Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in 2010

References

• Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA. Cancer J. Clin.58(2), 71–96 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box GN, Ahlering TE. Robotic radical prostatectomy: long-term outcomes. Curr. Opin. Urol.18(2), 173–179 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.87(4), 408–410 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badani KK, Kaul S, Menon M. Evolution of robotic radical prostatectomy: assessment after 2766 procedures. Cancer110(9), 1951–1958 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satava RM. Robotic surgery from past to future – a personal journey. Surg. Clin. North Am.83(6), 1491–1500 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlinger NT. Robotic surgery – squeezing into tight places. N. Engl. J. Med.354(20), 2099–2101 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology50(6), 854–857 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillonneau B, Vallencien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial experience and preliminary assessment after 65 operations. Prostate39(1), 71–75 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abbou CC, Salomon L, Hoznek A, Antiphon P, Cicco A, Saint F. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: preliminary results. Urology55(5), 630–634 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbou CC, Hoznek A, Salomon L et al. Remote laparoscopic radical prostatectomy carried out with a robot. Report of a case. Prog. Urol.10(4), 520–523 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Sarle R, Hemal A, Peabody JO. Laparoscopic and robot assisted radical prostatectomy: establishment of a structured program and preliminary analysis of outcomes. J. Urol.168(3), 945–949 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Hemal AK. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy: experience in more than 1000 cases. J. Endourol.18(7), 611–619 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A, Peabody JO et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy, a technique of robotic radical prostatectomy for management of localized carcinoma of the prostate: experience of over 1100 cases. Urol. Clin. North Am.31(4), 701–717 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Kaul S et al. Vattikuti institute prostatectomy: contemporary technique and analysis of results. Eur. Urol.51(3), 648–658 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewari AK, Jhaver JK, Surasi K, Patel N, Tan GY. Benefit of robotic assistance in comparing outcomes of minimally invasive versus open radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol.26(30), 4999–5000 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Patel VR, Kenneth JP, Coughlin G, Samavedi S. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: perioperative outcomes of 1500 cases. J. Endourol.22(10), 2299–2305 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss M, Osann K, Ornstein D. Positive surgical margins during robotic radical prostatectomy: a contemporary analysis of risk factors. BJU Int.102(5), 603–608 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Muhletaler F, Campos M, Peabody JO. Assessment of early continence after reconstruction of the periprostatic tissues in patients undergoing computer assisted (robotic) prostatectomy: results of a 2 group parallel randomized controlled trial. J. Urol.180(3), 1018–1023 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Bernstein AJ, Gofrit ON et al. Long-term functional and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing sural nerve interposition grafting during robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.22(5), 1005–1012 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wiltz AL, Shikanov S, Eggener SE et al. Robotic radical prostatectomy in overweight and obese patients: oncological and validated-functional outcomes. Urology73(2), 316–322 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel VR, Chammas MF, Shah S. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a review of the current state of affairs. Int. J. Clin. Pract.61(2), 309–314 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castle EP, Atug F, Woods M, Thomas R, Davis R. Impact of body mass index on outcomes after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J. Urol.26(1), 91–95 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colombo JR, Santos B, Hafron J, Gianduzzo T, Haber GP, Kaouk JH. Robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: surgical techniques and outcomes. Int. Braz. J. Urol.33(6), 803–809 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Atug F, Castle EP, Srivastav SK, Burgess SV, Thomas R, Davis R. Positive surgical margins in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: impact of learning curve on oncologic outcomes. Eur. Urol.49(5), 866–871 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahabudin RM, Arni T, Ashani N et al. Development of robotic program: an Asian experience. World J. Urol.24(2), 161–164 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wood DP, Schulte R, Dunn RL et al. Short-term health outcome differences between robotic and conventional radical prostatectomy. Urology70(5), 945–949 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Eichel L, Skarecky D. Evaluation of long-term thermal injury using cautery during nerve sparing robotic prostatectomy. Urology72(6), 1371–1374 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez-Salamanca JI, Rao S, Ramanathan R et al. Nerve advancement with end-to-end reconstruction after partial neurovascular bundle resection: a feasibility study. J. Endourol.21(8), 830–835 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mikhail AA, Orvieto MA, Billatos ES et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: first 100 patients with one year of follow-up. Urology68(6), 1275–1279 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appledorn SV, Bouchier-Hayes D, Agarwal D, Costello AJ. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: setup and procedural techniques after 150 cases. Urology67(2), 364–367 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith JA Jr, Chan RC, Chang SS et al. A comparison of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and open retropubic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.178(6), 2385–2389 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel A, Shah K, Thaly R, Palmer KJ, Patel V. Operative complications of robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the learning curve and beyond – a single surgeon series. Urology70(Suppl. 3A), 303 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ko YH, Ban JH, Kang SH et al. Does robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy enable to obtain adequate oncological and functional outcomes during the learning curve? From the Korean experience. Asian J. Andro.11(2), 167–175 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson B, Kaufman G, Broughton G et al. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. J. Urol177(3), 929–931 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A. Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J. Urol.174(6), 2291–2296 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Bhandari A. The technique of apical dissection of the prostate and urethrovesical anastomosis in robotic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.93(6), 715–719 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE. Robotic prostatectomy: is it the future? Urol. Oncol.24(1), 1–3 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Velthoven R, Ahlering TE, Peltier A, Skarecky DW, Clayman RV. Technique for laparoscopic running urethrovesical anastomosis: the single knot method. Urology61(4), 699–702 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finley DS, Osann K, Chang A, Santos R, Skarecky D, Ahlering TE. Hypothermic robotic radical prostatectomy: impact on continence. J. Endourol.23(9), 1443–1450 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrell SD, Smith JA: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: what is the learning curve? Urology66(5 Suppl.), 105–107 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: functional and pathological outcomes with interfascial nerve preservation. Eur. Urol.51(3), 755–762 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Cavalleri S, Novara G. Evidence from robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review. Eur. Urol.51(1), 45–55 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trabulsi EJ, Linden RA, Gomella LG, McGinnis DE, Strup SE, Lallas CD. The addition of robotic surgery to an established laparoscopic radical prostatectomy program: effect on positive surgical margins. Can. J. Urol.15(2), 3994–3999 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badani KK, Bhandari A, Tewari A, Menon M. Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional suturing: is there a difference in a robotic surgery setting? J. Endourol.19(10), 1212–1215 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• White MA, De Haan AP, Stephens DD, Maatman TK, Maatman TJ. Comparative analysis of surgical margins between radical retropubic prostatectomy and RALP: are patients sacrificed during initiation of robotics program? Urology73(3), 567–571 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• John H. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008. Urologe A.47(3), 291–298 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Tewari A, Baize B, Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience. Urology60(5), 864–868 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meeks JJ, Zhao L, Greco KA, Macejko A, Nadler RB. Impact of median lobe anatomy on robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Oncology484, 1–5 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nadler RB, User HM. Percutaneous urethral catheter retraction of prostate during laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology63(6), 1168–1169 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sarle R, Tewari A, Hemal AK, Menon M. Robotic-assisted anatomic radical prostatectomy: technical difficulties due to a large median lobe. Urol. Int.74(1), 92–94 (2005).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phong SV, Koh LK. Anaesthesia for robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: considerations for laparoscopy in the Trendelenburg position. Anaesth. Intensive Care35(2), 281–285 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Falabella A, Moore-Jeffries E, Sullivan MJ, Nelson R, Lew M. Cardiac function during steep Trendelenburg position and CO2 pneumoperitoneum for robotic-assisted prostatectomy: a trans-oesophageal Doppler probe study. Int. J. Med. Robot.3(4), 312–315 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson J. Myocardial infarction and subsequent death in a patient undergoing robotic prostatectomy. AANA J.77(5), 365–371 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meininger D, Zwissler B, Byhahn C, Probst M, Westphal K, Bremerich DH. Impact of overweight and pneumoperitoneum on hemodynamics and oxygenation during prolonged laparoscopic surgery. World J. Surg.30(4), 520–526 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lavery HJ, Thaly R, Albala D. Robotic equipment malfunction during robotic prostatectomy: a multi-institutional study. J. Endourol.22(9), 2165–2168 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham WS, Park SY, Yu HS, Choi YD, Hong SJ, Rha KH. Malfunction of da Vinci robotic system – disassembled surgeon’s console hand piece: case report and review of the literature. Urology73(1), 209.e7–e8 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kozlowski PM, Porter CR, Corman JM. Mechanical failure rate of da-Vinci robotic system: implications for pre-op patient counseling. J. Urol.175(Suppl.), 372–373 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Borden LS Jr, Kozlowski PM, Porter CR, Corman JM. Mechanical failure rate of da Vinci robotic system. Can. J. Urol.14(2), 3499–3501 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eichel L, Ahlering TE, Clayman RV. Robotics in urologic surgery: risks and benefits. AUA Update Series24(Ch-13), 106–111 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gofrit ON, Orvieto MA, Mikhail AA, Galocy RM, Shalav AL. da Vinci robot error and failure rates: single 3-arm robot unit of over 700 consecutive robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomies. J. Endourol.21(11), 1341–1344 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andonian S, Okeke Z, Okeke DA et al. Device failures associated with patient injuries during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgeries: a comprehensive review of FDA MAUDE database. Can. J. Urol.15(1), 3912–3916 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, Heaney JA, Seigne JD. A da Vinci robot system can make sense for a mature laparoscopic prostatectomy program. JSLS12(1), 9–12 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison LM, Heaney JA, Birkmeyer JD. The effect of hospital volume on mortality and resource use after radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.163(3), 867–869 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolenz C, Gupta A, Hotze T et al. Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Eur. Urol.57(3), 453–458 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg PL, Merguerian PA, Bihrle W 3rd, Seigne JD. The cost of learning robotic-assisted prostatectomy. Urology72(5), 1068–1072 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zorn KC, Orvieto MA, Gong EM, Mikhail AA, Gofrit ON, Zagaja GP. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon. J. Endourol.21(4), 441–447 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur RL, Wagner AA, Albala DM, Su LM. Critical role of the assistant in laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J. Endourol.22(4), 587–590 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Livingston EH, Harwell JD. The medicolegal aspects of proctoring. Am. J. Surg.184(1), 26–30 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Badani KK, Hemal AK, Peabody JO, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy: the Vattikutti Urology Institute training experience. World J. Urol.24(2), 148–151 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee DI. Robotic prostatectomy: what we have learned and where we are going. Yonsei Med. J.50(2), 177–181 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M. Robotic radical prostatectomy with the ‘veil of Aphrodite’ technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur. Urol.49, 1065–1073 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL et al. Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J. Urol.182(3), 1126–1132 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Fracalanza S et al.A prospective, non-randomized trial comparing robot-assisted laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy in one European institution. BJU Int.104(4), 534–539 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chino J, Schroeck FR, Sun L et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy is not associated with early postoperative radiation therapy. BJU Int.104(10), 1496–1500 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ficarra V, Novara G, Artibani W et al. Retropubic, laparoscopic, and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies. Eur. Urol.55(5), 1037–1063 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeck FR, Krupski TL, Sun L et al. Satisfaction and regret after open retropubic or robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Eur. Urol.54(4), 785–793 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu JC, Wang Q, Pashos CL, Lipsitz SR, Keating NL. Utilization and outcomes of minimally invasive radical prostatectomy. J. Clin. Oncol.26(14), 2278–2284 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooperberg MR, Kane CJ, Cowan JE, Carroll PR. Adequacy of lymphadenectomy among men undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int.105(1), 88–92 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zorn KC, Katz MH, Bernstein A et al. Pelvic lymphadenectomy during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: assessing nodal yield, perioperative outcomes, and complications. Urology74(2), 296–302 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Shrivastava A, Bhandari M, Satyanarayana R, Siva S, Agarwal PK. Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy: technical modifications in 2009. Eur. Urol.56(1), 89–96 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates J, Haleblian G, Stein B, Miller B, Renzulli J, Pareek G. The impact of robotic surgery on pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: the Brown University early robotic experience. Can. J. Urol.16(5), 4842–4846 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Feicke A, Baumgartner M, Talimi S et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic extended pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: surgical technique and experience with the first 99 cases. Eur. Urol.55(4), 876–883 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boris RS, Bhandari A, Krane LS, Eun D, Kaul S, Peabody JO. Salvage robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: initial results and early report of outcomes. BJU Int.103(7), 952–956 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Bjartell A, Ficarra V et al. Downsides of robot-assisted laparoscopic Radical prostatectomy: limitations and complications. Eur. Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2009.12.021 (2009) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Esposito MP, Ilbeigi P, Ahmed M, Lanteri V. Use of fourth arm in da Vinci robot-assisted extraperitoneal laparoscopic prostatectomy: novel technique. Urology66(3), 649–652 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee DI, Eichel L, Skarecky DW, Ahlering TE. Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with a single assistant. Urology63(6), 1172–1175 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ellis WJ, Lange PH. Point: open radical prostatectomy should not be abandoned. J. Natl Compr. Canc. Net.5(7), 85–88 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Hall R, Tong R, Goel R, Costello AJ. Robotic technology in surgery: current status in 2008. ANZ J. Surg.78(12), 1076–1081 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Boyette LB, Reardon MA, Mirelman AJ et al. Fiber optic imaging of cavernous nerves in vivo.J. Urol.178, 2694–2700 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Goel RK, Haber GP, Crouzet S, Desai MM, Gill IS. Single-port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urology72, 1190–1193 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barocas DA, Salem S, Kordan Y et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus radical retropubic prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: comparison of short-term biochemical recurrence-free survival. J. Urol.183, 990–996 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar