Coronary computed tomography angiography versus stress testing in suspected coronary disease

References

• Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D et al. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: The Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur. Heart J.27, 1341–1381 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, Nandalur MR, Carlos RC. Diagnostic performance of stress cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50, 1343–1353 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenland P, Bonow RO, Brundage BH et al. ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(3), 378–402 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mowatt G, Cook JA, Hillis GS et al. 64-slice computed tomography angiography in the diagnosis and assessment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart94, 1386–1393 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Moshage W, Ropers D, Nossen J, Daniel WG. Value of electron-beam computed tomography for the noninvasive detection of high-grade coronary-artery stenoses and occlusions. N. Engl. J. Med.339(27), 1964–1971 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Oudkerk M, Rensing BJ et al. Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography. Lancet357(9256), 599–603 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardiographically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography. Circulation103(21), 2535–2538 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ropers U, Ropers D, Pflederer T et al. Influence of heart rate on the diagnostic accuracy of dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(25), 2393–2398 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausleiter J, Meyer T, Hermann F et al. Estimated radiation dose associated with cardiac CT angiography. JAMA301(5), 500–507 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earls JP, Berman EL, Urban BA et al. Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology246(3), 742–753 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflederer T, Jakstat J, Marwan M et al. Radiation exposure and image quality in staged low-dose protocols for coronary dual-source CT angiography: a randomized comparison. Eur. Radiol.20(5), 1197–1206 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Leschka S, Stolzmann P, Desbiolles L et al. Diagnostic accuracy of high-pitch dual-source CT for the assessment of coronary stenoses: first experience. Eur. Radiol.19(12), 2896–2903 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller JM, Rochitte CE, Dewey M et al. Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT. N. Engl. J. Med.359, 2324–2336 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52(21), 1724–1732 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, Meijs MF, Schuijf JD et al. Diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography: a prospective, multicenter, multivendor study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52(25), 135–144 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Rensing BJ, van Geuns RJ et al. Non-invasive coronary angiography with multislice spiral computed tomography: impact of heart rate. Heart88(5), 470–474 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alkadhi H, Scheffel H, Desbiolles L et al. Dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography: influence of obesity, calcium load, and heart rate on diagnostic accuracy. Eur. Heart J.29(6), 766–776 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW, Goldstein JA, Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 552–557 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, von Ziegler F et al. Quantification of obstructive and nonobstructive coronary lesions by 64-slice computed tomography: a comparative study with quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46, 147–154 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raff GL, Abidov A, Achenbach S et al. SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary computed tomographic angiography. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.3(2), 122–136 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Arad Y, Goodman KJ, Roth M, Newstein D, Guerci AD. Coronary calcification, coronary disease risk factors, C-reactive protein, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease events: the St. Francis Heart Study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.46(1), 158–165 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Galema TW, Neefjes LA et al. Comparison of the value of coronary calcium detection to computed tomographic angiography and exercise testing in patients with chest pain. Am. J. Cardiol.104(11), 1499–1504 (2009).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leber AW, Knez A, Becker A et al. Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.43(7), 1241–1247 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Moselewski F, Nieman K et al. Noninvasive assessment of plaque morphology and composition in culprit and stable lesions in acute coronary syndrome and stable lesions in stable angina by multidetector computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.47(8), 1655–1662 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pflederer T, Marwan M, Schepis T et al. Characterization of culprit lesions in acute coronary syndromes using coronary dual-source CT angiography. Atherosclerosis211(2), 437–444 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motoyama S, Sarai M, Harigaya H et al. Computed tomographic angiography characteristics of atherosclerotic plaques subsequently resulting in acute coronary syndrome. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54(1), 49–57 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Min JK, Shaw LJ, Devereux RB et al. Prognostic value of multidetector coronary computed tomographic angiography for prediction of all-cause mortality. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(12), 1161–1170 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewey M, Dübel HP, Schink T, Baumann G, Hamm B. Head-to-head comparison of multislice computed tomography and exercise electrocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.28, 2485–2490 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, Van Mieghem C et al. Adjunctive value of CT coronary angiography in the diagnostic work-up of patients with typical angina pectoris. Eur. Heart J.28(15), 1872–1878 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Galema T, Weustink A et al. Computed tomography versus exercise electrocardiography in patients with stable chest complaints: real-world experiences from a fast-track chest pain clinic. Heart95(20), 1669–1675 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hacker M, Jakobs T, Matthiesen F et al. Comparison of spiral multidetector CT angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging in the noninvasive detection of functionally relevant coronary artery lesions: first clinical experiences. J. Nucl. Med.46, 1294–1300 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuijf JD, Wijns W, Jukema JW et al. Relationship between noninvasive coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography and myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 2508–2514 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Valenta I et al. Functionally relevant coronary artery disease: comparison of 64-section CT angiography with myocardial perfusion SPECT. Radiology248, 414–423 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicol ED, Stirrup J, Reyes E et al. Comparison of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography with myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for assessment of global and regional myocardial function and infarction in patients with low to intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Cardiol.15, 497–502 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamarappoo BK, Gutstein A, Cheng VY et al. Assessment of the relationship between stenosis severity and distribution of coronary artery stenoses on multislice computed tomographic angiography and myocardial ischemia detected by single photon emission computed tomography. J. Nucl. Cardiol.17(5), 791–802 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rispler S, Keidar Z, Ghersin E et al. Integrated single-photon emission computed tomography and computed tomography coronary angiography for the assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary artery lesions. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49(10), 1059–1067 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato A, Hiroe M, Tamura M et al. Quantitative measures of coronary stenosis severity by 64-slice CT angiography and relation to physiologic significance of perfusion in nonobese patients: comparison with stress myocardial perfusion imaging. J. Nucl. Med.49(4), 564–572 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Kajander S, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation122(6), 603–613 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravipati G, Aronow WS, Lai H et al. Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of stress testing versus 64-multislice coronary computed tomography angiography in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease diagnosed by coronary angiography. Am. J. Cardiol.101(6), 774–775 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54, 1072–1084 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging2(3), 174–182 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrow K, Morris CK, Froelicher VF et al. Prediction of cardiovascular death in men undergoing noninvasive evaluation for coronary artery disease. Ann. Intern. Med.118(9), 689–695 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Iskander S, Iskandrian AE. Risk assessment using single-photon emission computed tomographic technetium-99m sestamibi imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.32(1), 57–62 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom MP, Gopal A, Ahmadi N et al. Mortality incidence and the severity of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by computed tomography angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.52(16), 1335–1343 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Gaemperli O et al. Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur. Heart J.30(21), 2622–2629 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Budoff MJ, Achenbach S, Blumenthal RS et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease by cardiac computed tomography: a scientific statement from the AHA Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention, Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention, and Committee on Cardiac Imaging, Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation114, 1761–1791 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendel RC, Patel MR, Kramer CM et al. ACCF/ACR/SCCT/SCMR/ASNC/NASCI/SCAI/SIR 2006 appropriateness criteria for cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Quality Strategic Directions Committee Appropriateness Criteria Working Group. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 1475–1497 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder S, Achenbach S, Bengel F et al. Cardiac computed tomography: indications, applications, limitations, and training requirements: report of a Writing Group deployed by the Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Working Group Nuclear Cardiology and Cardiac CT; European Society of Cardiology; European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur. Heart J.29, 531–556 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner JS, Smeeth L, Kendall JM, Adams PC, Timmis A; Chest Pain Guideline Development Group. NICE guidance. Chest pain of recent onset: assessment and diagnosis of recent onset chest pain or discomfort of suspected cardiac origin. Heart96(12), 974–978 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D et al. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. N. Engl. J. Med.362(10), 886–895 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijboom WB, van Mieghem CA, Mollet NR et al. 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with high, intermediate, or low pretest probability of significant coronary artery disease. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.50(15), 1469–1475 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weustink AC, Mollet NR, Neefjes LA et al. Diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility of noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease. Ann. Intern. Med.152(10), 630–639 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow BJ, Wells GA, Chen L et al. Prognostic value of 64-slice cardiac computed tomography severity of coronary artery disease, coronary atherosclerosis, and left ventricular ejection fraction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55(10), 1017–1028 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottlieb I, Miller JM, Arbab-Zadeh A et al. The absence of coronary calcification does not exclude obstructive coronary artery disease or the need for revascularization in patients referred for conventional coronary angiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.55(7), 627–634 (2010).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.98(3), 303–308 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar