Computed tomography imaging in myocardial infarction

References

• Rahimtoola SH. A perspective on the three large multicenter randomised clinical trials of coronary bypass surgery for chronic stable angina. Circulation72, V123–V135 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersh BJ, Anderson JL. Thrombolysis and myocardial salvage. Results of clinical trials and the animal paradigm – paradoxic or predictable? Circulation88, 296–306 (1993).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson TB Jr, Hammill BG, Peterson ED, DeLong ER, Grover FL; STS National Database Committee. A decade of change: risk profiles and outcomes for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, 1990–1999: a report from the STS National Database Committee and the Duke Clinical Research Institute. Ann. Thorac. Surg.73, 480–489 (2002).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes JS, Kozak LJ, Owings MF. Use and in-hospital mortality associated with two cardiac procedures, by sex and age: national trends, 1990–2004. Health Aff. (Millwood)26, 169–177 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics – 2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation121, 948–954 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet361, 374–379 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuetz GM, Zacharopoulou NM, Schlattmann P, Dewey M. Meta-analysis: noninvasive coronary angiography using computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Intern. Med.152, 167–177 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyed SH, Cassidy MM, Hadi MA. Use of multidetector computed tomography for evaluation of global and regional left ventricular function. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.3(1 Suppl.), S23–S34 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tennant R, Wiggers CJ. Effect of coronary occlusion on myocardial contraction. Am. J. Physiol.112, 351–361 (1935).
   Google Scholar
• Heyndrickx GR, Millard RW, McRitchie RJ, Maroko PR, Vatner SF. Regional myocardial functional and electrophysiological alterations after brief coronary artery occlusion in conscious dogs. J. Clin. Invest.56, 978–985 (1975).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braunwald E, Kloner RA. The stunned myocardium: prolonged, postischemic ventricular dysfunction. Circulation66, 1146–1149 (1982).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloner RA, Bolli R, Marban E, Reinlib L, Braunwald E. Medical and cellular implications of stunning, hibernation, and preconditioning: an NHLBI workshop. Circulation97, 1848–1867 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen YT, Vatner SF. Mechanism of impaired myocardial function during progressive coronary stenosis in conscious pigs. Hibernation versus stunning?. Circ. Res.76, 479–488 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tillisch J, Brunken R, Marshall R et al. Reversibility of cardiac wall motion abnormalities predicted by positron emission tomography. N. Engl. J. Med.314, 884–888 (1986).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation56, 786–794 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N. Engl. J. Med.343, 1445–1453 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antoniucci D, Valenti R, Migliorini A et al. Direct infarct artery stenting without predilation and no-reflow in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am. Heart J.142, 684–690 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu KC, Zerhouni EA, Judd RM et al. Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation97, 765–772 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohn JN, Ferrari R, Sharpe N. Cardiac remodeling-concepts and clinical implications: a consensus paper from an international forum on cardiac remodeling. Behalf of an International Forum on Cardiac Remodeling. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.35, 569–582 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedrich MG, Abdel-Aty H, Taylor A, Schulz-Menger J, Messroghli D, Dietz R. The salvaged area at risk in reperfused acute myocardial infarction as visualized by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.51, 1581–1587 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai KV, Laine GA, Stewart RH et al. Mechanics of the left ventricular myocardial interstitium: effects of acute and chronic myocardial edema. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.294, H2428–H2434 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Go RT, Marwick TH, MacIntyre WJ et al. A prospective comparison of rubidium 82 PET and thallium 201 SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging utilizing a single dipyridamole stress in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Med.31, 1899–1905 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamaki N, Takahashi N, Kawamoto M et al. Myocardial tomography using technetium-99m-tetrofosmin to evaluate coronary artery disease. J. Nucl. Med.35, 594–600 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Saadi N, Nagel E, Gross M et al. Noninvasive detection of myocardial ischemia from perfusion reserve based on cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation101, 1379–1383 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmarian JJ, Shaw LJ, Filipchuk NG et al. A multinational study to establish the value of early adenosine technetium-99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging in identifying a low-risk group for early hospital discharge after acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 2448–2457 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allman KC, Shaw LJ, Hachamovitch R, Udelson JE. Myocardial viability testing and impact of revascularization on prognosis in patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.39, 1151–1158 (2002)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi KM, Kim RJ, Gubernikoff G, Vargas JD, Parker M, Judd RM. Transmural extent of acute myocardial infarction predicts long-term improvement in contractile function. Circulation104, 1101–1107 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DF, Hessel SJ, Judy PF, Stein JA, Abrams HL. Computed tomography of the normal and infarcted myocardium. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.126, 786–791 (1976).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt W et al. Uptake of contrast materials by experimental acute myocardial infarctions: a preliminary report. Invest. Radiol.13, 337–339 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumberger JA, Feiring AJ, Lipton MJ, Higgins CB, Ell SR, Marcus ML. Use of ultrafast computed tomography to quantitate regional myocardial perfusion: a preliminary report. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.9, 59–69 (1987).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al. Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.45, 2042–2047 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koyama Y, Matsuoka H, Mochizuki T et al. Assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction with two-phase contrast-enhanced helical CT: prediction of ventricular function and wall thickness. Radiology235, 804–811 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Kinzel S et al. Late-phase MSCT in the different stages of myocardial infarction: animal experiments. Eur. Radiol.17, 2310–2317 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams DF, Hessel SJ, Judy PF, Stein JA, Abrams HL. Differing attenuation coefficients of normal and infarcted myocardium. Science192, 467–469 (1976).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Bornikoel CM, Krämer N, Guenther RW. Assessment of myocardial edema by computed tomography in myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 1167–1174 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanz J, Weeks D, Nikolaou K et al. Detection of healed myocardial infarction with multidetector-row computed tomography and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance delayed hyperenhancement. Am. J. Cardiol.98, 149–55 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafar HM, Litt HI, Torigian DA. CT imaging features and frequency of left ventricular myocardial fat in patients with CT findings of chronic left ventricular myocardial infarction. Clin. Radiol.63, 256–262 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis KL, Mehlhorn U, Laine GA, Allen SJ. Myocardial edema, left ventricular function, and pulmonary hypertension. J. Appl. Physiol.78, 132–137 (1995).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Werkhoven JM, Schuijf JD, Bax JJ. Myocardial perfusion imaging to assess ischemia using multislice computed tomography. Expert Rev. Cardiovasc. Ther.7(1), 49–56 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gibson RS, Watson DD, Graddock GB et al. Prediction of cardiac events after uncomplicated myocardial infarction: a prospective study comparing predischarge exercise thallium-201 scintigraphy and coronary angiography. Circulation68, 321–336 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown KA, Heller GV, Landin RS et al. Early dipyridamole 99mTc-sestamibi single photon emission computed tomographic imaging after acute myocardial infarction predicts in-hospital and postdischarge cardiac events: comparison with submaximal exercise imaging. Circulation100, 2060–2066 (1999).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Klotz E, Pietsch H et al. Quantitative whole heart stress perfusion CT imaging as non-invasive assessment of hemodynamics in coronary artery stenosis: preliminary animal experience. Invest. Radiol.45, 298–305 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastarrika G, Ramos-Duran L, Rosenblum MA, Kang DK, Rowe GW, Schoepf UJ. Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging: initial clinical experience. Invest. Radiol.45, 306–313 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho KT, Chua KC, Klotz E, Panknin C. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. JACC Cardiovasc. Imaging3, 811–820 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Miller JM et al. Adenosine stress 64- and 256-row detector computed tomography angiography and perfusion imaging: a pilot study evaluating the transmural extent of perfusion abnormalities to predict atherosclerosis causing myocardial ischemia. Circ. Cardiovasc. Imaging2, 174–182 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Judy PF, Fishbein MC, Abrams HL. Detection of myocardial ischemia in vitro by computed tomography. Radiology127, 413–418 (1978).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty PW, Lipton MJ, Berninger WH, Skioldebrand CG, Carlsson E, Redington RW. Detection and quantitation of myocardial infarction in vivo using transmission computed tomography. Circulation63, 597–606 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slutsky RA, Mattrey RF, Long SA, Higgins CB. In vivo estimation of myocardial infarct size and left ventricular function by prospectively gated computerized transmission tomography. Circulation67, 759–765 (1983).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann U, Millea R, Enzweiler C et al. Acute myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT in a porcine model. Radiology231, 697–701 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer PH, Goldstein JA, Herkens RJ, Lipton MJ, Brundage BH. Imaging of acute myocardial infarction in man with contrast-enhanced computed transmission tomography. Am. Heart J.108, 1514–1523 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber DJ, Lapray JF, Hessel SJ. In vivoevaluation of experimental myocardial infarcts by ungated computed tomography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.136, 469–473 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore W, Fields J, Mieczkowski B. Multidetector computed tomography pulmonary angiogram in the assessment of myocardial infarction. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.30, 800–803 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gosalia A, Haramati LB, Sheth MP, Spindola-Franco H. CT detection of acute myocardial infarction. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.182, 1563–1566 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada H, Kobayashi Y, Yasu T et al. Multi-detector computed tomography for imaging of subendocardial infarction: prediction of wall motion recovery after reperfused anterior myocardial infarction. Circ. J.68, 512–514 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro MD, Sarwar A, Nieman K, Nasir K, Brady TJ, Cury RC. Cardiac computed tomography for prediction of myocardial viability after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.4, 267–273 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yim NY, Kim YH, Choi S et al. Multidetector-row computed tomographic evaluation of myocardial perfusion in reperfused chronic myocardial infarction: value of color-coded perfusion map in a porcine model. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging25(Suppl. 1), 65–74 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Lautenschläger S, Fritz D, Koos R, Scheuering M. Perfusion weighted color maps for enhanced visualization of myocardial infarction by MSCT: preliminary experience. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging24, 883–890 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Cury RC, Ferencik M et al. Differentiation of recent and chronic myocardial infarction by cardiac computed tomography. Am. J. Cardiol.98, 303–308 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winer-Muram HT, Tann M, Aisen AM, Ford L, Jennings SG, Bretz R. Computed tomography demonstration of lipomatous metaplasia of the left ventricle following myocardial infarction. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.28, 455–458 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Knez A, Sagmeister S, Wintersperger BJ, Reiser MF, Becker CR. Assessment of myocardial infarctions using multirow-detector computed tomography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.28, 286–292 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francone M, Carbone I, Danti M et al. ECG-gated multi-detector row spiral CT in the assessment of myocardial infarction: correlation with non-invasive angiographic findings. Eur. Radiol.16, 15–24 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blankstein R, Shturman LD, Rogers IS et al. Adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging using dual-source cardiac computed tomography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.54, 1072–1084 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha-Filho JA, Blankstein R, Shturman LD et al. Incremental value of adenosine-induced stress myocardial perfusion imaging with dual-source CT at cardiac CT angiography. Radiology254, 410–419 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang DK, Schoepf UJ, Bastarrika G et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for integrative imaging of coronary artery disease: principles and clinical applications. Semin. Ultrasound CT MR31, 276–91 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzsics B, Lee H, Zwerner PL, Gebregziabher M, Costello P, Schoepf UJ. Dual-energy CT of the heart for diagnosing coronary artery stenosis and myocardial ischemia-initial experience. Eur. Radiol.18, 2414–2424 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruzsics B, Schwarz F, Schoepf UJ et al. Comparison of dual-energy computed tomography of the heart with single photon emission computed tomography for assessment of coronary artery stenosis and of the myocardial blood supply. Am. J. Cardiol.104, 318–326 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SM, Choi JW, Song MG et al. Myocardial perfusion imaging using adenosine-induced stress dual-energy computed tomography of the heart: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and conventional coronary angiography. Eur. Radiol.21(1), 26–35 (2011).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer RW, Kerl JM, Fischer N et al. Dual-energy CT for the assessment of chronic myocardial infarction in patients with chronic coronary artery disease: comparison with 3-T MRI. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.195, 639–646 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman AN, Weiss JL, Jugdutt BI et al. Two-dimensional echocardiography and infarct size: relationship of regional wall motion and wall thickening to the extent of myocardial infarction in the dog. Circulation63, 739–746 (1981).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Katoh M, Bruners P et al. Acute myocardial infarction: assessment of left ventricular function with 16-detector row spiral CT versus MR imaging-study in pigs. Radiology236, 112–117 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al. Sixteen-slice spiral CT versus MR imaging for the assessment of left ventricular function in acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Radiol.15, 714–720 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarwar A, Shapiro MD, Nasir K et al. Evaluating global and regional left ventricular function in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction by 64-slice multidetector CT: a comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.3, 170–177 (2009).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brodoefel H, Reimann A, Klumpp B et al. Sixty-four-slice CT in the assessment of global and regional left ventricular function: comparison with MRI in a porcine model of acute and subacute myocardial infarction. Eur. Radiol.17, 2948–2956 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlsson E, Lipton MJ, Berninger WH, Doherty P, Redington RW. Selective left coronary myocardiography by computed tomography in living dogs. Invest. Radiol.12, 559–562 (1977).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masuda Y, Yoshida H, Morooka N, Watanabe S, Inagaki Y. The usefulness of x-ray computed tomography for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Circulation70, 217–225 (1984).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieman K, Shapiro MD, Ferencik M et al. Reperfused myocardial infarction: contrast-enhanced 64-Section CT in comparison to MR imaging. Radiology247, 49–56 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins CB, Sovak M, Schmidt W, Siemers PT. Differential accumulation of radiopaque contrast material in acute myocardial infarction. Am. J. Cardiol.43, 47–51 (1979).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Jost G, Bruners P et al. Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) evaluation of myocardial viability: intraindividual comparison of monomeric vs. dimeric contrast media in a rabbit model. Eur. Radiol.19, 290–297 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buecker A, Katoh M, Krombach GA et al. A feasibility study of contrast enhancement of acute myocardial infarction in multislice computed tomography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and gross morphology in pigs. Invest. Radiol.40, 700–704 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lardo AC, Cordeiro MA, Silva C et al. Contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography viability imaging after myocardial infarction: characterization of myocyte death, microvascular obstruction, and chronic scar. Circulation113, 394–404 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber BL, Belge B, Legros GJ et al. Characterization of acute and chronic myocardial infarcts by multidetector computed tomography: comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance. Circulation113, 823–833 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD et al. Multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 144–152 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habis M, Capderou A, Ghostine S et al. Acute myocardial infarction early viability assessment by 64-slice computed tomography immediately after coronary angiography: comparison with low-dose dobutamine echocardiography. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.49, 1178–1185 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodoefel H, Klumpp B, Reimann A et al. Sixty-four-MSCT in the characterization of porcine acute and subacute myocardial infarction: determination of transmurality in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology. Eur. J. Radiol.62, 235–246 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato A, Hiroe M, Nozato T et al. Early validation study of 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability and the prediction of left ventricular remodelling after acute myocardial infarction. Eur. Heart J.29, 490–498 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeed M, Lund G, Wendland MF, Bremerich J, Weinmann H, Higgins CB. Magnetic resonance characterization of the peri-infarction zone of reperfused myocardial infarction with necrosis-specific and extracellular nonspecific contrast media. Circulation103, 871–876 (2001).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuleri KH, Centola M, George RT et al. Characterization of peri-infarct zone heterogeneity by contrast-enhanced multidetector computed tomography: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.53, 1699–1707 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amado LC, Schuleri KH, Saliaris AP et al. Multimodality noninvasive imaging demonstrates in vivo cardiac regeneration after mesenchymal stem cell therapy. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.48, 2116–2124 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedema JP, Truter R, de Klerk PA, Zaaiman L, White L, Doubell AF. Cardiac sarcoidosis evaluated with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance and contrast-enhanced 64-slice computed tomography. Int. J. Cardiol.112, 261–263 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwan M, Pflederer T, Ropers D et al. Cardiac amyloidosis imaged by dual-source computed tomography. J. Cardiovasc. Comput. Tomogr.2, 403–405 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaminaga T, Naito H, Takamiya M, Hamada S, Nishimura T. Myocardial damage in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: CT evaluation. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.18, 393–397 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambrin G, Laissy JP, Serfaty JM, Caussin C, Lancelin B, Paul JF. Diagnostic value of ECG-gated multidetector computed tomography in the early phase of suspected acute myocarditis. A preliminary comparative study with cardiac MRI. Eur. Radiol.17, 331–338 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Friman O, Hennemuth A. The culprit lesion and its consequences: combined visualization of the coronary arteries and delayed myocardial enhancement in dual-source CT: a pilot study. Eur. Radiol.20(12), 2834–2843 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikolaou K, Sanz J, Poon M et al. Assessment of myocardial perfusion and viability from routine contrast-enhanced 16-detector-row computed tomography of the heart: preliminary results. Eur. Radiol.15, 864–871 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko SM, Seo JB, Hong MK et al. Myocardial enhancement pattern in patients with acute myocardial infarction on two-phase contrast-enhanced ECG-gated multidetector-row computed tomography. Clin. Radiol.61, 417–422 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lessick J, Ghersin E, Dragu R et al. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial hypoenhancement on multidetector computed tomography in identifying myocardial infarction in patients admitted with acute chest pain syndrome. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.31, 780–788 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henneman MM, Schuijf JD, Dibbets-Schneider P et al. Comparison of multislice computed tomography to gated single-photon emission computed tomography for imaging of healed myocardial infarcts. Am. J. Cardiol.101, 144–148 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahnken AH, Bruners P, Stanzel S et al. Functional imaging in the assessment of myocardial infarction: MR imaging vs. MDCT vs. SPECT. Eur. J. Radiol.71, 480–485 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubinshtein R, Miller TD, Williamson EE et al. Detection of myocardial infarction by dual-source coronary computed tomography angiography using quantitated myocardial scintigraphy as the reference standard. Heart95, 1419–1422 (2009).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepis T, Achenbach S, Marwan M et al. Prevalence of first-pass myocardial perfusion defects detected by contrast-enhanced dual-source CT in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Eur. Radiol.20, 1607–1614 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baks T, Cademartiri F, Moelker AD et al. Assessment of acute reperfused myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement 64-MDCT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.188, W135–W137 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul JF, Wartski M, Caussin C et al. Late defect on delayed contrast-enhanced multi-detector row CT scans in the prediction of SPECT infarct size after reperfused acute myocardial infarction: initial experience. Radiology236, 485–489 (2005).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiou KR, Liu CP, Peng NJ et al. Identification and viability assessment of infarcted myocardium with late enhancement multidetector computed tomography: comparison with thallium single photon emission computed tomography and echocardiography. Am. Heart J.155, 738–745 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar