References
- Miyashita H, Aizawa A, Hashimoto J et al. Cross-sectional characterization of all classes of antihypertensives in terms of central blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive patients. Am. J. Hypertens.23(3), 260–268 (2010).
- Chirinos JA, Zambrano JP, Chakko S et al. Aortic pressure augmentation predicts adverse cardiovascular events in patients with established coronary artery disease. Hypertension45, 980–985 (2005).
- Williams B, Lacy PS, Thom SM et al.; CAFE Investigators; Anglo–Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial Investigators; CAFE Steering Committee and Writing Committee. Differential impact of blood pressure-lowering drugs on central aortic pressure and clinical outcomes: principal results of the Conduit Artery Function Evaluation (CAFE) study. Circulation113, 1213–1225 (2006).
- Takazawa K, Kobayashi H, Shindo N, Tanaka N, Yamashina A. Relationship between radial and central arterial pulse wave and evaluation of central aortic pressure using the radial arterial pulse wave. Hypertens. Res.30, 219–228 (2007).
- Agabiti-Rosei E, Mancia G, O’Rourke MF et al. Central blood pressure measurements and antihypertensive therapy: a consensus document. Hypertension50, 154–160 (2007).
- Kohara K, Tabara Y, Tomita H, Nagai T, Igase M, Miki T. Clinical usefulness of the second peak of radial systolic blood pressure for estimation of aortic systolic blood pressure. J. Hum. Hypertens.23, 538–545 (2009).
- Matsui Y, Eguchi K, O’Rourke MF et al. Differential effects between a calcium channel blocker and a diuretic when used in combination with angiotensin II receptor blocker on central aortic pressure in hypertensive patients. Hypertension54, 716–723 (2009).
- Wang KL, Cheng HM, Chuang SY et al. Central or peripheral systolic or pulse pressure: which best relates to target organs and future mortality? J. Hypertens.27, 461–467 (2009).
- Masugata H, Senda S, Okuyama H et al. Comparison of central blood pressure and cardio–ankle vascular index for association with cardiac function in treated hypertensive patients. Hypertens. Res.32, 1136–1142 (2009).