Quantitative phosphoproteomics strategies for understanding protein kinase-mediated signal transduction pathways

References

• Hunter T. Signaling – 2000 and beyond. Cell100(1), 113–127 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubersax JA, Ferrell JE. Mechanisms of specificity in protein phosphorylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.8(7), 530–541 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning G, Whyte DB, Martinez R, Hunter T, Sudarsanam S. The protein kinase complement of the human genome. Science298(5600), 1912–1934 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell100(1), 57–70 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gatzka M, Walsh CM. Apoptotic signal transduction and T cell tolerance. Autoimmunity40(6), 442–452 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taniguchi CM, Emanuelli B, Kahn CR. Critical nodes in signaling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.7(2), 85–96 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirard JC, Vignal C, Dessein R, Chamaillard M. Nod-like receptors: cytosolic watchdogs for immunity against pathogens. PLoS Pathog.3(12), e152 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morandell S, Stasyk T, Grosstessner-Hain K et al. Phosphoproteomics strategies for the functional analysis of signal transduction. Proteomics6(14), 4047–4056 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Fuente van Bentem S, Mentzen WI, de la Fuente A, Hirt H. Towards functional phosphoproteomics by mapping differential phosphorylation events in signaling networks. Proteomics8(21), 4453–4465 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White FM. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of signaling network dynamics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19(4), 404–409 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattori S, Iida N, Kosako H. Identification of protein kinase substrates by proteomic approaches. Exp. Rev. Proteomics5(3), 497–505 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Larsen MR. Analytical strategies for phosphoproteomics. Proteomics9(6), 1451–1468 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macek B, Mann M, Olsen JV. Global and site-specific quantitative phosphoproteomics: principles and applications. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol.49, 199–221 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen P, Knebel A. KESTREL: a powerful method for identifying the physiological substrates of protein kinases. Biochem. J.393(Pt 1), 1–6 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blethrow JD, Glavy JS, Morgan DO, Shokat KM. Covalent capture of kinase-specific phosphopeptides reveals Cdk1-cyclin B substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(5), 1442–1447 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukunaga R, Hunter T. Identification of MAPK substrates by expression screening with solid-phase phosphorylation. Methods Mol. Biol.250, 211–236 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mok J, Im H, Snyder M. Global identification of protein kinase substrates by protein microarray analysis. Nat. Protoc.4(12), 1820–1827 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Görg A, Weiss W, Dunn MJ. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics4(12), 3665–3685 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh P, Li Y, Yu J et al. Subtractive proteomic mapping of the endothelial surface in lung and solid tumours for tissue-specific therapy. Nature429(6992), 629–635 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasyk T, Dubrovska A, Lomnytska M et al. Phosphoproteome profiling of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β signaling: abrogation of TGFβ1-dependent phosphorylation of transcription factor-II-I (TFII-I) enhances cooperation of TFII-I and Smad3 in transcription. Mol. Biol. Cell16(10), 4765–4780 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Agrawal GK, Thelen JJ. Large scale identification and quantitative profiling of phosphoproteins expressed during seed filling in oilseed rape. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(11), 2044–2059 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uuml;nlü M, Morgan ME, Minden JS. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis18(11), 2071–2077 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Viswanathan S, Ünlü M, Minden JS. Two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Nat. Protoc.1(3), 1351–1358 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marouga R, David S, Hawkins E. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Anal. Bioanal. Chem.382(3), 669–678 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilley KS, Friedman DB. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics. Exp. Rev. Proteomics1(4), 401–409 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kondo T, Hirohashi S. Application of highly sensitive fluorescent dyes (CyDye DIGE Fluor saturation dyes) to laser microdissection and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) for cancer proteomics. Nat. Protoc.1(6), 2940–2956 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasyk T, Morandell S, Bakry R et al. Quantitative detection of phosphoproteins by combination of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis and phosphospecific fluorescent staining. Electrophoresis26(14), 2850–2854 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosako H, Yamaguchi N, Aranami C et al. Phosphoproteomics reveals new ERK MAP kinase targets and links ERK to nucleoporin-mediated nuclear transport. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.16(10), 1026–1035 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins MO, Yu L, Coba MP et al. Proteomic analysis of in vivo phosphorylated synaptic proteins. J. Biol. Chem.280(7), 5972–5982 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubrovska A, Souchelnytskyi S. Efficient enrichment of intact phosphorylated proteins by modified immobilized metal-affinity chromatography. Proteomics5(18), 4678–4683 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machida M, Kosako H, Shirakabe K et al. Purification of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal affinity chromatography and its application to phosphoproteome analysis. FEBS J.274(6), 1576–1587 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueda K, Kosako H, Fukui Y, Hattori S. Proteomic identification of Bcl2-associated athanogene 2 as a novel MAPK-activated protein kinase 2 substrate. J. Biol. Chem.279(40), 41815–41821 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong Z, Zhang QY, Liu J et al. Phosphoproteome study reveals Hsp27 as a novel signaling molecule involved in GDNF-induced neurite outgrowth. J. Proteome Res.8(6), 2768–2787 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Morales MA, Watanabe R, Dacher M et al. Phosphoproteome dynamics reveal heat-shock protein complexes specific to the Leishmania donovani infectious stage. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA107(18), 8381–8386 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasyk T, Schiefermeier N, Skvortsov S et al. Identification of endosomal epidermal growth factor receptor signaling targets by functional organelle proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(5), 908–922 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang W, Deng Z, Oses-Prieto JA et al. Proteomics studies of brassinosteroid signal transduction using prefractionation and two-dimensional DIGE. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(4), 728–738 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tang W, Kim TW, Oses-Prieto JA et al. BSKs mediate signal transduction from the receptor kinase BRI1 in Arabidopsis. Science321(5888), 557–560 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis TS, Shapiro PS, Ahn NG. Signal transduction through MAP kinase cascades. Adv. Cancer Res.74, 49–139 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson G, Robinson F, Beers Gibson T, et al. Mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase pathways: regulation and physiological functions. Endocr. Rev.22(2), 153–183 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon S, Seger R. The extracellular signal-regulated kinase: multiple substrates regulate diverse cellular functions. Growth Factors24(1), 21–44 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eblen ST, Kumar NV, Shah K et al. Identification of novel ERK2 substrates through use of an engineered kinase and ATP analogs. J. Biol. Chem.278(17), 14926–14935 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen JJ, Li M, Brinkworth CS et al. A semisynthetic epitope for kinase substrates. Nat. Methods4(6), 511–516 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popescu SC, Popescu GV, Bachan S et al. MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. Genes Dev.23(1), 80–92 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis TS, Hunt JB, Aveline LD et al. Identification of novel MAP kinase pathway signaling targets by functional proteomics and mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell6(6), 1343–1354 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts EC,Hammond K, Traish AM, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Identification of G2/M targets for the MAP kinase pathway by functional proteomics. Proteomics6(16), 4541–4553 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosako H, Imamoto N. Phosphorylation of nucleoporins: signal transduction-mediated regulation of their interaction with nuclear transport receptors. Nucleus1(4), 309–313 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witze ES, Old WM, Resing KA, Ahn NG. Mapping protein post-translational modifications with mass spectrometry. Nat. Methods4(10), 798–806 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson L, Porath J. Isolation of phosphoproteins by immobilized metal (Fe3+) affinity chromatography. Anal. Biochem.154(1), 250–254 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuwaysir LM, Stults JT. Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of phosphopeptides isolated by on-line immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.4(8), 662–667 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xhou W, Merrick BA, Khaledi MG, Tomer KB. Detection and sequencing of phosphopeptides affinity bound to immobilized metal ion beads by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom.11(4), 273–282 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muszynska G, Dobrowolska G, Medin A, Ekman P, Porath JO. Model studies on iron(III) ion affinity chromatography. II. Interaction of immobilized iron(III) ions with phosphorylated amino acids, peptides and proteins. J. Chromatogr.604(1), 19–28 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posewitz MC, Tempst P. Immobilized gallium(III) affinity chromatography of phosphopeptides. Anal. Chem.71(14), 2883–2892 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol.20(3), 301–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi YH, Haller K, Ward MD, Semmes OJ, Li Y, Jeang KT. Requirements for protein phosphorylation and the kinase activity of polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1) for the kinetochore function of mitotic arrest deficiency protein 1 (Mad1). J. Biol. Chem.283(51), 35834–35844 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lyons TR, Thorburn J, Ryan PW, Thorburn A, Anderson SM, Kassenbrock CK. Regulation of the pro-apoptotic scaffolding protein POSH by Akt. J. Biol. Chem.282(30), 21987–21997 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kirkland PA, Gil MA, Karadzic IM, Maupin-Furlow JA. Genetic and proteomic analyses of a proteasome-activating nucleotidase A mutant of the haloarchaeon Haloferax volcanii. J. Bacteriol.190(1), 193–205 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nagano K, Shinkawa T, Mutoh H et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of distinct tumor cell lines in response to nocodazole treatment. Proteomics9(10), 2861–2874 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkse MW, Uitto PM, Hilhorst MJ, Ooms B, Heck AJ. Selective isolation at the femtomole level of phosphopeptides from proteolytic digests using 2D-NanoLC-ESI-MS/MS and titanium oxide precolumns. Anal. Chem.76(14), 3935–3943 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Larsen MR, Thingholm TE, Jensen ON, Roepstorff P, Jorgensen TJ. Highly selective enrichment of phosphorylated peptides from peptide mixtures using titanium dioxide microcolumns. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(7), 873–886 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kweon HK, Håkansson K. Selective zirconium dioxide-based enrichment of phosphorylated peptides for mass spectrometric analysis. Anal. Chem.78(6), 1743–1749 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sugiyama N, Masuda T, Shinoda K, Nakamura A, Tomita M, Ishihama Y. Phosphopeptide enrichment by aliphatic hydroxy acid-modified metal oxide chromatography for nano-LC-MS/MS in proteomics applications. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(6), 1103–1109 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Jedrychowski M, Schwartz D et al. Large-scale characterization of HeLa cell nuclear phosphoproteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(33), 12130–12135 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(3), 310–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Blagoev B, Gnad F et al. Global, in vivo, and site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in signaling networks. Cell127(3), 635–648 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villén J, Beausoleil SA, Gerber SA, Gygi SP. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of mouse liver. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(50), 1488–1493 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dephoure N, Zhou C, Villén J et al. A quantitative atlas of mitotic phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(31), 10762–10767 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal.3(104), ra3 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNulty DE, Annan RS. Hydrophilic interaction chromatography reduces the complexity of the phosphoproteome and improves global phosphopeptide isolation and detection. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(5), 971–980 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey A, Podtelejnikov AV, Blagoev B, Bustelo XR, Mann M, Lodish HF. Analysis of receptor signaling pathways by mass spectrometry: identification of vav-2 as a substrate of the epidermal and platelet-derived growth factor receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA97(1), 179–184 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagano K, Itagaki C, Izumi T et al. Rb plays a role in survival of Abl-dependent human tumor cells as a downstream effector of Abl tyrosine kinase. Oncogene25(4), 493–502 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Matsumoto M, Oyamada K, Takahashi H, Sato T, Hatakeyama S, Nakayama KI. Large-scale proteomic analysis of tyrosine-phosphorylation induced by T-cell receptor or B-cell receptor activation reveals new signaling pathways. Proteomics9(13), 3549–3563 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rush J, Moritz A, Lee KA et al. Immunoaffinity profiling of tyrosine phosphorylation in cancer cells. Nat. Biotechnol.23(1), 94–101 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rikova K, Guo A, Zeng Q et al. Global survey of phosphotyrosine signaling identifies oncogenic kinases in lung cancer. Cell131(6), 1190–1203 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka S, Ballif BA, Smogorzewska A et al. ATM and ATR substrate analysis reveals extensive protein networks responsive to DNA damage. Science316(5828), 1160–1166 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen JV, Mann M. Improved peptide identification in proteomics by two consecutive stages of mass spectrometric fragmentation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(37), 13417–13422 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Schwartz JC, Hunt DF, Coon JJ. A neutral loss activation method for improved phosphopeptide sequence analysis by quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.76(13), 3590–3598 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palumbo AM, Reid GE. Evaluation of gas-phase rearrangement and competing fragmentation reactions on protein phosphorylation site assignment using collision induced dissociation-MS/MS and MS3. Anal. Chem.80(24), 9735–9747 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Syka JE, Coon JJ, Schroeder MJ, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF. Peptide and protein sequence analysis by electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(26), 9528–9533 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguiar M, Haas W, Beausoleil SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. Gas-phase rearrangements do not affect site localization reliability in phosphoproteomics data sets. J. Proteome Res.9(6), 3103–3107 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mischerikow N, Altelaar AF, Navarro JD, Mohammed S, Heck A. Comparative assessment of site assignments in CID and ETD spectra of phosphopeptides discloses limited relocation of phosphate groups. Mol. Cell. Proteomics9(10), 2140–2148 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zubarev RA, Horn DM, Fridriksson EK et al. Electron capture dissociation for structural characterization of multiply charged protein cations. Anal. Chem.72(3), 563–573 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stensballe A, Jensen ON, Olsen JV, Haselmann KF, Zubarev RA. Electron capture dissociation of singly and multiply phosphorylated peptides. Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom.14(19), 1793–1800 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(7), 2193–2198 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson K, Cooper HJ, Emmett MR, Costello CE, Marshall AG, Nilsson CL. Electron capture dissociation and infrared multiphoton dissociation MS/MS of an N-glycosylated tryptic peptic to yield complementary sequence information. Anal. Chem.73(18), 4530–4536 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirgorodskaya E, Roepstorff P, Zubarev RA. Localization of O-glycosylation sites in peptides by electron capture dissociation in a Fourier transform mass spectrometer. Anal. Chem.71(20), 4431–4436 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Udeshi ND, Shabanowitz J, Hunt DF, Rose KL. Analysis of proteins and peptides on a chromatographic timescale by electron-transfer dissociation MS. FEBS J.274(24), 6269–6276 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet SM, Bailey CM, Cunningham DL, Heath JK, Cooper HJ. Large scale localization of protein phosphorylation by use of electron capture dissociation mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(5), 904–912 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Good DM, Wirtala M, McAlister GC, Coon JJ. Performance characteristics of electron transfer dissociation mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(11), 1942–1951 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaney DL, McAlister GC, Coon JJ. Decision tree-driven tandem mass spectrometry for shotgun proteomics. Nat. Methods5(11), 959–964 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swaney DL, Wenger CD, Thomson JA, Coon JJ. Human embryonic stem cell phosphoproteome revealed by electron transfer dissociation tandem mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA106(4), 995–1000 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Nat. Biotechnol.24(10), 1285–1292 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey CM, Sweet SM, Cunningham DL, Zeller M, Heath JK, Cooper HJ. SLoMo: automated site localization of modifications from ETD/ECD mass spectra. J. Proteome Res.8(4), 1965–1971 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu P, Vogel C, Wang R, Yao X, Marcotte EM. Absolute protein expression profiling estimates the relative contributions of transcriptional and translational regulation. Nat. Biotechnol.25(1), 117–124 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel C, Marcotte EM. Calculating absolute and relative protein abundance from mass spectrometry-based protein expression data. Nat. Protoc.3(9), 1444–1451 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Griffin NM, Yu J, Long F et al. Label-free, normalized quantification of complex mass spectrometry data for proteomic analysis. Nat. Biotechnol.28(1), 83–89 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva JC, Gorenstein MV, Li GZ, Vissers JP, Geromanos SJ. Absolute quantification of proteins by LCMSE: a virtue of parallel MS acquisition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(1), 144–156 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oda Y, Huang K, Cross FR, Cowburn D, Chait BT. Accurate quantitation of protein expression and site-specific phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA96(12), 6591–6596 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Mann M. Mass spectrometry-based proteomics turns quantitative. Nat. Chem. Biol.1(5), 252–262 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li XJ, Yi EC, Kemp CJ, Zhang H, Aebersold R. A software suite for the generation and comparison of peptide arrays from sets of data collected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1328–1340 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellew M, Coram M, Fitzgibbon M et al. A suite of algorithms for the comprehensive analysis of complex protein mixtures using high-resolution LC-MS. Bioinformatics22(15), 1902–1909 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palagi PM, Walther D, Quadroni M et al. MSight: an image analysis software for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. Proteomics5(9), 2381–2384 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kohlbacher O, Reinert K, Gröpl C et al. TOPP – the OpenMS proteomics pipeline. Bioinformatics23(2), e191–e197 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jaffe JD, Mani DR, Leptos KC, Church GM, Gillette MA, Carr SA. PEPPeR, a platform for experimental proteomic pattern recognition. Mol. Cell. Proteomics5(10), 1927–1941 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Rinner O, Schmidt A et al. SuperHirn – a novel tool for high resolution LC-MS-based peptide/protein profiling. Proteomics7(19), 3470–3480 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cox J, Mann M. MaxQuant enables high peptide identification rates, individualized p.p.b.-range mass accuracies and proteome-wide protein quantification. Nat. Biotechnol.26(12), 1367–1372 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mueller LN, Brusniak MY, Mani DR, Aebersold R. An assessment of software solutions for the analysis of mass spectrometry based quantitative proteomics data. J. Proteome Res.7(1), 51–61 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Old WM, Shabb JB, Houel S et al. Functional proteomics identifies targets of phosphorylation by B-Raf signaling in melanoma. Mol. Cell34(1), 115–131 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gygi SP, Rist B, Gerber SA, Turecek F, Gelb MH, Aebersold R. Quantitative analysis of complex protein mixtures using isotope-coded affinity tags. Nat. Biotechnol.17(10), 994–999 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ong SE, Blagoev B, Kratchmarova I et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics1(5), 376–386 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross PL, Huang YN, Marchese JN et al. Multiplexed protein quantitation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using amine-reactive isobaric tagging reagents. Mol. Cell. Proteomics3(12), 1154–1169 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson A, Schäfer J, Kuhn K et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem.75(8), 1895–1904 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann M. Functional and quantitative proteomics using SILAC. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.7(12), 952–958 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishihama Y, Sato T, Tabata T et al. Quantitative mouse brain proteomics using culture-derived isotope tags as internal standards. Nat. Biotechnol.23(5), 617–621 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger M, Moser M, Ussar S et al. SILAC mouse for quantitative proteomics uncovers kindlin-3 as an essential factor for red blood cell function. Cell134(2), 353–364 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinidad JC, Thalhammer A, Specht CG et al. Quantitative analysis of synaptic phosphorylation and protein expression. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(4), 684–696 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zhang Y, Wolf-Yadlin A, Ross PL et al. Time-resolved mass spectrometry of tyrosine phosphorylation sites in the epidermal growth factor receptor signaling network reveals dynamic modules. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(9), 1240–1250 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Gucek M, Hart GW. Cross-talk between GlcNAcylation and phosphorylation: site-specific phosphorylation dynamics in response to globally elevated O-GlcNAc. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(37), 13793–13798 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nabetani T, Kim YJ, Watanabe M, Ohashi Y, Kamiguchi H, Hirabayashi Y. Improved method of phosphopeptides enrichment using biphasic phosphate-binding tag/C18 tip for versatile analysis of phosphorylation dynamics. Proteomics9(24), 5525–5533 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nilsson CL, Dillon R, Devakumar A et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomic analysis of the STAT3/IL-6/HIF1α signaling network: an initial study in GSC11 glioblastoma stem cells. J. Proteome Res.9(1), 430–443 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dayon L, Pasquarello C, Hoogland C, Sanchez JC, Scherl A. Combining low- and high-energy tandem mass spectra for optimized peptide quantification with isobaric tags. J. Proteomics73(4), 769–777 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnad F, Ren S, Cox J et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol.8(11), R250 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linding R, Jensen LJ, Ostheimer GJ et al. Systematic discovery of in vivo phosphorylation networks. Cell129(7), 1415–1426 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han MY, Kosako H, Watanabe T, Hattori S. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase regulates actin organization and cell motility by phosphorylating the actin cross-linking protein EPLIN. Mol. Cell. Biol.27(23), 8190–8204 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kinoshita-Kikuta E, Aoki Y, Kinoshita E, Koike T. Label-free kinase profiling using phosphate affinity polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics6(2), 356–366 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosako H. Phos-tag Western blotting for detecting stoichiometric protein phosphorylation in cells. Nat. Protoc. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.170 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Cox DM, Zhong F, Du M, Duchoslav E, Sakuma T, McDermott JC. Multiple reaction monitoring as a method for identifying protein posttranslational modifications. J. Biomol. Tech.16(2), 83–90 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf-Yadlin A, Hautaniemi S, Lauffenburger DA, White FM. Multiple reaction monitoring for robust quantitative proteomic analysis of cellular signaling networks. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(14), 5860–5865 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unwin RD, Griffiths JR, Whetton AD. A sensitive mass spectrometric method for hypothesis-driven detection of peptide post-translational modifications: multiple reaction monitoring-initiated detection and sequencing (MIDAS). Nat. Protoc.4(6), 870–877 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong J, Taylor P, Peterman SM, Prakash A, Moran MF. Epidermal growth factor receptor phosphorylation sites Ser991 and Tyr998 are implicated in the regulation of receptor endocytosis and phosphorylations at Ser1039 and Thr1041. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(9), 2131–2144 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RP, El-Yazbi AF, Hughes MF et al. Identification and functional characterization of protein kinase A-catalyzed phosphorylation of potassium channel Kv1.2 at serine 449. J. Biol. Chem.284(24), 16562–16574 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciccimaro E, Hanks SK, Yu KH, Blair IA. Absolute quantification of phosphorylation on the kinase activation loop of cellular focal adhesion kinase by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem.81(9), 3304–3313 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traweger A, Wiggin G, Taylor L, Tate SA, Metalnikov P, Pawson T. Protein phosphatase 1 regulates the phosphorylation state of the polarity scaffold Par-3. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA105(30), 10402–10407 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Mueller LN, Mueller M, Domon B, Aebersold R. Reproducible isolation of distinct, overlapping segments of the phosphoproteome. Nat. Methods4(3), 231–237 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan C, Olsen JV, Daub H, Mann M. Global effects of kinase inhibitors on signaling networks revealed by quantitative phosphoproteomics. Mol. Cell. Proteomics8(12), 2796–2808 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choudhary C, Mann M. Decoding signalling networks by mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.11(6), 427–439 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar