Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: current options and outcomes

References

• Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Manlhiot C et al. Mechanical valves versus the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement in children: propensity-adjusted comparison of long-term outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.137, 362–370 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Karamlou T, Jang K, Williams WG et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for aortic valve replacement in 160 children: a competing-risks analysis. Circulation112, 3462–3469 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Al-Ahmadi M et al. Outcomes and associated risk factors for mitral valve replacement in children. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2010.12.060 (2011) (Epub ahead of print).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Karamlou T, Bradley T et al. Short and midterm results of aortic valve cusp extension in the treatment of children with congenital aortic valve disease. Ann. Thorac. Surg.82, 1292–1299 (2006).
   Google Scholar
• Polimenakos AC, Sathanandam S, Elzein C, Barth MJ, Higgins RS, Ilbawi MN. Aortic cusp extension valvuloplasty with or without tricuspidization in children and adolescents: long-term results and freedom from aortic valve replacement. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.139, 933–941 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Oppido G, Davies B, McMullan DM et al. Surgical treatment of congenital mitral valve disease: mid- term results of a repair-oriented policy. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.135, 1313–1329 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW et al. Results after mitral valve replacement with mechanical prostheses in young children. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.139, 1189–1196 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Manlhiot C et al. Superior results following the Ross procedure in patients with congenital heart disease. J. Heart Valve Dis.19, 269–277 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Hickey EJ, Yeh T Jr, Jacobs JP et al. Ross and Yasui operations for complex biventricular repair in infants with critical left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.37, 279–288 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Manlhiot C et al. Intermediate results following complex biventricular repair of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction in neonates and infants. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.38, 431–438 (2010).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, Fadel B et al. The Ross procedure in children: preoperative haemodynamic manifestation has significant effect on late autograft re-operation. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg.38, 547–555 (2010).
   Google Scholar
• Khwaja S, Nigro JJ, Starnes VA. The Ross procedure is an ideal aortic valve replacement operation for the teen patient. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Cardiol. Surg. Annu.173–175 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Kadner A, Raisky O, Degandt A et al. The Ross procedure in infants and young children. Ann. Thorac. Surg.85, 803–808 (2008).
   Google Scholar
• Pasquali SK, Shera D, Wernovsky G et al. Midterm outcomes and predictors of reintervention after the Ross procedure in infants, children, and young adults. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.133, 893–899 (2007).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudito A, Brook MM, Suleman S et al. The Ross procedure in children and young adults: a word of caution. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.122, 147–153 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• David TE, Omran A, Ivanov J et al. Dilation of the pulmonary autograft after the Ross procedure. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.119, 210–220 (2000).
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater M, Shen I, Welke K, Komanapalli C, Ungerleider R. Modification to the Ross procedure to prevent autograft dilatation. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. Pediatr. Cardiol. Surg. Annu.181–184 (2005).
   Google Scholar
• Ishizaka T, Devaney EJ, Ramsburgh SR, Suzuki T, Ohye RG, Bove EL. Valve sparing aortic root replacement for dilatation of the pulmonary autograft and aortic regurgitation after the Ross procedure. Ann. Thorac. Surg.75, 1518–1522 (2003).
   Google Scholar
• Nordmeyer J, Coats L, Bonhoeffer P. Current experience with percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.18, 122–125 (2006).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Manlhiot C, McCrindle BW et al. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes? Eur. J. Cardiol. Othorac. Surg.36, 84–90 (2009).
   Google Scholar
• Rafii DY, Davies RR, Carroll SJ, Quaegebeur JM, Chen JM. Age less than two years is not a risk factor for mortality after mitral valve replacement in children. Ann. Thorac. Surg.91, 1228–1234 (2011).
   Google Scholar
• Caldarone CA, Raghuveer G, Hills CB et al. Long-term survival after mitral valve replacement in children aged <5 years: a multi-institutional study. Circulation104(Suppl. 1), I143–I147 (2001).
   Google Scholar
• Kojori F, Chen R, Caldarone CA et al. Outcomes of mitral valve replacement in children: a competing-risks analysis. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.128, 703–709 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Kabbani S, Jamil H, Nabhani F et al. Analysis of 92 mitral pulmonary autograft replacement (Ross II) operations. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg.134, 902–908 (2007).
   Google Scholar
• Alsoufi B, Al-Halees Z, Fadel B et al. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: time-related outcomes and risk factors. J. Heart Valve Dis.19, 341–348 (2010).
   Google Scholar