Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography: techniques and applications

References

• Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J. Vasc. Surg.45(Suppl. S), S5–S67 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Revel D, Loubeyre P, Delignette A, Douek P, Amiel M. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance tomoangiography: a new imaging technique for studying thoracic great vessels. Magn. Reson. Imaging11(8), 1101–1105 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Prince MR. Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology191(1), 155–164 (1994).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leung DA, Debatin JF. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the thoracic vasculature. Eur. Radiol.7(7), 981–989 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffens JC, Link J, Grassner J et al. Contrast-enhanced, K-space-centered, breath-hold MR angiography of the renal arteries and the abdominal aorta. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging7(4), 617–622 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Debatin JF, Hany TF. MR-based assessment of vascular morphology and function. Eur. Radiol.8(4), 528–539 (1998).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haustein J, Laniado M, Niendorf HP et al. Triple-dose versus standard-dose gadopentetate dimeglumine: a randomized study in 199 patients. Radiology186(3), 855–860 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Cowper SE, Robin HS, Steinberg SM, Su LD, Gupta S, LeBoit PE. Scleromyxoedema-like cutaneous diseases in renal-dialysis patients. Lancet356(9234), 1000–1001 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marckmann P, Skov L, Rossen K et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: suspected causative role of gadodiamide used for contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.17(9), 2359–2362 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juluru K, Vogel-Claussen J, Macura KJ, Kamel IR, Steever A, Bluemke DA. MR imaging in patients at risk for developing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: protocols, practices, and imaging techniques to maximize patient safety. Radiographics29(1), 9–22 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Grobner T. Gadolinium – a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.21(4), 1104–1108 (2006).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallen AJ, Jhung MA, Cheng S et al. Gadolinium-containing magnetic resonance imaging contrast and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a case–control study. Am. J. Kidney Dis.51(6), 966–975 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen HS, Marckmann P, Logager VB. Update on nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.16(4), 551–560, vii (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Abraham JL, Thakral C, Skov L, Rossen K, Marckmann P. Dermal inorganic gadolinium concentrations: evidence for in vivo transmetallation and long-term persistence in nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Br. J. Dermatol.158(2), 273–280 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axel L, Shimakawa A, MacFall J. A time-of-flight method of measuring flow velocity by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging4(3), 199–205 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Parker DL, Yuan C, Blatter DD. MR angiography by multiple thin slab 3D acquisition. Magn. Reson. Med.17(2), 434–451 (1991).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Mattle HP, Wallner B et al. Extracranial carotid arteries: evaluation with ‘black blood’ MR angiography. Radiology177(1), 45–50 (1990).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonetti OP, Finn JP, White RD, Laub G, Henry DA. ‘Black blood’ T2-weighted inversion-recovery MR imaging of the heart. Radiology199(1), 49–57 (1996).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shonai T, Takahashi T, Ikeguchi H, Miyazaki M, Amano K, Yui M. Improved arterial visibility using short-tau inversion-recovery (STIR) fat suppression in non-contrast-enhanced time-spatial labeling inversion pulse (Time-SLIP) renal MR angiography (MRA). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging29(6), 1471–1477 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T et al. Non-contrast-enhanced hepatic MR angiography with true steady-state free-precession and time spatial labeling inversion pulse: optimization of the technique and preliminary results. Eur. J. Radiol.70(1), 111–117 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Katoh M, Spuentrup E, Stuber M et al. Flow targeted 3D steady-state free-precession coronary MR angiography: comparison of three different imaging approaches. Invest. Radiol.44(12), 757–762 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Sheehan JJ, Dunkle E, Schindler N, Carr J, Koktzoglou I. Quiescent-interval single-shot unenhanced magnetic resonance angiography of peripheral vascular disease: technical considerations and clinical feasibility. Magn. Reson. Med.63(4), 951–958 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR portography with time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: comparison of imaging with three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo and true steady-state free-precession sequences. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging29(5), 1140–1146 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T et al. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography for selective visualization of the hepatic vein and inferior vena cava with true steady-state free-precession sequence and time-spatial labeling inversion pulses: preliminary results. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging29(2), 474–479 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki M, Isoda H. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the abdomen. Eur. J. Radiol.80(1), 9–23 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• White EM, Edelman RR, Wedeen VJ, Brady TJ. Intravascular signal in MR imaging: use of phase display for differentiation of blood-flow signal from intraluminal disease. Radiology161(1), 245–249 (1986).
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki M, Sugiura S, Tateishi F, Wada H, Kassai Y, Abe H. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using 3D ECG-synchronized half-Fourier fast spin echo. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging12(5), 776–783 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedeen VJ, Meuli RA, Edelman RR et al. Projective imaging of pulsatile flow with magnetic resonance. Science230(4728), 946–948 (1985).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyazaki M, Takai H, Sugiura S, Wada H, Kuwahara R, Urata J. Peripheral MR angiography: separation of arteries from veins with flow-spoiled gradient pulses in electrocardiography-triggered three-dimensional half-Fourier fast spin-echo imaging. Radiology227(3), 890–896 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki M, Lee VS. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology248(1), 20–43 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey P, Atanasova IP, Lim RP et al. Tailoring the flow sensitivity of fast spin-echo sequences for noncontrast peripheral MR angiography. Magn. Reson. Med.64(4), 1098–1108 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Koktzoglou I, Edelman RR. STAR and STARFIRE for flow-dependent and flow-independent noncontrast carotid angiography. Magn. Reson. Med.61(1), 117–124 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Brittain JH, Olcott EW, Szuba A et al. Three-dimensional flow-independent peripheral angiography. Magn. Reson. Med.38(3), 343–354 (1997).
   Google Scholar
• Wright GA, Nishimura DG, Macovski A. Flow-independent magnetic resonance projection angiography. Magn. Reson. Med.17(1), 126–140 (1991).
   Google Scholar
• Schar M, Kozerke S, Fischer SE, Boesiger P. Cardiac SSFP imaging at 3 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Med.51(4), 799–806 (2004).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stafford RB, Sabati M, Mahallati H, Frayne R. 3D non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography with balanced steady-state free precession Dixon method. Magn. Reson. Med.59(2), 430–433 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Stafford RB, Sabati M, Haakstad MJ, Mahallati H, Frayne R. Unenhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries with balanced steady-state free precession dixon method. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.191(1), 243–246 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Stuber M, Weiss RG. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging26(2), 219–234 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Weber OM, Martin AJ, Higgins CB. Whole-heart steady-state free precession coronary artery magnetic resonance angiography. Magn. Reson. Med.50(6), 1223–1228 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichenbach JR, Venkatesan R, Schillinger DJ, Kido DK, Haacke EM. Small vessels in the human brain: MR venography with deoxyhemoglobin as an intrinsic contrast agent. Radiology204(1), 272–277 (1997).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaafsma JD, Velthuis BK, Majoie CB et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography – multicenter study. Radiology256(1), 209–218 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Bi X, Weale P, Schmitt P, Zuehlsdorff S, Jerecic R. Non-contrast-enhanced four-dimensional (4D) intracranial MR angiography: a feasibility study. Magn. Reson. Med.63(3), 835–841 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Edelman RR, Koktzoglou I, Ankenbrandt WJ, Dunkle EE. Cerebral venography using fluid-suppressed STARFIRE. Magn. Reson. Med.62(2), 538–543 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Du YP, Jin Z. Simultaneous acquisition of MR angiography and venography (MRAV). Magn. Reson. Med.59(5), 954–958 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Ishimaru H, Ochi M, Morikawa M et al. Accuracy of pre- and postcontrast 3D time-of-flight MR angiography in patients with acute ischemic stroke: correlation with catheter angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol.28(5), 923–926 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwanenburg JJ, Hendrikse J, Takahara T, Visser F, Luijten PR. MR angiography of the cerebral perforating arteries with magnetization prepared anatomical reference at 7 T: comparison with time-of-flight. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging28(6), 1519–1526 (2008).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morze CV, Purcell DD, Banerjee S et al. High-resolution intracranial MRA at 7T using autocalibrating parallel imaging: initial experience in vascular disease patients. Magn. Reson. Imaging26(10), 1329–1333 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Morze CV, Xu D, Purcell DD et al. Intracranial time-of-flight MR angiography at 7T with comparison to 3T. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging26(4), 900–904 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Maderwald S, Ladd SC, Gizewski ER et al. To TOF or not to TOF: strategies for non-contrast-enhanced intracranial MRA at 7 T. MAGMA21(1–2), 159–167 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Debrey SM, Yu H, Lynch JK et al. Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance angiography for internal carotid artery disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke39(8), 2237–2248 (2008).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Babiarz LS, Romero JM, Murphy EK et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography is not more accurate than unenhanced 2D time-of-flight MR angiography for determining > or = 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.30(4), 761–768 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Yu W, Underhill HR, Ferguson MS et al. The added value of longitudinal black-blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography in the cross sectional identification of carotid atherosclerotic ulceration. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.11, 31 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Yim YJ, Choe YH, Ko Y et al. High signal intensity halo around the carotid artery on maximum intensity projection images of time-of-flight MR angiography: a new sign for intraplaque hemorrhage. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging27(6), 1341–1346 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Babiarz LS, Astor B, Mohamed MA, Wasserman BA. Comparison of gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography with high-resolution black blood cardiovascular magnetic resonance for assessing carotid artery stenosis. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.9(1), 63–70 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Satogami N, Okada T, Koyama T, Gotoh K, Kamae T, Togashi K. Visualization of external carotid artery and its branches: non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography using balanced steady-state free-precession sequence and a time-spatial labeling inversion pulse. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging30(3), 678–683 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bagan P, Vidal R, Martinod E et al. Cerebral ischemia during carotid artery cross-clamping: predictive value of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. Ann. Vasc. Surg.20(6), 747–752 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Fan Z, Zhang Z, Chung YC et al. Carotid arterial wall MRI at 3T using 3D variable-flip-angle turbo spin-echo (TSE) with flow-sensitive dephasing (FSD). J. Magn. Reson. Imaging31(3), 645–654 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Kurosaki Y, Yoshida K, Endo H, Chin M, Yamagata S. Association between carotid atherosclerosis plaque with high signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and subsequent ipsilateral ischemic events. Neurosurgery68(1), 62–67; discussion 67 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Tan MA, DeVeber G, Kirton A, Vidarsson L, MacGregor D, Shroff M. Low detection rate of craniocervical arterial dissection in children using time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography: causes and strategies to improve diagnosis. J. Child Neurol.24(10), 1250–1257 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Huang HH, Tyan YS, Tsao TF. Time-of-flight MR angiography not for diagnosing subclavian steal syndrome. Radiology253(3), 897; author reply 897 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Bitar R, Gladstone D, Sahlas D, Moody A. MR angiography of subclavian steal syndrome: pitfalls and solutions. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.183(6), 1840–1841 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Amano Y, Takahama K, Kumita S. Non-contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the thoracic aorta using cardiac and navigator-gated magnetization-prepared three-dimensional steady-state free precession. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging27(3), 504–509 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Potthast S, Mitsumori L, Stanescu LA et al. Measuring aortic diameter with different MR techniques: comparison of three-dimensional (3D) navigated steady-state free-precession (SSFP), 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), 2D T2 black blood, and 2D cine SSFP. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging31(1), 177–184 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Malik S, Desphande V, Laub G, Ruehm SG. Image quality and diagnostic accuracy of unenhanced SSFP MR angiography compared with conventional contrast-enhanced MR angiography for the assessment of thoracic aortic diseases. Eur. Radiol.20(6), 1311–1320 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Uribe S, Beerbaum P, Sorensen TS, Rasmusson A, Razavi R, Schaeffter T. Four-dimensional (4D) flow of the whole heart and great vessels using real-time respiratory self-gating. Magn. Reson. Med.62(4), 984–992 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Francois CJ, Tuite D, Deshpande V, Jerecic R, Weale P, Carr JC. Pulmonary vein imaging with unenhanced three-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession MR angiography: initial clinical evaluation. Radiology250(3), 932–939 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Hecht EM, Rosenkrantz A. Pulmonary MR angiography techniques and applications. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.17(1), 101–131 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Ley S, Kauczor HU. MR imaging/magnetic resonance angiography of the pulmonary arteries and pulmonary thromboembolic disease. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.16(2), 263–273, ix (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wittlinger T, Dzemali O, Martinovic I, Moritz A. Assessment of coronary artery bypass grafts patency with different magnetic resonance technologies. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.30(3), 436–442 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Greil GF, Desai MY, Fenchel M et al. Reproducibility of free-breathing cardiovascular magnetic resonance coronary angiography. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.9(1), 49–56 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kato S, Kitagawa K, Ishida N et al. Assessment of coronary artery disease using magnetic resonance coronary angiography: a national multicenter trial. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol.56(12), 983–991 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnam MS, Tomasian A, Deshpande V et al. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest. Radiol.43(6), 411–420 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Greil GF, Seeger A, Miller S et al. Coronary magnetic resonance angiography and vessel wall imaging in children with Kawasaki disease. Pediatr. Radiol.37(7), 666–673 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Suzuki A, Takemura A, Inaba R, Sonobe T, Tsuchiya K, Korenaga T. Magnetic resonance coronary angiography to evaluate coronary arterial lesions in patients with Kawasaki disease. Cardiol. Young16(6), 563–571 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Clemente A, Del Borrello M, Greco P et al. Anomalous origin of the coronary arteries in children: diagnostic role of three-dimensional coronary MR angiography. Clin. Imaging.34(5), 337–343 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Katscher U, Bornert P, Leussler C, van den Brink JS. Transmit SENSE. Magn. Reson. Med.49(1), 144–150 (2003).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Elderen SG, Versluis MJ, Westenberg JJ et al. Right coronary MR angiography at 7 T: a direct quantitative and qualitative comparison with 3 T in young healthy volunteers. Radiology257(1), 254–259 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Potthast S, Maki JH. Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the renal arteries. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.16(4), 573–584, vii (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y et al. Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ. J.72(10), 1627–1630 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Wilson GJ, Maki JH. Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 Tesla. Magn. Reson. Imaging Clin. N. Am.17(1), 13–27 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Wyttenbach R, Braghetti A, Wyss M et al. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology245(1), 186–195 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Maki JH, Wilson GJ, Eubank WB, Glickerman DJ, Millan JA, Hoogeveen RM. Navigator-gated MR angiography of the renal arteries: a potential screening tool for renal artery stenosis. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.188(6), W540–W546 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Schulze T et al. High-resolution 3D unenhanced ECG-gated respiratory-navigated MR angiography of the renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.195(6), 1423–1428 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lanzman RS, Voiculescu A, Walther C et al. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA. Radiology252(3), 914–921 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Liu X, Berg N, Sheehan J et al. Renal transplant: nonenhanced renal MR angiography with magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession. Radiology251(2), 535–542 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Francois CJ, Lum DP, Johnson KM et al. Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast. Radiology258(1), 254–260 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Hartung MP, Grist TM, Francois CJ. Magnetic resonance angiography: current status and future directions. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson.13, 19 (2011).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A et al. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging31(6), 1411–1418 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atanasova IP, Kim D, Lim RP et al. Noncontrast MR angiography for comprehensive assessment of abdominopelvic arteries using quadruple inversion-recovery preconditioning and 3D balanced steady-state free precession imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging33(6), 1430–1439 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Shimada K, Isoda H, Okada T et al. Non-contrast-enhanced hepatic MR angiography: do two-dimensional parallel imaging and short tau inversion recovery methods shorten acquisition time without image quality deterioration? Eur. J. Radiol.77(1), 137–142 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Smith CS, Sheehy N, McEniff N, Keogan MT. Magnetic resonance portal venography: use of fast-acquisition true FISP imaging in the detection of portal vein thrombosis. Clin. Radiol.62(12), 1180–1188 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Ito K, Koike S, Shimizu A et al. Portal venous system: evaluation with unenhanced MR angiography with a single-breath-hold ECG-synchronized 3D half-Fourier fast spin-echo sequence. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.191(2), 550–554 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hahn WY, Hecht EM, Friedman B, Babb JS, Jacobowitz GR, Lee VS. Distal lower extremity imaging: prospective comparison of 2-dimensional time of flight, 3-dimensional time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and 3-dimensional bolus chase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.31(1), 29–36 (2007).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurnher S, Miller S, Schneider G et al. Diagnostic performance of although gadobenate dimeglumine enhanced MR angiography of the iliofemoral and calf arteries: a large-scale multicenter trial. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.189(5), 1223–1237 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Kang JW, Lim TH, Choi CG, Ko GY, Kim JK, Kwon TW. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using Gd-DOTA compared with time-of-flight MRA in the diagnosis of clinically significant non-coronary arterial disease. Eur. Radiol.20(8), 1934–1944 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Lim RP, Hecht EM, Xu J et al. 3D non gadolinium-enhanced ECG-gated MRA of the distal lower extremities: preliminary clinical experience. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging28(1), 181–189 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Hoey ET, Ganeshan A, Puni R, Henderson J, Crowe PM. Fresh blood imaging of the peripheral vasculature: an emerging unenhanced MR technique. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.195(6), 1444–1448 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Huff S, Honal M, Baumann T, Hennig J, Markl M, Ludwig U. Continuously moving table time-of-flight angiography of the peripheral veins. Magn. Reson. Med.63(5), 1219–1229 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Tsaftaris SA, Offerman E, Edelman RR, Koktzoglou I. Fully automated reconstruction of ungated ghost magnetic resonance angiograms. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging31(3), 655–662 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen T, Cooper M, Spincemaille P, Winchester P, Prince M, Wang Y. Three dimensional non-contrast MRA of the lower extremities using stepping thin slab acquisition: Initial experience in healthy subjects. Proc. Intl Soc. Mag. Reson. Med.19, 33–37 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Bangerter NK, Cukur T, Hargreaves BA et al. Three-dimensional fluid-suppressed T2-prep flow-independent peripheral angiography using balanced SSFP. Magn. Reson. Imaging29(8), 1119–1124 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Lim RP, Storey P, Atanasova IP et al. Three-dimensional electrocardiographically gated variable flip angle FSE imaging for MR angiography of the hands at 3.0 T: initial experience. Radiology252(3), 874–881 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Roditi G, Maki JH, Oliveira G, Michaely HJ. Renovascular imaging in the NSF Era. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging30(6), 1323–1334 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Utsunomiya M, Nozaki Y, Nakamura S. A case of successful intervention without a contrast agent for a chronic totally occlusive lesion of the superficial femoral artery. Cardiovasc. Revasc. Med.11(3), 175–181 (2010).
   Google Scholar