Minimally invasive cystectomy approaches in the treatment of bladder cancer

References

• Stein JP. Improving outcomes with radical cystectomy for high-grade invasive bladder cancer. World J. Urol.24(5), 509–516 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cooke PW, Dunn JA, Latief T, Bathers S, James ND, Wallace DM. Long-term risk of salvage cystectomy after radiotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur. Urol.38(3), 279–286 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Quek ML, Stein JP, Daneshmand S et al. A critical analysis of perioperative mortality from radical cystectomy. J. Urol.175(3 Pt 1), 886–889 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1,054 patients. J. Clin. Oncol.19(3), 666–675 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shabsigh A, Korets R, Vora KC et al. Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology. Eur. Urol.55(1), 164–176 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galich A, Sterrett S, Nazemi T, Pohlman G, Smith L, Balaji KC. Comparative analysis of early perioperative outcomes following radical cystectomy by either the robotic or open method. JSLS10(2), 145–150 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wang GJ, Barocas DA, Raman JD, Scherr DS. Robotic vs open radical cystectomy: prospective comparison of perioperative outcomes and pathological measures of early oncological efficacy. BJU Int.101(1), 89–93 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Campbell SC, Colombo Jr JR et al. Comparison between open- and laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J. Urol.179(4), 532 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: peripoperative and pathologic results. Eur. Urol.57(2), 196–201 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parra RO, Andrus CH, Jones JP, Boullier JA. Laparoscopic cystectomy: initial report on a new treatment for the retained bladder. J. Urol.148(4), 1140–1144 (1992).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez de Badajoz E, Gallego Perales JL, Reche Rosado A, Gutiérrez de la Cruz JM, Jiménez Garrido A. Radical cystectomy and laparoscopic ileal conduit. Arch. Esp. Urol.46(7), 621–624 (1993).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cathelineau X, Arroyo C, Rozet F et al. Laparoscopic assisted radical cystectomy: the montsouris experience after 84 cases. Eur. Urol.47(6), 780–784 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Gill IS. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy for cancer: oncological outcomes at up to 5 years. BJU Int.100(1), 137–142 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J. Urol.170(5), 1738–1741 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates DR, Vaessen C, Roupret M. From Leonardo to da Vinci: the history of robot-assisted surgery in urology. BJU Int.108(11), 1708–1714 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Menon M, Hemal AK, Tewari A et al. Nerve-sparing robot assisted radical cysto-prostatectomy and urinary diversion. BJU Int.92(3), 232–236 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhee JJ, Lebeau S, Smolkin M, Theodorescu D. Radical cystectomy with ileal conduit diversion: early prospective evaluation of the impact of robotic assistance. BJU Int.98(5), 1059–1063 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuh BE, Ciccone J, Chandrasekhar R et al. Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robot-assisted radical cystectomy. JSLS13(3), 398–405 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE et al. Surgical margin status after robot assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J. Urol.184(1), 87–91 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Challacombe BJ, Bochner BH, Dasgupta P et al. The role of laparoscopic and robotic cystectomy in the management of muscle-invasive bladder cancer with special emphasis on cancer control and complications. Eur. Urol.60(4), 767–775 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy DG, Challacombe BJ, Elhage O et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy with extracorporeal urinary diversion: initial experience. Eur. Urol.54(3), 570–580 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Fergany A, Klein EA et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy with ileal conduit performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 2 cases. Urology56(1), 26–29 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Campbell SC, Colombo JR et al. Perioperative outcomes with laparoscopic radical cystectomy: ‘pure laparoscopic’ and ‘open-assisted laparoscopic’ approaches. Urology70(5), 910–915 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beecken W-D, Wolfram M, Engl T et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy and intra-abdominal formation of an orthotopic ileal neobladder. Eur. Urol.44(3), 337–339 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi RS, Wallen EM. Robotic assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: operative and pathological outcomes. J. Urol.178(3), 814–818 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guru KA, Kim HL, Piacente PM, Mohler JL. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection: initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology69(3), 469–474 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi RS, Nix J, McRackan D et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur. Urol.57(6), 1013–1021 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guru K, Seixas-Mikelus SA, Hussain A et al. Robot-assisted intracorporeal ileal conduit: marionette technique and initial experience at Roswell Park Cancer Institute. Urology76(4), 866–871 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jonsson MN, Adding C, Hosseini A et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur. Urol.60(5), 1066–1073 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright JL, Lin DW, Porter MP. The association between extent of lymphadenectomy and survival among patients with lymph node metastases undergoing radical cystectomy. Cancer112(11), 2401–2408 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesner C, Salzer A, Thomas C et al. Cancer-specific survival after radical cystectomy and standardized extended lymphadenectomy for node-positive bladder cancer: prediction by lymph node positivity and density. BJU Int.104(3), 331–335 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr H, Lee C, Chang S, Lerner S; Bladder Cancer Collaborative Group. Standardization of radical cystectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection for bladder cancer. A collaborative group report. J. Urol.171(5), 1823–1828 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppie TM, Vickers AJ, Vora K, Dalbagni G, Bochner BH. Standardization of pelvic lymphadenectomy performed at radical cystectomy: can we establish a minimum number of lymph nodes that should be removed? Cancer107(10), 2368–2374 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konety S, Joslyn S, O’Donnell M. Extent of pelvic lymphadenectomy and its impact on outcome in patients diagnosed with bladder cancer: analysis of data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results program data base. J. Urol.169(3), 946–950 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorin RP, Daneshmand S, Eisenberg MS et al. Lymph node dissection technique is more important than lymph node count in identifying nodal metastases in radical cystectomy patients: a comparative mapping study. Eur. Urol.60(5), 946–952 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner DG. Management of invasive bladder cancer: a meticulous pelvic node dissection can make a difference. J. Urol.1281(1), 34–36 (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Mills RD, Fleishmann A, Studer UE. Radical cystectomy with an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy: rationale and results. Surg. Oncol. Clin. North Am.16(1), 233–245 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simonato A, Gregori A, Lissiani A et al. Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy: our experience in a consecutive series of 10 patients with 3 years follow-up. Eur. Urol.47(6), 785–790 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang J, Lin T, Liu H et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder for bladder cancer: oncologic results of 171 cases with a median 3-year follow-up. Eur. Urol.58(3), 442–449 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai MM, Berger AK, Brandina RR et al. Robotic and laparoscopic high extended pelvic lymph node dissection during radical cystectomy: technique and outcomes. Eur. Urol.61(2), 350–355 (2012).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellenthal NJ, Hussain A, Andrews PE et al. Lymphadenectomy at the time of robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. BJU Int.107(4), 642–646 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Studer UE, Burkhard FC, Schumacher M et al. Twenty year experience with an ileal orthotopic low pressure bladder substitute; lessons to be learned. J. Urol176(1), 161–166 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayn MH, Hellenthal NJ, Seixas-Mikelus SA et al. Is patient outcome compromised during the initial experience with robot-assisted radical cystectomy? Results of 164 consecutive cases. BJU Int.108(6), 882–887 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann. Surg.240(2), 205–213 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng CK, Kauffman EC, Lee M-M et al. A comparison of postoperative complications in open versus robotic cystectomy. Eur. Urol.57(2), 274–282 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan MS, Elhage O, Challacombe B, Rimington P, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. Analysis of early complications of robotic-assisted radical cystectomy using a standardized reporting system. Urology77(2), 357–362 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Türk I, Deger S, Winkelmann B , Schönberger B, Loening SA. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with continent urinary diversion (rectal sigmoid pouch) performed completely intracorporeally: the initial 5 cases. J. Urol.165(6), 1863–1866 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deger S, Peters R, Roigas J et al. Laparoscopic radical cystectomy with continent urinary diversion (rectosigmoid pouch) performed completely intracorporeally: an intermediate functional and oncologic analysis. Urology64(5), 935–939 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haber GP, Crouzet S, Gill IS. Laparoscopic and robotic assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a critical analysis. Eur. Urol.54(1), 54–62 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo OA, Abreu SC, Mariano MB et al. Complications in laparoscopic radical cystectomy: the South American experience with 59 cases. Int. Braz. J. Urol.32(3), 300–305 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sung HH, Ahn JS, Seo SI et al. A comparison of early complications between open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy. J. Endourol. doi:10.1089/end.2011.0372 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lau CS, Talug J, Williams SB et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy in the octogenarian. Int. J. Med. Robot doi:10.1002/rcs.460 (2012) (Epub ahead of print).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donat SM, Shabsigh A, Savage C et al. Potential impact of postoperative early complications on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing radical cystectomy: a high-volume tertiary cancer center experience. Eur. Urol55(1), 177–185 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuh B, Butt Z, Fazili A et al. Short-term quality-of-life assessed after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: a prospective analysis. BJU Int.103(6), 800–804 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kulaksizoglu H, Toktas G, Kulaksizoglu UB, Aglamis E, Unluer E. When should quality of life be measured after radical cystectomy? Eur. Urol.42(4), 350–355 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotan ZA, Kavanagh K, Yossepowitch O et al. Positive surgical margins in soft tissue following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer and cancer specific survival. J. Urol.178(6), 2308 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME, Nix J, Smith A, Schultz H, Wallen EM. Robotic radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: surgical and pathological outcomes in 100 consecutive cases. J. Urol.183(2), 510–514 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novara G, Svatek RS, Karakiewicz P et al. Soft tissue margin status is a powerful predictor of outcomes after radical cystectomy: a multicenter study of over 4,400 patients. J. Urol.183(6), 2165–2170 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman EC, Ng CK, Lee MM, Otto BJ, Wang GJ, Scherr DS. Early oncological outcomes for bladder urothelial carcinoma patients treated with robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. BJU Int.107(4), 628–635 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dasgupta P, Rimington P, Murphy D et al. Robotic assisted radical cystectomy: short to medium-term oncologic and functional outcomes. Int. J. Clin. Pract.62(11), 1709–1714 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chade DC, Laudone VP, Bochner BH and Parra RO. Oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: open versus minimally invasive approaches. J. Urol.183(3), 862–869 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Epplen R, Pfister D, Heidenreich A. Peritoneal carcinomatosis after robotic-assisted radical cystectomy. Urologe A50(11), 1435–1437 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hadjizacharia P, Stein JP, Cai J, Miranda G. The impact of positive soft tissue margins following radical cystectomy for high-grade, invasive bladder cancer. World J. Urol.27(1), 33–38 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herr HW, Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Donat SM, Reuter VE, Bajorin DF. Impact of the number of lymph nodes retrieved on outcome in patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer. J. Urol.167(3), 1295–1298 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein JP, Quek ML and Skinner DG. Lymphadenectomy for invasive bladder cancer. II. Technical aspects and prognostic factors. BJU Int.97(2), 232–237 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith A, Kurpad R, Lal A, Nielsen M, Wallen EM and Pruthi RS. Cost analysis of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. J. Urol.183(2), 505–509 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin AD, Nunez RN, Castle EP. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a complete cost analysis. Urology77(3), 621–625 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Ng CK, Shariat SF et al. The economics of robotic cystectomy: cost comparison of open versus robotic cystectomy. BJU Int.108(11), 1886–1892 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Chughtai B, Herman M, Shariat SF, Scherr DS. Cost-analysis comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (RC) vs open RC. BJU Int.108(6 Pt 2), 976–983 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Health Information and Quality Authority.Health Technology Assessment of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Selected Surgical Procedures. Health Information and Quality Authority, Dublin, Ireland, 1–218 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Robot-Assisted Surgery versus Open Surgery and Laparoscopic Surgery: Clinical Effectiveness and Economic Analyses. Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, ON, Canada, 1–298 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Gill IS, Advincula AP, Aron M et al. Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. Surg. Endos.24(4), 762–768 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T et al. Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur. Urol.53(6), 1117–1120 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box G, Averch T, Cadeddu J et al. Nomenclature of natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) procedures in urology. J. Endourol.22(11), 2575–2581 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl JP, Ponsky JL. Natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery: a criticial review. J. Gastrointest. Surg.12(7), 1293–1300 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaouk JH, Autorino R, Kim FJ et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery in urology: worldwide multi-institutional analysis of 1076 cases. Eur. Urol.60(5), 998–1005 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Permpongkosol S, Link RE, Su LM et al. Complications of 2775 urological laparoscopic procedures: 1993 to 2005. J. Urol.177(2), 580–585 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahlenkamp D, Rassweiler J, fornara P, Frede T, Loenin SA. Complications of laparoscopic procedures in urology: experience with 2,407 procedures at 4 German centres. J. Urol.162(3 Pt 1), 765–770 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulié M, Salomon L, Seguin P et al. Multi-institutional study of complications in 1085 laparoscopic urologic procedures. Urology58(6), 899–903 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman AC, Wood NA, Farritor S, Goede MR, Oleynikov D. Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery. Surg. Endosc.25(1), 119–123 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen JB, Pedersen KV, Olsen KØ, Bisgaard UF and Jensen KM. Mini-laparotomy approach to radical cystectomy. BJU Int.108(7), 1125–1130 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail AF, Elhage O, Rimington P, Kelly JD, Dasgupta P, Khan MS. Initial experience with a Randomised Controlled trial of Open, Robotic and Laparoscopic (CORAL) radical cystectomy. BJU Int.106(S1), 7 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Joudi FN and Konety BR. The volume/ outcome relationship in urologic cancer surgery. Support Cancer Ther.2(1), 42–46 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar