Role of proteomics in nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics

References

• Kussmann M, Daniel H. Editorial overview. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19(2), 63–65 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kussmann M, Raymond F, Affolter M. OMICS-driven biomarker discovery in nutrition and health. J. Biotechnol.124(4), 758–787 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussmann M, Fay LB. Nutrigenomics and personalized nutrition, science and concept. Per. Med.5(5), 447–455 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussmann M, Affolter M, Nagy K et al. Mass spectrometry in nutrition, understanding dietary health effects at the molecular level. Mass. Spectrom. Rev.26(6), 727–750 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ordovas JM, Corella D. Nutritional genomics. Annu. Rev. Genomics Hum. Genet.5, 71–118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaput J. Nutrigenomics research for personalized nutrition and medicine. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19(2), 110–120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay LB, German JB. Personalizing foods, is genotype necessary? Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19(2), 121–128 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallou-Kabani C, Vige A, Gross MS et al. Nutri-epigenomics, lifelong remodelling of our epigenomes by nutritional and metabolic factors and beyond. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med.45(3), 321–327 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Junien C, Gallou-Kabani C, Vige A et al. [Nutritional epigenomics, consequences of unbalanced diets on epigenetics processes of programming during lifespan and between generations]. Ann. Endocrinol. (Paris)66(2 Pt 3), 2S19–2S28 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beck HC, Nielsen EC, Matthiesen R et al. Quantitative proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications of human histones. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(7), 1314–1325 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonenfant D, Coulot M, Towbin H et al. Characterization of histone H2A and H2B variants and their post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(3), 541–552 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kussmann M, Affolter M. Proteomic methods in nutrition. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care9(5), 575–583 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kussmann M, Affolter M, Fay LB. Proteomics in nutrition and health. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen.8(8), 679–696 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs JM, Adkins JN, Qian WJ et al. Utilizing human blood plasma for proteomic biomarker discovery. J. Proteome Res.4(4), 1073–1085 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aebersold R. A stress test for mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Bell AW, Deutsch EW, Au CE et al. A HUPO test sample study reveals common problems in mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Methods (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Gong Y, Li X, Yang B et al. Different immunoaffinity fractionation strategies to characterize the human plasma proteome. J. Proteome Res.5(6), 1379–1387 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics9(6), 1451–1468 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mechref Y, Madera M, Novotny MV. Glycoprotein enrichment through lectin affinity techniques. Methods Mol. Biol.424, 373–396 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wollscheid B, Bausch-Fluck D, Henderson C et al. Mass-spectrometric identification and relative quantification of N-linked cell surface glycoproteins. Nat. Biotechnol.27(4), 378–386 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moresco JJ, Dong MQ, Yates JR III. Quantitative mass spectrometry as a tool for nutritional proteomics. Am. J. Clin. Nutr.88(3), 597–604 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Panchaud A, Hansson J, Affolter M et al. ANIBAL, stable isotope-based quantitative proteomics by aniline and benzoic acid labeling of amino and carboxylic groups. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(4), 800–812 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA et al. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Schafer J, Kuhn K et al. Tandem mass tags, a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem.75(8), 1895–1904 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Godoy LM, Olsen JV, de Souza GA et al. Status of complete proteome analysis by mass spectrometry, SILAC labeled yeast as a model system. Genome Biol.7(6), R50 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR et al. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong JW, Sullivan MJ, Cagney G. Computational methods for the comparative quantification of proteins in label-free LCn-MS experiments. Brief Bioinform.9(2), 156–165 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gerber SA, Rush J, Stemman O et al. Absolute quantification of proteins and phosphoproteins from cell lysates by tandem MS. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA100(12), 6940–6945 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratt JM, Simpson DM, Doherty MK et al. Multiplexed absolute quantification for proteomics using concatenated signature peptides encoded by QconCAT genes. Nat. Protoc.1(2), 1029–1043 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis A, Hennekinne JA, Garin J et al. Protein Standard Absolute Quantification (PSAQ) for improved investigation of staphylococcal food poisoning outbreaks. Proteomics8(22), 4633–4636 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallick P, Schirle M, Chen SS et al. Computational prediction of proteotypic peptides for quantitative proteomics. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 125–131 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange V, Picotti P, Domon B et al. Selected reaction monitoring for quantitative proteomics, a tutorial. Mol. Syst. Biol.4, 222 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yocum AK, Chinnaiyan AM. Current affairs in quantitative targeted proteomics, multiple reaction monitoring-mass spectrometr. Brief Funct. Genomic Proteomic8(2), 145–157 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fuchs D, Winkelmann I, Johnson IT et al. Proteomics in nutrition research, principles, technologies and applications. Br. J. Nutr.94(3), 302–314 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kussmann M, Blum-Sperisen S. OMICS-derived targets for inflammatory gut disorders, opportunities for the development of nutrition related biomarkers. Endocr. Metab. Immune Disord. Drug Targets7(4), 271–287 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kussmann M, Affolter M. Proteomics and metabonomics routes towards obesity. In: Obesity – Genomics and Postgenomics. Sorensen T, Clément K (Eds). Informa Health Care Inc., NY, USA, 527–536 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs D, Piller R, Linseisen J et al. The human peripheral blood mononuclear cell proteome responds to a dietary flaxseed-intervention and proteins identified suggest a protective effect in atherosclerosis. Proteomics7(18), 3278–3288 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breikers G, van Breda SG, Bouwman FG et al. Potential protein markers for nutritional health effects on colorectal cancer in the mouse as revealed by proteomics analysis. Proteomics6(9), 2844–2852 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• tom-Dieck H, Doring F, Fuchs D et al. Transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies the pathways that increase hepatic lipid accumulation in zinc-deficient rats. J. Nutr.135(2), 199–205 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancone C, Amicone L, Fimia GM et al. Proteomic analysis of human very low-density lipoprotein by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and MALDI-TOF/TOF. Proteomics7(1), 143–154 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bantscheff M, Eberhard D, Abraham Y et al. Quantitative chemical proteomics reveals mechanisms of action of clinical ABL kinase inhibitors. Nat. Biotechnol.25(9), 1035–1044 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson L, Hunter CL. Quantitative mass spectrometric multiple reaction monitoring assays for major plasma proteins. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(4), 573–588 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panchaud A, Affolter M, Moreillon P et al. Experimental and computational approaches to quantitative proteomics, status quo and outlook. J. Proteomics71(1), 19–33 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staab CA, Ceder R, Jagerbrink T et al. Bioinformatics processing of protein and transcript profiles of normal and transformed cell lines indicates functional impairment of transcriptional regulators in buccal carcinoma. J. Proteome Res.6(9), 3705–3717 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholson JK, Connelly J, Lindon JC et al. Metabonomics, a platform for studying drug toxicity and gene function. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov.1(2), 153–161 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty MK, Beynon RJ. Protein turnover on the scale of the proteome. Expert Rev. Proteomics3(1), 97–110 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siffert W. G protein polymorphisms in hypertension, atherosclerosis, and diabetes. Ann. Rev. Med.56, 17–28 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen Y, Rollins J, Paigen B et al. Genetic and genomic insights into the molecular basis of atherosclerosis. Cell. Metab.6(3), 164–179 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holtmann G, Siffert W, Haag S et al. G-protein β3 subunit 825 CC genotype is associated with unexplained (functional) dyspepsia. Gastroenterology126(4), 971–979 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar