Erectile dysfunction after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy

References

• Ferlay J, Autier P, Boniol M, Heanue M, Colombet M, Boyle P. Estimates of the cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2006. Ann. Oncol.18(3), 581–592 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancer incidence and mortality. Northern Ireland Cancer Registry (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hsing A, Tsao L, Devesa S. International trends and patterns of prostate cancer incidence and mortality. Int. J. Cancer85, 60–67 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson RA. Prostate cancer trends in the era of prostate-specific antigen. An update of incidence, mortality, and clinical factors from the SEER database. Urol. Clin. North Am.29, 173–181 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Young HH. Conservative perineal prostatectomy: the results of two years’ experience and report of seventy-five cases. Ann. Surg.41(4), 549–557 (1905).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Walsh PC, Donker PJ. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J. Urol.128, 492–497 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Radical prostatectomy: long-term cancer control and recovery of sexual and urinary function (‘trifecta’). Urology66(5 Suppl.), 83–94 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han M, Partin AW, Pound CR, Epstein JI, Walsh PC. Long-term biochemical disease-free and cancer-specific survival following anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy. The 15-year Johns Hopkins experience. Urol. Clin. North Am.28(3), 555–565 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orvieto MA, Alsikafi NF, Shalhav AL et al. Impact of surgical margin status on long-term cancer control after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.98, 1199–1203 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Osann K, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Hypothermic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: rationale, feasibility, and effect on early continence. Urology73(4), 691–696 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang MS, O’Connor RC, Laven BA, Orvieto MA, Brendler CB. Early release of the neurovascular bundles and optical loupe magnification lead to improved and earlier return of potency following radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.173(2), 537–539 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Magera JS Jr, Inman BA, Slezak JM, Bagniewski SM, Sebo TJ, Myers RP. Increased optical magnification from 2.5x to 4.3x with technical modification lowers the positive margin rate in open radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.179(1), 130–135 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tewari A, Srivasatava A, Menon M; Members of the VIP Team. A prospective comparison of radical retropubic and robot-assisted prostatectomy: experience in one institution. BJU Int.92(3), 205–210 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krambeck AE, DiMarco DS, Rangel LJ et al. Radical prostatectomy for prostatic adenocarcinoma: a matched comparison of open retropubic and robot-assisted techniques. BJU Int.103(4), 448–453 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.87(4), 408–410 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Rodriguez E, Skarecky DW. Overcoming obstacles: nerve-sparing issues in radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.22(4), 745–750 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Rodriguez Jr E, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of the recovery of potency after radical prostatectomy: effect of unilateral vs bilateral nerve sparing. BJU Int.104(10), 1484–1489 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chien GW, Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA et al. Modified clipless antegrade nerve preservation in robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with validated sexual function evaluation. Urology66(2), 419–423 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orvieto MA, Patel VR. Evolution of robot-assisted radical prostatecomy. Scand J. Surg.98(2), 76–88 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepor H, Gregerman M, Crosby R, Mostofi FK, Walsh PC. Precise localization of the autonomic nerves from the pelvic plexus to the corpora cavernosa: a detailed anatomical study of the adult male pelvis. J. Urol.133(2), 207–212 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quinlan DM, Epstein JI, Carter BS, Walsh PC. Sexual function following radical prostatectomy: influence of preservation of neurovascular bundles. J. Urol.145(5), 998–1002 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello AJ, Brooks M, Cole OJ. Anatomical studies of the neurovascular bundle and cavernosal nerves. BJU Int.94(7), 1071–1076 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari A, Takenaka A, Mtui E et al. The proximal neurovascular plate and the tri-zonal neural architecture around the prostate gland: importance in the athermal robotic technique of nerve-sparing prostatectomy. BJU Int.98(2), 314–323 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Pineiro L, Cansino JR, Sanchez C, Tabernero A, Cisneros J, de la Pena JJ. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Differences between interfascial and intrafascial technique. Eur. Urol.5, 331 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenburg JU, Schwalenberg T, Horn LC, Neuhaus J, Constantinides C, Liatsikos EN. Anatomical landmarks of radical prostatecomy. Eur. Urol.51(3), 629–639 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kiyoshima K, Yokomizo A, Yoshida T et al. Anatomical features of periprostatic tissue and its surroundings: a histological analysis of 79 radical retropubic prostatectomy specimens. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.34(8), 463–468 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Villers A, Stamey TA, Yemoto C, Rischmann P, McNeal JE. Modified extrafascial radical retropublic prostatectomy technique decreases frequency of positive surgical margins in T2 cancers < 2 cm3. Eur. Urol.38(1), 64–73 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Zagaja GP, Shalhav AL. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathologic outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol.51(3), 755–762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Poel HG, de Blok W, Joshi N, van Muilekom E. Preservation of lateral prostatic fascia is associated with urine continence after robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.55(4), 892–900 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Steinberg GP et al. Planned nerve preservation to reduce positive surgical margins during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.22, 1303–1309 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ong AM, Su LM, Varkarakis I et al. Nerve sparing radical prostatectomy: effects of hemostatic energy source on the recovery of cavernous nerve function in a canine model. J. Urol.172(4 Pt 1), 1318–1322 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Chou D, Skarecky DW. Feasibility study for robotic radical prostatectomy cautery-free neurovascular bundle preservation. Urology65(5), 994–997 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez E Jr, Finley DS, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Single institution 2-year patient reported validated sexual function outcomes after nerve sparing robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.181(1), 259–263 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gill IS, Ukimura O, Rubinstein M et al. Lateral pedicle control during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: refined technique. Urology65(1), 23–27 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coughlin G, Dangle PP, Palmer KJ et al. Athermal early retrograde release of the neurovascular bundle during nerve-sparing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Robotic Surg.3(1), 13–17 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Coelho RF, Chuahan S, Palmer KJ, Rocco B, Patel M, Patel VR. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. A review of current outcomes. BJU Int.104(10), 1428–1435 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur. Urol.56(1), 89–96 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhall JP. Defining and reporting erectile function outcomes after radical prostatectomy: challenges and misconceptions. J. Urol.181(2), 462–471 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocco B, Matei DV, Melegari S et al. Robotic vs open prostatectomy in a laparoscopically naive centre: a matched-pair analysis. BJU Int. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08532.x (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Bentas W, Wolfram M, Jones J, Bräutigam R, Kramer W, Binder J. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur. Urol.44(2), 175–181 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendiola FP, Zorn KC, Mikhail AA et al.Urinary and sexual function outcomes among different age groups after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Endourol.22(3), 519–524 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Kaplan AG, Yee DS, Skarecky DW. Prostate weight and early potency in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Urology72(6), 1263–1268 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Madeb R, Golijanin D, Knopf J et al. Patient-reported validated functional outcome after extraperitoneal robotic-assisted nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. JSLS11(4), 443–448 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Poel HG, de Blok W. Role of extent of fascia preservation and erectile function after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Urology73(4), 816–821 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Kerger M, Crowe H, Peters JS, Costello AJ. Operative details and oncological and functional outcome of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: 400 cases with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. Eur. Urol.55(6), 1367 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Montorsi F, Brock G, Lee J et al. Effect of nightly versus on-demand vardenafil on recovery of erectile function in men following bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.54(4), 924–931 (2008)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padma-Nathan H, McCullough AR et al. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of postoperative nightly sildenafil citrate for the prevention of erectile dysfunction after bilateral nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy. Int. J. Impot. Res.20(5), 479–486 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhall JP, Rojaz-Cruz C, Muller A. An analysis of sexual health information on radical prostatectomy websites. BJU Int.105(1), 68–72 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol.55(5), 1037–1063 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakimi AA, Blitstein J, Feder M, Shapiro E, Ghavamian R. Direct comparison of surgical and functional outcomes of robotic-assisted versus pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: single-surgeon experience. Urology73(1), 119–123 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph JV, Vicente I, Madeb R, Erturk E, Patel HR. Robot-assisted vs pure laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: are there any differences? BJU Int.96(1), 39–42 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer110(9), 1951–1958 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Thaly R, Shah K. Robotic radical prostatectomy: outcomes of 500 cases. BJU Int.99(5), 1109–1112 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar