Dissecting phosphorylation networks: lessons learned from yeast

References

• Cohen P. Protein kinases – the major drug targets of the twenty-first century? Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov.1(4), 309–315 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunter T. Treatment for chronic myelogenous leukemia: the long road to imatinib. J. Clin. Invest.117(8), 2036–2043 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gridelli C, De Marinis F, Di Maio M, Cortinovis D, Cappuzzo F, Mok T. Gefitinib as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with activating epidermal growth factor receptor mutation: implications for clinical practice and open issues. Lung Cancer72(1), 3–8 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ptacek J, Devgan G, Michaud G et al. Global analysis of protein phosphorylation in yeast. Nature438(7068), 679–684 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tegge WJ, Frank R. Analysis of protein kinase substrate specificity by the use of peptide libraries on cellulose paper (SPOT-method). Methods Mol. Biol.87, 99–106 (1998).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu JJ, Phan H, Lam KS. Comparison of the intrinsic kinase activity and substrate specificity of c-Abl and Bcr–Abl. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.8(17), 2279–2284 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez M, Li SS, Harper JW, Songyang Z. An oriented peptide array library (OPAL) strategy to study protein–protein interactions. J. Biol. Chem.279(10), 8802–8807 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rychlewski L, Kschischo M, Dong L, Schutkowski M, Reimer U. Target specificity analysis of the Abl kinase using peptide microarray data. J. Mol. Biol.336(2), 307–311 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songyang Z, Blechner S, Hoagland N, Hoekstra MF, Piwnica-Worms H, Cantley LC. Use of an oriented peptide library to determine the optimal substrates of protein kinases. Curr. Biol.4(11), 973–982 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songyang Z, Lu KP, Kwon YT et al. A structural basis for substrate specificities of protein Ser/Thr kinases: primary sequence preference of casein kinases I and II, NIMA, phosphorylase kinase, calmodulin-dependent kinase II, CDK5, and Erk1. Mol. Cell. Biol.16(11), 6486–6493 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nishikawa K, Toker A, Johannes FJ, Songyang Z, Cantley LC. Determination of the specific substrate sequence motifs of protein kinase C isozymes. J. Biol. Chem.272(2), 952–960 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obata T, Yaffe MB, Leparc GG et al. Peptide and protein library screening defines optimal substrate motifs for AKT/PKB. J. Biol. Chem.275(46), 36108–36115 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii K, Zhu G, Liu Y et al. Kinase peptide specificity: improved determination and relevance to protein phosphorylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA101(38), 13744–13749 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutti JE, Jarrell ET, Chang JD et al. A rapid method for determining protein kinase phosphorylation specificity. Nat. Methods1(1), 27–29 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mok J, Kim PM, Lam HY et al. Deciphering protein kinase specificity through large-scale analysis of yeast phosphorylation site motifs. Sci. Signal.3(109), ra12 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budovskaya YV, Stephan JS, Deminoff SJ, Herman PK. An evolutionary proteomics approach identifies substrates of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(39), 13933–13938 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubersax JA, Woodbury EL, Quang PN et al. Targets of the cyclin-dependent kinase Cdk1. Nature425(6960), 859–864 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loog M, Morgan DO. Cyclin specificity in the phosphorylation of cyclin-dependent kinase substrates. Nature434(7029), 104–108 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dephoure N, Howson RW, Blethrow JD, Shokat KM, O’Shea EK. Combining chemical genetics and proteomics to identify protein kinase substrates. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA102(50), 17940–17945 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooten MW. In-gel kinase assay as a method to identify kinase substrates. Sci. STKE2002(153), pl15 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Li X, Guan B, Srivastava MK, Padmanabhan A, Hampton BS, Bieberich CJ. The reverse in-gel kinase assay to profile physiological kinase substrates. Nat. Methods4(11), 957–962 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo WS, Duggan L, Emre NC et al. Snf1 – a histone kinase that works in concert with the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 to regulate transcription. Science293(5532), 1142–1146 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Kenski DM, Paulson JL et al. A second-site suppressor strategy for chemical genetic analysis of diverse protein kinases. Nat. Methods2(6), 435–441 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaever G, Chu AM, Ni L et al. Functional profiling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome. Nature418(6896), 387–391 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopko R, Huang D, Preston N et al. Mapping pathways and phenotypes by systematic gene overexpression. Mol. Cell21(3), 319–330 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thuret JY, Valay JG, Faye G, Mann C. Civ1 (CAK in vivo), a novel Cdk-activating kinase. Cell86(4), 565–576 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao S, Prelich G. Activation of the Bur1-Bur2 cyclin-dependent kinase complex by Cak1. Mol. Cell. Biol.22(19), 6750–6758 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinoza FH, Farrell A, Nourse JL, Chamberlin HM, Gileadi O, Morgan DO. Cak1 is required for Kin28 phosphorylation and activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol.18(11), 6365–6373 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sopko R, Papp B, Oliver SG, Andrews BJ. Phenotypic activation to discover biological pathways and kinase substrates. Cell Cycle5(13), 1397–1402 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler D, Braberg H, Mehta M et al. Functional organization of the S. cerevisiae phosphorylation network. Cell136(5), 952–963 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarro SB, McCleland ML, Stukenberg PT et al. Phosphoproteome analysis by mass spectrometry and its application to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat. Biotechnol.20(3), 301–305 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li X, Gerber SA, Rudner AD et al. Large-scale phosphorylation analysis of α-factor-arrested Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Proteome Res.6(3), 1190–1197 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi A, Huttenhower C, Geer LY et al. Analysis of phosphorylation sites on proteins from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron transfer dissociation (ETD) mass spectrometry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(7), 2193–2198 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruhler A, Olsen JV, Mohammed S et al. Quantitative phosphoproteomics applied to the yeast pheromone signaling pathway. Mol. Cell. Proteomics4(3), 310–327 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albuquerque CP, Smolka MB, Payne SH, Bafna V, Eng J, Zhou H. A multidimensional chromatography technology for in-depth phosphoproteome analysis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics7(7), 1389–1396 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smolka MB, Albuquerque CP, Chen SH, Zhou H. Proteome-wide identification of in vivo targets of DNA damage checkpoint kinases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA104(25), 10364–10369 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen SH, Albuquerque CP, Liang J, Suhandynata RT, Zhou H. A proteome-wide analysis of kinase–substrate network in the DNA damage response. J. Biol. Chem.285(17), 12803–12812 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodenmiller B, Wanka S, Kraft C et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis reveals interconnected system-wide responses to perturbations of kinases and phosphatases in yeast. Sci Signal.3(153), rs4 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu X, Gerstein M, Snyder M. Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. Genes Dev.21(9), 1010–1024 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watts DJ, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks. Nature393(6684), 440–442 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Network biology: understanding the cell’s functional organization. Nat. Rev. Genetics5(2), 101–113 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barabasi AL, Albert R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science286(5439), 509–512 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Tombor B, Albert R, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL. The large-scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature407(6804), 651–654 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong H, Mason SP, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Lethality and centrality in protein networks. Nature411(6833), 41–42 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guelzim N, Bottani S, Bourgine P, Kepes F. Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nat. Genet.31(1), 60–63 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD et al. Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science303(5659), 808–813 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alon U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat. Rev. Genet.8(6), 450–461 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, Alon U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat. Genet.31(1), 64–68 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitkreutz A, Choi H, Sharom JR et al. A global protein kinase and phosphatase interaction network in yeast. Science328(5981), 1043–1046 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fasolo J, Sboner A, Sun MG et al. Diverse protein kinase interactions identified by protein microarrays reveal novel connections between cellular processes. Genes Dev.25(7), 767–778 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barik D, Baumann WT, Paul MR, Novak B, Tyson JJ. A model of yeast cell-cycle regulation based on multisite phosphorylation. Mol. Syst. Biol.6, 405 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tak YS, Tanaka Y, Endo S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. A CDK-catalysed regulatory phosphorylation for formation of the DNA replication complex Sld2-Dpb11. EMBO J.25(9), 1987–1996 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka S, Umemori T, Hirai K, Muramatsu S, Kamimura Y, Araki H. CDK-dependent phosphorylation of Sld2 and Sld3 initiates DNA replication in budding yeast. Nature445(7125), 328–332 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu H, Luscombe NM, Lu HX et al. Annotation transfer between genomes: protein–protein interologs and protein–DNA regulogs. Genome Res.14(6), 1107–1118 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gnad F, Ren S, Cox J et al. PHOSIDA (phosphorylation site database): management, structural and evolutionary investigation, and prediction of phosphosites. Genome Biol.8(11), R250 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry CR, Levy ED, Michnick SW. Weak functional constraints on phosphoproteomes. Trends Genet.25(5), 193–197 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt LJ, Tuch BB, Villen J, Johnson AD, Gygi SP, Morgan DO. Global analysis of Cdk1 substrate phosphorylation sites provides insights into evolution. Science325(5948), 1682–1686 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beltrao P, Trinidad JC, Fiedler D et al. Evolution of phosphoregulation: comparison of phosphorylation patterns across yeast species. PLoS Biol.7(6), e1000134 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shou C, Bhardwaj N, Lam HY et al. Measuring the evolutionary rewiring of biological networks. PLoS Comput. Biol.7(1), e1001050 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Slepchenko BM, Schaff JC, Macara I, Loew LM. Quantitative cell biology with the Virtual Cell. Trends Cell Biol.13(11), 570–576 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker ME, Wiley MJ. Multiscale control of flooding and riparian-forest composition in Lower Michigan, USA. Ecology90(1), 145–159 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooy Wd, Mrvar A, Batagelj V. Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science298(5594), 824–827 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar