What has happened to multiple arterial grafting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?

References

• Detre KM, Guo P, Holubkov R et al. Coronary revascularization in diabetic patients: a comparison of the randomized and observational components of the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation (BARI). Circulation99, 633–640 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh RN, Sosa JA, Green GE. Long-term fate of the internal mammary artery and saphenous vein grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.86, 359–363 (1983).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lytle BW, Loop FD, Cosgrove DM, Ratliff NB, Easley K, Taylor PC. Long-term (5 to 12 years) serial studies of internal mammary artery and saphenous vein coronary bypass grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.89, 248–258 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalan JM, Roberts WC. Comparison of morphologic changes and luminal sizes of saphenous vein and internal mammary artery after simultaneous implantation for coronary arterial bypass grafting. Am. J. Cardiol.60, 193–196 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper GJ, Underwood MJ, Deverall PB. The LIMA success story – whither other arterial grafts – are vein grafts obsolete? Br. J. Clin. Pract.50, 144–150 (1996).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fitzgibbon GM, Kafka HP, Leach AJ, Keon WJ, Hooper GD, Burton JR. Coronary bypass graft fate and patient outcome: angiographic follow-up of 5,065 grafts related to survival and reoperation in 1,388 patients during 25 years. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.28, 616–626 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourassa MG, Fisher LD, Campeau L, Gillespie MJ, McConney M, Lesperance J. Long-term fate of bypass grafts: the Coronary Artery Surgery Study (CASS) and Montreal Heart Institute experiences. Circulation72, V71–V78 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman S, Zadina K, Moritz T et al. Long-term patency of saphenous vein and left internal mammary artery grafts after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from a Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.44, 2149–2156 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loop FD, Lytle BW, Cosgrove DM et al. Influence of the internal-mammary-artery graft on 10-year survival and other cardiac events. N. Engl. J. Med.314, 1–6 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron A, Davis KB, Green G, Schaff HV. Coronary bypass surgery with internal-thoracic-artery grafts – effects on survival over a 15-year period. N. Engl. J. Med.334, 216–219 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leavitt BJ, O’Connor GT, Olmstead EM et al. Use of the internal mammary artery graft and in-hospital mortality and other adverse outcomes associated with coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation103, 507–512 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dabal RJ, Goss JR, Maynard C, Aldea GS. The effect of left internal mammary artery utilization on short-term outcomes after coronary revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg.76, 464–470 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taggart DP, D’Amico R, Altman DG. Effect of arterial revascularisation on survival: a systematic review of studies comparing bilateral and single internal mammary arteries. Lancet358, 870–875 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytle BW, Blackstone EH, Loop FD et al. Two internal thoracic artery grafts are better than one. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.117, 855–872 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzoli G, Schiavon L, Bellini P. Does the use of bilateral internal mammary artery (IMA) grafts provide incremental benefit relative to the use of a single IMA graft? A meta-analysis approach. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.22, 781–786 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhan A, Gupta V, Choudhary SK et al. Radial artery in CABG: could the early results be comparable to internal mammary artery graft? Ann. Thorac. Surg.67, 1631–1636 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen G, Tamariz MG, Sever JY et al. The radial artery versus the saphenous vein graft in contemporary CABG: a case-matched study. Ann. Thorac. Surg.71, 180–185 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Possati G, Gaudino M, Prati F et al. Long-term results of the radial artery used for myocardial revascularization. Circulation108, 1350–1354 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barner HB, Sundt TM 3rd. Multiple arterial grafts and survival. Curr. Opin. Cardiol.14, 501–505 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sundt TM 3rd, Barner HB, Camillo CJ, Gay WA Jr. Total arterial revascularization with an internal thoracic artery and radial artery T graft. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68, 399–404 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• El Nakadi B, Choghari C, Joris M. Complete myocardial revascularization with bilateral internal thoracic artery T graft. Ann. Thorac. Surg.69, 498–500 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wendler O, Hennen B, Demertzis S et al. Complete arterial revascularization in multivessel coronary artery disease with 2 conduits (skeletonized grafts and T grafts). Circulation102, III79–III83 (2000).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA, Royse AG. Total arterial coronary revascularization: techniques and results in 3,220 patients. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68, 2093–2099 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royse AG, Royse CF, Tatoulis J. Total arterial coronary revascularization and factors influencing in-hospital mortality. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.16, 499–505 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A et al. Left internal thoracic artery-radial artery composite grafts as the technique of choice for myocardial revascularization in elderly patients: a prospective randomized evaluation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.127, 179–184 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muneretto C, Bisleri G, Negri A et al. Total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts improves results of coronary surgery in elderly: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation108(Suppl. 1), II29–II33 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Muneretto C, Negri A, Manfredi J et al. Safety and usefulness of composite grafts for total arterial myocardial revascularization: a prospective randomized evaluation. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.125, 826–835 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legare JF, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA, Hirsch GM. Composite arterial grafts versus conventional grafting for coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.127, 160–166 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Buxton BF, Raman JS, Ruengsakulrach P et al. Radial artery patency and clinical outcomes: five-year interim results of a randomized trial. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.125, 1363–1371 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Fremes SE. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N. Engl. J. Med.351, 2302–2309 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guru V, Fremes SE, Tu JV. How many arterial grafts are enough? A population-based study of midterm outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.131, 1021–1028 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Weinschelbaum EE, Gabe ED, Macchia A, Smimmo R, Suarez LD. Total myocardial revascularization with arterial conduits: radial artery combined with internal thoracic arteries. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.114, 911–916 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tector AJ, McDonald ML, Kress DC, Downey FX, Schmahl TM. Purely internal thoracic artery grafts: outcomes. Ann. Thorac. Surg.72, 450–455 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calafiore AM, Contini M, Vitolla G et al. Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting: long-term clinical and angiographic results of in situ versus Y grafts. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.120, 990–996 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard S, Wetterslev J, Lund JT et al. One-year results of total arterial revascularization vs. conventional coronary surgery: CARRPO trial. Eur. Heart. J.30, 1005–1011 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baskett RJ, Cafferty FH, Powell SJ, Kinsman R, Keogh BE, Nashef SA. Total arterial revascularization is safe: multicenter ten-year analysis of 71,470 coronary procedures. Ann. Thorac. Surg.81, 1243–1248 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catarino PA, Black E, Taggart DP. Why do UK cardiac surgeons not perform their first choice operation for coronary artery bypass graft? Heart88, 643–644 (2002).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Legare JF, Hassan A, Buth KJ, Sullivan JA. The effect of total arterial grafting on medium-term outcomes following coronary artery bypass grafting. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.2, 44 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sergeant PT, Blackstone EH, Meyns BP. Does arterial revascularization decrease the risk of infarction after coronary artery bypass grafting? Ann. Thorac. Surg.66, 1–10 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Derose JJ Jr, Swistel DG. The impact of deep sternal wound infection on long-term survival after coronary artery bypass grafting. Chest127, 464–471 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Paulis R, de Notaris S, Scaffa R et al. The effect of bilateral internal thoracic artery harvesting on superficial and deep sternal infection: the role of skeletonization. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.129, 536–543 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioannidis JP, Galanos O, Katritsis D et al. Early mortality and morbidity of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery revascularization: propensity and risk modeling. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.37, 521–528 (2001).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Borger MA, Rao V, Weisel RD et al. Deep sternal wound infection: risk factors and outcomes. Ann. Thorac. Surg.65, 1050–1056 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toumpoulis IK, Anagnostopoulos CE, Balaram S, Swistel DG, Ashton RC Jr, DeRose JJ Jr. Does bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting increase long-term survival of diabetic patients? Ann. Thorac. Surg.81, 599–606 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Endo M, Tomizawa Y, Nishida H. Bilateral versus unilateral internal mammary revascularization in patients with diabetes. Circulation108, 1343–1349 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pevni D, Mohr R, Lev-Run O et al. Influence of bilateral skeletonized harvesting on occurrence of deep sternal wound infection in 1,000 consecutive patients undergoing bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting. Ann. Surg.237, 277–280 (2003).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lev-Ran O, Braunstein R, Nesher N, Ben-Gal Y, Bolotin G, Uretzky G. Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafting in oral-treated diabetic subsets: comparative seven-year outcome analysis. Ann. Thorac. Surg.77, 2039–2045 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boodhwani M, Lam BK, Nathan HJ et al. Skeletonized internal thoracic artery harvest reduces pain and dysesthesia and improves sternal perfusion after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized, double-blind, within-patient comparison. Circulation114, 766–773 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pagni S, Storey J, Ballen J et al. ITA versus SVG: a comparison of instantaneous pressure and flow dynamics during competitive flow. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.11, 1086–1092 (1997).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Royse AG, Royse CF, Groves KL, Bus B, Yu G. Blood flow in composite arterial grafts and effect of native coronary flow. Ann. Thorac. Surg.68, 1619–1622 (1999).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O et al. Graft design strategies with optimum antegrade bypass flow in total arterial off-pump coronary artery bypass. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.31, 276–282 (2007).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O, Bando K, Niwaya K, Kitamura S. Competitive flow in arterial composite grafts and effect of graft arrangement in off-pump coronary revascularization. Ann. Thorac. Surg.78, 481–486 (2004).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nakajima H, Kobayashi J, Tagusari O, Bando K, Niwaya K, Kitamura S. Functional angiographic evaluation of individual, sequential, and composite arterial grafts. Ann. Thorac. Surg.81, 807–814 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zacharias A, Schwann TA, Riordan CJ, Durham SJ, Shah AS, Habib RH. Late results of conventional versus all-arterial revascularization based on internal thoracic and radial artery grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg.87, 19–26.e2 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatoulis J, Buxton BF, Fuller JA et al. Long-term patency of 1108 radial arterial-coronary angiograms over 10 years. Ann. Thorac. Surg.88, 23–29 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A et al. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation115, 684–691 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah PJ, Durairaj M, Gordon I et al. Factors affecting patency of internal thoracic artery graft: clinical and angiographic study in 1434 symptomatic patients operated between 1982 and 2002. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.26, 118–124 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serruys PW, Morice MC, Kappetein AP et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. N. Engl. J. Med.360, 961–972 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar