsma M, Vreugdenhil W, Eggink F, Peperkamp E, Van Meurs J. Changes in refraction after retinal detachment surgery corrected by extended wear contact lenses for early visual rehabilitation. Retina 13(2), 120–124 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemen UM. Changes of refraction following operations with episcleral plugs and encircling procedures in cases of retinal detachment. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 174(1), 109–112 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzano D, Calabrese A, Fiormonte F. Extrusion and infection incidence in scleral buckling surgery with the use of silicone sponge: to soak or not to soak? An 11-year retrospective analysis. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 17(3), 399–403 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deokule S, Reginald A, Callear A. Scleral explant removal: the last decade. Eye (Lond.) 17(6), 697–700 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen QD, Lashkari K, Hirose T, Pruett RC, McMeel JW, Schepens CL. Erosion and intrusion of silicone rubber scleral buckle. Presentation and management. Retina 21(3), 214–220 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maillette de Buy Wenniger-Prick L, van Mourik-Noordenbos A. Diplopia after retinal detachment surgery. Doc. Ophthalmol. 70(2–3), 237–242 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright LA, Cleary M, Barrie T, Hammer HM. Motility and binocularity outcomes in vitrectomy versus scleral buckling in retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 237(12), 1028–1032 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Bopp S. Retinal folds following retinal detachment surgery. Ophthalmologica 226(Suppl. 1), 18–26 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R, Buettner H, Norton EW, Parel JM. Vitrectomy: a pars plana approach. Trans. Am. Acad. Ophthalmol. Otolaryngol. 75(4), 813–820 (1971).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benson WE, Machemer R. Severe perforating injuries treated with pars plana vitrectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 81(6), 728–732 (1976).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machemer R, Allen AW. Retinal tears 180 degrees and greater. Management with vitrectomy and intravitreal gas. Arch. Ophthalmol. 94(8), 1340–1346 (1976).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gonvers M. Temporary silicone oil tamponade in the management of retinal detachment with proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 100(2), 239–245 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang S, Ozmert E, Zimmerman NJ. Intraoperative perfluorocarbon liquids in the management of proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 106(6), 668–674 (1988).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Bornfeld N, Friedrichs W et al. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 234(9), 561–568 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakin KN, Lavin MJ, Leaver PK. Primary vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 231(6), 344–346 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gartry DS, Chignell AH, Franks WA, Wong D. Pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment uncomplicated by advanced proliferative vitreoretinopathy. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 77(4), 199–203 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dugas B, Lafontaine PO, Guillaubey A et al. The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 247(3), 319–324 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devenyi RG, de Carvalho Nakamura H. Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as a primary procedure for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmic Surg. Lasers 30(8), 615–618 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almony A, Holekamp NM, Bai F, Shui YB, Beebe D. Small-gauge vitrectomy does not protect against nuclear sclerotic cataract. Retina 32(3), 499–505 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petermeier K, Szurman P, Bartz-Schmidt UK, Gekeler F. Pathophysiology of cataract formation after vitrectomy. Klin. Monbl. Augenheilkd. 227(3), 175–180 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roider J, Hoerauf H, Hager A, Herboth T, Laqua H. Conventional ablation surgery or primary vitrectomy in complicated retinal holes. Ophthalmologe 98(9), 887–891 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Tien V, Pierre-Kahn V, Azan F, Renard G, Chauvaud D. Displacement of retained subfoveal perfluorocarbon liquid after vitreoretinal surgery. Arch. Ophthalmol. 126(1), 98–101 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Han DP, Lewis H, Lambrou FH Jr, Mieler WF, Hartz A. Mechanisms of intraocular pressure elevation after pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 96(9), 1357–1362 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahman R, Rosen PH. Pupillary capture after combined management of cataract and vitreoretinal pathology. J. Cataract Refract. Surg. 28(9), 1607–1612 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinori M, Moisseiev E, Shoshany N et al. Comparison of pars plana vitrectomy with and without scleral buckle for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 152(2), 291.e2–297.e2 (2011).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta S, Blinder KJ, Shah GK, Grand MG. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can. J. Ophthalmol. 46(3), 237–241 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weichel ED, Martidis A, Fineman MS et al. Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy-scleral buckle for primary repair of pseudophakic retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 113(11), 2033–2040 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham L, Connor M, Aylward GW. Vitrectomy and gas for inferior break retinal detachments: are the results comparable to vitrectomy, gas, and scleral buckle? Br. J. Ophthalmol. 88(11), 1376–1379 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirn MJ. Comparison of 25, 23 and 20-gauge vitrectomy. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 20(3), 195–199 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabian ID, Moisseiev J. Sutureless vitrectomy: evolution and current practices. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 95(3), 318–324 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunimoto DY, Kaiser RS; Wills Eye Retina Service. Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20- and 25-gauge vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 114(12), 2133–2137 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Dev S et al. Endophthalmitis after 25-gauge and 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: incidence and outcomes. Retina 28(1), 138–142 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang A, Kaiser RS, Avery RL et al. Endophthalmitis in microincision vitrectomy: outcomes of gas-filled eyes. Retina 31(8), 1513–1517 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu L, Berrocal MH, Arévalo JF et al. Endophthalmitis after pars plana vitrectomy: results of the Pan American Collaborative Retina Study Group. Retina 31(4), 673–678 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott IU, Flynn HW Jr, Acar N et al. Incidence of endophthalmitis after 20-gauge vs 23-gauge vs 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 249(3), 377–380 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mura M, Tan SH, De Smet MD. Use of 25-gauge vitrectomy in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 29(9), 1299–1304 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourla DH, Bor E, Axer-Siegel R, Mimouni K, Weinberger D. Outcomes and complications of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair with selective sutureless 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 149(4), 630.e1–634.e1 (2010).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller DM, Riemann CD, Foster RE, Petersen MR. Primary repair of retinal detachment with 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy. Retina 28(7), 931–936 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendrinos E, Dang-Burgener NP, Stangos AN, Sommerhalder J, Pournaras CJ. Primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 145(6), 1063–1070 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lai MM, Ruby AJ, Sarrafizadeh R et al. Repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina 28(5), 729–734 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsang CW, Cheung BT, Lam RF et al. Primary 23-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 28(8), 1075–1081 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Fricken MA, Kunjukunju N, Weber C, Ko G. 25-Gauge sutureless vitrectomy versus 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 29(4), 444–450 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colyer MH, Barazi MK, von Fricken MA. Retrospective comparison of 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy to 20-gauge vitrectomy for the repair of pseudophakic primary inferior rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina (PA, USA) 30(10), 1678–1684 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaal S, Sherman MP, Barr CC, Kaplan HJ. Primary retinal detachment repair: comparison of 1-year outcomes of four surgical techniques. Retina 31(8), 1500–1504 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Rouic JF, Behar-Cohen F, Azan F et al. Vitrectomy without scleral buckle versus ab-externo approach for pseudophakic retinal detachment: comparative retrospective study. J. Fr. Ophtalmol. 25(3), 240–245 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment resulting from flap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn. J. Ophthalmol. 45(2), 187–191 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH; Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group. Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 114(12), 2142–2154 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azad RV, Chanana B, Sharma YR, Vohra R. Primary vitrectomy versus conventional retinal detachment surgery in phakic rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 85(5), 540–545 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tornambe PE, Hilton GF. Pneumatic retinopexy. A multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. The Retinal Detachment Study Group. Ophthalmology 96(6), 772–783; discussion 784 (1989).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tornambe PE, Hilton GF, Brinton DA et al. Pneumatic retinopexy. A two-year follow-up study of the multicenter clinical trial comparing pneumatic retinopexy with scleral buckling. Ophthalmology 98(7), 1115–1123 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulvihill A, Fulcher T, Datta V, Acheson R. Pneumatic retinopexy versus scleral buckling: a randomised controlled trial. Ir. J. Med. Sci. 165(4), 274–277 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han DP, Mohsin NC, Guse CE, Hartz A, Tarkanian CN. Comparison of pneumatic retinopexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Southern Wisconsin Pneumatic Retinopexy Study Group. Am. J. Ophthalmol. 126(5), 658–668 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saw SM, Gazzard G, Wagle AM, Lim J, Au Eong KG. An evidence-based analysis of surgical interventions for uncomplicated rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 84(5), 606–612 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schröder S, Muether PS, Caramoy A et al. Anterior chamber aqueous flare is a strong predictor for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in patients with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Retina 32(1), 38–42 (2012).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar